Hearted Youtube comments on The Young Turks (@TheYoungTurks) channel.
-
1900
-
1300
-
1100
-
1100
-
979
-
954
-
926
-
877
-
859
-
858
-
841
-
779
-
765
-
752
-
716
-
697
-
692
-
678
-
673
-
644
-
644
-
639
-
623
-
612
-
600
-
598
-
597
-
594
-
583
-
576
-
563
-
549
-
546
-
544
-
537
-
535
-
533
-
529
-
522
-
508
-
498
-
497
-
495
-
489
-
486
-
484
-
479
-
475
-
463
-
461
-
460
-
448
-
446
-
442
-
436
-
435
-
433
-
429
-
425
-
425
-
423
-
420
-
415
-
412
-
396
-
395
-
390
-
387
-
382
-
376
-
375
-
371
-
370
-
369
-
368
-
367
-
364
-
360
-
352
-
349
-
348
-
347
-
346
-
344
-
340
-
335
-
335
-
333
-
332
-
331
-
327
-
326
-
I find it absloutely disgusting, sad and sick when people will say anything, write anything or do anything just to cash a check. Like how can he sleep at night knowing that he has played a sad, twisted, cruel and sick role in a family who lost their six year old son to one of the most sickening acts of violence and you are firing up your racist, ignorant, sad and loveless listeners to harass these poor innocent people. It's bad enough that all of those families have lost their children, it's bad that they have to live with that pain grief and heartache everyday and it's bad enough that they will never ever get to see, love, hug or spend with their chilldren and he wants to be a heartless jackass. Like really wherever he supposedly earned his journalism degree he needs to give it back and let someone who wants to be a real journalist actually earn it and use it to promote facts, non bias, accurate fair and truthful journalism something this piece of shit known as Alex Jones does not do.
325
-
325
-
323
-
321
-
321
-
321
-
320
-
319
-
318
-
317
-
317
-
316
-
315
-
315
-
313
-
309
-
306
-
304
-
303
-
303
-
301
-
300
-
299
-
296
-
295
-
293
-
292
-
291
-
291
-
288
-
285
-
284
-
284
-
284
-
283
-
282
-
278
-
273
-
272
-
272
-
271
-
270
-
269
-
267
-
266
-
265
-
265
-
265
-
264
-
264
-
263
-
263
-
262
-
262
-
261
-
258
-
258
-
258
-
257
-
257
-
256
-
255
-
255
-
255
-
252
-
In West Virginia Board of Education v Barnette, SCOTUS established no public school employee, or other government official, can force you to say or stand for the Pledge (or any other Patriotic ritual), or punish you if you dont. "If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein".
251
-
248
-
246
-
246
-
246
-
244
-
242
-
240
-
239
-
237
-
236
-
234
-
234
-
232
-
231
-
229
-
229
-
228
-
223
-
223
-
222
-
220
-
220
-
220
-
219
-
219
-
219
-
217
-
216
-
216
-
216
-
215
-
215
-
215
-
213
-
213
-
211
-
210
-
209
-
209
-
208
-
206
-
203
-
203
-
203
-
202
-
202
-
201
-
200
-
200
-
199
-
198
-
198
-
198
-
197
-
196
-
196
-
196
-
196
-
195
-
193
-
193
-
191
-
190
-
190
-
189
-
189
-
189
-
189
-
188
-
187
-
186
-
186
-
186
-
186
-
185
-
184
-
183
-
183
-
182
-
181
-
179
-
179
-
177
-
177
-
176
-
175
-
175
-
175
-
175
-
174
-
174
-
173
-
172
-
170
-
170
-
170
-
169
-
168
-
168
-
168
-
167
-
167
-
166
-
165
-
164
-
164
-
163
-
163
-
163
-
163
-
162
-
162
-
162
-
161
-
160
-
160
-
158
-
158
-
158
-
157
-
157
-
155
-
154
-
153
-
153
-
153
-
151
-
151
-
151
-
150
-
149
-
148
-
148
-
147
-
147
-
147
-
146
-
145
-
145
-
144
-
144
-
144
-
143
-
143
-
143
-
142
-
142
-
142
-
141
-
141
-
140
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
138
-
137
-
137
-
137
-
135
-
135
-
134
-
133
-
133
-
133
-
132
-
132
-
132
-
131
-
131
-
130
-
129
-
129
-
129
-
129
-
129
-
128
-
128
-
127
-
127
-
127
-
126
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
123
-
123
-
122
-
122
-
122
-
121
-
121
-
120
-
120
-
120
-
120
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
118
-
118
-
118
-
118
-
117
-
117
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
115
-
115
-
115
-
114
-
114
-
114
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
110
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
108
-
108
-
108
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
107
-
107
-
107
-
107
-
107
-
106
-
106
-
106
-
106
-
105
-
105
-
105
-
105
-
104
-
104
-
104
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
102
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
101
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
This video shows why we need Justice Democrats, Brand New Congress, Wolf Pac, Our Revolution, Represent US to take over and reform every level of government. Until we get big money out of politics/corruption out of politics and until we get real people (both progressives and even actual conservatives) elected in the majority of local, state and federal government, we will never get true representation in government. Unfortunately, that is going to take years if not a few decades for that to happen. And that is time that Americans don't have especially for issues like climate change, war, the economy, healthcare, gun control and so on. After all, corruption can not only drown out people's voices in government but it can also literally rob and kill people.
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
Sen. Corker didn't go far enough. Untruthful, unscrupulous, unintelligent, uncouth, inept, amoral, incompetent, unhinged, go ahead, folks, feel free to add to the list that has no end...
76
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
List of lawyers who decided not to represent ole Trumpster himself:
Brendan Sullivan, Williams & Connolly: Sullivan represented Oliver North after the Iran-Contra scandal, but won’t represent Donald Trump.
Paul Clement, Kirkland & Ellis: Clement defended DOMA — the Defense of Marriage Act — and was a leading litigator in the constitutional challenges to Obamacare. But he won’t represent the leader of the Republican party.
Mark Filip, Kirkland & Ellis: Filip is a big-time white-collar defense lawyer who served as Deputy Attorney General in the George W. Bush administration. He was unwilling to return to government work to help defend the current president.
Robert Giuffra, Sullivan & Cromwell: Guiffra represents Volkswagon in its litigation about using devices to thwart clean-air standards, and defended UBS from disaffected Enron shareholders. Defending Trump’s financial dealings from Robert Mueller was apparently not something he wanted to do.
Emmet Flood, Williams & Connolly: Emmet Flood represented Bill Clinton in his impeachment hearing. Of course, Clinton was impeached (just not convicted), and we know that Trump prefers soldiers who never captured.
Robert S. Bennett, Hogan Lovells: Bennett represented Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones dispute. Seems relevant.
Theodore Olson, Gibson Dunn: Ted Olson represented George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore case where the Supreme Court chose the American president. And he wants no part of Trump.
[DM me for sources if you're that much of a prick]
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
Wow, the ad before this, about new laws in Idaho, combination of "stand your ground" and trespassing. Omfg, is this trickle down population control? If we don't do something, our laws are going to continue to reflect a continued degradation of the value of human lives. Well, unless, you're a billionaire like the ones who made these laws happen. Of course, that's already well on it's way (see the number of human beings living on the street, etc, etc), and it started with money-ism, er, capitalism, which is putting money over human lives. No? What percentage of human beings love the job they are doing in this system, how many are happy, healthy? Oh, and how is it working out for the health of our planet? Capitalism is money above everything else. No, Cenk, your beloved capitalism sucks sh*t. Since we have a self-loathing population (rooted in religion), no band-aids on money-ism is going to really fix our world. We need a whole new system that strongly incentivizes the health/safety of the planet (and all its creatures/plants) and the health and true FREEDOM of human beings. Oh, haven't watched the video yet, but by the title, money-ism is the root of it.
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
Is this the same CIA that stated Nicaragua, Cuba, Chile, Argentina, Vietnam, Korea, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Mexico, Granada, Panama, South Africa, Palestine, Libya, Syria etc were "enemy assets" and thus needed regime change or invasion to satisfy American Imperialism?
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
Republican senators receiving NRA funding:
$7,740,521 - Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)
$6,986,620 - Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC)
$4,551,146 - Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO)
$4,418,012 - Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC)
$3,879,064 - Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO)
$3,303,355 - Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)
$3,124,273 - Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)
$3,061,941 - Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH)
$2,896,732 - Sen. Todd Young (R-IN)
$2,861,047 - Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
Total NRA donations to republicans in 2016: $5.5 million
Total NRA donations to democrats in 2016: $0.1 million
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
I agree with Hasan. Sometimes it's hard to tell if what you are doing is not okay. Where I stand on it, as a woman, is if someone does something inappropriate the first time, I just tell them that I don't want them to do that to me. If it happens again, it's sexual harassment or sexual assault. I've been groped by a lot of men. You'd think the fact that I have shaved my head would clue them into the fact that I'm not interested but some people are just really dense. When I get groped, I make a big scene out of it and yell at them. Then, if they apologize, I treat it as water under the bridge. On multiple occasions, however, the same person has groped me in the same way, even though I had already told that person it was not okay to me. When that happens, it is clearly sexual assault because they know very specifically that I don't want them to do a certain thing to me and yet they have decided not to give me agency over my own body anyway. Those men (and potentially woman, although this hasn't been my personal experience) are sexual predators.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
CNN's whole list, this TYT clip didn't say it, so I googled and pasted it here: CNN's"definitive 2020 Democratic candidate power rankings" 1Joe Biden, 2Elizabeth Warren, 3Kamala Harris, 4Kirstin Gillibrand, 5Bernie Sanders, 6Eric Holder, 7Steve Bullock, 8Cory Booker, 9Mitch Landrieu, 10Sherrod Brown
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
Canadian here: If you’re interested, here are a few ideas.
It IS possible to have a free country with reasonable gun controls. The best place to start is probably with background checks. When my boyfriend applied for a long gun licence, using me as a reference, an officer called me to see if I had any concerns. They also checked for any criminal history or history of attempted suicide or other mental health issues.. These steps are pretty simple and can make a difference. Background checks would also would likely be acceptable to many Americans.
In Canada, handguns have stronger restrictions than long guns. You can own them if you belong to a gun club, but you have to carry them to and from the firing range in a secure case and, if you’re not going to the range, you need to keep them locked up at home. I realize this rule would be much harder to implement in America than background checks.
Of course, there are some criminals who have illegal guns, but you are at far less risk of being shot by an ordinary person who just looses it due to some provocation such a traffic incident or a fight. Also, you are less likely to be shot by police because they don’t have to do their jobs based on the assumption that everyone has a concealed gun. They have more freedom to talk to people and to use nonviolent methods.
Finally, I think Americans need to fight the proposed bill to allow silencers and to increase sales of military style weapons. My thoughts are with all the victims of gun violence at home and abroad.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Instead of hating women's bodies start worrying about Wal Mart taking jobs away from employees and having customers have to wait in line while their food start to melt from not being refrigerated for a long period at a time. With the danger of food borne pathogens to be of concern.
Meanwhile, there are so many registers not occupied with cashiers. So many people needing jobs and Wal Mart with their Greed can not hire people who need cash to buy food to eat, buy water, pay their bills, pay for their homes mortgages, pay rent, pay health nsurance, pay car insurance, pay car payments, etc....
But instead value so much the customers but have customers ring up their own groceries, bag their own groceries, and carry their own groceries or heavy merchandise to their vehicles. But let's talk about a little cleavage of a women's body shall we?
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
WOW , LOL , you're right , the dems are weak , and cowardly and the country knows it , that's why they did't win both , the house and the senate . the dems should start PUNCHING , and stop tap dancing , get some back bone and lose schumer , feinstein and pelosi . too many coward ass dems standing in line taking MONEY and getting rich , they make us look weak , they need to go fast , LMFAO .
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
I think the distinction here is between sexual harassment and sexual assault. Most of Louis C.K.'s incidents sound like sexual harassment, rather than assault. But, sexual harassment still yields significant power over the person being harassed, especially when he's powerful, famous, stronger, etc. When sexual harassment takes place in the workplace, as I think nearly all of these situations did, there need to be protections in place against being harassed at work. Sometimes with celebrities, we don't think of these as workplaces, but events their performing at, or on the set of a production it's DEFINITELY their workplace. If this happened in California, I believe there are still pretty stringent regulations for workplace sexual harassment, so this issue ought to open up some dialogue about implementing policies and procedures for these types of violations in the future. Listen, Louis C.K. knows very well he absolutely shouldn't be doing any of these things, so he gets no points for his belated remorse now that he's been caught. But, what about the people who not only tolerated this behavior but helped protect him from retaliation or silently looked the other way? I can't help feeling that had he EVER been discouraged or suffered consequences for his actions in the past, he likely would have thought twice before just brazenly asking to masturbate in front of a co-worker on a production set or at an award show appearance. It's not just that he's doing these things, it's that he- and others, are being allowed to do it out in the open, in the workplace and at public venues, giving it a level of acceptance that should NOT be tolerated. While I agree his violations are not as egregious as Weinstein or even Spacey (Damn you, Spacey-you were my favorite Hollywood actor! What a disappointment...), it's still a violation and acceptance or allowances for sexual harassment, assault, molestation, rape, violence, etc. is what has led to the rape culture in America where Louis C.K. might only go THIS far, but someone else may easily go just that much farther.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I'm a big time, yet fading, proponent of TYT, but this is a far reaching mish-mash report of connecting fragile spaghetti strings. Anna endulges the subjective emotional, and possible connective approach, yet fails to realize the logic she proports daily is failing at this moment. This is a movie stunt, regardless if it was labeled a stunt (w/quotations), this is a stunt. Sure, Quentin is upset, and so was she, they all had an "oh shit" moment, but beyond that as a reporting factor since 2003, or whatever timeline this transpired, is a contextual manipulation. Dear TYT, my patience is waning with the recent tide in your organization, and I am certainly leaning my loyalty (subjectively) to Jimmy Dore. He's the number 1, too bad you missed his reality...
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
So the rest of the world who have a program that works FAR BETTER than the US system (like many things) are stupid? Give me a break, Orrin. YOU are stupid...or maybe just wilfully ignorant of facts and statistics. Obamacare was a Republican program and admittedly a joke, but you idiot Americans got that program because you were too ignorant to do ANY REAL research on single payer. I live in Canada. I'd be dead today without my health care system. It's far from perfect, but it has saved my life many times, and for that, I am eternally grateful to Tommy Douglas, a Baptist minister, who fought for it here AND WON. Bernie Sanders does NOT need to be president to get Americans the health care they deserve. Ignorance is one thing. But I don't believe ignorance deserves a death sentence. Even the most wilfully ignorant people deserve to live and thrive. Your constitution guarantees you the right to life. If you die because you can't afford your medical bills, that right has been severely violated. Don't take that up with me. Take it up with your founders, one of whom was Thomas Paine, who many of you would call a "socialist" because he believed the govt REALLY had a responsibility to help the "welfare" of the American people. Think I'm taking the constitution out of context? You do that every day with the 2nd Amendment. Intellectual honesty, my friends. You deserve better.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Abilify is the most sold drug in the US. Its billed as a supplement to Anti-depressant, if the patient is also having suicidal thoughts, they take Abilify on top of their regular anti-depressant. The problem is Abilify's first and most common side effect is Suicidal thoughts.
The reason its doing so well is off-brand marketing, Doctors are prescribing Abilify for OTHER things then what its actually meant for, which is legal, as long as Abilify is approved by the FDA for SOMETHING, a Doctor can prescribe it for ANYTHING. And so its really just a matter of bribing enough Doctors, sell them on bullshit "Clinical studies show significant improvement in X, Y and Z" and here we are.
Just another example of what happens when Drug Companies are allowed to market their drugs directly to consumers, which only two countries in the world allow, New Zealand and.....
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's illegal to discriminate based on sex, whether man or woman, so if a woman identifies with being a man, she is protected, as would be a man who identified with being a woman. In either case, the law equally supports being a man or woman. To discriminate against someone based on their choice to be one or the other, where either is protected by law, would be violating one's rights, be they male of female. In any case, regardless of their choice, they are still one or the other and protected against discrimination.
The civil rights act was enacted to end discrimination against human beings based on that which they had no control over, in this case, their sex. It was intended to provide equal rights for all persons on the basis of race, religion, sex, ethnic background and all those things that people were being discriminated against because of, that were not of their control. Today, after more than 50 years of cultural development in our society, to "choose" not to recognize discrimination against a group of human beings based on their "choice" of sexual orientation is not in keeping with the fundamental reasoning on which the anti-discrimination laws were conceived. No one shall be deprived of the freedom to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, when it does not interfere with or deprive others of their right to do the same.
I pray that the Chief Justice who decides on this matter, writes something to this effect.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"We shouldn't erase * from history. We need to learn from it."
Do you listen to yourself? You are erasing history. The most pivotal moment in the history of slavery WAS the US Civil War and now that is being erased. You are even celebrating the removal of a perfectly legitimate (as in legally selected) US Supreme Court Justice because he wrote a decision which has not stood the 'test of time'.
The slave markets are gone. The slave ships are gone. Virtually all the history of the slave economy in the South is gone. Civil Rights museums in the South are so marinated in Black Racism, no White person wants to go to one.
So, what is to make White people in the South even think about slavery? Monuments, roads and parks ... and all of those are going away. See, one can't 'glorify' the Civil War without understanding the South supported Black chattel slavery while the North did not. That and States' Rights are the fundamental issues which brought about such a slaughter. But now, White people won't have to look at that anymore.
I guess White people in the South should be grateful?
"Slavery? What slavery? We don't talk about it. It never comes up. In fact, are you've got your facts straight ... How did all the Black people get here? From the Caribbean? What do you mean ~ we enslaved them? I don't think so. Besides, if we enslaved them, how did they become free? Wouldn't there be a Black Independence Day, or something? A Civil War? When? 1861 to 1865? You mean to tell me the 'South' fought a war against the 'North' for FOUR YEARS and it left no mark ... beyond freeing the supposed slaves? You would have thought a few monuments would have been erected to remind us of this, or something. What ... what do you mean they existed, but you tore them all down? That was a dumb-a** thing to do. You put them in Archive Buildings and 'Confederate Graveyards'? Who ever goes to 'Archive Buildings', or 150 year old cemeteries anymore? Man, you people aren't too bright."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ha, ha, LMAO. The government fines Wells. They do remember that THEY got rid of Glass -Steagal and replaced it with Graham - Rudman that allowed ALL this to happen in the first place right? Thank U Billary. They totally failed to monitor these banks activities or their portfolios, didn't monitor their standards at all, didn't review the quality of any of their portfolios, didn't monitor any of the rating agencies like Standard and Poor's, or Moody's to ensure that these were supposedly high quality mortgage notes being "re-bundled" and sold to investors as like AAA rated securities. I mean where was the SEC, the Banking Committee, the Federal Trade Commission, ANY of the NYSE or other exchange people? It goes on and on, even today. We are told it took like THREE years for the government to respond to complaints that Wells was creating totally fake accounts. This whole thing is a bad dream. The government wasn't just asleep at the switch they were totally brain dead and complicit. I worked in the lending industry myself prior to these events and basically knew, like any professional would, that these loans were fake loans based on fiction. Our government intentionally went along with it, kept interest rates low intentionally, thank you Alan Greenspan, to CREATE a fictional BOOM that had to end somewhere. It did. Right on the taxpayers doorstep. So NOW I'm supposed to trust them because they fined some company PEANUTS compared to what they and many others MADE off this . Yeah, right, sure! PLEEEEAAAASE!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
These corporate thieves want us to die, plain and simple. And they want to take our money while we die slowly through bad nutrition, lack of exercise, medical care, over-reliance of medications, mental illness, etc. And when they do deign to "help" us, they treat the symptoms of disease without treating the cause... so we have to pay for expensive treatment over and over and over again without getting to the true cause of what made us sick in the first place.
They see us as cattle... but they can't merely slaughter us like they would a cow; they have to do it in a slow, methodical, and deceptive manner that we can't or don't want to acknowledge. They are parasites who feed off of us all while calling us parasites for not pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps that they cut anyway through the cutting of jobs and social programs. They create a reliance then cut us off from it.
These are people who have given their humanity to a corporate system of power and profit and they want to rid the Earth of people who they see as not living up their standards. They are the true pimps and Nazis who hide in plain sight. Any way I slice it, that's what I see...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Will you guys please stick up for kratom again? We now have the FDA (who the DEA bounced the issue to after last years 'emergency ban') saying it's so dangerous and they put out a public safety strong warning. The DEA will schedule it according to what the FDA says. Basically they are touting the same false data again, saying all these people died from kratom when they did not (they all had other conditions and/or other drugs in their system). Then the FDA guy who has taken money from Big Pharma, of course, trying to act like they are scared that people are using it to get off opiates! BS. It works, it doesn't need more study or for Big Pharma to take the constituents out and spend billions to make it into a synthetic version of the real thing so they can patent and sell a less safe, less effective and likely much more addictive drug. That is what they do. And Scott Gottlieb said they would be glad to review it, but no pharma company has presented them with their version of it, as if it can't even be considered just on it's own, untainted by them. Please don't let these people get another effective and safe plant. Please go after this hard. We cannot sit back and watch them continually criminalize plants and trees for God's sake. It must stop and everyone is tired of Big Pharma always winning. When do we get to sue the govt. for trying to own nature? When do we sue the govt. for helping corporations stomp down competition? When do we sue them for violating civil liberties as far as our right to use nature as it is, to have choice over what we consume? When do we sue the govt. for repeatedly appointing people with stark conflicts of interest into regulatory positions, people who work for or have taken financial benefit from the very industry they regulate? That should be a crime. Expose Gottlieb and the whole dirty business of the corporate/regulatory revolving door. You did it last time, please help because they are going to take it this time if some big names with influence don't help us. Remember, the rehab industry and their partners in Big Pharma want people one methadone and suboxone, a couple of horrible killers that have terrible addiction problems. Kratom is a cousin of coffee and its mildly addictive and it has a ceiling effect and an incredible safety history. It's a supplement. The FDA took the testimony of people using it to treat symptoms and addiction (this was planned probably) to say it's a drug so you have to get it through Big Pharma and a doctor. That's how the game is played. But coffee is a drug too if you look at it that way as it treats low energy and is mildly addictive. Please stop them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1