Hearted Youtube comments on Asianometry (@Asianometry) channel.

  1. 7700
  2. 4300
  3. 3400
  4. 2300
  5. 2100
  6. 2000
  7. 1700
  8. 1600
  9. 1600
  10. 1600
  11. 1500
  12. 1500
  13. 1400
  14. 1400
  15. 1400
  16. 1300
  17. 1300
  18. 1300
  19. 1200
  20. 1100
  21. 1100
  22. 1100
  23. 1000
  24. 1000
  25. 1000
  26. 1000
  27. 1000
  28. 1000
  29. 986
  30. 980
  31. 949
  32. 917
  33. 879
  34. 838
  35. 816
  36. 777
  37. 773
  38. 771
  39. 766
  40. 765
  41. 761
  42. 759
  43. 758
  44. 736
  45. I worked for Wang Labs at corporate headquarters ("The Towers...") for 8 years, first as a product manager for several software communications products and then as part of the marketing team for the Americas/Asia/Pacific region (China, Aus, NZ, Latin America, Canada). I joined in 1984 when the company was on a growth tear, profitable, and almost 32,000 employees and about $3B in revenue (and note that $3B was worth a lot more back then); I stayed until 1992, when the company declared Chapter 11, revenue dropped to about $1B, and 20k employees were laid off. I learned a tremendous amount at the company, travelled extensively (25+ countries), and not once ever thought we would fail, in spite of profitability, revenue, and product issues toward the end. Comments below lay blame on both Dr. Wang and on Fred (which are valid: Fred was not ready to take over the company, other senior managers (Cunningham, for example) saw no future for themselves and left, and the Doctor was unable to see beyond the end of the VS and the mini-computer). However, remember that several other companies - many of them based in Massachusetts - were also laid low by the rise of the personal computer, including DEC, Prime, and Data General. I spent 40 years in the tech industry, the last 16 as a tech industry analyst (Gartner and a couple others). I have been with companies that have gone Chapter 11 (Wang), run out of cash and closed the doors, gone public, been acquired, or have gone through massive downsizing. Tech is not for the faint of heart, but I can honestly say in 40 years I was never once bored. For readers who are newer to the tech industry, let me leave you with a couple thoughts on why the lessons of the ancient past (in tech, 1982 is ancient history) are still relevant: .If you think what happened to Wang can't happen to you or your company, you are wrong. Change always happens, and in tech it happens fast. (social media companies, I am looking at you). .The future is rarely predictable. Hard to realize today, but the idea of replacing typewriters, paper, and administrative assistants with computers was once radical. .The tech industry is a roller coaster. To survive you need a strong stomach and a healthy amount of stamina. And luck is a large part of it, right next to innovation and hard work. Anyone who hits it big and tries to tell you they didn't get lucky is fooling themselves. Great story by Asianometry, thanks for making this happen.
    728
  46. 724
  47. 719
  48. 706
  49. 705
  50. 696
  51. 687
  52. 682
  53. 676
  54. 673
  55. 669
  56. 667
  57. 660
  58. 653
  59. 649
  60. 646
  61. 643
  62. 625
  63. 612
  64. 608
  65. 605
  66. 604
  67. 594
  68. 585
  69. 573
  70. 558
  71. 547
  72. 544
  73. 543
  74. 541
  75. 540
  76. 532
  77. 525
  78. 524
  79. 514
  80. 513
  81. 512
  82. 508
  83. 502
  84. 499
  85. 497
  86. 493
  87. 493
  88. 492
  89. 484
  90. 477
  91. 477
  92. 477
  93. 475
  94. 469
  95. 467
  96. 464
  97. 460
  98. 459
  99. 457
  100. 457
  101. 457
  102. 453
  103. 452
  104. 443
  105. 442
  106. 440
  107. 440
  108. 439
  109. 439
  110. 433
  111. 433
  112. 430
  113. 421
  114. 420
  115. 415
  116. 415
  117. 414
  118. 414
  119. 413
  120. 412
  121. 407
  122. 407
  123. 400
  124. 398
  125. 397
  126. 397
  127. 397
  128. 393
  129. 393
  130. 390
  131. 384
  132. 380
  133. 379
  134. 378
  135. 376
  136. 372
  137. 371
  138. 370
  139. 369
  140. Where I work we use 18.7MΩ UPW for ultrasonically washing massive coffee table size glass substrates before they're loaded into metal oxide electron beam vapor deposition chambers to be multi-layer dielectric coated with Bragg diffraction interference polarizers, anti-reflection coatings, and mirrors used in the construction of ultra-high power neodymium glass lasers for inertial confinement fusion research. The particle counter on the final deionized water loop from Particle Measuring Systems that detects down to 30nm diameter particles is the size of a desktop PC and costs about as much as my house. The software that runs the counter from the same company is actually amazingly crap and looks like something from the windows 3.1 era. Also PS, I really wish the ridiculous and very old myth of ultrapure water being "so toxic and corrosive because it sucks minerals out of everything it touches" would finally die. It's not. I've drank it. It's just water, it tastes great, I didn't die. The instant it touches your tongue, or you, or ANYthing except the hyperpure fluorinated polymer pipes that it runs through, it's not ultra-pure anything anymore, it's just normal water again with normal water's normal properties. One of those properties is actually really interesting - people always say water is clear and it just looks blue because it's reflecting the sky or has junk dissolved into it or whatever, but that's wrong, it's ACTUALLY blue. When we fill a super shiny stainless steel ultrasonic washer with it the color gradually gets bluer and bluer as it gets deeper and there's obviously no particle impurities in there doing it. All the color is coming from the third overtone of the stretching mode of the hydroxy group part of the water molecule absorbing a tiny amount of far red light in the tail of the absorption peak.
    368
  141. 366
  142. 351
  143. 349
  144. 349
  145. 348
  146. Dear Asianometry, I was born and raised in Hood River OR USA and I know this story very well, Hood River OR had a quite large community of Japanese-American farmers, many of them quite successful. In High School I went on one of my very first dates with a local girl. My Parents found out, and delicately informed me that it was their wish that I stop seeing her. Having never behaved in such a way before I was taken aback. No she was not Japanese American. When the US Government ( in a fit of racist paranoia as no German Americans went to camps ) sent the Japanese Americans to "...The Camps..." they had to leave their homes, possessions, but worse they had to leave their land, and farmland does not take care of itself. Often they would sell the land for a $ 1.00 someone in the area who would promise to sell it back when the war was over, and when they came back. The insult to their injury was that for some of them, when they came back they could not get their land back, or if they did, the land had been commercially raped, no fertilizer, no pruning, no care of any kind. The caretaker owners had sold every piece of fruit on the tress, year after year at top US Army prices, and making a small fortune. So when the Japanese-American family came back from the camps, and assuming they could even get their own property back, the farm had to be plowed up and started from scratch at great cost. Those who profited from the Japanese-Americans misfortunes were known, many of the more "liberal" or Christian members in the valley knew who these people were, it was a small world after all, and refused to associate with them socially or even in business ( some were even family ), and this is where my girlfriend story emerges, her family was one of those that had profited and my Parents had rejected her family. There was a deep, deep rift of feelings within the European-American community over this, it was a scar that lasted for many decades after the war.
    348
  147. 348
  148. 345
  149. 344
  150. 344
  151. 338
  152. 333
  153. 333
  154. 332
  155. 331
  156. 329
  157. 328
  158. 326
  159. 324
  160. 322
  161. 319
  162. 314
  163. 313
  164. 311
  165. 309
  166. 305
  167. 302
  168. 302
  169. 301
  170. 297
  171. 297
  172. 294
  173. 293
  174. 291
  175. 289
  176. 288
  177. 288
  178. 288
  179. 287
  180. 287
  181. 286
  182. 285
  183. 285
  184. 281
  185. 279
  186. 278
  187. 276
  188. 276
  189. 273
  190. 272
  191. 271
  192. 271
  193. 269
  194. 268
  195. 268
  196. 263
  197. 259
  198. 253
  199. 252
  200. 251
  201. 251
  202. 249
  203. 248
  204. 248
  205. 247
  206. 246
  207. 246
  208. 241
  209. 237
  210. 237
  211. 234
  212. 234
  213. 232
  214. 230
  215. 230
  216. 229
  217. 228
  218. 228
  219. 226
  220. 226
  221. 225
  222. 223
  223. 223
  224. 220
  225. 219
  226. 219
  227. 218
  228. 214
  229. 214
  230. 214
  231. 210
  232. 210
  233. 210
  234. 209
  235. 208
  236. 206
  237. 205
  238. 205
  239. 204
  240. 204
  241. 203
  242. 203
  243. 202
  244. 199
  245. 198
  246. 197
  247. 197
  248. My favorite application for mems is in aviation, since I am a recreational pilot. One of the first and most successful application of mems was accelerometers, which don't need openings in the package to work. Accelerometers can replace gyroscopes as well as enable inertial navigation, since they can be made to sense rotation as well as movement. With the advent of mems, avionics makers looked forward to replacing expensive and maintenance intensive mechanical gyroscopes with mems. A huge incentive was reliability: a gyroscope that fails can bring down an aircraft. The problem was accuracy. Mems accelerometers displayed drift that was worse than the best mechanical gyros. Previous inertial navigation systems used expensive laser gyros that worked by sending light pulses through a spool of fibre optical line and measuring the delay due to rotation. Mems accelerometers didn't get much better, but they are sweeping all of the old mechanical systems into the trash can. So how did this problem get solved? Well, the original technology for GPS satellite location was rather slow, taking up to a minute to form a "fix". But with more powerful CPUs it got much faster. But GPS cannot replace gyros, no matter how fast it can calculate. But the faster calculation enabled something incredible: the GPS calculation could be used to calibrate the mems accelerometers. By carefully calculating the math, a combined GPS/multiaxis accelerometer package can accurately and reliably find a real time position and orientation in space. You can think of it this way: GPS provides position over long periods of time,, but very accurately, and mems accelerometers provide position and orientation over short periods of time, but not so accurately. Together they achieve what neither technology can do on its own. The result has been a revolution in avionics. Now even small aircraft can have highly advanced "glass" panels, that give moving maps, a depiction of the aircraft attitude, and even a synthetic view of of the world outside the aircraft in conjunction with terrain data. It can even tell exactly which way the wind is blowing on the aircraft because this information falls out of the GPS/accelerometer calculation.
    193
  249. 190
  250. 189
  251. 189
  252. 188
  253. 186
  254. 184
  255. 181
  256. 181
  257. 181
  258. 180
  259. 180
  260. 179
  261. 178
  262. 176
  263. 176
  264. 175
  265. 174
  266. 173
  267. 173
  268. 173
  269. 173
  270. 172
  271. 169
  272. 169
  273. 169
  274. 169
  275. 167
  276. 167
  277. 165
  278. 164
  279. 164
  280. 164
  281. 164
  282. 164
  283. 160
  284. 158
  285. 158
  286. 157
  287. 157
  288. 154
  289. 153
  290. 153
  291. 150
  292. 150
  293. 148
  294. 147
  295. 145
  296. 145
  297. 145
  298. 144
  299. 144
  300. 142
  301. 142
  302. 141
  303. 141
  304. 140
  305. 139
  306. 139
  307. 139
  308. 137
  309. 134
  310. 133
  311. 133
  312. 133
  313. Grandpa in the 442nd: My Grandfather and several great-uncles served in the 442nd. My grandfather as a Corporal (w/ purple heart, bronze star) and eventually an MP, maybe attached to the artillery batillion- its not clear.) ...After going through the craziness of the Itialian campaign, France, etc, he saw DACHAU during its liberation. (can you imagine that? With his own family spending most of the war in 'camp', in places like Idaho?) He ended up guarding German POWs, at a former concentration/death camp (not sure which: he was a shutterbug, but the pics I have don't show exactly where, though I suspect it was Dachau, which was used for that purpose)... He was a guard, whole they were sorted into different classifications- draftees, officers, SS, war criminals, etc. Apperantly, He got along fairly well with a few of the POWS, and, as most were cleared of any war crimes, I think he may have identified with some of them as in: 'Well, ain't this FUBAR?', etc. (I'm paraphrasing). Anyway, when my mother was a teenager in the 60s, My grandfather owned a wholesale nursery (for trees/plants), and one afternoon, a stranger came to the door, asking for my grandfather by name. The visitor was a former German officer that was in town to sell machine tools (of course he was- what could be more German?), and had recalled that my grandfather, as a guard, had mentioned that he lived there. The German had brought a six-pack of German beer, and appearently they sat on the porch for a while and caught up, and then never saw one another again. It's a great story... according to my mother and uncle, it's true. My grandfather would never speak about his time in Europe (which is common, appearently), but, I suppose that those were significant moments in his life and for that German ex-soldier. So, wow, eh? I've been thinking about writing a history of the 442, using his life and experiences to personalize/ anchor the history. Anyway, that's my connection to the 442nd. (I have some relics- a camera he 'bought' in Italy, an alabaster statuette, some photo albums (Most of which have been donated to an Asian-American museum- the Wing Luke- in Seattle) -B (One more thing- as a shutterbug, he had a ton of photos of his friends in itally- short-ish Japanese men sitting/ dancing/ flirting with lots of tall, beautiful (recently liberated?) Itialian women. He DID talk about that, a few times... Grandpa was pretty cool.)
    133
  314. 132
  315. 131
  316. 131
  317. 131
  318. 130
  319. 130
  320. 130
  321. 130
  322. 130
  323. 129
  324. 129
  325. 128
  326. 127
  327. 127
  328. 127
  329. 124
  330. 124
  331. 124
  332. 124
  333. 123
  334. 122
  335. 121
  336. 121
  337. 121
  338. 120
  339. 120
  340. 118
  341. 118
  342. 118
  343. 117
  344. 117
  345. 117
  346. 116
  347. 116
  348. 116
  349. 115
  350. 114
  351. 114
  352. 113
  353. 113
  354. 112
  355. 112
  356. 112
  357. 111
  358. 109
  359. Yours is one of the most interesting channels on YouTube, I think. Tech, history, economics, geopolitics are all combined in a way that is digestible and sensible. As you pointed out, each new node generation is more expensive than the last. Demand for chips is only going up, but fewer and fewer companies can hang a shingle for the latest node. TSMC believes it can succeed at 3 nm. That will be difficult, in terms of expense, reject rates and reliability. Such a small node leaves chips vulnerable to stray electromagnetic radiation and cross-channel electron bleeding. And after 3 nm? Photo-etching on 2-D silicon is nearly at the end of its journey. If Moore's Law is to continue, a new chip concept will be required, and sooner rather than later, a concept that leaves plenty of room for future advances. It would be good if it were cheap, too, so that many companies can jump in and compete for rising demand. We need innovation! Who will supply it? And what will it look like? I have no idea. In principle, different semiconductors (beyond silicon) might come into play. I'm not sure how far that will extend the runway for 2-D optically-etched chips. Might not be very far at all. In principle, moving to 3-D designs etched by some method other than projecting an image onto a 2-dimensional surface might be tried (but I can't imagine what that etching process might look like). In principle, quantum computing might change everything - though a complete, economically-viable, better-than-silicon solution remains far in the future, at best. At worst, quantum computing will be a niche adjunct to silicon processing. Or at really worst, nothing from quantum computing will arrive at commercial viability at all. Photonic computing? Who knows. The irony is that matter appears to be compute-intensive. Everything computes. We just don't know how to take advantage.
    109
  360. 109
  361. 109
  362. 108
  363. 107
  364. 107
  365. 105
  366. 105
  367. 105
  368. 105
  369. 105
  370. 104
  371. 103
  372. 102
  373. 102
  374. 102
  375. 101
  376. 101
  377. 101
  378. 101
  379. 100
  380. 100
  381. 99
  382. 99
  383. 99
  384. 98
  385. 98
  386. 98
  387. 98
  388. 98
  389. 97
  390. 97
  391. 97
  392. 96
  393. 96
  394. 96
  395. 96
  396. 96
  397. 95
  398. 95
  399. 94
  400. 94
  401. 93
  402. 93
  403. 93
  404. 93
  405. 93
  406. 93
  407. 92
  408. 91
  409. 91
  410. 91
  411. 91
  412. 90
  413. 90
  414. 90
  415. 90
  416. 89
  417. 89
  418. 89
  419. 89
  420. 89
  421. 88
  422. 88
  423. 88
  424. 88
  425. 88
  426. 87
  427. 87
  428. 87
  429. 86
  430. 86
  431. 86
  432. 86
  433. 86
  434. 86
  435. 86
  436. 86
  437. 86
  438. 86
  439. 85
  440. 85
  441. 85
  442. 85
  443. 84
  444. As someone who's family is half Thai I'd wager geography, urbanization, cultural ties, and price are all big contributors: Thailand is located near the South China Sea which has one of the most valuable shipping corridors on Earth with trade passing between Africa, Europe, India, East Asia, and the Western half of the Americas, plus Thailand is only a short distance from China and Vietnam, both large manufactures of Automobile parts. They're near Japan and South Korea, both major manufacturers. This means its easier to ship parts in and vehicles out and also means they're likely to farm out very labor intensive tasks to nearby Thailand. Thailand is also a highly urbanized country with a massive 14 million people (over 20% of the country) living in the Bangkok metro zone which is also right on the water allowing easy importing and exporting of goods, and a highly urbanized population also means much easier manufacturing and having most of the country in 1 giant city means its easy to have multiple different companies making and assembling parts, sections, or entire vehicles. You dont need to make the chassis in Chicago, the engine in Houston, and send them to Detroit for assembly, you can keep different jobs in one city if it has most of the population there. That city also being a massive port on a massive shipping lane makes things even easier. Urbanized populations are also more well educated then more rural ones making things easier. Thailand also has very close ties to the US and they have close business/trading ties to China, South Korea, and Japan. This makes it even easier to get contracts to assemble vehicles for them or manufacture parts. The fact Thailand has close ties to China and the US also means they have large markets to sell to as well as import parts from. The cultural ties also means that there are more personal relationships and business is easier, plus tons of Thai people speak English or Chinese as a second language which makes doing business even more attractive. Another important factor is that costs are low in Thailand. Thanks to the shipping lanes transport costs are low, their location near resources like Chinese or Australian coal, locally made rubber, oil from the South China Sea, and Chinese and Japanese steel means resources are cheap as well. The fact that cost of living is very low and wages are also fairly low means that its cheap to do business in Thailand. Countries like South Korea and Japan can hire fairly well educated Thai people to do jobs for much less then doing it locally, and they have the benefits i already mentioned rolled in. They dont need to go to Africa where wages are low but geography makes business more difficult and where politics makes things less stable. A less important, but still important factor is also stability. Thailand despite all their coups is still fairly stable for doing business. New regimes dont like to "rock the boat" or institute wide ranging changes to society. The new regimes arent revolutionary and they dont want to radically change the countries allegiances or become isolated. New regimes usually just want to be the new leaders of the same basic government, they keep doing business with the same nations, keep local business going as normal, they dont try to nationalize tons of companies or force out certain businesses, and they dont demand radical changes to existing contracts or relationships. They also try to keep corruption manageable as well and try to keep Thailand an attractive trading partner. Compare this to some Arab or African nations where new regimes institute massive changes to their relationships or try to nationalize tons of business, or compare it to communist and socialist revolutionaries where the new regime seizes control of businesses and radically change society. Unpredictable politics like that make doing business less attractive and in complicated, global, heavily integrated industries like automotive
    84
  445. 84
  446. 84
  447. 84
  448. 83
  449. 83
  450. 83
  451. 83
  452. 82
  453. 82
  454. 80
  455. 80
  456. 80
  457. 79
  458. 79
  459. 79
  460. 79
  461. 78
  462. 78
  463. 78
  464. 77
  465. 77
  466. 77
  467. 76
  468. 76
  469. 75
  470. 75
  471. 75
  472. 74
  473. 74
  474. 74
  475. 74
  476. 74
  477. 74
  478. 73
  479. 73
  480. 72
  481. 72
  482. 72
  483. 72
  484. 72
  485. 72
  486. 72
  487. 71
  488. 71
  489. 71
  490. 71
  491. 70
  492. 70
  493. 70
  494. 70
  495. 70
  496. 70
  497. 69
  498. 69
  499. 69
  500. 69
  501. 69
  502. 69
  503. 68
  504. 68
  505. 68
  506. 68
  507. 68
  508. 67
  509. 67
  510. 67
  511. 67
  512. 67
  513. 66
  514. 66
  515. 66
  516. 65
  517. 65
  518. 65
  519. 64
  520. 64
  521. 64
  522. 64
  523. 64
  524. 63
  525. 63
  526. 63
  527. 63
  528. 63
  529. 62
  530. 62
  531. 61
  532. 61
  533. 61
  534. 61
  535. 61
  536. 60
  537. 60
  538. 60
  539. 60
  540. 60
  541. 59
  542. 59
  543. 59
  544. 58
  545. 58
  546. 58
  547. 58
  548. 58
  549. 58
  550. 57
  551. 57
  552. 57
  553. 57
  554. 57
  555. 56
  556. 56
  557. 56
  558. 56
  559. 55
  560. 55
  561. 55
  562. 55
  563. 55
  564. 54
  565. 54
  566. 54
  567. 54
  568. 54
  569. 54
  570. 54
  571. 53
  572. 53
  573. 53
  574. 53
  575. 53
  576. 53
  577. 53
  578. Hey long time fan of your channel. You touched on my field of interest so I thought to leave some notes. Notes from a Master Student AI: 1:22 You mention Semantic labeling, but don't actually show any semantic segmentation, which is the semantic labeling of each pixel. It is slightly different from instance segmentation (on the right) because with semantic segmentation you do actually need to assign a value to every pixel, not just the objects within the image. The most complete form is panoptic segmentation, which is both instances and classes annotated at every pixel. 1:47 Brand new dataset is not actually the standard, what commonly is tested is the generalization from one subset of a dataset (~80%) to another subset of the dataset (~20%). A brand new dataset falls under Out of Distribution (OOD) attacks and under the general term "robustness". 3:22 AlphaZero is a warped example of the concept you're trying to explain. Because AlphaZero has a perfectly working simulation to work with, and its predecessor also did a lot of self play. The improvement was in removing the need to pretrain (or prime) the model on humanplay. This was an advancement in reinforcement learning, not the simulation to reality gap. 4:59 You miss the full scope of difference in scale, the difference between 3 and 96 doesn't seem large (factor of 32) but what is actually significant is the amount parameters. That difference is between ~10,000 parameters for ALVINN and 170,000,000,000 (170 billion) Parameters for GPT-3 a factor of 17 million. Also check out DALL-E for the new multi-modal language and image comprehension and GATO for multimodel behavior learning. 5:20 A KMP 1500 robot isn't deployed with any machine learning behavior. It's all old-fashioned expert-made modelling. A better illustration would be robot arms grabbing complex and/or morphable objects. 6:11 Actually the problem isn't that 5000 isn't enough, it's an academic benchmark dataset. Big companies can get 500,000 images if they try a bit (probably even more). The problem is that is also not enough for self-driving cars. And it's not because 500.000 isn't enough to detect trees or pedestrians in the city on a clear day, but there needs to be an insane amount of diversity to detect trees, roads under any weather condition and circumstance. Not to mention 1 in a billion or 1 in a trillion edge cases. For the rest, the carla stuff is great! PS: for another mind-blow look up: "Neural Radiance Fields" and "instant NERFS".
    53
  579. 52
  580. 52
  581. 52
  582. 52
  583. 52
  584. 52
  585. 52
  586. 51
  587. 51
  588. 51
  589. 51
  590. 51
  591. 51
  592. 51
  593. 51
  594. 51
  595. 51
  596. 50
  597. 50
  598. 49
  599. 49
  600. 49
  601. 49
  602. 49
  603. 48
  604. 48
  605. 48
  606. 48
  607. 48
  608. 48
  609. 48
  610. 48
  611. 48
  612. 47
  613. 47
  614. 47
  615. 47
  616. 47
  617. 47
  618. 47
  619. 47
  620. 47
  621. 46
  622. 46
  623. 46
  624. 46
  625. 46
  626. 45
  627. 45
  628. 45
  629. 44
  630. 44
  631. 44
  632. 44
  633. 43
  634. 43
  635. 43
  636. 42
  637. 42
  638. 42
  639. 42
  640. 42
  641. 42
  642. 42
  643. 41
  644. 41
  645. 41
  646. 41
  647. 41
  648. 41
  649. 41
  650. 41
  651. 41
  652. 41
  653. 41
  654. 41
  655. 40
  656. 40
  657. 40
  658. 40
  659. 40
  660. 40
  661. 40
  662. 40
  663. 40
  664. 39
  665. 39
  666. 39
  667. 39
  668. 39
  669. Dear Asianometry, Thank you once again for a well researched and delivered piece. As a working artist I have "options" on how I survive in a world. I can paint a large number of small paintings on simple subjects that are moderately demanding technically and artistically, with simplistic content, and they sell well. Small paintings always sell better than larger works, but they are moderately interesting to me as an artist to create. These tend to be low priced and moderate volume. Or I can create a body of work that meets the interests of the largest number of buyers, relatively low technical and artistic requirements, and these can be larger works, or small, they sell very well, but the content is derivative, repetitive, and even less interesting to create. These tend to be moderate volume, but better priced Or I can create work that interests me as an artist, this work is demanding, both technically and artistically, with a high potential for failure and a low potential for sales. These tend to be very high priced and low volume and tend to be a specific type of collector or buyer. Or I can have a Full Time Job, while this will allow me to paint whatever I wish artistically, and if I have sales all the better, it demands almost all my time, and leaves little time to work as an artist. Or I can marry well ( or have a trust fund ), this means I can paint full time and define my content outside of any commercial requirements, it allows me to paint full time regardless of sales.This is the best of all possible worlds, but if no one is interested in my work, no commercial gallery will take me on, as they prefer artists with a known track records of shows and sales. TV, Music and Movies have a similar problem. While content defines the viewership, and earnings, the medium, viewership and the price also defines the content.
    39
  670. 39
  671. 39
  672. 38
  673. 38
  674. 38
  675. 38
  676. 38
  677. 38
  678. 37
  679. 37
  680. 37
  681. 37
  682. 37
  683. 37
  684. 37
  685. 37
  686. 36
  687. 36
  688. 36
  689. 36
  690. 36
  691. 36
  692. 36
  693. 36
  694. 36
  695. 36
  696. 36
  697. 36
  698. 35
  699. 35
  700. 35
  701. 35
  702. 35
  703. 35
  704. 35
  705. 34
  706. 34
  707. 34
  708. 34
  709. 34
  710. 34
  711. 34
  712. 33
  713. 33
  714. 33
  715. 33
  716. 33
  717. 33
  718. 33
  719. 33
  720. 33
  721. 33
  722. 33
  723. 33
  724. 32
  725. 32
  726. 32
  727. 32
  728. 32
  729. 32
  730. 31
  731. 31
  732. 31
  733. 31
  734. 31
  735. 31
  736. 31
  737. 31
  738. 31
  739. 31
  740. 31
  741. 31
  742. 31
  743. 31
  744. 30
  745. 30
  746. 30
  747. 30
  748. 30
  749. 30
  750. 30
  751. 30
  752. 30
  753. 29
  754. 29
  755. 29
  756. 29
  757. 29
  758. 29
  759. 29
  760. 29
  761. 29
  762. 28
  763. 28
  764. 28
  765. 28
  766. 28
  767. 28
  768. 28
  769. 28
  770. 27
  771. 27
  772. 27
  773. 27
  774. 27
  775. 27
  776. 27
  777. 27
  778. 27
  779. 27
  780. 27
  781. 27
  782. 27
  783. 27
  784. 27
  785. 27
  786. 27
  787. 26
  788. 26
  789. 26
  790. 26
  791. 26
  792. 26
  793. 26
  794. 26
  795. 25
  796. 25
  797. 25
  798. 25
  799. 25
  800. 25
  801. 25
  802. 25
  803. 25
  804. 25
  805. 25
  806. 25
  807. 25
  808. 25
  809. 25
  810. 25
  811. 24
  812. 24
  813. 24
  814. 24
  815. 24
  816. 24
  817. 24
  818. 24
  819. 24
  820. 24
  821. 24
  822. 24
  823. 24
  824. 23
  825. 23
  826. 23
  827. 23
  828. 23
  829. 23
  830. As a Malaysian, I thank you for giving a fair and objective discussion on this topic. Too often us Malaysians are hard on ourselves and we're too quick to criticise policy failures rather than examining the problem. From your videos, it's enlightening how challenging this industry can be and other nations have also tried and end up in the same boat. Frankly, it's uncanny how much your videos on Taiwan resonate to many of the problems we're facing but at much earlier phases of development. I think one of the problems could also be attributed to a mixed message about local labour or talent. On one hand, development agencies will market how competitive labour costs are. Making labour cost a USP sends a wrong message when you're trying to compete for skilled workers. It's funny to see some employers expect an Ivy League quality hire with $14-16k annual pay package. While many employers are bumping wages to remedy this, it's still nowhere near as competitive and talent retention continues to be a problem. Also, what's less spoken of is the setting of "convoluted priorities" especially when problems have snowballed. You've already noted some evidence of this with the choice for local appointments for Silterra than finding qualified, experienced executives for leadership positions. Coupled with the talent bidding/retention issue as mentioned, it may be the case that red tape and socioeconomic KPIs could have led to interventions on business decisions at the (unintended?) expense of building a viable enterprise. It happens too often problems snowball and Khazanah ends up in a position of trying to fix a leaky ship while juggling pressures to retain jobs, industry capacity etc. It's really unfortunate because Khazanah, as a strategic investor, spends a lot of their capital and brain trust fixing problems which could have otherwise be spent seeding or supporting new growth opportunities.
    23
  831. 23
  832. 23
  833. 23
  834. 23
  835. 23
  836. 23
  837. 23
  838. 23
  839. 23
  840. 23
  841. 23
  842. 23
  843. 23
  844. 23
  845. 22
  846. 22
  847. Of course we should do everything we can to stop money laundering -- especially around drug trafficking and human trafficking -- but whatever fraction of China's mass capital flight that's legitimate should definitely considered foreign direct investment and carefully handled, because anybody with a large amount of money within China understandably wants to get their money out of China as soon as possible. Australia's relatively recent regulations are pretty smart: We have no restrictions on foreigners purchasing new buildings. If you buy a vacant plot of land you must build a dwelling within 4 years (you can't just buy it and hold it). You can only buy and demolish an existing dwelling if you build more buildings than were previously there. Finally, real-estate investment no longer contributes to gaining citizenship. All these things are good because they encourage increasing the housing supply which means housing is more affordable. I know that some places (I believe Vancouver and maybe London) tax empty houses and apartments which should encourage them to be placed on the rental market instead of the cultural preference of leaving the home unoccupied. (Side note: China itself has a massive problem with unproductive ghost cities, so other countries need to be smarter than the CCP in combating this with smart policy). Finally, I should note that after decades of giving permanent residency and citizenship to people with strong Chinese Communist Party viewpoints and associations, Australia has developed massive issues around Chinese Communist Party-linked political corruption, infiltration and bribery (eg, Huang Xiangmo and his family), but that's a separate issue.
    22
  848. 22
  849. 22
  850. 22
  851. 22
  852. 22
  853. 22
  854. The Native Taiwanese, who make up around 84% of Taiwan's population according to official ROC statistics, are ethnically, linguistically, and culturally Han Chinese, based on the official modern definition of this term (the definition which most countries recognise). However, just like Guangdong, Shanghai, Fujian, and other regions of China, Taiwan has historically been home to several native dialects which are related to the official Chinese language, Mandarin, but are still quite distinct from this language. These languages can be broadly grouped up into the "Taiwanese Hokkien" and "Taiwanese Hakka" language families. Even though the Native Taiwanese only diverged from China 100-400 years ago, making them still ethnically Han Chinese, they've still been disconnected from China long enough that most Native Taiwanese no longer have direct family ties to people living in Mainland China (contrary to the situation which we can see between North Korea and South Korea). The Taiwanese are certainly a distinct and localised group within what can be referred to as the "Sinosphere" (ie, regions which are influenced by Han Chinese culture and/or are home to large ethnic Han Chinese populations), and it can be said that the Native Taiwanese are perhaps the most distinct ethnic group in China which is still considered to be a subgroup of the Han Chinese (as opposed to, say, the Tibetans, who live in China but are not considered to be Han Chinese). Culturally speaking, yes, the Native Taiwanese are Han Chinese, though the degree of Native Taiwan's "cultural Han Chinese-ness" is debatable. "Native Taiwan" is certainly culturally distinct from Mainland China and also from "Mainland Taiwan", but this isn't so much a result of radical cultural change in any of these regions as it is the result of slight cultural changes in all of these regions, and significant political changes. The three-way divergence of these three subgroups of the Han Chinese culture, in addition to cultural exchanges between these subgroups and also with foreign ethnic groups, such as the Russians, the Germans, the Americans, the Japanese, and various indigenous peoples, has resulted in three distinct cultures - Mainlander Chinese, Mainlander Taiwanese, and Native Taiwanese, which can all equally trace their heritage to the Qing Dynasty, the state which controlled China prior to the establishment of the Republic of China in Mainland China in 1912. Of course, the People's Republic of China (ie, Mainland China) currently has the strongest claim to being "the legitimate cultural successor to the Chinese Nation-State", given that it is widely recognised as the legitimate government of China. Meanwhile, the Republic of China also claims to be the true cultural successor to the Chinese Nation-State, even though it has clear and sometimes extreme cultural differences in relation to the People's Republic of China. Within the Republic of China, there is a clear cultural divide between the Mainlander Taiwanese and the Native Taiwanese, which has sometimes been perceived to be an ethnic divide between two related but distinct ethnic groups. Some of the Native Taiwanese argue that they have diverged too far from Mainlander Chinese culture to be considered as the same ethnic group. They argue that Japanese influence, as well as Taiwan having been absent from major historical and cultural events in China, such as the Xinhai Revolution, the Chinese Civil War (the beginning of it), the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Communist Revolution, and the Cultural Revolution, etc, have resulted in Taiwan becoming a culturally and ethnically distinct region from China. In fact, the influence of Japan on Taiwan has been minimal, largely due to the fact that the Republic of China quickly set about removing any and all Japanese influences from Taiwanese society as best they could, following the Chinese Annexation of Taiwan. Whilst nearly all Taiwanese people could speak conversational Japanese during the Japanese Colonial Period of Taiwan, the majority of Taiwanese people these days speak Mandarin as their primary language, possibly with a native dialect as a secondary language. However, whilst Japan's presence in Taiwan is no longer strongly felt at a fundamental level, Taiwan is still culturally distinct from Mainland China, to a debatable degree, as a result of Taiwan having not experienced many of the same cultural and historical events, and also as a result of Taiwan having been effectively a separate political entity from (Mainland) China for over a century, beginning from the 1895 handover to Japan, and continuing with the Nationalist Chinese retreat to Taiwan following the Chinese Annexation of Taiwan shortly prior.
    22
  855. 22
  856. 22
  857. 22
  858. 22
  859. 22
  860. 22
  861. 21
  862. 21
  863. 21
  864. 21
  865. 21
  866. 21
  867. 21
  868. 21
  869. 21
  870. 21
  871. 21
  872. 21
  873. 21
  874. 21
  875. 21
  876. 21
  877. 21
  878. 20
  879. 20
  880. 20
  881. 20
  882. 20
  883. 20
  884. 20
  885. 20
  886. 20
  887. 20
  888. 20
  889. 20
  890. 20
  891. 20
  892. 20
  893. 20
  894. 20
  895. 19
  896. 19
  897. 19
  898. 19
  899. 19
  900. 19
  901. 19
  902. 19
  903. 19
  904. 19
  905. 19
  906. 19
  907. 19
  908. 19
  909. 19
  910. 19
  911. 19
  912. 19
  913. 19
  914. 19
  915. 19
  916. 19
  917. 18
  918. 18
  919. 18
  920. 18
  921. 18
  922. 18
  923. 18
  924. 18
  925. 18
  926. 18
  927. 18
  928. 18
  929. 18
  930. 18
  931. 18
  932. 18
  933. 18
  934. 18
  935. 18
  936. 18
  937. 18
  938. 18
  939. 18
  940. 18
  941. 18
  942. 17
  943. 17
  944. 17
  945. 17
  946. 17
  947. 17
  948. 17
  949. 17
  950. 17
  951. 17
  952. 17
  953. 17
  954. 17
  955. 17
  956. 17
  957. 17
  958. 17
  959. 17
  960. 17
  961. 16
  962. 16
  963. 16
  964. 16
  965. 16
  966. 16
  967. 16
  968. 16
  969. 16
  970. 16
  971. 16
  972. 16
  973. 16
  974. 16
  975. 16
  976. 16
  977. 16
  978. 16
  979. 16
  980. 15
  981. 15
  982. 15
  983. 15
  984. 15
  985. 15
  986. 15
  987. 15
  988. 15
  989. 15
  990. 15
  991. 15
  992. 15
  993. 15
  994. 15
  995. 15
  996. 15
  997. 15
  998. 15
  999. 15
  1000. 15
  1001. 15
  1002. 15
  1003. 14
  1004. 14
  1005. 14
  1006. 14
  1007. 14
  1008. 14
  1009. 14
  1010. 14
  1011. 14
  1012. 14
  1013. 14
  1014. 14
  1015. 14
  1016. 14
  1017. 14
  1018. 14
  1019. 14
  1020. 14
  1021. 14
  1022. 14
  1023. 14
  1024. 14
  1025. 14
  1026. Ever thought about doing a video about the Taiwanese Aboriginals? It’s interesting how they always vote for the KMT because they view the DPP as a Hoklo supremacist group which has attempted to appropriate indigenous status through so-called "blood nationalism" (claiming they are different from mainland Han because they may have an Aboriginal grandmother and so they are just as “native” as the Aboriginals, like white colonialists in the United States who claimed native American ancestry even if it was often untrue and they continued to violently oppress native Americans but they did so to distance themselves from Britain and justify their ownership of indigenous land). While the KMT are more “practical” (a focus on business), emphasize a pan-Chinese identity which pushes down Hoklo chauvinism and they do not appropriate Aboriginal identity (instead some will say they are not true Taiwanese because only indigenous people should be seen as that which has been positively received by Taiwanese Aboriginals; similar to how many non-native Hawaiians will say they are not actually Hawaiians because only native Hawaiians are true Hawaiians). In a contrast to many Taiwanese Hoklo, the Aboriginals also prefer KMT rule over the Japanese rule that came before and the Hoklo-dominance before that. Despite the KMT's assimilation efforts on them, they also improved infrastructure and built effective support networks for Aboriginal communities. The Aboriginals have always had terrible relations with the Hoklo (but comparatively okay relations with the Hakka and waishengren) and the Japanese committed numerous pogroms against Aboriginals so many Aboriginal people hold anti-Japanese sentiments which further aligns themselves with the KMT. To them, cross-strait relations hold very little importance because either option of Taiwan being independent or reunited with mainland China would be the same - they will be ruled by a Chinese majority.
    14
  1027. 14
  1028. 14
  1029. 14
  1030. 14
  1031. 14
  1032. 14
  1033. 14
  1034. 14
  1035. 14
  1036. 14
  1037. 14
  1038. 13
  1039. 13
  1040. 13
  1041. 13
  1042. 13
  1043. 13
  1044. 13
  1045. 13
  1046. 13
  1047. 13
  1048. 13
  1049. 13
  1050. 13
  1051. 13
  1052. 13
  1053. 13
  1054. 13
  1055. 13
  1056. 13
  1057. 13
  1058. 13
  1059. 13
  1060. 13
  1061. 13
  1062. 13
  1063. 13
  1064. 13
  1065. The problem with Taiwan is that it is large, homogeneous (there are two main ethnic groups in Taiwan), and has a long history as a distinct region, unlike Macau and Hong Kong. Whilst Macau is an international city of business (and quite a small city for Chinese standards), being mostly known for its gambling industry and attracting many rich Mainlander Chinese and foreigners, and whilst Hong Kong is also an international city which hosts many international businesses and is home to a large immigrant population, consisting of wealthy Europeans, South Asians who were brought over during British colonial times, an indigenous Chinese population, and a large population of recent Chinese immigrants from Guangdong (who came to Hong Kong to escape poverty or persecution), Taiwan is not an internationally renowned destination, Taiwan has a huge population of indigenous Chinese residents (though, 14% of the population of Taiwan are recent Chinese immigrants), and Taiwan is an entire Chinese Province, not just some small city full of rich immigrants and Chinese refugees; additionally, Taiwan has been administered separately from other regions of China for around 340-360 years, though it was only proclaimed as an independent province from Fujian in 1885. So, why is it so difficult for China to reclaim, or, more accurately, annex Taiwan? Is it because Taiwan is an American puppet, propped up by American guns? Or is it because Taiwan is controlled by the Kuomintang, with aims to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party and take control of all of China? Or is it because Taiwan is full of brainwashed Fujianese people who believe that they are a separate ethnicity from the Han Chinese? Well, actually, it is all of these things to some extent, though this doesn't explain the whole story, and these accusations are quite biased and hurtful. No, there is a major reason why Taiwan is still independent from China, and it is none of these reasons which I have listed. Unlike Macau and Hong Kong, Taiwan is not controlled by a foreign government. With Macau and Hong Kong, agreements on Sovereignty were the responsibility of external powers, those being China, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. On the other hand, this was only the case for Taiwan when it was under the control of the Japanese Empire, and even then, Japan had been ceded the territory of Taiwan in perpetuity, and this is why Japan conducted assimilation campaigns against the Taiwanese people whilst Taiwan was under its control, intending to permanently integrate Taiwan into Japan, politically, culturally, and ethnically. Meanwhile, concerning modern Taiwan, the modern Republic of China almost exclusively administers Taiwan, so the issue of giving up Taiwan is not just a cession of a single region but a cession of the ROC's entire Sovereignty, which is why it is not likely to happen in the near future. While it is true that the Kuomintang, the former rulers of the ROC, have in recent history decided to align themselves with the Chinese Communist Party and now believe that Taiwan must be reunited with China under the rule of the CCP, given that it is unrealistic for the KMT to reunite Taiwan with the Mainland under its own rule, Taiwan is still independent. And, the primary reason for Taiwan's Independence is that the Taiwanese people themselves - not the recent Chinese immigrants but rather the indigenous Chinese residents - want some form of independence or autonomy, whether that is "De Jure Independence" or "De Facto Independence". These people have been living in Taiwan for hundreds of years. They have experienced life under various regimes, but throughout all of these regimes, they have never lost their Taiwanese identity. And their Taiwanese identity didn't originally pertain to the idea that Taiwan is an independent country; instead, the Taiwanese people have always identified with the island of Taiwan, at one time "Taiwan Prefecture of Fujian Province, China", at a later time "Taiwan Province of China", at a later time "Taiwan Dependency of Japan", and at a later time "Republic of China (Taiwan)". Whilst the Mainlander Chinese, both the actual Mainlanders and the Mainlanders in Taiwan alike, love to refer to the Taiwanese as "Fujianese (and Hakka) immigrants in Taiwan", this designation is blatantly false. Ask yourself; does a Shanghainese person refer to himself as a Zhejiangese immigrant in Shanghai? No, he identifies as Shanghainese because that is his province. Likewise, the Taiwanese people are NOT Fujianese, at least not anymore. Nowadays, most Taiwanese people identify as Taiwanese, regardless of whether they believe that they are independent or not, and they only consider Fujian to be a distant ancestral homeland, rather than their own current homeland. Of course, the Hakka do often identify as Hakka, rather than as Taiwanese, but this is because the Hakka have never possessed their own province, whether in Taiwan or in Mainland China, and identify with the Hakka culture rather than with a hypothetical "Hakka Province". So, clearly, there does exist a distinct Taiwanese identity, even though the Chinese Communist Party and Kuomintang love to ridicule this identity, referring to the Taiwanese as mere Fujianese migrants. The only question of Taiwanese identity is whether the Taiwanese are a subgroup of the Han Chinese, or whether they are an independent ethnic group. Critically, the history of Taiwan is unique amongst regions of China; Taiwan was colonised only in (relatively) recent history by China, starting from 1683; though, Han Chinese people from Fujian Province began migrating to Taiwan in large waves during the early-1600s, to work for the Dutch East India Company and for the Kingdom of Tungning. Taiwanese people, for the first 2-3 centuries of living in Taiwan, experienced life as frontiersmen, expanding the territory of China by Sinicising the indigenous Austronesian natives and by increasing the population of Han Chinese on the island. Originally identifying as Fujianese, these people eventually came to identify as Taiwanese, and this identity was cemented through the shared experience of living in Taiwan as immigrants for hundreds of years, separated from China by the Taiwan Strait, and trying to adapt to life in a isolated island full of indigenous tribes and deadly diseases. In 1885, the Qing Dynasty proclaimed Taiwan to be its own independent province, separate from Fujian Province. Of course, Taiwan had already effectively been separate from Fujian since China had begun colonising the island, given that Taiwan and Fujian were separated by the large Taiwan Strait. The proclamation of an independent "Taiwan Province" was not very remarkable; life in Taiwan continued as normal, and most people did not care whether Taiwan was its own Chinese province or not; they mainly identified with the island of Taiwan, loosely identifying as ethnically Han Chinese (in the same way that the American settlers from the United Kingdom would primarily identify as American). Of course, shortly after the 1885 declaration of Taiwanese province-hood, Taiwan was ceded to Japan in 1895. The Taiwanese people initially resisted the Japanese invasion, with local militias defending Taiwanese villages, and with high-ranking Qing-loyalists proclaiming "the Democratic State of Taiwan". Regardless of self-identification and beliefs, the various ethnic groups on the island, which consisted of various Chinese peoples, such as the Hoklo Taiwanese, the Hakka Taiwanese, and the Mainlander Chinese officials stationed in Taiwan, as well as the various indigenous Austronesian tribes, all tried to defend Taiwan from a foreign Japanese invasion, and they resisted Japanese rule for a period of time after China ceded Taiwan to Japan. However, eventually, these people were defeated, and Japan gradually began to absorb Taiwan into its territory, such as by educating the Taiwanese in the Japanese language (this programme took several years to become successful, of course), and also by making the Taiwanese believe that they were citizens of Japan, and also by making the Taiwanese believe that they were ethnically Japanese. Nowadays, the Taiwanese no longer identify as Japanese. Even though most Taiwanese people have favorable views towards modern Japan, they would certainly not support Japan if it again decided to start invading and occupying all of its Asian neighbours, as it did 80 years ago. However, despite this fact, the Taiwanese people no longer identify strongly as Han Chinese either. First and foremost, the Taiwanese are a settler people, just like the Americans and the Australians. Secondly, the Taiwanese people love their island above all else, and their loyalty to their island is more important than their loyalty to any external government which might have control over the island. And thirdly, the Taiwanese identify strongly with their unique cultural experience, because this is the only history which they know. They never experienced the Xinhai Revolution. They never experienced the Warlord Period of China. They never experienced proper rule under the Republic of China (this only occurred from 1945 until 1949, but during that time, Taiwan was subjected to the February 28 Incident and Martial Law). And they also never experienced China's Communist Revolution, Cultural Revolution, and Economic Revolution (1978- and onwards, instigated by Deng Xiaoping). So, how can the Taiwanese identify as Han Chinese if they have experience history completely differently from the people living in Mainland China? (Continued below.)
    13
  1066. I am Taiwanese, and I can share my vivid memory back to the horrible incident of the massacre I read from newspapers and leaked videos in 1994. The incident is briefly described in Wikipedia. Why do I mention "leaked videos"? That's because in 1990s China was like nowadays North Korea -- every information about China had to be censored, and propaganda must be positive and politically correct. All the tourists with camera could only filming what CCP's directors assigned to, otherwise they would be regarded as spies and be arrested. When the families of the victims arrived in the county of the incident, they soon noticed that they were restricted where they could go, and lots of local policemen kept watching them. All the videos filmed by the families of the victims had to be reviewed by CCP officials, and be deleted if the CCP officials felt any negative and politically incorrect in videos. Some Taiwanese did not comply with the censoring rule, and risked their lives by hiding some video tapes from China's censorship. After leaving China and back to Taiwan, they gave their video tapes to Taiwan TV stations to reveal the truth of what happened and how they were treated in China. At first the official information of the incident from the police was locked to as simply an accident. But when the families of the victims were introduced to see the burned ferry, they noticed the information from the police was deceptive and incorrect. They felt angry that the police tried to fool them with a childish police reasoning! That ferry was made of iron, and there was an iron door to the lower cabin of the ship. Inside the cabin, there were lots of pieces of human flesh still sticking on the floor and walls of the cabin. The families of the victims reasoned out what happened to the deceased before they died: The victims were locked inside the cabin after being robbed, then those robbers pouring gasoline on the top of the ferry, and set fire before those robbers left. The victims tried banging on walls and hoped some ships nearby hearing the banging sounds and come to rescue them. Unfortunately, they were burned alive with their screaming in an iron coffin. The families of the victims argued with the police that it was a murder crime event, but the police forcefully wanted them to swallow the decision already made by the police. The deed of the police made the families of the victims furious, and started to protest, which causing the suppression from the police. Someone was filming what the police barbaric action to them; but the police grabbed the camcorder, pulled out the tape, smashed and destroyed it on the ground. When the police thought they had covered up their barbaric action, another camcorder had already recorded the same scene tens of meters away. The video secretly shipped back to Taiwan, and broadcasted it through Taiwan TV stations. In 1990s, Taiwanese could watch CCP's CCTV satellite programs, so we could keep an eye on the activities of the families of the victims through Chinese censored TV news. We knew the families of the victims in China were not happy about Chinese police's action, but what did the CCTV propaganda say? CCTV news showed a local government official kindly shook hands one by one with the families of the victims, with narration: ALL WERE HAPPY and GRATEFULLY THANKS TO THE HOSPITALITY OF THE KIND MOTHERLAND. Taiwanese was further infuriated by the CCTV news, and noticed the one wanted to cover up the whole incident was not only by the local police, but also the local government. Taiwan government started trying to intervene the investigation processes of the incident, and threw all the suspicious points in that incident for Chinese government to answer. Because of the intervention of Taiwan government, Chinese county police changed their attitude from simple accident to murder robbery incident, and soon arrested SO CALLED robbers in just a few days. The police showed the guns that the robbers carried during the crime scene in CCTV news, but later strangely there were totally different guns shown in the jurisdictional court before executing those robbers. So more suspicions were still lingered: Why different guns were shown in public? Did those SO CALLED robbers actually the ones killing victims? What and why did Chinese government want to cover-up in the first place? The shadow of the incident was one of the points for Taiwanese to distrust Chinese governments and their officials, and push Taiwanese further away from China. The CCP today does not change at all after decades -- Still likes to cover-up everything that is negative and politically incorrect about China from the Chinese and the rest of the world.
    13
  1067. 13
  1068. 13
  1069. 13
  1070. 13
  1071. 13
  1072. 13
  1073. 13
  1074. 12
  1075. 12
  1076. 12
  1077. 12
  1078. 12
  1079. 12
  1080. 12
  1081. 12
  1082. 12
  1083. 12
  1084. 12
  1085. 12
  1086. 12
  1087. 12
  1088. 12
  1089. 12
  1090. 12
  1091. 12
  1092. 12
  1093. 12
  1094. 12
  1095. 12
  1096. 12
  1097. 12
  1098. 12
  1099. 12
  1100. 12
  1101. 12
  1102. 12
  1103. 12
  1104. 12
  1105. 11
  1106. 11
  1107. 11
  1108. 11
  1109. 11
  1110. 11
  1111. 11
  1112. 11
  1113. 11
  1114. 11
  1115. 11
  1116. 11
  1117. 11
  1118. 11
  1119. 11
  1120. 11
  1121. 11
  1122. 11
  1123. 11
  1124. 11
  1125. 11
  1126. 11
  1127. 11
  1128. 11
  1129. 11
  1130. 11
  1131. 11
  1132. 11
  1133. 11
  1134. 11
  1135. 11
  1136. 11
  1137. 11
  1138. 11
  1139. 10
  1140. 10
  1141. 10
  1142. 10
  1143. 10
  1144. 10
  1145. 10
  1146. 10
  1147. 10
  1148. 10
  1149. 10
  1150. 10
  1151. 10
  1152. 10
  1153. 10
  1154. 10
  1155. 10
  1156. 10
  1157. 10
  1158. 10
  1159. 10
  1160. 10
  1161. 10
  1162. 10
  1163. 10
  1164. 10
  1165. 10
  1166. 10
  1167. 9
  1168. 9
  1169. 9
  1170. 9
  1171. 9
  1172. 9
  1173. 9
  1174. 9
  1175. 9
  1176. 9
  1177. 9
  1178. 9
  1179. 9
  1180. 9
  1181. 9
  1182. 9
  1183. 9
  1184.  @Asianometry  Thanks! The problem with the "cultural divergence" theory is that Taiwan is still currently in the process of diverging from Chinese culture. Additionally, Taiwan is still officially under Chinese (ROC) control, which makes it very difficult for Taiwanese culture to become nationalised and centralised. Taiwanese culture is not very well defined, even though it is certainly real, mainly as a result of Taiwan's difficult political status, and also due to the young age of the Taiwanese Nation. Though many families have been living in Taiwan for hundreds of years, the decision of several (not all) Native Taiwanese to declare themselves as a separate ethnic group and nation has been a more recent phenomenon, most probably beginning during the White Terror period of Taiwan. Taiwan's Democratisation only began a few decades ago, and prior to that, Taiwan was under the control of a strict Chinese regime which did its best to ensure that Chinese culture would be retained and that Taiwanese culture - whatever that is - would be permanently erased. Given that Taiwan is such a young nation with such an undefined culture and such a tense political situation, with no effective "motherland" (given that the "Taiwanese Motherland" is currently under Chinese control), it's very difficult to know who is actually Taiwanese and who isn't; vague surveys with questions that are designed to derive specific answers and with very small (and often rigged) sample spaces are not a very accurate indication of general public sentiment in Taiwan, regarding Taiwan's culture and nation-hood. Meanwhile, whilst most Overseas Taiwanese do identify to a small extent with Taiwan, it can probably be said that the majority do not fully regard "Taiwanese" as an independent nationality or ethnicity, and probably have wildly differing opinions from one another in regards to what it means to be Taiwanese; a significant number of Overseas Taiwanese perhaps identify as Han Chinese, and it is quite difficult to distinguish these people from Overseas Mainlander Chinese. With the future status of Taiwan being very uncertain, and with the strength of China increasing, Taiwanese culture will probably continue to radically change and be redefined throughout the years. It's quite possible that different groups within Taiwan may begin to disagree on their own definitions of what Taiwanese culture actually is, given that Taiwanese culture is not very ancient; if you go back far enough, Taiwanese culture is just Han Chinese culture, and pro-independence Taiwanese obviously don't want people to make that connection, so they're going to place more emphasis on recent changes and trends in Taiwanese culture, which, by their very nature of being recent and not integral to traditional Taiwanese culture, can easily become points of disagreement even amongst the pro-independence Taiwanese themselves.
    9
  1185. 9
  1186. 9
  1187. 9
  1188. 9
  1189. 9
  1190. 9
  1191. 9
  1192. 9
  1193. 9
  1194. 9
  1195. 9
  1196. 9
  1197. 9
  1198. 9
  1199. 9
  1200. 9
  1201. 9
  1202. 9
  1203. 9
  1204. 8
  1205. 8
  1206. 8
  1207. 8
  1208. 8
  1209. 8
  1210. 8
  1211. 8
  1212. 8
  1213. 8
  1214. 8
  1215. 8
  1216. 8
  1217. 8
  1218. 8
  1219. 8
  1220. 8
  1221. 8
  1222. 8
  1223. 8
  1224. 8
  1225. 8
  1226. 8
  1227. 8
  1228. 8
  1229. 8
  1230. 8
  1231. 8
  1232. 8
  1233. 8
  1234. 8
  1235. 8
  1236. 8
  1237. 8
  1238. 8
  1239. 8
  1240. 8
  1241. 8
  1242. 8
  1243. 8
  1244. 8
  1245. 8
  1246. 8
  1247. 8
  1248. 8
  1249. 7
  1250. 7
  1251. 7
  1252. 7
  1253. 7
  1254. 7
  1255. 7
  1256. 7
  1257. 7
  1258. 7
  1259. 7
  1260. 7
  1261. 7
  1262. 7
  1263. 7
  1264. 7
  1265. 7
  1266. 7
  1267. 7
  1268. 7
  1269. 7
  1270. 7
  1271. 7
  1272. 7
  1273. 7
  1274. 7
  1275. 7
  1276. 7
  1277. 7
  1278. 7
  1279. 7
  1280. 7
  1281. 7
  1282. 7
  1283. 7
  1284. 7
  1285. 7
  1286. 7
  1287. 7
  1288. 7
  1289. 7
  1290. 7
  1291. 7
  1292. 7
  1293. 7
  1294. 7
  1295. 7
  1296. 7
  1297. 7
  1298. 7
  1299. 7
  1300. 7
  1301. 7
  1302. 7
  1303. 6
  1304. 6
  1305. 6
  1306. 6
  1307. 6
  1308. 6
  1309. 6
  1310. 6
  1311. 6
  1312. 6
  1313. 6
  1314. 6
  1315. 6
  1316. 6
  1317. 6
  1318. 6
  1319. 6
  1320. 6
  1321. 6
  1322. 6
  1323. 6
  1324. 6
  1325. 6
  1326. 6
  1327. 6
  1328. 6
  1329. 6
  1330. 6
  1331. 6
  1332. 6
  1333. 6
  1334. I worked for sun Microsystems for quite a number of years, I think about 25 or 26. So I totally understand how awesome Sun Microsystems was having started with them back in 1987. But before I worked at Sun Microsystems I worked at Apollo computer for about 4 and 1/2 years. What people forget is that Apollo computer actually came up with their workstation running a proprietary operating system called aegis and they shipped their first product in 1981 with the company starting in 1980. In fact when I went to work at Sun microsystems, I still felt that the Apollo computer hardware and software was Superior. In fact I would say it took son three or four more years before the software and easy Network connectivity came to be the same as Apollos. But I will say one thing about Sun that Apollo could never do, and that was the son understood how to meet customer needs. Apollo had very custom hardware and therefore costlier hardware where Sun would take a lot of things off the shelf. Not only that Apollo would always go for the highest performance, and Sun would go for the sort of performance that people expected, and that alone would cause their hardware and therefore product pricing to be lower. They hit the customer sweet spots, or Apollo was just too expensive. But even more critical than that even, sun Microsystems gave their sales force tremendous latitude. When sun and Apollo were duking it out in competition with a customer, son allowed their sales force to have much greater latitude in throwing in bargains and deals where Apollo had to make their customer sales force go back to the main sales people taking a lot of time. Sun Microsystems salespeople would win deals just because Apollo salespeople could not react fast enough. So all in all, Sun Microsystems had a much better corporation because even though I talked only about two companies back then, at one point in probably the early 90s there were easily JAWS companies.... And Jaws was an acronym for just another workstation. It was a dog eat dog business, and that's why sons total company infrastructure and incentives worked so well against all others!
    6
  1335. 6
  1336. 6
  1337. 6
  1338. 6
  1339. 6
  1340. 6
  1341. 6
  1342. 6
  1343. 6
  1344. 6
  1345. 6
  1346. 6
  1347. 6
  1348. 6
  1349. 6
  1350. 6
  1351. 6
  1352. 6
  1353. 6
  1354. 6
  1355. 6
  1356. 6
  1357. 6
  1358. 6
  1359. 6
  1360. 5
  1361. 5
  1362. 5
  1363. 5
  1364. 5
  1365. 5
  1366. 5
  1367. 5
  1368. 5
  1369. 5
  1370. 5
  1371. 5
  1372. 5
  1373. 5
  1374. 5
  1375. 5
  1376. 5
  1377. 5
  1378. 5
  1379. 5
  1380. 5
  1381. 5
  1382. 5
  1383. 5
  1384. 5
  1385. 5
  1386. 5
  1387. 5
  1388. 5
  1389. 5
  1390. 5
  1391. 5
  1392. 5
  1393. 5
  1394. 5
  1395. 5
  1396. 5
  1397. 5
  1398. 5
  1399.  @Asianometry  Do you know anything about how much contact the Taiwanese had with people living outside of Taiwan, and how easy/difficult it was to travel in and out of Taiwan (including to Mainland Japan)? I also think that it would be interesting to research the history of Taiwanese refugees who fled to Mainland China and other regions during the Japanese Invasion of Taiwan, and during the beginning of Japanese Colonial Rule in Taiwan. It will also be interesting to research the relationship between Taiwanese and Japanese people during the Colonial Period. I live in Australia, and I'm somewhat unique because I'm a fourth-generation Chinese Australian. I told my art teacher this one time and she told me that it's quite common, even though I've never personally met any other people who are anything more than 3rd-gen Chinese Australian, and this is even the case though I attend a high school which is (coincidentally) roughly 60% ethnically-Chinese. Whilst Australia only abolished the White Australia Policy back in 1973, Chinese were still migrating less frequently to Australia before that time, and large Chinese migrations to Australia occurred historically, during the Victorian Gold Rush of the 1850s-1860s, and also during the latter half of the Chinese Civil War. However, I'm not descended from these types of Chinese immigrants. Instead, through my maternal grandmother, I'm descended from Chinese people originating from Taiwan who were brought to Australia from Indonesia as Japanese Prisoners-of-War. My great great grandfather had allegedly fled Taiwan in 1895 following the Japanese Invasion, choosing to migrate to Java, Dutch Indonesia as a refugee. In 1936, my great great grandfather travelled back to Taiwan in order to retrieve a wife for his son, my great grandmother, and he brought her back to Java. My great grandmother, who was allegedly a distant relative of my great grandfather, was born and raised in Japanese Taiwan, and she had never formally lost her Japanese/Taiwanese nationality even whilst living in Indonesia; my grandmother has explained to me that both of her parents were Stateless, though I'm not so sure that my grandmother even has access to reliable records of nationality. In December 1941, my great grandparents and my great great grandparents living in Indonesia were arrested by the Dutch Indonesian Government and were deported to Australia for temporary internment during WWII, lasting until March 1946. During their internment in Australia, my grandmother was born here, receiving an Australian birth certificate, essentially signifying Australian citizenship. My great grandfather was apparently an intelligent man; he knew how to speak English, and he taught English whilst living in the camp; he probably even taught some Japanese people. However, my family hated the Japanese, I've been told, considering the Japanese to be the enemy, and being hostile to them even though many had been living outside of Japan for decades. My great grandparents and other Taiwanese in the internment camp for Japanese civilians wrote numerous letters to the Chinese consulate (presumably in Melbourne) to be repatriated to China, rather than Japan. Of course, with the realisation that Taiwan was now under Chinese control, rather than Japanese, my family begged to be returned to Taiwan Province. A Japanese ship called the "Yoizuki", with a Japanese captain, came to Sydney to pick up the Japanese and Taiwanese internees and repatriate them to their respective homelands. This caused panic amongst the Taiwanese, and one of my relatives is quoted as (roughly) saying to a prison guard "If they send me to Japan, please give me your revolver so I can shoot myself in the head." My family was successfully repatriated to Taiwan, Republic of China, sometime during mid-1946. They continued to live in Taiwan for several years, but they eventually abandoned the island in 1952, for reasons which are as of yet unknown to me. My grandmother then spent the rest of her young life living in Indonesia, with her parents having chosen to return to this country. Later, my grandmother traveled to Mainland China to study (which is where my great grandfather learnt English), and then she traveled to Hong Kong, and finally, she returned to Australia in 1978, bringing her husband and daughter with her; she had always possessed Australian citizenship. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatura https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_destroyer_Yoizuki
    5
  1400. 5
  1401. 5
  1402. 5
  1403. 5
  1404. 5
  1405. 5
  1406. 5
  1407. 5
  1408. 5
  1409. 5
  1410. 5
  1411. 5
  1412. 5
  1413. 5
  1414. 5
  1415. 5
  1416. 5
  1417. 5
  1418. 5
  1419. 5
  1420. 5
  1421. 5
  1422. 5
  1423. 5
  1424. 5
  1425. 5
  1426. 4
  1427. 4
  1428. 4
  1429. 4
  1430. 4
  1431. 4
  1432. 4
  1433. 4
  1434. 4
  1435. 4
  1436. 4
  1437. 4
  1438. 4
  1439. 4
  1440. 4
  1441. 4
  1442. 4
  1443. 4
  1444. 4
  1445. 4
  1446. 4
  1447. 4
  1448. 4
  1449. 4
  1450. 4
  1451. 4
  1452. 4
  1453. 4
  1454. 4
  1455. 4
  1456. 4
  1457. 4
  1458. 4
  1459. 4
  1460. 4
  1461. 4
  1462. 4
  1463. 4
  1464. 4
  1465. 4
  1466. 4
  1467. 4
  1468. 4
  1469. 4
  1470. 4
  1471. 4
  1472. 4
  1473. 4
  1474. 4
  1475. 4
  1476. 4
  1477. 4
  1478. 4
  1479. 4
  1480. 4
  1481. 4
  1482. 4
  1483. 4
  1484. 4
  1485. 4
  1486. 4
  1487. 4
  1488. 4
  1489. 4
  1490. 4
  1491. 4
  1492. 4
  1493. 4
  1494. 4
  1495. 4
  1496. 4
  1497. 4
  1498. 4
  1499. 4
  1500. 4
  1501. 4
  1502. 4
  1503. 4
  1504. 4
  1505. 4
  1506. 4
  1507. 4
  1508. 4
  1509. 4
  1510. 4
  1511. 4
  1512. 4
  1513. 4
  1514. 4
  1515. 4
  1516. 4
  1517. 3
  1518. 3
  1519. 3
  1520. 3
  1521. 3
  1522. 3
  1523. 3
  1524. 3
  1525. 3
  1526. 3
  1527. 3
  1528. 3
  1529. 3
  1530. 3
  1531. 3
  1532. 3
  1533. 3
  1534. 3
  1535. 3
  1536. 3
  1537. 3
  1538. 3
  1539. 3
  1540. 3
  1541. 3
  1542. 3
  1543. 3
  1544. 3
  1545. 3
  1546. 3
  1547. 3
  1548. 3
  1549. 3
  1550. 3
  1551. 3
  1552. 3
  1553. 3
  1554. 3
  1555. 3
  1556. 3
  1557. 3
  1558. 3
  1559. 3
  1560. 3
  1561. 3
  1562. 3
  1563. 3
  1564. 3
  1565. 3
  1566. 3
  1567. 3
  1568. 3
  1569. 3
  1570. 3
  1571. 3
  1572. 3
  1573. 3
  1574. 3
  1575. 3
  1576. 3
  1577. 3
  1578. 3
  1579. 3
  1580. 3
  1581. 3
  1582. 3
  1583. 3
  1584. 3
  1585. 3
  1586. 3
  1587. 3
  1588. 3
  1589. 3
  1590. 3
  1591. 3
  1592. 3
  1593. 3
  1594. 3
  1595. 3
  1596. 3
  1597.  @Asianometry  I recently traveled to Hong Kong, where I met my grandmother's cousin, who is in her early-50s, I believe. She is half-Taiwanese and half-Chinese from Beijing. She was born and raised in Mainland China, before migrating to Hong Kong; her husband's family has been living in Hong Kong since the early to mid-1900s. My relative in Hong Kong is pro-Chinese Unification, though none of her ancestors has ever lived in Japanese Taiwan, because her father grew up in Indonesia and Australia, whereas her paternal grandparents emigrated from Taiwan in 1895, in order to escape Japanese rule. So, none of her ancestors has ever lived under Japanese rule in Taiwan. At the same time, her mother comes from Beijing, and would have had a strictly-Chinese upbringing. Edit: According to my relative in Hong Kong, our family has lived in Taiwan for 35 generations, though these claims seem rather dubious. The only person within my family who lived in Japanese Taiwan was my maternal grandmother's mother, who was born in Japanese Taiwan in 1918, and who emigrated from Taiwan in 1936. She is the only person who would have been directly affected by the experience of living under Japanese rule. I met my great grandmother when I was a young child. I was born in Adelaide, South Australia, whereas my great grandmother was living in Sydney at the time of my birth. My immediate family migrated to Sydney when I was young, and I met my great grandmother again in 2007; at this point, I was old enough to remember meeting her. According to my grandmother, who lives nearby to me in Sydney, my great grandmother hated the Japanese. However, she knew how to speak the Japanese language. And, when my grandmother was a young child living in Taiwan and later in Indonesia, my great grandmother tried to teach her to speak Japanese, though she was apparently "lazy" and didn't end up learning Japanese. I believe that my great grandmother might not have hated Japanese people as much as my grandmother seems to think. Or maybe, she was using the logic that "to defeat your enemy, you must understand your enemy". She managed not to strangle any Japanese to death in the internment camp, so that says something, at least. Apparently, she spent her time in the camp polishing the floorboards of her living quarters with butter.
    3
  1598.  @Asianometry  Good idea. Except that I don't live in Taiwan. My maternal grandmother's paternal grandfather and mother were both born in Taiwan, in ~1880 and 1918, respectively. However, my maternal grandmother was born in Australia in 1944, in a POW camp for Japanese people. She was then, in 1946, repatriated to Taiwan, under the rule of the Republic of China, where she witnessed the February 28 Massacre. Then, her family migrated to Indonesia, where they had been living prior to having been captured and imprisoned during WWII. My grandmother then traveled to China and lived through the Cultural Revolution, where she met my maternal grandfather, who was a Chinese man who had been born and raised in Burma. They were married in Yunnan Province and then migrated to Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, my grandmother discovered that she had possessed Australian citizenship for her entire life, due to possessing an Australian birth certificate. She contacted the Australian Embassy in Hong Kong, and they informed her that she was a full Australian citizen and that she could return to Australia. So, she returned to Australia in 1978 with my maternal grandfather and my young mother, and so my mother has grown up in Australia for most of her life, though having been born in China and having spent her early childhood living in Hong Kong. My father migrated to Australia in 1990 from Shanghai, People's Republic of China, and so I have visited China several times because of him, and I learnt about Chinese culture to a small degree as a young child. However, I have never been to Taiwan, Indonesia, or Burma. I have been to Hong Kong, though.
    3
  1599. Whilst it can be said that many Han Chinese people live in various regions overseas but have never lost their Han Chinese identity, it can also be said that these people have never experienced the same kinds of cultural pressures as the Taiwanese. Whilst most Overseas Chinese have been persecuted or discriminated against by foreigners for being Han Chinese, naturally making them gravitate towards the Chinese Motherland, Taiwanese people have, throughout history, been persecuted for being Taiwanese; first by the Japanese Colonisers, and later by the Chinese Mainlanders (Waishengren) who came to Taiwan as refugees in the 1940s-1950s. And whilst the other groups of Overseas Chinese have always been united by their Han Chinese identity, persecuted by local majority groups such as the Indonesians and the (White) Americans, the Taiwanese have always been united by their shared Taiwanese identity throughout their island's tumultuous history, and the Han Chinese identity has only been drifting further and further away after more and more decades of separation from Mainland China. This separation has been further exacerbated by the oppression instigated against the Taiwanese by the Mainlander Chinese immigrants during the 1940s-1990s, and the hostile threats by the Chinese Communist Party against the Taiwanese people over the decades have also not done a good job of convincing them that they are Han Chinese. "You are Han Chinese, or else!" The impression which Taiwanese people get from the Chinese Communist Party is that it's illegal for the Taiwanese to maintain their individual identity, which involves being a settler people living on a beautiful island, and also being forced to live under Japanese rule, under a Kuomintang Dictatorship, and now as a Democratic State which lacks recognition from the international community. So, this is why the Taiwanese people are not keen on reunification with China, and this is why the Taiwanese people would prefer to maintain their unique culture, identity, and way of life, which is similar to Mainland China's, but also quite different, and distinctly Taiwanese.
    3
  1600. 3
  1601. 3
  1602. 3
  1603. 3
  1604. 3
  1605. 3
  1606. 3
  1607. 3
  1608. 3
  1609. 3
  1610. 3
  1611. 3
  1612. 3
  1613. 3
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. I've come across multiple people that believe in a conspiracy theory that China's "Later, Longer, Fewer" policy and the One Child Policy were not designed by the Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and the rest of the Chinese Communist Party. The theory argues they were tricked by economists working at Western charitable foundations (the Rockerfeller Foundation and Rockerfeller's "Population Council") who convinced them to implement the family planning and population control policies. The reasons they argue were not even based on managing the number of dependent children, but to curb the populations of Asia for racial supremacist reasons. As far as I can tell, it's all conspiracy theorist nonsense, but I've come across a 30 minute documentary on YouTube from 2013 titled "Population Control: The Eugenics Connection" that at least starts out arguing a similar point (I haven't been able to sit through the whole thing yet). The video quality is grainy but it's otherwise relatively well-produced (going as far as including the same background piano track I've heard in actual PBS documentaries grainy 1990s VHS tapes). My concern is that when the Chinese Communist Party eventually comes to the realization that they have made a massive mistake with their population management policies allowing the total fertility rate to fall so far below 2.1 children that they will end up reviving the conspiracy theory in their propaganda to whip up nationalism (in the same way China's propaganda arms have convinced people in China that COVID-19 did not emerge in China).
    1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1