Hearted Youtube comments on City Beautiful (@CityBeautiful) channel.
-
438
-
434
-
413
-
409
-
393
-
381
-
379
-
362
-
351
-
320
-
309
-
304
-
300
-
297
-
265
-
260
-
257
-
253
-
253
-
We must define the goals. If it is to draw people out of their cars. One must evaluate whether the money spent to increase subsidies by eliminating fares would be more effective at drawing more people out of their cars by improving service. For "choice" riders, cost is rarely the limiting factor, and poor service is much more likely to be a reason for not using transit. Now, whether this is the case probably depends substantially on the specific city, and existing service that is provided, and also any direct costs placed on driving.
More broadly there are other considerations, movement of people has a societal benefit (it's the reason we subsidize roads, cars, and transit in the first place) of enabling economic activity. Perhaps transit should be free for those reasons. On the other hand, it is also a limited resource, and placing a cost on it is a great way to help us effectively manage that resource. Of course, that argument would carry a lot more weight if we also applied it to driving.
245
-
241
-
236
-
215
-
214
-
214
-
213
-
207
-
206
-
195
-
192
-
185
-
183
-
179
-
179
-
174
-
173
-
172
-
171
-
170
-
165
-
159
-
153
-
153
-
145
-
141
-
139
-
132
-
129
-
129
-
125