Hearted Youtube comments on Asianometry (@Asianometry) channel.
-
7700
-
4300
-
3400
-
2300
-
2100
-
2000
-
1700
-
1600
-
1600
-
1600
-
1500
-
1500
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1300
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
986
-
980
-
949
-
917
-
879
-
838
-
816
-
777
-
773
-
771
-
766
-
765
-
761
-
759
-
758
-
736
-
I worked for Wang Labs at corporate headquarters ("The Towers...") for 8 years, first as a product manager for several software communications products and then as part of the marketing team for the Americas/Asia/Pacific region (China, Aus, NZ, Latin America, Canada). I joined in 1984 when the company was on a growth tear, profitable, and almost 32,000 employees and about $3B in revenue (and note that $3B was worth a lot more back then); I stayed until 1992, when the company declared Chapter 11, revenue dropped to about $1B, and 20k employees were laid off. I learned a tremendous amount at the company, travelled extensively (25+ countries), and not once ever thought we would fail, in spite of profitability, revenue, and product issues toward the end. Comments below lay blame on both Dr. Wang and on Fred (which are valid: Fred was not ready to take over the company, other senior managers (Cunningham, for example) saw no future for themselves and left, and the Doctor was unable to see beyond the end of the VS and the mini-computer). However, remember that several other companies - many of them based in Massachusetts - were also laid low by the rise of the personal computer, including DEC, Prime, and Data General.
I spent 40 years in the tech industry, the last 16 as a tech industry analyst (Gartner and a couple others). I have been with companies that have gone Chapter 11 (Wang), run out of cash and closed the doors, gone public, been acquired, or have gone through massive downsizing. Tech is not for the faint of heart, but I can honestly say in 40 years I was never once bored.
For readers who are newer to the tech industry, let me leave you with a couple thoughts on why the lessons of the ancient past (in tech, 1982 is ancient history) are still relevant:
.If you think what happened to Wang can't happen to you or your company, you are wrong. Change always happens, and in tech it happens fast. (social media companies, I am looking at you).
.The future is rarely predictable. Hard to realize today, but the idea of replacing typewriters, paper, and administrative assistants with computers was once radical.
.The tech industry is a roller coaster. To survive you need a strong stomach and a healthy amount of stamina. And luck is a large part of it, right next to innovation and hard work. Anyone who hits it big and tries to tell you they didn't get lucky is fooling themselves.
Great story by Asianometry, thanks for making this happen.
728
-
724
-
719
-
706
-
705
-
696
-
687
-
682
-
676
-
673
-
669
-
667
-
660
-
653
-
649
-
646
-
643
-
625
-
612
-
608
-
605
-
604
-
594
-
585
-
573
-
558
-
547
-
544
-
543
-
541
-
540
-
532
-
525
-
524
-
514
-
513
-
512
-
508
-
502
-
499
-
497
-
493
-
When working on outlining a writing project, I thought I'd give GTP4 a try as a writing assistant and sounding board.
It was very impressive at first. I essentially just gave it all the outline material I'd worked on so far, and then I was able to have it give me summaries as I worked to connect all my points together. It was essentially remembering everything I'd come up with for me, completely uncluttering my mind and allowing me to focus on specific points with a lot more ease. And then I could ask it to take what I'd just done and suggest connections with the rest of the outline. It made working almost obsessingly easy.
Then I tried to ask it for suggestions of points to add, way to tackle certain questions, etc. I could ask for historical references (which I would double-check), point out possible logical fallacies, etc. I was very impressed.
And then I I started to realize how all of it was turning out to be an echo chamber of my own thoughts, and while some material GPT provided me with was indeed very useful, much of it was also just my own thoughts rehashed in a way that made it a bit harder to spot, especially in the middle of a creative momentum.
So yeah, super interesting, but major caveats. Whoever uses such tools should remain wary.
493
-
492
-
484
-
477
-
477
-
477
-
475
-
469
-
467
-
464
-
460
-
459
-
457
-
457
-
457
-
453
-
452
-
443
-
442
-
440
-
440
-
439
-
439
-
433
-
433
-
430
-
421
-
420
-
415
-
415
-
414
-
414
-
413
-
412
-
407
-
Dear Asianometry, As a young man in my early 20's working for the massive San Francisco Law Firms, I remember the entire floor was the Word Processing floor, it was composed of 30 to 40 women working on IBM Mag Card Selectrics using carbon paper. When the elevator door opened the noise was loud and staggering, and the room was filled with a blue-gray pallor in the air as everyone of the operators smoked ( mostly women of course ). All of that changed.
One day I came to work and was doing a delivery to the Word Processing floor, and as the elevator door opened, the floor was quit, no smoke and almost empty except for 6 or 8 individuals working on these strange large cabinet like things with keyboards and screens, the word WANG was at the top. Fascinated I walked over and watched over the shoulder of one of the operators as they showed me how they could store entire pages of information and move words, sentences, or paragraphs all over the page, They were expensive, but the saved the firm a fortune in wages and benefits, and it was like looking at the future.
407
-
400
-
398
-
397
-
397
-
397
-
393
-
393
-
390
-
384
-
380
-
379
-
378
-
376
-
372
-
371
-
370
-
369
-
Where I work we use 18.7MΩ UPW for ultrasonically washing massive coffee table size glass substrates before they're loaded into metal oxide electron beam vapor deposition chambers to be multi-layer dielectric coated with Bragg diffraction interference polarizers, anti-reflection coatings, and mirrors used in the construction of ultra-high power neodymium glass lasers for inertial confinement fusion research. The particle counter on the final deionized water loop from Particle Measuring Systems that detects down to 30nm diameter particles is the size of a desktop PC and costs about as much as my house. The software that runs the counter from the same company is actually amazingly crap and looks like something from the windows 3.1 era.
Also PS, I really wish the ridiculous and very old myth of ultrapure water being "so toxic and corrosive because it sucks minerals out of everything it touches" would finally die. It's not. I've drank it. It's just water, it tastes great, I didn't die. The instant it touches your tongue, or you, or ANYthing except the hyperpure fluorinated polymer pipes that it runs through, it's not ultra-pure anything anymore, it's just normal water again with normal water's normal properties. One of those properties is actually really interesting - people always say water is clear and it just looks blue because it's reflecting the sky or has junk dissolved into it or whatever, but that's wrong, it's ACTUALLY blue. When we fill a super shiny stainless steel ultrasonic washer with it the color gradually gets bluer and bluer as it gets deeper and there's obviously no particle impurities in there doing it. All the color is coming from the third overtone of the stretching mode of the hydroxy group part of the water molecule absorbing a tiny amount of far red light in the tail of the absorption peak.
368
-
366
-
351
-
349
-
349
-
348
-
Dear Asianometry, I was born and raised in Hood River OR USA and I know this story very well, Hood River OR had a quite large community of Japanese-American farmers, many of them quite successful. In High School I went on one of my very first dates with a local girl. My Parents found out, and delicately informed me that it was their wish that I stop seeing her. Having never behaved in such a way before I was taken aback. No she was not Japanese American. When the US Government ( in a fit of racist paranoia as no German Americans went to camps ) sent the Japanese Americans to "...The Camps..." they had to leave their homes, possessions, but worse they had to leave their land, and farmland does not take care of itself.
Often they would sell the land for a $ 1.00 someone in the area who would promise to sell it back when the war was over, and when they came back. The insult to their injury was that for some of them, when they came back they could not get their land back, or if they did, the land had been commercially raped, no fertilizer, no pruning, no care of any kind. The caretaker owners had sold every piece of fruit on the tress, year after year at top US Army prices, and making a small fortune.
So when the Japanese-American family came back from the camps, and assuming they could even get their own property back, the farm had to be plowed up and started from scratch at great cost. Those who profited from the Japanese-Americans misfortunes were known, many of the more "liberal" or Christian members in the valley knew who these people were, it was a small world after all, and refused to associate with them socially or even in business ( some were even family ), and this is where my girlfriend story emerges, her family was one of those that had profited and my Parents had rejected her family. There was a deep, deep rift of feelings within the European-American community over this, it was a scar that lasted for many decades after the war.
348
-
348
-
345
-
344
-
344
-
338
-
333
-
333
-
332
-
331
-
329
-
328
-
326
-
324
-
322
-
319
-
314
-
313
-
311
-
309
-
305
-
302
-
302
-
301
-
297
-
297
-
294
-
293
-
291
-
289
-
Another cool thing about FPGAs is their interconnects. Decades ago, we didn't worry too much about how a signal got from A to B, because wire wrapped and FPGAs implemented them for us. Then came along higher speed circuitry. Electromagnetic fields coupled signals in one wire to another wire, especially if those wires ran parallel to each other. We didn't worry about what was inside the FPGAs, because they seemed not to have this cross coupling problem. Finally we decided to characterize this phenomenon to wire interconnects on the boards. We came up with something the RF engineers used - micro strips and strip lines. Most of you will recognize them, because boards are constructed of layers. These layers are GND, then interconnects, then PWR, then interconnects, and so forth. This solved the glitch problem. CPLD and FPGA manufacturers figured this out much earlier, probably because they came from the ASIC world.
288
-
288
-
288
-
287
-
287
-
286
-
285
-
285
-
281
-
279
-
278
-
276
-
276
-
273
-
272
-
271
-
271
-
269
-
268
-
268
-
263
-
259
-
253
-
252
-
251
-
251
-
249
-
248
-
248
-
I'm intimately familiar with this topic because I was an early adapter of DLP projectors for home theater use.
1-chip DLP has a serious flaw, in that, at any given moment, there is only one of the primary color being projected onto the entire screen. Some people are much more sensitive to the so called "rainbow effect." Moving your head quickly can exacerbate the issue. They reduced the problem by either spinning the RGB wheel faster, or doubling up the colors into RGBRGB wheel, so that one color stays on the screen for a shorter amount of time, each.
Technically, even 3-chip DLP will have many pixels displaying just one color at some moments, but these are per-pixel effect, not whole screen effects.
Fundamentally, what is projected onto the screen is a pulse-code-modulation pixels. Each pixel is either ON or OFF at any given time, and in case of 1-chip DLP, in one of the Red/Green/Blue.
There is no grayscale. It's just ON or OFF. Each pixels blinks at incredibly fast rate, you can't normally tell, and the brightness is controlled by the rate of ON time, vs. OFF time (hence PCM). For example, 50% brightness would be represented as ON/OFF/ON/OFF/ON/OFF and so on. 1/3 brightness would be ON/OFF/OFF/ON/OFF/OFF, although they could throw in some randomness to making it look more natural to human brains.
247
-
246
-
246
-
241
-
237
-
237
-
234
-
234
-
232
-
230
-
230
-
229
-
228
-
228
-
226
-
226
-
225
-
223
-
223
-
220
-
219
-
219
-
218
-
214
-
214
-
214
-
210
-
210
-
210
-
209
-
208
-
206
-
205
-
205
-
204
-
204
-
203
-
203
-
202
-
I live in Iligan City, and I'd say, there's a huge steel masterpiece at their admin building, it's beautifully made, like a huge canvas of steel art, welded by highly skilled welders.
Also, NSC was so popular back then, and the employers there were so rich they can even pawn their uniform. Even when I go to Cebu and ride a cab, when the drivers were informed that I live here, they'd immediately ask me about NSC.. I also had a chance to get inside the property, which is really strict before pandemic, and it's amazing, there are also a lot of preserved things there that were displayed like the first computer invented, the uniform, the helmet, etc., everything you'll see at NSC back then. It's not that easy to get inside though, so I was quite lucky to get the chance. Interestingly, there's a black horse roaming freely around it. :D
199
-
198
-
197
-
197
-
My favorite application for mems is in aviation, since I am a recreational pilot. One of the first and most successful application of mems was accelerometers, which don't need openings in the package to work. Accelerometers can replace gyroscopes as well as enable inertial navigation, since they can be made to sense rotation as well as movement. With the advent of mems, avionics makers looked forward to replacing expensive and maintenance intensive mechanical gyroscopes with mems. A huge incentive was reliability: a gyroscope that fails can bring down an aircraft. The problem was accuracy. Mems accelerometers displayed drift that was worse than the best mechanical gyros. Previous inertial navigation systems used expensive laser gyros that worked by sending light pulses through a spool of fibre optical line and measuring the delay due to rotation.
Mems accelerometers didn't get much better, but they are sweeping all of the old mechanical systems into the trash can. So how did this problem get solved? Well, the original technology for GPS satellite location was rather slow, taking up to a minute to form a "fix". But with more powerful CPUs it got much faster. But GPS cannot replace gyros, no matter how fast it can calculate. But the faster calculation enabled something incredible: the GPS calculation could be used to calibrate the mems accelerometers. By carefully calculating the math, a combined GPS/multiaxis accelerometer package can accurately and reliably find a real time position and orientation in space. You can think of it this way: GPS provides position over long periods of time,, but very accurately, and mems accelerometers provide position and orientation over short periods of time, but not so accurately. Together they achieve what neither technology can do on its own.
The result has been a revolution in avionics. Now even small aircraft can have highly advanced "glass" panels, that give moving maps, a depiction of the aircraft attitude, and even a synthetic view of of the world outside the aircraft in conjunction with terrain data. It can even tell exactly which way the wind is blowing on the aircraft because this information falls out of the GPS/accelerometer calculation.
193
-
190
-
189
-
189
-
188
-
186
-
184
-
181
-
181
-
181
-
180
-
180
-
179
-
178
-
176
-
176
-
175
-
174
-
173
-
173
-
173
-
173
-
172
-
169
-
169
-
169
-
169
-
167
-
167
-
165
-
164
-
164
-
164
-
164
-
164
-
160
-
158
-
158
-
157
-
157
-
154
-
153
-
153
-
150
-
150
-
148
-
147
-
145
-
145
-
145
-
144
-
144
-
142
-
142
-
141
-
141
-
140
-
139
-
139
-
139
-
137
-
134
-
133
-
133
-
133
-
Grandpa in the 442nd:
My Grandfather and several great-uncles served in the 442nd. My grandfather as a Corporal (w/ purple heart, bronze star) and eventually an MP, maybe attached to the artillery batillion- its not clear.)
...After going through the craziness of the Itialian campaign, France, etc, he saw DACHAU during its liberation. (can you imagine that? With his own family spending most of the war in 'camp', in places like Idaho?)
He ended up guarding German POWs, at a former concentration/death camp (not sure which: he was a shutterbug, but the pics I have don't show exactly where, though I suspect it was Dachau, which was used for that purpose)... He was a guard, whole they were sorted into different classifications- draftees, officers, SS, war criminals, etc.
Apperantly, He got along fairly well with a few of the POWS, and, as most were cleared of any war crimes, I think he may have identified with some of them as in: 'Well, ain't this FUBAR?', etc. (I'm paraphrasing).
Anyway, when my mother was a teenager in the 60s, My grandfather owned a wholesale nursery (for trees/plants), and one afternoon, a stranger came to the door, asking for my grandfather by name.
The visitor was a former German officer that was in town to sell machine tools (of course he was- what could be more German?), and had recalled that my grandfather, as a guard, had mentioned that he lived there. The German had brought a six-pack of German beer, and appearently they sat on the porch for a while and caught up, and then never saw one another again.
It's a great story... according to my mother and uncle, it's true. My grandfather would never speak about his time in Europe (which is common, appearently), but, I suppose that those were significant moments in his life and for that German ex-soldier.
So, wow, eh? I've been thinking about writing a history of the 442, using his life and experiences to personalize/ anchor the history.
Anyway, that's my connection to the 442nd. (I have some relics- a camera he 'bought' in Italy, an alabaster statuette, some photo albums (Most of which have been donated to an Asian-American museum- the Wing Luke- in Seattle)
-B
(One more thing- as a shutterbug, he had a ton of photos of his friends in itally- short-ish Japanese men sitting/ dancing/ flirting with lots of tall, beautiful (recently liberated?) Itialian women. He DID talk about that, a few times... Grandpa was pretty cool.)
133
-
132
-
131
-
131
-
131
-
130
-
130
-
130
-
130
-
130
-
129
-
129
-
128
-
127
-
127
-
127
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
123
-
122
-
121
-
121
-
121
-
120
-
120
-
118
-
118
-
118
-
117
-
117
-
117
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
115
-
114
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
112
-
112
-
112
-
111
-
109
-
Yours is one of the most interesting channels on YouTube, I think. Tech, history, economics, geopolitics are all combined in a way that is digestible and sensible.
As you pointed out, each new node generation is more expensive than the last. Demand for chips is only going up, but fewer and fewer companies can hang a shingle for the latest node.
TSMC believes it can succeed at 3 nm. That will be difficult, in terms of expense, reject rates and reliability. Such a small node leaves chips vulnerable to stray electromagnetic radiation and cross-channel electron bleeding.
And after 3 nm?
Photo-etching on 2-D silicon is nearly at the end of its journey. If Moore's Law is to continue, a new chip concept will be required, and sooner rather than later, a concept that leaves plenty of room for future advances. It would be good if it were cheap, too, so that many companies can jump in and compete for rising demand.
We need innovation! Who will supply it? And what will it look like?
I have no idea.
In principle, different semiconductors (beyond silicon) might come into play. I'm not sure how far that will extend the runway for 2-D optically-etched chips. Might not be very far at all.
In principle, moving to 3-D designs etched by some method other than projecting an image onto a 2-dimensional surface might be tried (but I can't imagine what that etching process might look like).
In principle, quantum computing might change everything - though a complete, economically-viable, better-than-silicon solution remains far in the future, at best. At worst, quantum computing will be a niche adjunct to silicon processing. Or at really worst, nothing from quantum computing will arrive at commercial viability at all.
Photonic computing? Who knows.
The irony is that matter appears to be compute-intensive. Everything computes. We just don't know how to take advantage.
109
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
105
-
105
-
105
-
Initially, FPGA's were not a serious threat to LSI's gate-arrays/standard-cell designs because the per-unit cost of the FPGA devices were very high by comparison, and the turnaround time for gate arrays was very fast. When I was an LSI customer in the early 1990s (at Intel), I got silicon back in 8 days (gate array), and 17 days (standard cell with 3 metal layers). ASIC costs were quite low, too. Gate-array NRE charges were around $10K for the LMA100K designs I did in 1 micron, and I think the LCB007 standard cell which was around 0.7 micron were around $35K. From there, you went into production at costs well below $20 per chip and that was way less than FPGAs.
Now, as process technology advanced, the number of masks increased and the costs exploded. NRE costs for 0.18 microns (LSI's G11 process) was $250K and up. At the same time, FPGA costs were coming down as the number of available gates continued to increase, so LSI got squeezed at both ends: Better-faster-cheaper FPGAs luring customers away from the low-end, and the high-cost of taping-out designs at the high end.
I just retired from the chip industry last year. When I started in 1985, I literally did the entire design myself (architecture, design, simulation, debug, layout, timing analysis, test vectors, etc). Today, you have an army of engineers working on chips, and we only get to work on small bits of the design.
105
-
105
-
104
-
103
-
102
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
100
-
100
-
99
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
As someone who's family is half Thai I'd wager geography, urbanization, cultural ties, and price are all big contributors:
Thailand is located near the South China Sea which has one of the most valuable shipping corridors on Earth with trade passing between Africa, Europe, India, East Asia, and the Western half of the Americas, plus Thailand is only a short distance from China and Vietnam, both large manufactures of Automobile parts. They're near Japan and South Korea, both major manufacturers. This means its easier to ship parts in and vehicles out and also means they're likely to farm out very labor intensive tasks to nearby Thailand.
Thailand is also a highly urbanized country with a massive 14 million people (over 20% of the country) living in the Bangkok metro zone which is also right on the water allowing easy importing and exporting of goods, and a highly urbanized population also means much easier manufacturing and having most of the country in 1 giant city means its easy to have multiple different companies making and assembling parts, sections, or entire vehicles. You dont need to make the chassis in Chicago, the engine in Houston, and send them to Detroit for assembly, you can keep different jobs in one city if it has most of the population there. That city also being a massive port on a massive shipping lane makes things even easier. Urbanized populations are also more well educated then more rural ones making things easier.
Thailand also has very close ties to the US and they have close business/trading ties to China, South Korea, and Japan. This makes it even easier to get contracts to assemble vehicles for them or manufacture parts. The fact Thailand has close ties to China and the US also means they have large markets to sell to as well as import parts from. The cultural ties also means that there are more personal relationships and business is easier, plus tons of Thai people speak English or Chinese as a second language which makes doing business even more attractive.
Another important factor is that costs are low in Thailand. Thanks to the shipping lanes transport costs are low, their location near resources like Chinese or Australian coal, locally made rubber, oil from the South China Sea, and Chinese and Japanese steel means resources are cheap as well. The fact that cost of living is very low and wages are also fairly low means that its cheap to do business in Thailand. Countries like South Korea and Japan can hire fairly well educated Thai people to do jobs for much less then doing it locally, and they have the benefits i already mentioned rolled in. They dont need to go to Africa where wages are low but geography makes business more difficult and where politics makes things less stable.
A less important, but still important factor is also stability. Thailand despite all their coups is still fairly stable for doing business. New regimes dont like to "rock the boat" or institute wide ranging changes to society. The new regimes arent revolutionary and they dont want to radically change the countries allegiances or become isolated. New regimes usually just want to be the new leaders of the same basic government, they keep doing business with the same nations, keep local business going as normal, they dont try to nationalize tons of companies or force out certain businesses, and they dont demand radical changes to existing contracts or relationships. They also try to keep corruption manageable as well and try to keep Thailand an attractive trading partner. Compare this to some Arab or African nations where new regimes institute massive changes to their relationships or try to nationalize tons of business, or compare it to communist and socialist revolutionaries where the new regime seizes control of businesses and radically change society. Unpredictable politics like that make doing business less attractive and in complicated, global, heavily integrated industries like automotive
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
First off, thank you for your hard work and cogent perspectives from your part of the world.
I feel like this is missing a second half, since when covid hit, auto companies began slowing or canceling orders. This led the chip manufacturers to close their least profitable and older chip production lines, and ramp up their more profitable lines to supply companies who did not cancel orders, like Tesla, BYD, and other Chinese EV manufacturers. This is also happening when there is a major shift in automotive computer architecture, as separate control units supplied by parts manufacturers with their component systems are being brought in house, and are using fewer more centralized controllers to connect to many different systems. Since the chip manufacturers need at least a decade of sales to pay for chip design and production development, they are reluctant to risk making new lines for legacy systems that they do not see a future for. Many of the old lines that were closed had parts cannibalized to increase production for consumer electronics sold during lock-down, and these production lines are unlikely to be restarted.
P.S. I believe that you were slightly off with the first electronics in cars, as the magneto and spark systems were the first, like pull start lawn mowers.
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
Hey long time fan of your channel. You touched on my field of interest so I thought to leave some notes.
Notes from a Master Student AI:
1:22 You mention Semantic labeling, but don't actually show any semantic segmentation, which is the semantic labeling of each pixel. It is slightly different from instance segmentation (on the right) because with semantic segmentation you do actually need to assign a value to every pixel, not just the objects within the image. The most complete form is panoptic segmentation, which is both instances and classes annotated at every pixel.
1:47 Brand new dataset is not actually the standard, what commonly is tested is the generalization from one subset of a dataset (~80%) to another subset of the dataset (~20%). A brand new dataset falls under Out of Distribution (OOD) attacks and under the general term "robustness".
3:22 AlphaZero is a warped example of the concept you're trying to explain. Because AlphaZero has a perfectly working simulation to work with, and its predecessor also did a lot of self play. The improvement was in removing the need to pretrain (or prime) the model on humanplay. This was an advancement in reinforcement learning, not the simulation to reality gap.
4:59 You miss the full scope of difference in scale, the difference between 3 and 96 doesn't seem large (factor of 32) but what is actually significant is the amount parameters. That difference is between ~10,000 parameters for ALVINN and 170,000,000,000 (170 billion) Parameters for GPT-3 a factor of 17 million. Also check out DALL-E for the new multi-modal language and image comprehension and GATO for multimodel behavior learning.
5:20 A KMP 1500 robot isn't deployed with any machine learning behavior. It's all old-fashioned expert-made modelling. A better illustration would be robot arms grabbing complex and/or morphable objects.
6:11 Actually the problem isn't that 5000 isn't enough, it's an academic benchmark dataset. Big companies can get 500,000 images if they try a bit (probably even more). The problem is that is also not enough for self-driving cars. And it's not because 500.000 isn't enough to detect trees or pedestrians in the city on a clear day, but there needs to be an insane amount of diversity to detect trees, roads under any weather condition and circumstance. Not to mention 1 in a billion or 1 in a trillion edge cases.
For the rest, the carla stuff is great!
PS: for another mind-blow look up: "Neural Radiance Fields" and "instant NERFS".
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
Dear Asianometry, Thank you once again for a well researched and delivered piece. As a working artist I have "options" on how I survive in a world.
I can paint a large number of small paintings on simple subjects that are moderately demanding technically and artistically, with simplistic content, and they sell well. Small paintings always sell better than larger works, but they are moderately interesting to me as an artist to create. These tend to be low priced and moderate volume.
Or I can create a body of work that meets the interests of the largest number of buyers, relatively low technical and artistic requirements, and these can be larger works, or small, they sell very well, but the content is derivative, repetitive, and even less interesting to create. These tend to be moderate volume, but better priced
Or I can create work that interests me as an artist, this work is demanding, both technically and artistically, with a high potential for failure and a low potential for sales. These tend to be very high priced and low volume and tend to be a specific type of collector or buyer.
Or I can have a Full Time Job, while this will allow me to paint whatever I wish artistically, and if I have sales all the better, it demands almost all my time, and leaves little time to work as an artist.
Or I can marry well ( or have a trust fund ), this means I can paint full time and define my content outside of any commercial requirements, it allows me to paint full time regardless of sales.This is the best of all possible worlds, but if no one is interested in my work, no commercial gallery will take me on, as they prefer artists with a known track records of shows and sales.
TV, Music and Movies have a similar problem. While content defines the viewership, and earnings, the medium, viewership and the price also defines the content.
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
Love the video! I can’t speak on semiconductor wafer bonding, but in the MEMS field, wafer to wafer bonding is commonly used to package MEMS components in hermetic environments. The EVG tools that you mention can apply force, temperature, and vacuum, the last one sucks any air out of the MEMS package. This is really important for high Q factor MEMS resonant devices, where any damping, including any air molecules, can severely degrade performance.
One subset of thermocompression bonding is eutectic bonding, which is super cool because if you heat up two different element thin films together, the alloy you create will have a lower melting point than each of the individual elements themselves. This can let you bond wafers together with really low temperatures. Indium-tin has a melting point of just over 100C, but most others are higher. Gold-tin is below 300C. When you’re choosing materials for your bonding, it all depends on what you’re designing. In-Sn has a low Young’s modulus, which might be undesirable. But Au-Sn’s eutectic temperature might be too high, and your devices can’t take that much heat. So you need to pick and choose materials to suit your needs
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
As an expat in Taipei and an employer too. I have come across this discussion a lot. Except for real estate everything else is cheap compared to neighbouring cities like Hong Kong, Shanghai or Seoul. Education, Health care, Electricity, Fuel prices, Public transportation, etc are not expensive in this region. I have lived in Singapore and Hong Kong enough years to understand the difference. And being an employer I understand the difficulty of paying salaries. Almost 80% of the small business owners pay more salary than the income they draw for themselves. This is the truth, If minimum wage is increased again, we will just see more 'shop space for rent' boards as we already see way too many. Also, I wish English teaching expats and youtubers grasp a better idea about this than just say things like the money is not going to the workers. In a fight with big corporations regarding them paying less salary to their employees, small businesses come to their streets along with their families. Taiwanese companies need to pay more salary and Taiwanese businesses have to at least survive.
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
As a Malaysian, I thank you for giving a fair and objective discussion on this topic. Too often us Malaysians are hard on ourselves and we're too quick to criticise policy failures rather than examining the problem. From your videos, it's enlightening how challenging this industry can be and other nations have also tried and end up in the same boat. Frankly, it's uncanny how much your videos on Taiwan resonate to many of the problems we're facing but at much earlier phases of development.
I think one of the problems could also be attributed to a mixed message about local labour or talent. On one hand, development agencies will market how competitive labour costs are. Making labour cost a USP sends a wrong message when you're trying to compete for skilled workers. It's funny to see some employers expect an Ivy League quality hire with $14-16k annual pay package. While many employers are bumping wages to remedy this, it's still nowhere near as competitive and talent retention continues to be a problem.
Also, what's less spoken of is the setting of "convoluted priorities" especially when problems have snowballed. You've already noted some evidence of this with the choice for local appointments for Silterra than finding qualified, experienced executives for leadership positions. Coupled with the talent bidding/retention issue as mentioned, it may be the case that red tape and socioeconomic KPIs could have led to interventions on business decisions at the (unintended?) expense of building a viable enterprise. It happens too often problems snowball and Khazanah ends up in a position of trying to fix a leaky ship while juggling pressures to retain jobs, industry capacity etc. It's really unfortunate because Khazanah, as a strategic investor, spends a lot of their capital and brain trust fixing problems which could have otherwise be spent seeding or supporting new growth opportunities.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
The Native Taiwanese, who make up around 84% of Taiwan's population according to official ROC statistics, are ethnically, linguistically, and culturally Han Chinese, based on the official modern definition of this term (the definition which most countries recognise). However, just like Guangdong, Shanghai, Fujian, and other regions of China, Taiwan has historically been home to several native dialects which are related to the official Chinese language, Mandarin, but are still quite distinct from this language. These languages can be broadly grouped up into the "Taiwanese Hokkien" and "Taiwanese Hakka" language families. Even though the Native Taiwanese only diverged from China 100-400 years ago, making them still ethnically Han Chinese, they've still been disconnected from China long enough that most Native Taiwanese no longer have direct family ties to people living in Mainland China (contrary to the situation which we can see between North Korea and South Korea). The Taiwanese are certainly a distinct and localised group within what can be referred to as the "Sinosphere" (ie, regions which are influenced by Han Chinese culture and/or are home to large ethnic Han Chinese populations), and it can be said that the Native Taiwanese are perhaps the most distinct ethnic group in China which is still considered to be a subgroup of the Han Chinese (as opposed to, say, the Tibetans, who live in China but are not considered to be Han Chinese). Culturally speaking, yes, the Native Taiwanese are Han Chinese, though the degree of Native Taiwan's "cultural Han Chinese-ness" is debatable. "Native Taiwan" is certainly culturally distinct from Mainland China and also from "Mainland Taiwan", but this isn't so much a result of radical cultural change in any of these regions as it is the result of slight cultural changes in all of these regions, and significant political changes. The three-way divergence of these three subgroups of the Han Chinese culture, in addition to cultural exchanges between these subgroups and also with foreign ethnic groups, such as the Russians, the Germans, the Americans, the Japanese, and various indigenous peoples, has resulted in three distinct cultures - Mainlander Chinese, Mainlander Taiwanese, and Native Taiwanese, which can all equally trace their heritage to the Qing Dynasty, the state which controlled China prior to the establishment of the Republic of China in Mainland China in 1912. Of course, the People's Republic of China (ie, Mainland China) currently has the strongest claim to being "the legitimate cultural successor to the Chinese Nation-State", given that it is widely recognised as the legitimate government of China. Meanwhile, the Republic of China also claims to be the true cultural successor to the Chinese Nation-State, even though it has clear and sometimes extreme cultural differences in relation to the People's Republic of China. Within the Republic of China, there is a clear cultural divide between the Mainlander Taiwanese and the Native Taiwanese, which has sometimes been perceived to be an ethnic divide between two related but distinct ethnic groups. Some of the Native Taiwanese argue that they have diverged too far from Mainlander Chinese culture to be considered as the same ethnic group. They argue that Japanese influence, as well as Taiwan having been absent from major historical and cultural events in China, such as the Xinhai Revolution, the Chinese Civil War (the beginning of it), the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Communist Revolution, and the Cultural Revolution, etc, have resulted in Taiwan becoming a culturally and ethnically distinct region from China. In fact, the influence of Japan on Taiwan has been minimal, largely due to the fact that the Republic of China quickly set about removing any and all Japanese influences from Taiwanese society as best they could, following the Chinese Annexation of Taiwan. Whilst nearly all Taiwanese people could speak conversational Japanese during the Japanese Colonial Period of Taiwan, the majority of Taiwanese people these days speak Mandarin as their primary language, possibly with a native dialect as a secondary language. However, whilst Japan's presence in Taiwan is no longer strongly felt at a fundamental level, Taiwan is still culturally distinct from Mainland China, to a debatable degree, as a result of Taiwan having not experienced many of the same cultural and historical events, and also as a result of Taiwan having been effectively a separate political entity from (Mainland) China for over a century, beginning from the 1895 handover to Japan, and continuing with the Nationalist Chinese retreat to Taiwan following the Chinese Annexation of Taiwan shortly prior.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
There are other aspects of the book, in an addendum to my earlier comment, that make Mao look good in some ways. For example, until late in old age his resilience and physical power - being able to outswim some of his younger guards, while also showing what a risk taker he was, that he risked his own life sometimes for his own exercise gives insight into some of his political decisions. The flippancy for the lives of Chinese is something he sometimes, to his security team's exasperation, displayed for his own. He is also shown as having genuine love and affection for his third wife and Li even notes that the memory of his deceased second wife obviously pains him when it is brought up. But there is also a lot that makes him look bad - Li for example obviously cannot understand why Mao despised the Soviets so much when they treated him like an elder statesman and fawned over him. Mao also increasingly lies as the book goes on, becomes less and less open to criticism. I wouldn't share the opinion that Mao was a sociopath. I think he was a man who had seen a lot of death and suffering, and like you say, had become indifferent to it by the time he was an older man. But I think he did care for certain people as human beings, it's just it became less and less so as he approached his own death - with the unspoken question obviously in his mind of 'what was my entire life for?'
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
The problem with Taiwan is that it is large, homogeneous (there are two main ethnic groups in Taiwan), and has a long history as a distinct region, unlike Macau and Hong Kong.
Whilst Macau is an international city of business (and quite a small city for Chinese standards), being mostly known for its gambling industry and attracting many rich Mainlander Chinese and foreigners, and whilst Hong Kong is also an international city which hosts many international businesses and is home to a large immigrant population, consisting of wealthy Europeans, South Asians who were brought over during British colonial times, an indigenous Chinese population, and a large population of recent Chinese immigrants from Guangdong (who came to Hong Kong to escape poverty or persecution), Taiwan is not an internationally renowned destination, Taiwan has a huge population of indigenous Chinese residents (though, 14% of the population of Taiwan are recent Chinese immigrants), and Taiwan is an entire Chinese Province, not just some small city full of rich immigrants and Chinese refugees; additionally, Taiwan has been administered separately from other regions of China for around 340-360 years, though it was only proclaimed as an independent province from Fujian in 1885.
So, why is it so difficult for China to reclaim, or, more accurately, annex Taiwan? Is it because Taiwan is an American puppet, propped up by American guns? Or is it because Taiwan is controlled by the Kuomintang, with aims to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party and take control of all of China? Or is it because Taiwan is full of brainwashed Fujianese people who believe that they are a separate ethnicity from the Han Chinese? Well, actually, it is all of these things to some extent, though this doesn't explain the whole story, and these accusations are quite biased and hurtful. No, there is a major reason why Taiwan is still independent from China, and it is none of these reasons which I have listed.
Unlike Macau and Hong Kong, Taiwan is not controlled by a foreign government. With Macau and Hong Kong, agreements on Sovereignty were the responsibility of external powers, those being China, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. On the other hand, this was only the case for Taiwan when it was under the control of the Japanese Empire, and even then, Japan had been ceded the territory of Taiwan in perpetuity, and this is why Japan conducted assimilation campaigns against the Taiwanese people whilst Taiwan was under its control, intending to permanently integrate Taiwan into Japan, politically, culturally, and ethnically. Meanwhile, concerning modern Taiwan, the modern Republic of China almost exclusively administers Taiwan, so the issue of giving up Taiwan is not just a cession of a single region but a cession of the ROC's entire Sovereignty, which is why it is not likely to happen in the near future.
While it is true that the Kuomintang, the former rulers of the ROC, have in recent history decided to align themselves with the Chinese Communist Party and now believe that Taiwan must be reunited with China under the rule of the CCP, given that it is unrealistic for the KMT to reunite Taiwan with the Mainland under its own rule, Taiwan is still independent. And, the primary reason for Taiwan's Independence is that the Taiwanese people themselves - not the recent Chinese immigrants but rather the indigenous Chinese residents - want some form of independence or autonomy, whether that is "De Jure Independence" or "De Facto Independence". These people have been living in Taiwan for hundreds of years. They have experienced life under various regimes, but throughout all of these regimes, they have never lost their Taiwanese identity. And their Taiwanese identity didn't originally pertain to the idea that Taiwan is an independent country; instead, the Taiwanese people have always identified with the island of Taiwan, at one time "Taiwan Prefecture of Fujian Province, China", at a later time "Taiwan Province of China", at a later time "Taiwan Dependency of Japan", and at a later time "Republic of China (Taiwan)".
Whilst the Mainlander Chinese, both the actual Mainlanders and the Mainlanders in Taiwan alike, love to refer to the Taiwanese as "Fujianese (and Hakka) immigrants in Taiwan", this designation is blatantly false. Ask yourself; does a Shanghainese person refer to himself as a Zhejiangese immigrant in Shanghai? No, he identifies as Shanghainese because that is his province. Likewise, the Taiwanese people are NOT Fujianese, at least not anymore. Nowadays, most Taiwanese people identify as Taiwanese, regardless of whether they believe that they are independent or not, and they only consider Fujian to be a distant ancestral homeland, rather than their own current homeland. Of course, the Hakka do often identify as Hakka, rather than as Taiwanese, but this is because the Hakka have never possessed their own province, whether in Taiwan or in Mainland China, and identify with the Hakka culture rather than with a hypothetical "Hakka Province".
So, clearly, there does exist a distinct Taiwanese identity, even though the Chinese Communist Party and Kuomintang love to ridicule this identity, referring to the Taiwanese as mere Fujianese migrants. The only question of Taiwanese identity is whether the Taiwanese are a subgroup of the Han Chinese, or whether they are an independent ethnic group. Critically, the history of Taiwan is unique amongst regions of China; Taiwan was colonised only in (relatively) recent history by China, starting from 1683; though, Han Chinese people from Fujian Province began migrating to Taiwan in large waves during the early-1600s, to work for the Dutch East India Company and for the Kingdom of Tungning. Taiwanese people, for the first 2-3 centuries of living in Taiwan, experienced life as frontiersmen, expanding the territory of China by Sinicising the indigenous Austronesian natives and by increasing the population of Han Chinese on the island. Originally identifying as Fujianese, these people eventually came to identify as Taiwanese, and this identity was cemented through the shared experience of living in Taiwan as immigrants for hundreds of years, separated from China by the Taiwan Strait, and trying to adapt to life in a isolated island full of indigenous tribes and deadly diseases.
In 1885, the Qing Dynasty proclaimed Taiwan to be its own independent province, separate from Fujian Province. Of course, Taiwan had already effectively been separate from Fujian since China had begun colonising the island, given that Taiwan and Fujian were separated by the large Taiwan Strait. The proclamation of an independent "Taiwan Province" was not very remarkable; life in Taiwan continued as normal, and most people did not care whether Taiwan was its own Chinese province or not; they mainly identified with the island of Taiwan, loosely identifying as ethnically Han Chinese (in the same way that the American settlers from the United Kingdom would primarily identify as American). Of course, shortly after the 1885 declaration of Taiwanese province-hood, Taiwan was ceded to Japan in 1895.
The Taiwanese people initially resisted the Japanese invasion, with local militias defending Taiwanese villages, and with high-ranking Qing-loyalists proclaiming "the Democratic State of Taiwan". Regardless of self-identification and beliefs, the various ethnic groups on the island, which consisted of various Chinese peoples, such as the Hoklo Taiwanese, the Hakka Taiwanese, and the Mainlander Chinese officials stationed in Taiwan, as well as the various indigenous Austronesian tribes, all tried to defend Taiwan from a foreign Japanese invasion, and they resisted Japanese rule for a period of time after China ceded Taiwan to Japan. However, eventually, these people were defeated, and Japan gradually began to absorb Taiwan into its territory, such as by educating the Taiwanese in the Japanese language (this programme took several years to become successful, of course), and also by making the Taiwanese believe that they were citizens of Japan, and also by making the Taiwanese believe that they were ethnically Japanese.
Nowadays, the Taiwanese no longer identify as Japanese. Even though most Taiwanese people have favorable views towards modern Japan, they would certainly not support Japan if it again decided to start invading and occupying all of its Asian neighbours, as it did 80 years ago. However, despite this fact, the Taiwanese people no longer identify strongly as Han Chinese either. First and foremost, the Taiwanese are a settler people, just like the Americans and the Australians. Secondly, the Taiwanese people love their island above all else, and their loyalty to their island is more important than their loyalty to any external government which might have control over the island. And thirdly, the Taiwanese identify strongly with their unique cultural experience, because this is the only history which they know. They never experienced the Xinhai Revolution. They never experienced the Warlord Period of China. They never experienced proper rule under the Republic of China (this only occurred from 1945 until 1949, but during that time, Taiwan was subjected to the February 28 Incident and Martial Law). And they also never experienced China's Communist Revolution, Cultural Revolution, and Economic Revolution (1978- and onwards, instigated by Deng Xiaoping). So, how can the Taiwanese identify as Han Chinese if they have experience history completely differently from the people living in Mainland China?
(Continued below.)
13
-
I am Taiwanese, and I can share my vivid memory back to the horrible incident of the massacre I read from newspapers and leaked videos in 1994. The incident is briefly described in Wikipedia.
Why do I mention "leaked videos"? That's because in 1990s China was like nowadays North Korea -- every information about China had to be censored, and propaganda must be positive and politically correct. All the tourists with camera could only filming what CCP's directors assigned to, otherwise they would be regarded as spies and be arrested.
When the families of the victims arrived in the county of the incident, they soon noticed that they were restricted where they could go, and lots of local policemen kept watching them. All the videos filmed by the families of the victims had to be reviewed by CCP officials, and be deleted if the CCP officials felt any negative and politically incorrect in videos. Some Taiwanese did not comply with the censoring rule, and risked their lives by hiding some video tapes from China's censorship. After leaving China and back to Taiwan, they gave their video tapes to Taiwan TV stations to reveal the truth of what happened and how they were treated in China.
At first the official information of the incident from the police was locked to as simply an accident. But when the families of the victims were introduced to see the burned ferry, they noticed the information from the police was deceptive and incorrect. They felt angry that the police tried to fool them with a childish police reasoning!
That ferry was made of iron, and there was an iron door to the lower cabin of the ship. Inside the cabin, there were lots of pieces of human flesh still sticking on the floor and walls of the cabin.
The families of the victims reasoned out what happened to the deceased before they died: The victims were locked inside the cabin after being robbed, then those robbers pouring gasoline on the top of the ferry, and set fire before those robbers left. The victims tried banging on walls and hoped some ships nearby hearing the banging sounds and come to rescue them. Unfortunately, they were burned alive with their screaming in an iron coffin.
The families of the victims argued with the police that it was a murder crime event, but the police forcefully wanted them to swallow the decision already made by the police. The deed of the police made the families of the victims furious, and started to protest, which causing the suppression from the police. Someone was filming what the police barbaric action to them; but the police grabbed the camcorder, pulled out the tape, smashed and destroyed it on the ground. When the police thought they had covered up their barbaric action, another camcorder had already recorded the same scene tens of meters away. The video secretly shipped back to Taiwan, and broadcasted it through Taiwan TV stations.
In 1990s, Taiwanese could watch CCP's CCTV satellite programs, so we could keep an eye on the activities of the families of the victims through Chinese censored TV news. We knew the families of the victims in China were not happy about Chinese police's action, but what did the CCTV propaganda say? CCTV news showed a local government official kindly shook hands one by one with the families of the victims, with narration: ALL WERE HAPPY and GRATEFULLY THANKS TO THE HOSPITALITY OF THE KIND MOTHERLAND.
Taiwanese was further infuriated by the CCTV news, and noticed the one wanted to cover up the whole incident was not only by the local police, but also the local government. Taiwan government started trying to intervene the investigation processes of the incident, and threw all the suspicious points in that incident for Chinese government to answer. Because of the intervention of Taiwan government, Chinese county police changed their attitude from simple accident to murder robbery incident, and soon arrested SO CALLED robbers in just a few days. The police showed the guns that the robbers carried during the crime scene in CCTV news, but later strangely there were totally different guns shown in the jurisdictional court before executing those robbers.
So more suspicions were still lingered: Why different guns were shown in public? Did those SO CALLED robbers actually the ones killing victims? What and why did Chinese government want to cover-up in the first place?
The shadow of the incident was one of the points for Taiwanese to distrust Chinese governments and their officials, and push Taiwanese further away from China.
The CCP today does not change at all after decades -- Still likes to cover-up everything that is negative and politically incorrect about China from the Chinese and the rest of the world.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@iwx2672 If you have the opportunity visit the Chiang Kai Shek memorial in the centre of Taipei. From what I can gather, many Chinese mainlanders despise Chiang Kai Shek, but still acknowledge his role in creating the modern state. He is much more revered in Taiwan, although there are those in Taiwan who despise him. He created Martial law and suppressed the other dialects of Chinese language such as Hakka, Taiwanese even Cantonese in favour of Mandarin, he brutally weeded out Communist sympathisers, but was instrumental in creating the modern Taiwanese state. His son took over the reigns after his death, he was a lot more moderate, he helped reform the Taiwanese economy, and in part in responsible for the period of prosperity which Taiwan has enjoyed. In my opinion Taiwan is still more prosperous than China. If you have the opportunity visit some of the outlying towns such as Yilai, Alishan.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
very interesting slice of history, reminds me of an ex, actually an ex's mom...who was born of Fujian Chinese-ancestry in Taiwan back when it was a Japanese colony and Japanese was mandatory in school. When she was 12 or so, her family picked up and moved to the growing Chinese colony in Kobe Japan. She survived the war, which she never talked about, and ended up marrying a Chinese-American merchant seaman, moved to San Francisco. When I went to visit my girlfriend in San Francisco, she was always busy working, school, social schedule so I often hung with her mom...who was an extremely interesting nice person who seemingly knew every business owner in both Chinatown and Japan-town as she spoke fluent Japanese, 5-6 Chinese dialects including most of the ones heard in SF, and native Taiwanese and English. Her connections later helped her kids set up prominent local businesses. I miss her a lot, RIP MrsD.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Thanks for this video, it's great you don't only focus on technology development etc, also culture, and an explanation of family here.
The West was more strict in the 60, 70s, then they become more "happy communists" where they try and be nicer and giving too much freedom.
This has lead the West, mainly the US, Australia, maybe UK etc to have people who don't have direction, don't know how to focus.
So, as westerns companies manufactured their stuff in China, a very ordered society, it drastically pulled up their wealth, whilst the West's children were not given direction and focus, so we're becoming more useless...
I'm white by the way, grew up in Africa, so had an older style education, and life experience growing up
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@Asianometry Thanks!
The problem with the "cultural divergence" theory is that Taiwan is still currently in the process of diverging from Chinese culture. Additionally, Taiwan is still officially under Chinese (ROC) control, which makes it very difficult for Taiwanese culture to become nationalised and centralised. Taiwanese culture is not very well defined, even though it is certainly real, mainly as a result of Taiwan's difficult political status, and also due to the young age of the Taiwanese Nation. Though many families have been living in Taiwan for hundreds of years, the decision of several (not all) Native Taiwanese to declare themselves as a separate ethnic group and nation has been a more recent phenomenon, most probably beginning during the White Terror period of Taiwan. Taiwan's Democratisation only began a few decades ago, and prior to that, Taiwan was under the control of a strict Chinese regime which did its best to ensure that Chinese culture would be retained and that Taiwanese culture - whatever that is - would be permanently erased. Given that Taiwan is such a young nation with such an undefined culture and such a tense political situation, with no effective "motherland" (given that the "Taiwanese Motherland" is currently under Chinese control), it's very difficult to know who is actually Taiwanese and who isn't; vague surveys with questions that are designed to derive specific answers and with very small (and often rigged) sample spaces are not a very accurate indication of general public sentiment in Taiwan, regarding Taiwan's culture and nation-hood. Meanwhile, whilst most Overseas Taiwanese do identify to a small extent with Taiwan, it can probably be said that the majority do not fully regard "Taiwanese" as an independent nationality or ethnicity, and probably have wildly differing opinions from one another in regards to what it means to be Taiwanese; a significant number of Overseas Taiwanese perhaps identify as Han Chinese, and it is quite difficult to distinguish these people from Overseas Mainlander Chinese. With the future status of Taiwan being very uncertain, and with the strength of China increasing, Taiwanese culture will probably continue to radically change and be redefined throughout the years. It's quite possible that different groups within Taiwan may begin to disagree on their own definitions of what Taiwanese culture actually is, given that Taiwanese culture is not very ancient; if you go back far enough, Taiwanese culture is just Han Chinese culture, and pro-independence Taiwanese obviously don't want people to make that connection, so they're going to place more emphasis on recent changes and trends in Taiwanese culture, which, by their very nature of being recent and not integral to traditional Taiwanese culture, can easily become points of disagreement even amongst the pro-independence Taiwanese themselves.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
My father bought the families first Trinitron (21") in 1976. It was only the 2nd color TV set we purchased. The first was a 25" Zenith in 1971. The Zenith disappeared by 1982, but the Trinitron was still working, when sent off to an e-waste center in 2009. Though it was replaced by a 27" Trinitron, in the living room, in 1994, due to the tube getting dimmer, as that's what just happens to all CRTs over time. The old set went to my Mom's bedroom, until disposal.
Electronics was expensive back then. My father paid somewhere over $600 for the 21" Trinitron in 1976, but not from a store, but new, in the box, from someone's house. That was at a bargain price, and I guess "it fell off a truck", as they use to say. Good thing, it wasn't "a box of rocks", as that also often occurred.
6
-
6
-
6
-
I worked for sun Microsystems for quite a number of years, I think about 25 or 26. So I totally understand how awesome Sun Microsystems was having started with them back in 1987. But before I worked at Sun Microsystems I worked at Apollo computer for about 4 and 1/2 years. What people forget is that Apollo computer actually came up with their workstation running a proprietary operating system called aegis and they shipped their first product in 1981 with the company starting in 1980. In fact when I went to work at Sun microsystems, I still felt that the Apollo computer hardware and software was Superior. In fact I would say it took son three or four more years before the software and easy Network connectivity came to be the same as Apollos. But I will say one thing about Sun that Apollo could never do, and that was the son understood how to meet customer needs. Apollo had very custom hardware and therefore costlier hardware where Sun would take a lot of things off the shelf. Not only that Apollo would always go for the highest performance, and Sun would go for the sort of performance that people expected, and that alone would cause their hardware and therefore product pricing to be lower. They hit the customer sweet spots, or Apollo was just too expensive. But even more critical than that even, sun Microsystems gave their sales force tremendous latitude. When sun and Apollo were duking it out in competition with a customer, son allowed their sales force to have much greater latitude in throwing in bargains and deals where Apollo had to make their customer sales force go back to the main sales people taking a lot of time. Sun Microsystems salespeople would win deals just because Apollo salespeople could not react fast enough. So all in all, Sun Microsystems had a much better corporation because even though I talked only about two companies back then, at one point in probably the early 90s there were easily JAWS companies.... And Jaws was an acronym for just another workstation. It was a dog eat dog business, and that's why sons total company infrastructure and incentives worked so well against all others!
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Asianometry Do you know anything about how much contact the Taiwanese had with people living outside of Taiwan, and how easy/difficult it was to travel in and out of Taiwan (including to Mainland Japan)? I also think that it would be interesting to research the history of Taiwanese refugees who fled to Mainland China and other regions during the Japanese Invasion of Taiwan, and during the beginning of Japanese Colonial Rule in Taiwan. It will also be interesting to research the relationship between Taiwanese and Japanese people during the Colonial Period.
I live in Australia, and I'm somewhat unique because I'm a fourth-generation Chinese Australian. I told my art teacher this one time and she told me that it's quite common, even though I've never personally met any other people who are anything more than 3rd-gen Chinese Australian, and this is even the case though I attend a high school which is (coincidentally) roughly 60% ethnically-Chinese. Whilst Australia only abolished the White Australia Policy back in 1973, Chinese were still migrating less frequently to Australia before that time, and large Chinese migrations to Australia occurred historically, during the Victorian Gold Rush of the 1850s-1860s, and also during the latter half of the Chinese Civil War.
However, I'm not descended from these types of Chinese immigrants. Instead, through my maternal grandmother, I'm descended from Chinese people originating from Taiwan who were brought to Australia from Indonesia as Japanese Prisoners-of-War. My great great grandfather had allegedly fled Taiwan in 1895 following the Japanese Invasion, choosing to migrate to Java, Dutch Indonesia as a refugee. In 1936, my great great grandfather travelled back to Taiwan in order to retrieve a wife for his son, my great grandmother, and he brought her back to Java. My great grandmother, who was allegedly a distant relative of my great grandfather, was born and raised in Japanese Taiwan, and she had never formally lost her Japanese/Taiwanese nationality even whilst living in Indonesia; my grandmother has explained to me that both of her parents were Stateless, though I'm not so sure that my grandmother even has access to reliable records of nationality.
In December 1941, my great grandparents and my great great grandparents living in Indonesia were arrested by the Dutch Indonesian Government and were deported to Australia for temporary internment during WWII, lasting until March 1946. During their internment in Australia, my grandmother was born here, receiving an Australian birth certificate, essentially signifying Australian citizenship. My great grandfather was apparently an intelligent man; he knew how to speak English, and he taught English whilst living in the camp; he probably even taught some Japanese people. However, my family hated the Japanese, I've been told, considering the Japanese to be the enemy, and being hostile to them even though many had been living outside of Japan for decades.
My great grandparents and other Taiwanese in the internment camp for Japanese civilians wrote numerous letters to the Chinese consulate (presumably in Melbourne) to be repatriated to China, rather than Japan. Of course, with the realisation that Taiwan was now under Chinese control, rather than Japanese, my family begged to be returned to Taiwan Province. A Japanese ship called the "Yoizuki", with a Japanese captain, came to Sydney to pick up the Japanese and Taiwanese internees and repatriate them to their respective homelands. This caused panic amongst the Taiwanese, and one of my relatives is quoted as (roughly) saying to a prison guard "If they send me to Japan, please give me your revolver so I can shoot myself in the head."
My family was successfully repatriated to Taiwan, Republic of China, sometime during mid-1946. They continued to live in Taiwan for several years, but they eventually abandoned the island in 1952, for reasons which are as of yet unknown to me. My grandmother then spent the rest of her young life living in Indonesia, with her parents having chosen to return to this country. Later, my grandmother traveled to Mainland China to study (which is where my great grandfather learnt English), and then she traveled to Hong Kong, and finally, she returned to Australia in 1978, bringing her husband and daughter with her; she had always possessed Australian citizenship.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatura
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_destroyer_Yoizuki
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yukon Huang has very interesting views on corruption in China. The issue that China has is that since the government is so involved in the economy, corruption actually allows companies to function more like if they were in a market economy, allowing more efficiency, more growth etc.
This means that almost everybody in China is involved in corruption. Party/government officials, corrupt. SOEs, corrupt. Large foreign firms, large Chinese firms, medium sized Chinese firms, and a good portion of small Chinese firms, all corrupt. So now the top levels of the CCP say 'No more corruption!' But everybody, including Xi and the PSC, knows that nothing will get done if people actually have to follow the letter of the law, so it just becomes a purge of those who are politically inconvenient, as well as a few of the most egregious cases of corruption regardless of politics in order to save face.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
For viewers who enjoy Asianometry, I recommend watching videos by PolyMatter (China), Wendover Productions (Aircraft+Logistics), Caspian Report (Geopolitics), VisualPolitik (Geopolitics), CGPGrey, Johnny Harris (Vice / New York Times video journalist). For more China specific videos, serpentza/laowhy86/advchina has some gold (among lots of clickbait). You may also like Cheddar and Quartz (for random topics), and Newsthink (SpaceX/Tesla/Elon Musk), ColdFusion TV (future tech focused), RealEngineering, CuriousDroid (mostly engineering focused)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Asianometry I recently traveled to Hong Kong, where I met my grandmother's cousin, who is in her early-50s, I believe. She is half-Taiwanese and half-Chinese from Beijing. She was born and raised in Mainland China, before migrating to Hong Kong; her husband's family has been living in Hong Kong since the early to mid-1900s.
My relative in Hong Kong is pro-Chinese Unification, though none of her ancestors has ever lived in Japanese Taiwan, because her father grew up in Indonesia and Australia, whereas her paternal grandparents emigrated from Taiwan in 1895, in order to escape Japanese rule. So, none of her ancestors has ever lived under Japanese rule in Taiwan. At the same time, her mother comes from Beijing, and would have had a strictly-Chinese upbringing.
Edit: According to my relative in Hong Kong, our family has lived in Taiwan for 35 generations, though these claims seem rather dubious.
The only person within my family who lived in Japanese Taiwan was my maternal grandmother's mother, who was born in Japanese Taiwan in 1918, and who emigrated from Taiwan in 1936. She is the only person who would have been directly affected by the experience of living under Japanese rule.
I met my great grandmother when I was a young child. I was born in Adelaide, South Australia, whereas my great grandmother was living in Sydney at the time of my birth. My immediate family migrated to Sydney when I was young, and I met my great grandmother again in 2007; at this point, I was old enough to remember meeting her.
According to my grandmother, who lives nearby to me in Sydney, my great grandmother hated the Japanese. However, she knew how to speak the Japanese language. And, when my grandmother was a young child living in Taiwan and later in Indonesia, my great grandmother tried to teach her to speak Japanese, though she was apparently "lazy" and didn't end up learning Japanese.
I believe that my great grandmother might not have hated Japanese people as much as my grandmother seems to think. Or maybe, she was using the logic that "to defeat your enemy, you must understand your enemy". She managed not to strangle any Japanese to death in the internment camp, so that says something, at least. Apparently, she spent her time in the camp polishing the floorboards of her living quarters with butter.
3
-
@Asianometry Good idea. Except that I don't live in Taiwan.
My maternal grandmother's paternal grandfather and mother were both born in Taiwan, in ~1880 and 1918, respectively. However, my maternal grandmother was born in Australia in 1944, in a POW camp for Japanese people. She was then, in 1946, repatriated to Taiwan, under the rule of the Republic of China, where she witnessed the February 28 Massacre. Then, her family migrated to Indonesia, where they had been living prior to having been captured and imprisoned during WWII. My grandmother then traveled to China and lived through the Cultural Revolution, where she met my maternal grandfather, who was a Chinese man who had been born and raised in Burma. They were married in Yunnan Province and then migrated to Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, my grandmother discovered that she had possessed Australian citizenship for her entire life, due to possessing an Australian birth certificate. She contacted the Australian Embassy in Hong Kong, and they informed her that she was a full Australian citizen and that she could return to Australia. So, she returned to Australia in 1978 with my maternal grandfather and my young mother, and so my mother has grown up in Australia for most of her life, though having been born in China and having spent her early childhood living in Hong Kong. My father migrated to Australia in 1990 from Shanghai, People's Republic of China, and so I have visited China several times because of him, and I learnt about Chinese culture to a small degree as a young child. However, I have never been to Taiwan, Indonesia, or Burma. I have been to Hong Kong, though.
3
-
Whilst it can be said that many Han Chinese people live in various regions overseas but have never lost their Han Chinese identity, it can also be said that these people have never experienced the same kinds of cultural pressures as the Taiwanese. Whilst most Overseas Chinese have been persecuted or discriminated against by foreigners for being Han Chinese, naturally making them gravitate towards the Chinese Motherland, Taiwanese people have, throughout history, been persecuted for being Taiwanese; first by the Japanese Colonisers, and later by the Chinese Mainlanders (Waishengren) who came to Taiwan as refugees in the 1940s-1950s. And whilst the other groups of Overseas Chinese have always been united by their Han Chinese identity, persecuted by local majority groups such as the Indonesians and the (White) Americans, the Taiwanese have always been united by their shared Taiwanese identity throughout their island's tumultuous history, and the Han Chinese identity has only been drifting further and further away after more and more decades of separation from Mainland China.
This separation has been further exacerbated by the oppression instigated against the Taiwanese by the Mainlander Chinese immigrants during the 1940s-1990s, and the hostile threats by the Chinese Communist Party against the Taiwanese people over the decades have also not done a good job of convincing them that they are Han Chinese. "You are Han Chinese, or else!" The impression which Taiwanese people get from the Chinese Communist Party is that it's illegal for the Taiwanese to maintain their individual identity, which involves being a settler people living on a beautiful island, and also being forced to live under Japanese rule, under a Kuomintang Dictatorship, and now as a Democratic State which lacks recognition from the international community. So, this is why the Taiwanese people are not keen on reunification with China, and this is why the Taiwanese people would prefer to maintain their unique culture, identity, and way of life, which is similar to Mainland China's, but also quite different, and distinctly Taiwanese.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Asianometry Hey bud, hope you're well. I have enjoyed several of your well made videos and genuinely appreciated the effort you've put into them.
While my comment may have seemed rude, and I won't contest that opinion, I will add that it was effective in getting your attention. Albeit, negative upon initial review.
See, my frustration stemmed from the amount of time it took you to explain "the big semiconductor problem", hence the "get to the effing point dude" comment from me.
You spent a considerable amount of time giving the history of electrical components and semiconductors in automobiles, and that's great, you did a wonderful job; the video was engaging and entertaining, but it dragged on. Perhaps a more appropriate title would be "The History of Semiconductors in Automobiles".
That being said, don't take it personally, accept constructive criticism, continue making great videos (as you already do) and stay positive. And I, your new fan, will continue to appreciate them and learn to leave kinder comments. We all learn and grow together.
Happy New Year my friend!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1