Hearted Youtube comments on Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins (@SimoneandMalcolm) channel.
-
1300
-
1000
-
740
-
664
-
633
-
600
-
503
-
503
-
502
-
422
-
359
-
321
-
313
-
303
-
292
-
291
-
281
-
265
-
This is going to sound sociopathic via text, so please understand this is a deliberately value-free analysis and is not an endorsement of vigilantism in a moral sense.
In many ways, vigilantism helped build higher societies. No tribe emerged from the primordial aether with bureaucratized and abstracted concepts of legality and ethics which in any way resembled high civilizations.
Vigilantism was one of the costs "priced in" by social codes. If you screwed a man hard enough, he might just come for you. You can see this reflected in folk wisdom such as "nothing more dangerous than a man with nothing to lose". That cute little adage isn't saying "oh, those with nothing on the line try harder", it's warning that once someone has no chips left on the game board, they might flip the table.
History is replete with this echo: "surrender with honor", "allowing an exit", "chose to retire", etc. In our very safe, very insulated, very civilized world, these might seem quant or be accepted as received moral precepts, but they are based on a firm inherited calculus: every man, no matter how reasonable, has a point where he'll turn to tooth and claw, if only to make you bleed with him.
We might think of our age as one built on these costs, but so managed that we no longer pay them. Unjust words no longer result in duels, but we say slander is bad. The shopkeeper no longer has to beat thieves, because the justice system punishes theft. And the tribe doesn't have to mob-justice the degenerate who wrecked the common green, because social shame makes the idea of transgressing abhorrent, well before the thought of violence arises.
Or rather... our society was functional. For a blip of time in the late modernity, the West managed to reach an amazing peak. We'd priced in vigilantism to our social systems so efficiently that the vigilantism was no longer ever actioned. Unfortunately, over time this lead to virtuous violence being classed as mere violence, and morally equal to unjust violence. Like many modern ills, this wasn't felt at first, as the moral inertia of the old system propelled behavior that was no longer incentivized by the current market. Slowly, though, new actors came about in an age with new incentives, and they better adapted to their environment.
If a powerful CEO can get ahead with profit maximization through legal murder, and the only penalty is a fractional hit on a rocketing upward graph? Why not? The only external cost is some disapproval from people he doesn't care about. He's optimized for his environment, because he's recognized that the formerly "priced in" vigilantism behind that disapproval has been replaced with a memory of said vigilantism, like a vestigial clause in a defunct contract.
We've been at this point for some time. The grinding inhumanity of our era would have brought our ancestors to violence long before. We've constrained this through the anti-agentic "all violence is (equally) bad" propaganda.
So yes, this murder, and moreover, the general public acceptance, is indicative of social degeneration. But it's not a descent from normality. It's a return. A ball was thrown into the air, and for a time (the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries) it seemed to hang suspended at its apex, but it has now begun to fall.
The proper response is to recognize where we are, what we are, the historical anomaly we are exiting, and decide how to proceed.
261
-
260
-
256
-
255
-
251
-
245
-
230
-
228
-
228
-
My parents are Korean, and my sister and I were born here in the states. Basically, my parents convinced my sister and I, that we were such defective human beings, that we, on our own, decided that we should not reproduce. (All the while, they would encourage us to have kids. Note that we had high class rankings in school and my sister and I both went to an Ivy league school.) I am still aghast at having discovered that my mom was just tuning out everything we said, and just using emotional weapons against us to dismiss what we said and just shut us up -- but doing this in such a way, that it was portrayed like they were so much wiser than us and just thought everything we said was just stupid and terrible. I finally figured this out through my 40's, and I started asking my mom what she thought I had just said. It wasn't Alzheimers. She was just put together in such a way, that she never registered anything we said or thought it would matter. I don't know if I've explained this clearly, or even if anyone might believe me, but really, I don't know how to process this.
226
-
223
-
220
-
205
-
200
-
199
-
198
-
I'm an academic running a lab in a research-intensive US university, and I rely on federal funding to do medical research. Even though my job could be at risk, I cannot understate how grossly corrupt universities, academic medical centers, and the research enterprise are. We need a shake-up, because universities are failing in their fiduciary responsibilities to taxpayers who have given them the benefit of the doubt for decades. I'm a citizen first and a scientist second. As a scientist, I'm so overwhelmed with bureaucracy that I spend 100% of my regularly allotted effort on it. I'm no different from most of my peers. We then spend very little of our time actually thinking about science, doing bench work, and mentoring/training people. I would gladly take a pay cut to just get back time, energy, and cognitive space to do science, whether that's in a corporation, government agency, or reconceptualized university.
196
-
194
-
193
-
187
-
183
-
179
-
178
-
165
-
164
-
As a Nigerian, here's my simple answer: Bad geography, poor social and economic systems, poor political systems, failing legal and social institutions, dutch disease, tribalism and others. During the golden age of Islam, under Harun al-Rashid, the civilization was experiencing great economic, social and scientific development and Islam was moderatingbabd becoming more Secular until Orthodox pushback from Imams and others caused these changes to stop. Then, the Christian West embraced modernity and reform and advanced in all fields. The fact that Christianity abolished institutions like slavery, broke clan structures by removing cousin marriage, and stopped the ban on usary which led to stuff like capitalism and meritocracy, while islam refused to do all of this. Also, the colonialism excuse is just lazy and mainly used by tribalist Arabs as an excuse. Same way Pan-Africans use it as an excuse for Africa's failings.
164
-
161
-
161
-
159
-
157
-
155
-
153
-
152
-
152
-
151
-
151
-
151
-
148
-
148
-
148
-
148
-
146
-
146
-
145
-
145
-
144
-
141
-
141
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
139
-
137
-
130
-
130
-
130
-
128
-
128
-
128
-
127
-
127
-
126
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
122
-
121
-
118
-
116
-
116
-
114
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
110
-
110
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
106
-
106
-
105
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
101
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
100
-
99
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
Alright, woman veteran (US Navy) here adding my 2 cents, enlisted for 4 years and went to 2 deployments.
Most women I met have ended up single moms, and two of my good friends are into their third marriages.
There are lots of cheating and promiscuity. I met very few men faithful to their wives, and out of all the couples that happened during my 4 year stay, I only know of one that survived.
Personally, best way is to stay out of relationships while there which is what I did. I went to church with awesome bootcamp girlfriends and pretty much, most people I worked with thought I was a lesbian which was fine by me. Saved me a lot of drama.
I did end up marrying a few years later after I got back home to an amazing man, but Iām not the typical demographic you guys normally look at (immigrant, hispanic, from Miami). So I donāt even know if thatās helpful or not.
I donāt regret my time in the military because it helped me grow as a person, however to this day I donāt think thatās a healthy place for a woman. My humble opinion.
97
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
I had to tap out at 5. Was trying to get a girl, but ended up with all boys. But they are very healthy. I took some shit for marrying a younger woman, who was 21 at the time, but I now have a total of 5 kids. My oldest is 16, his class president, top of his class in every subject, and gets national awards for math, and was coding at the age of 11. AThe next oldest is on the same trajectory. They are taller than me too. I lift weights with them, teach them how to garden, and whenever possible to be a leader. Leaders live better lives. I teach them about girls too, try to red pill, not black pill them. It's interesting seeing them surpass me in certain mental areas. I had a brain injury in Iraq in 2004, when I was less than 50ft from a bomb that went off. I'm not stupid, but I sometimes have to sit and think about things twice as long as I ought to in order to figure something out. But my boys, wow are they smart. I blame it on the home cooked food.
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
Regarding the "why aren't people buying it?" question, I think all three answers provided are corrrect, meaning both of Malcolm's, and Simone's. Considering Malcolm (dis)missed Simone's point, I'll try to steelman it here. There are the kind of people who are "woke" in the same way there are christians who never pick up a bible. They conform to the ruling religion, but they aren't interested in the theology. As such, it becomes much the same as why you have the US having a majority of christians, yet christian games fail. Because people aren't interested in a "christian product". They might be interested in preventing anti-christian products, but they won't actually want a christian product.
Another key point, relevant for the true believers of wokeism, is that woke products are painful. They're not fun, they're not pleasant. And as such, I think someone who is constantly running an inquisition against their "friends" and either have their scorn, or worse, their approval and watchful eye, will have enough pain in their lives that playing something to reinforce it is just extra agony.
70
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
I think you guys are over complicating things. If the Wachowski effect is real, it probably has nothing to do with gender and female vs male brain types and is far more simple: it's brain damage. Decreased brain function is seen with things as simple as too few vitamins, imbalanced hormones, or a bad physical injury. Is it not plausible that injecting people with these toxic chemicals, unnatural hormones, and chopping off body parts puts the brain in a state of shock and damage? Studies would have to be done, but I would wager that a man who has undergone this "change" has more in common, brainwise, with drug users, severe car accident victims, or people undergoing long term illness treatment than women.
58
-
58
-
The key distinction is between organic and inorganic worldviews, not state-enforced versus non-state-enforced. Organic worldviews, supported by the state, market, and culture at all societal levels, thrive (e.g., medieval Catholicism), while inorganic ones, upheld solely by the state, are unsustainable (e.g., Soviet communism).
The problem with Iran is not that Islam is integrated into the state, itās that itās only integrated in the state.
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
God, I wish the government would help with fertility medicine - and I'm generally not someone who wants the government to help with much. Mary Harrington in a recent interview talked about how feminism changed from having "care" to "freedom" as the driving force, and it really shows in all policy around reproduction. For instance, my fertility medicine specialist wanted me to keep having miscarriages before trying medical interventions. When I informed her that, knowing what i know about my body, this was a moral issue for me (basically choosing to put my babies to death for no reason) she acted like i had two heads. It was somehow morally worse to consider my "clumps of cells" as babies, because of the ideological implication, than it was to insist that a woman to through the physical and emotional pain of miscarriage without even trying interventions. Honestly, at that point, i believe that this trained fertility doctor would have rather that someone like me never became a mom.
Jokes on her, I found a lovely Catholic clinic in Colombia, took my embryos on a plane, and had my baby last year.
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
I didn't understand much about traditional mechanics before either, until I was with what is now my wife.
My sister, for example, couldn't understand why she obey me in almost everything; it seemed inconceivable to her that a man could say something and that she would do it almost no question asked. She even said it was something like a rug.
So I asked my (girlfriend at the time) wife, why do you listen to me when I tell you some things? And she told me something fundamental, "Because I chose you, I know that you read a lot, you inform yourself, you are sensible and we have an almost identical scale of values,also you have never hurt me or abused me."
And that's where I understood where all this "obeying your husband" comes from, it's not obedience, it's that women authentically admire their husbands, and by admiring them they respect and take into great consideration what they may say. That says much more about women's partner selection than men's.
I'm not saying that men can't admire their wives, but if you are the sex that does not have the privilege of the passive role of courtship you cannot be picky, that is why men in general terms do not ask much of women to enter a relationship. (Or at least not much in relation to the demands of the average woman). Most men standard is be atractive fisicaly to me and have a decent personality that is compatible with my values... no much more...
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
The reason why the highly religious would reject this is pretty obvious. To me, what is more interesting is why "progressives" would reject this. I don't really think they are hypocritical, just evil. My two cents:
The reason why progressives don't want to accept this view, such as that guy you showed in the video is because of the centrality of rebellion and anti-authoritarianism in their meta-narratives. It isn't JUST the hedonism, with these people rejecting hedonistic pleasure as central focus of their life.
To them, having any "non-straight" sexuality means you are part of an oppressed group, who society is maliciously trying to coerce into a rigid and oppressive framework. The role of this person then, is to act in a way conducive towards collective liberation, by "living out their truth". They have to actively reject the system, and live in "counter-cultural" way (hence, blue hair, dysfunctional sexual lives, etc.). In this case, any "non-straight" man who engages in a normal marriage is a class traitor, going against the interests of the collective and reinforcing the oppressive social norms meant to control them. Your personal freedom is not relevant at all, it is you class freedom that matters. To "live authentically" is to live in rebellion against the system, and all actions that go along with the system are definitionally "inauthentic". This also is why practically everything promoted by the urban monoculture is so dysfunctional, an oppressive system will want good worker drones, and doing the total opposite of everything is wants will simply lead to total personal dysfunction. And yes, this is a major aspect of why progressivism is totalitarian.
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
I've been schizoposting about dragons re: this phenomenon for years now. Dragons used to be these huge tyrannical hoarders, canibals and kidnappers, but now they're your pets, you ride them, there's dragon boyfriend erotica, the dragon is just misunderstood it's the humans who are evil (I'm thinking about that recent Netflix film...) Down with the degeneracy, make dragons great again!
Simone is totally right near the end, we wear things because we think they're cute, and because of what other girls think, I can't really recall anyone outright dressing for a man. Even in older books, Jane Austen for example, it's always "This shawl is so lovely!" or "I hope Lady So-And-So likes my dress!" or "Ugh that colour makes her look choleric..." Men can't even reliably tell if we have make up on, if there is such a thing as "dressing for men" it's enforced by the female social hierarchy.
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
lived in Busan, South Korea for 5 years. engaged to a Korean man. needless to say... I'm early 30s now and he will be joining me in Upper Midwest USA where we will start our family. Malcom is 100% right about the crazy social issues in Korea. I literally could NOT stand it. I could NOT stand the disrespect I felt towards "blue collared workers" there... coming from Michigan it made noooo sense and was almost the opposite of how I was raised haha. like um... electricians and snow plow drivers and cleaners are a million times better and more useful than some office waste of space pushing unnecessary paperwork and drinking too much Maxim insta-coffee, oh and online shopping but "pretending to be working so hard" doing overtime??? lol.
I started having culture shock breakdowns where I'd purposely make myself look ugly and mess up my hair right next to people fixing their hair with their brand name shit on hahahahaha. if you are a strange, nonconformist American... you will slowly go insane there if you spend too long and try to settle... trust me. you can adapt some but you will never feel right. lol. things do seem very strange and cult-like there... probably why cults are so popular in general there too hahaha. chaebols also used to do creepy "mass games" like you see in North Korea too... like where everyone in the company has to do the same movements/dances and hold up cards and stuff. just go search for it. and the test obsession, and rote memorization is education... lack of creativity in the class. really didn't like it compared to my American style education. if this crazy competitive, power structure, shit ever went away in Korea... it would be SO AMAZING. the food, the culture other than the hierarchal obsession, the cool cafes and third space ideas in cities, the conveniences they figured out perfectly in their infrastructure... literally love it.
also... pro tip: don't follow friendly young Koreans that speak English to you and promise you a "cultural experience" if they approach you in Seoul. they are from a cult, and you should tell them to screw off lmao.
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
So Iāve been a homeschooler for six years. From what Iāve noticed, most homeschooling parents prioritize good parenting over teaching. āEducationā might only take a few hours a day, but things like manners, health habits, wholesome interests/hobbies, quality time, chores, nurturing, big conversations, relationships, etc. take priority. Schools do things in reverse: school/educational skills take priority over everything else. Even home time revolves around preparing and recovering from school.
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
I grew up in the Netherlands, raised by a single mother who didnāt earn much, but I never felt poor. Although she often claimed she was "bad" with money, she was incredibly skilled at managing it without overspending. For example, she shopped at multiple grocery stores with different lists, always knowing which stores had the best prices and quality. She never just bought the cheapest option, but rather sought the best value for money. My mother would mentally calculate the total cost of our groceries while shopping, so she always knew the bill before we reached the checkout. She also had a keen eye for catching outdated or incorrect prices and could memorize the prices of our regular items, immediately noticing any increases. We rarely ate out, preferring to cook meals that would last for several days.
What I find particularly interesting is how she often compared our life to her own childhood, which was even more financially challenging. Her family, like many working-class families at the time, could only afford meat twice a week. They made meatballs with lots of breadcrumbs, cooked large amounts of gravy, and rationed portions to make it last the entire week. People often forget that compared to most people in history we live a life of luxury.
35
-
Pacific Islander, Catholic, massive families, 3-4 generations, 5-11 kids per family.
We donāt call our family āfriendsā, not even cousins. Itās assumed that weāre in good relations by default. Even if thereās trouble between people in the family, weāre family, so there are ways weād avoid fighting and there are lines weād never cross. Weād still take a bullet for each other, family is above everything.
Friends would be a step BELOW cousins, cousins being almost equal with siblings however.
Friends come over all the time and connects us with other communities.
More communities = more exposure = more opportunity.
Huge families are so fun, Iām blessed to be part of one.
Start networking.
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
It is definitely and unambiguously the case that both Malcolm's religious language and Simone's non-religious language should be made available. The Malcolm's religious language will tend to appeal more to people with religious backgrounds and Simone's non-religious language will tend appeal more to people with atheistic backgrounds. The parallel reading of the two texts will facilitate the understanding of the language more foreign to the reader, the mutual understanding between religious leaning and atheist leaning groups, and the cooperation between those groups.
Malcolm tends to be better at saying interesting things, while Simone tends to be better at rephrasing those things in ways that are less susceptible to misinterpretation. For example, on one occasion Malcolm said that he has a strong aversion to women with a high body count, then Simone clarified that he meant a sexual aversion, not a general aversion, and illustrated this with the example of Malcolm living in a brothel district in Korea. While this does suggest that Malcolm's statements would benefit from refinement by Simone, such refinement seems at least somewhat distinct from the "nuking out" of Malcolm's religious language, and I strongly reaffirm the initial sentence of this post.
Malcolm's potentially misinterpretation religious language also invites the possibility of potentially fruitful elaboration on important religious topics in ways Simone's language would not. For instance Malcolm's use of the phrase "sons of man" invites elaboration on the relation between that and Jesus's referring to him self as "the son of man" as in John 9:35-37, it's relationship to Jesus also referring to himself as the son of god, and the further relationship between being the son of god and being the son of man, both in Jesus's case and in general. This further invites elaboration on the term "son of the devil" as in Acts 13:10.
Please keep both languages, as each has a distinct value all it's own, and the parallel consumption of both languages has a distinct value all it's own.
Please also address the hedonistic consumption of and engagement with interesting ideas such as those you present in lieu of doing obviously pragmatically more beneficial but less interesting and enjoyable labor.
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
Ok so I'm going to answer a few questions that came up having spent 7 years in Israel, while now in the U.S. Over the last twenty or so years, it has become more and more difficult to get a gun in Israel. Partly this is the government being more afraid of the occasional, "Wild Weed," (Jewish fanatic.) But mostly, it's a combination of complacency and an ever-expanding bureaucracy making it not worth the effort, paperwork, and long wait times. The day this massacre happened, the government reversed policy and issued 10,000 rifles, and this will doubtless result in a permanent change.
Gun ownership is open carry only. Concealed carry is not allowed. They want any potential terrorist to see all the guns around and decide that his likelihood of success is so low as to not be worth it. You can get a gun if you are a former soldier, involved in security in any way, or if you have a job or residence in a dangerous area. It is reviewed by a committee before approval.
The communities by Gaza were built in the 50's as border outposts back when the secular socialist movement that built the country was in it's prime. But as the secular Israeli society that created them aged and became more and more progressive in the modern sense, they lost a lot of their edge. Had this happened to a settlement in the West Bank, the terrorists would not have had nearly the success they did here.
There was just a lot of complacency that the army, the intelligence services, and the local security teams had the problem covered. The Arabs have never carried out an attack this well-coordinated and clever before. All of the complacency came back to bite them in the most horrible way.
As for Jews with guns, well, I think a lot of us are just better off than most and are able to live in places where personal security isn't an issue, and so have the luxury of being consumed by their progressive pieties. I'm a Modern Orthodox Jew living in the U.S. suburbs, my wife is more liberal than I. Even she just agreed we need to buy a gun in light of the security situation. I have been learning how to shoot and hopefully will have one soon. Me and A LOT my Jewish neighbors.
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
31:20 - Women have a bimodal distribution of sexual expression because historically they might be in one of two scenarios. I realised this exact same thing! The 'slave' archetype is literally a survival mechanism that is deeply encoded to be resorted to because in deep history many women had to survive like this, and play the part well enough that they would be kept. Its very dark. This is why I dislike discourse that makes light of BDSM - look at the evolutionary context, and you come to very dark places.
The other side of the coin is that, of course, male sexuality is bi- or tri-modal. Being a husband to one, or few wives, being an incel, and being a warlord. The 'Master' sexual archetype is just as evolutionarily encoded, and at its core derives from a real desire to own, rape, and torture.
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
I got a chuckle. We call it "booping" and it redirects. There is also "Stand in the corner" and "Ok, now decide which toys you want me to bag up and hide OR you comply with cleaning them up..." They all work most of the time. I never believed in any form of corporal punishment, either spanking, booping, threatening the loss of toys, etc. when my eldest child was growing up. He was our only child for 10 years and his childhood, and our experience of parenting was very different compared to having 3 more boys back to back to back and now we're managing 2 toddlers and an infant and a teenager and the toddlers in particular require a lot of redirect when they're attempting to be outright destructive (out of curiosity or just playing too rough in some way) or obstinate. My toddlers do have meltdowns in public sometimes, they don't sit still much in church, they're very dynamic boys and we've bopped them in public with a stern "Stop that now." And I've seen people around us act all pearl-clutching about it, or a grocery person saying, "You should have ordered your grocery through Instacart". Yeah, you're childless, keep your mouth shut, please. We refuse to shove a screen in their faces to try to keep them "behaved" in public when they need to learn how to behave, period. So if they meltdown and have a tantrum, we handle it there and then and make expectations clear. I appreciated this video, shared with my husband.
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
What strikes me is that it's all extremely obvious when you look at the neurological explanation: Pain signals are avoidance signals. Stove is hot, hot is painful, I should NOT TOUCH the stove. Delayed punishment doesn't work because the state of the brain isn't in the context where you want the lesson to be learned. Imagine if instead of stove hurting today, it hurts tomorrow. So, suddenly while you're playing in the sandpit, you get massive pain in your hand, and the brain is overflooded with "DO NOT" signals, so the kid basically gets "DO NOT PLAY IN SANDPIT". Because that's the current state of the brain. If the kid is older, there can be a conscious response to it, but it too is very dependent on the current state of the brain.
And this is also why punishment is so detrimental to learning, because if you punish someone for making mistakes, you're not imprinting "Do not make mistakes" into the brain, because that's impossible. You're imprinting "Do not attempt" or "Do not display your work". Negative feedback works by prohibiting behavior, positive by reinforcing behavior. Both are needed, both are severely misunderstood by many.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
12:15 Malcolm misses here WHY the Appalachian people were so much more violent than the English people in the rest of the country, and that's because most of them were of Scottish descent. Most Hillbillies are Scottish and Highland Scottish people are violent for the same reason that Sicilians, Arabs, and the Irish were, this is because most of rural Scotland stayed a largely clan-based honour society.
This is also why Sicilians and Napolitaneans formed large criminal organisations while other groups if Italians like the Lombards, Latins, Venetians, Tuscans, Etc. never managed to do so. This is why Chinese people were constantly fighting amongst each other, even in Indonesia or San Francisco.
English culture is very different, in England you are an individual and you create an egalitarian nuclear family, you don't marry into someone's family nor do you bring shame to your family if you accept an insult.
This is why Hillbillies get so violent when they feel like you've insulted their honour.
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
Years ago I witnessed the bear/man thought experiment play out in real life. I heard a woman hollering for help when I was trail cycling at a preserve. I rushed to her fearing she'd been snakebit or had an alligator clamped on her leg. Turned out she'd seen a bear and was terrified. I told her Florida bears are not at all aggressive and she'd be fine. She asked me to stay with her back to the trailhead, so despite my worry being alone with someone who'd shown a propensity for irrationality, I gave up my trail riding to walk her back to her car. ... A woman brought the bear vs. man thing up with me more recently and it enraged her when I said women say they prefer the bear, because they rarely go into the wild without men. I've been hiking, kayaking and trail cycling since the '80s. Only come across solo, or groups of, women in woodlands and bayous a handful of times. Too often, I had to rescue them in some way, like changing bicycle tubes since they neglected to bring spares, levers and pumps, and didn't know how to change tubes anyhow. Come across solo men, couples and mixed groups fairly regularly. Women can say they prefer the bear, but my hunch is if they come across one most will want a man nearby to help. Yes, I know there are women who are fully competent in the wild, and men who are completely incompetent in the wild.
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
The first thing I thought when you said that the mom gets sick and has to take to her bed for a week at a time on a frequent enough basis to warrant mentioning is that she possibly has some nutritional deficiencies that need to be fixed after so many kids. Not bad enough to end up in hospital in a deficiency disease, but bad enough to make her more susceptible to passing illness or exhaustion than normal.
When my 5th baby was 6 months old, I crashed into the nutritional deficiency wall. I had been nursing and tandem nursing and nursing through pregnancies for 8 straight years at that point (ever since the birth of my oldest) and the depletion had finally caught up with me in an undeniable way. I have never done any of the dieting or exercise to get back into shape/lose weight between babies, so I have never calorie/food restricted. I also stopped working just before baby #4 when the lockdowns happened in 2020.
So when I look at the number of kids she has had, the work of motherhood and a farm, the continued work that requires her to get back into shape quickly postpartum, I think there is a lot of extraordinary nutritional draw on her.
The good news is that it took only a month of nutritional support (not targeted, just organ meat supplements + added vitamin C and D) to fix the problem. So, if she is just depleted, she could fix it very quickly.
Either way, she definitely needs to investigate why she gets those bouts of exhaustion - that is not normal.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
For housing there is a self-reinforcing cycle. The government here in the UK only builds 1-2 bed apartments because theyāre higher ROI and āpeople are having fewer childrenā. And then because there is absolutely no 3-5 bedroom apartments available, you only have two choices: move to Kent, buy a big house for 1 million+, but live isolated, car dependent, in an area where not much happens and only few high-paying jobs are⦠OR youāre in a 2br in the city, with access to jobs and leisure opportunities and your social network, but with no chance to upgrade to a family-sized apartment. So the world becomes split between people who have 0 or 1 child, living happily in London, and wonāt have more because it would mean leaving their neighborhood, friends and jobs. Or you move out and start over so you can have a larger family, but you sacrifice everything else.
Itās a really frustrating situation.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
You had multiple areas where they where attacked and changed.
But the quick one, would be easy money to borrow from government investors firm.
I am sorry to say, but part of this was the Norwegian oil fund, that invested in "social aware" companies.
So, to get access to this easy money, they needed to hire diversity hires to make the company "social aware".
Then you had how HR departments hired other who was brainwashed in academia to be woke.
And then we have how the current generation of high educated, got brainwashed in academia, after the cold war ended, so they could no longer notice how these ideas failed in east Europe.
But the next, will grow up, knowing how woke destroy companies so this will not last.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
The rudest awakening I've had is realizing just how deeply ingrained anti-Semitism is in the Islamic world, from Morocco to Pakistan, and even India. I think we've made the grave mistake of thinking that militant extremism in these countries is like militant extremism in our own, where the sentiments of the extremists are wildly out of sync with the larger population. It seems that is not the case in many of those countries. Most people don't want to risk their own lives taking up arms against the US, Israel or other political enemies, but many people sympathize with those that do, or at least share their value structure, just not their tactics. I've been extremely disturbed to find it almost impossible to find Muslim apologists, scholars or influencers who do not hold powerful anti-Semite, anti-Christian, anti-Western and anti-Secular views. I started looking into it after Oct 7 last year, and its been very troubling to realize people I thought were generally peaceable, and even aligned with my personal values weren't just slightly different in their worldview, but embraced ideas that were in final analysis, murderous with people like me as the target.
18
-
18
-
18
-
As a German, I understand your derision and take it in the spirit it is offered, though I'd rather like you to not insult our language ;). I like my culture, but we appear to have lost our will to power, ie our will to leave a mark on the world, and without that you can't survive in a competitive world. I think we were once one of those correct answers, and ironically given how wokeness works, what ruined things for us back then was an overentitled sense of victimhood after the end of WWI, and the revanchist mindset that resulted from it. Not that there wasn't reason for it, but it was not the right answer. We'll see how things go.
As for the party ban, I'm not an AfD voter but this is a really stupid idea from any political point of view, and I wonder what got into those 113 lawmakers. All it'll do is to make communication across political divides even more difficult than it already is, and that's the last thing we need. Meanwhile, there are several misperceptions in your video about Germany after 35:00 I can't correct because it would take too long.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
I think you have a decent seed of an idea, but incorrectly analyzed.
Disgust based moral systems work, but have externalities. A culture based on avoiding/removing disgust would be functional, positive, and broadly good for human flourishing.
Its issue would not be that it did not work, but that the externalities it created were cruel. For instance, avoiding disease is a prosocial norm, but unjust shunning of a cripple is an evil act.
Where I think you misread the prior moral systems is that even in harder disgust based moralities, higher order thinkers recognized that excess or blind disgust could lead to cruelty, and in the most functional, you see arguments that essentially boil down to "yes, live clean and virtuous, but also remember mercy and compassion".
Where cringe morality took over was where the countervailing force of "remember X when experiencing disgust" became dominant over disgust. Instead of mercy and compassion to the infirm, it became condemnation of the able.
In many ways, the problem is that the higher-order thoughts became the low-brow thoughts. A helpful truism is that "the prize for winning the culture is to see the stupid version of your smart ideas".
Disgust as a low resolution system functioned for grug-brain and monk-brain alike, and when the elite also argued for contrary compassion, you saw the greatest human flourishing.
When that compassion became the Grug-brain low resolution "base morality", it turned toxic (it's unsound like an inverted pyramid). What your seeing with "based" is a cognitive elite counter-signal in favor that "sometimes disgust is necessary" just as "sometimes compassion is necessary" countered low resolution disgust morality.
Tl;Dr - low res disgust is functional, and when tempered by high resolution mercy, is great. Low res mercy is dysfunctional, and we've yet to see if/how it can be countered by high resolution disgust.
Tl;Dr 2 - as the prize for winning the culture war is low resolution versions of high resolution thinking, one of the preeminent challenges of our era is fighting for cultures that function for Grug as well as for Aquinas, since there are far more Grugs.
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
Firstly, I do appreciate you both for taking on this issue of skilled immigration at face value and going over its pros and cons. This is an admirable quality of the 2 of you which is sorely missed in many commentators and is why I subscribe to you.
However, I think there are multiple variables that you overlooked. Firstly, there is a concern over inter-ethnic tensions within these organizations and in the broader Right-wing coalition. Thomas Sowell talks about how affirmative action, among its myriad issues, is more likely to produce animosity between ethnic groups rather than alleviate them because of the perception that said ethnic beneficiary is receiving special treatment. This issue is likely to produce a similar form of tension that could be a problem for a pluralistic future. Cultural diversity is an admirable pursuit but it must be balanced against inter-cultural animosity.
Second, this is a serious Motte and Bailey situation because the discussion in this podcast was surrounding high-skilled labor ā as in the economic and national benefit to bringing in people to fill productivity gaps in the American labor market. However, look at the positions being offered for H1B Visas currently. Youāll see listings like Data Analysts (entry level), Accountants (entry level), even line cooks (no degree necessary). Iām libertarian myself, but this is EXACTLY what happened to Canada: competition in labor markets deflating wages in tech industries while competition for housing increasing cost of living = decreased living standards. Predictable undesirable outcomes.
Finally, this discussion is causing the new right, particularly Musk himself, to behave EXTREMELY questionably. You guys brought up Laura Loomer as one of the detractors in this discussion. Say what you want about her business acumen compared to the likes of Vivek or Elon, but Lauren had her X account SUSPENDED and her checkmark removed ā along with MANY others in the wake of this discussion. Regardless of where anyone stands on this issue, this is concerning. Whoever is making these decisions at X headquarters is risking the Elonās integrity as a warrior for free speech and thus weakening his standing with the new rightwing coalition.
Itās as if in November everyone was saying āThe Right is not longer the party of big business, weāre for the working class!ā and now, after speaking with a lot of my fellow right-wing friends, at the end of December itās āThe Right is in favor of Big Business outsourcing its talent at discounted prices.ā
I want to reiterate ā I appreciate you guys both giving both sides of the argument consideration and I donāt have any issue with you both landing on the pro side of the H1B discussion. Itās good for there to be debate over meaningful questions. But just as a person observing this discussion, and especially with the backlash that itās producing online, this feels⦠ominously⦠like a canary in the coal mine for things to come.
Happy New Year!
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
Regarding the importance of orthodox preaching for church vitality, as opposed to simply echoing secular culture from a pulpit: in the Catholic Church there was a revolution in the 1960s in which, in Western countries, both the traditional liturgy and traditional doctrine were done away with. (On paper the doctrine was the same, but in practice Catholicism became a different and much more liberal religion.)
Traditionalists, who have refused these changes, have been very much in the habit of pointing to their preservation of the liturgy as the reason for their congregations' vitality while the mainstream congregations die out. As someone from a trad Cath background drilled in this "It's the liturgy, stupid" explanation, it was very interesting for me to see some high-church Episcopalian services, beautiful and reverent, sung by competent choirs... with half-empty pews and no children. While I definitely think the liturgy is a fundamental part of the appeal of traditionalist Catholicism (and certainly was the main draw to me ā having been used to the dreary standard Novus Ordo Mass, my mind was blown the first time I attended a Latin High Mass), to a great extent trad Caths probably misdiagnose the reason for their own success within the Catholic Church, which has much more to do with doctrinal orthodoxy, intransigence, and demands placed upon the believer than with the liturgy.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Donald Trump is absolutely Jack Sparrow. It's the perfect comparison, and I'm shocked I haven't heard of this comparison before. In universe, he's both loved by some and disrespected by others for very similar reasons, he's the living embodiment of slipping on a banana peel and sticking the landing, and he oozes wit and intuitive brilliance, just like Trump. They're both also driven by legacy and wanting to "live forever" in one sense of another as well.
As someone who was born into lower-middle class Midwestern society, I fit your description of being a bit confused that real estate, lawyers, and doctors aren't considered high class in the uppermost echalons of society, but then I remembered the Stanley Kubrick movie Eyes Wide Shut. Bill Harford (Tom Cruise) is a doctor who often services the NYC blue blood elite, but he isn't one of them. He's forever on the periphery, but just close enough that he gets their table scraps, and he and his wife, Alice (Nicole Kidman), are trying to get in the club (though there's a theory that Alice already was, but I digress). The upper class characters made it pretty clear that Bill was considered more of a "servant friend" who they'd entertain because he was useful to them, but he wasn't really one of them no matter how much he wanted to be. Bill also goes around signalling his wealth in the way that he tips and flashes his credentials everywhere. The film is about things like martial fidelity, the fantasy and reality of the intersection between marriage, class, and sexuality, the real nature of the differences between men and women, and so on, but the narrative also shows Bill getting a peek inside the upper echalons of society as well. He sneaks into the inner circle uninvited, and doing so basically throws him into extremely precarious and ethically shady situations. It essentially tells Bill and the audience that you really don't want to be a part of what the blue bloods have. Point being, your comments about class went from sounding confusing to completely clicking in my mind because of the movie Eyes Wide Shut and how well Kubrick seemed to understand the elite classes and was able to dissect and critique (and sometimes mock) them. If you guys would ever be interested in doing a kind of analysis of that film, I think it would be incredibly interesting. I think it intersects quite a bit with some of your discussions around class and marriage lately.
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
OMG, Simone is right about the sledge hammer.
A few years ago I was living in one of my rentals while I was in between houses. At that moment, it was a rougher neighborhood.
I kept a sledge hammer (and a gun) by my bed. As a landlord, I have a lot of tools and a sledge hammer seems to be one of the more effective defensive weapons.
One night, at 2 AM, a single Mom neighbor came pounding on my door frantically asking for help. I jumped out of bed with the sledge hammer, opened the front door and saw two shorter men harassing her. I don't know what they wanted. She's on welfare and doesn't necessarily hang out with good people. Maybe money problems.
I yelled from my porch, "Hey you f***ers, if you don't get out of here right now, I'm going to bash in your heads."
They looked at me stunned. A bright white, nearly naked, foot taller man holder a Harbor Freight sledge hammer. They stood dumbfounded.
So I repeated, "If you don't get out of here *now*, I start swinging!"
They both ran away.
Diane, the neighbor, thanked me and the rest of the night was peaceful.
So yes, I agree with Simone's expectation.
I have another story where I brought a water bottle (sitting next to me now) to a knife fight...
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
[UK] 4:00 Norway funded Dustborn - as did the CIA. Neither is in the EU (although the mistake is understanable and your point is still valid).
35:20 Broadly, we in the UK and the EU have never had the level of democracy or political accountability which you used to have in the USA, until the ironically-named 'democrats' abandoned any pretence of democracy, honesty, or integrity. We come from previously monarchistic societies so tolerate a more centralised level of control (conversely, of course, a lot of our countries are smaller than most of your states). Nevertheless, the waste and corruption of national governments, and the unelected EU bureaucracy in particular, are a great cause of concern.
[> UK politics specifically; it took until the 1960s for the labour party (our socialists/communists) to gain office. Since then we've more or less had to suffer them one term per generation just to prove to the kids how dangerous leftwing extremists can be, then we have another sane generation of centre/right rule. After Thatcher (and Major) we had Blair, who was the first evil labour leader - anti-democracy and anti-British as well as anti-capitalist. He completed the 'long march through the institutions' which meant that the succeeding generation of conservatives were prevented from doing anything useful by an extreme-left establishment - which refused to implement government policy - and biased media - which rewrites history to attack Britain and the British in every article and programme. With 12 years of complete failure, and 2 years of an active covid campaign of terror based on lies against the populace, almost no-one bothered to vote in our July election, which by default let labour in again, and they are already completing the authoritarian extreme-left destruction of the country and peoples. We have openly political police, persecuting political prisoners, and locking them in political prisons cleared of actual criminals released early to make way for them. The 'crimes' of these political prisoners range from mean words on social media to shouting at a police dog. Sentences are for 2 - 9 years].
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
I love the idea of DOGE. I also think the dissolving department model could be used for an accounting and audit team. Every specified time period (just going to base this off quarterly model, though a different one could work also), the team forms, goes to each major department checks the books, makes and submits said reports to oversight committee/dept/etc, then dissolves until the next quarter.
On the topic of ADD/ADHD types, its all about playing to our strengths. Some psychology professionals also believe it should be rebranded to Intention Deficit Disorder. This is because many, like myself, suffer from executive type dysfunctions. We function best in groups and pairs with a Neuro-Typical type to gently nudge us back if we get distracted. We also tend to love "pressure cooker" situations. Give us a near deadline and let 'er rip. "You're going to be here in 3hrs?!" Starts nonstop furiously cleaning. Game-ify tasks, give us challenging benchmark goals...society has become so cookie cutter that we are often not using our best assets, playing to each others strengths and covering each others weaknesses in team building. Harness us, we have a superpower!!
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Also, to any agents reading these chat messages: Read some Oswald Spengler. You guys think you're justified in your nonsense because you're agents of the most prosperous regime ever in humanity, but you didn't do that, technologists did that. Anywhere that wasn't dumb enough to go for communism, or unfortunate enough to be valuable to the west if they remained as a poor country (i.e. banana republics generalized), would experience incredible growth once they adopt the miracles of our hypertechnology. Fertilizer, medicine, transportation, communication. All these things were made by science, not federal bureaucrats. You are mistaking being born into a miraculous development with being part of the development. You are not protectors of the prosperous world order, you're at best symbiotic parasites, at worst pure parasites, to the mechanisms that brought it into being. You guys have an understanding of the world and the future we're heading towards similar to that of the economists who said "There's no way housing can crash" in 2006. You've mythologized the status quo and refuse to look at the markers indicating that everything is about to change. And we're currently in 2007, soon we'll be in 2008. Buckle up buckaroo, it's gonna be a wild ride.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
You guys have stated what your really want is not more people, but more people who can help humanity ascend to an Omega Point civilization. You want people like you who can assist in advancing AI, genetic modification, cybernetic implants, other robotics, and space travel. But this video exactly shows how you are refusing to say the quiet part out loud: If you really care about long-term trends, look at population increase inside countries over the last 100 years. That is true long-term. The quiet part you refuse to address is that in many countries that have no prospect of contributing to any of your goals, the population over the last hundred years has increased by a factor of 6 or more, so that countries that were below 20 million in 1924 are now well over 100 million. If a country is not advanced technologically, this 6x increase in population was completely unnecessary, because advances in agriculture over the past 100 years require far fewer than 6x. And if they are not contributing inside their country to advance technology and other production of actual goods, there is no place for them to go than to go to other countries, such as those of the West. See how this is the quiet part that makes all appeals to pro-natalism sound like the rantings of lunatics. Until you convince people that the Earth at the moment does not have 6x the people it should have, you cannot win the argument for pro-natalism. And this is compounded by the belief that AI and robotics that will make 3/4 of jobs obsolete is right around the corner.
12
-
12
-
12
-
Having lived my childhood as an only child in the city, I can confidently say that i would give anything to live the life that my children are living right now in our rural slice of heaven. Our nearest neighbors are a mile away and they can play as loudly as they please, all the time, every day, out in nature where they are watched from afar by me and their grandfather (at least some of the time, when he's up to it). There are no bad days here, no weather too foul, no strangers, and neighbors a short drive away who have a trampoline. It's a paradise for children to grow up knowing the wonders of life, nature, and a caring community. Seeing my toddlers play with the neighbors' older children is a wonderful preview of things to come.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Malsom & Simon,
You both have missed a very important point. These activists and their pet Federal supervisors/managers not only diverted the most cryptographically secure National Security bandwidth for non-national security related tasks. They created a "hostile work environment" for straight and non-trans gay employees under Federal sexual harassment laws, rules, regulations and agency procedures.
Federal managers have a positive legal obligation to act against sexual harassment and discrimination upon awareness. The Federal intelligence managers only failed to meet that legal obligation. They actively promoted a "hostile work environment" above the national security mission in agency policy documents with their signatures on them. All of the various intelligence agency supervisors and managers who had awareness of these sexting chat rooms, and promoted agency blogs where activists were expressing their gender identities, have "dead careers walking."
Every member of national intelligence supervision "with awareness" - given the signed agency policy documents, that is all of them - can now be fired for cause both as ineffective managers of expensive, cryptographically secured, national intelligence bandwidth and as supervision who failed in their legal duties to act against sexual harassment under Federal sexual harassment laws, rules, regulations and agency procedures.
While theses supervisors and managers can sue to get their jobs back under the Hatch act after U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) administrative appeals are exhausted. These soon to be ex-Federal intelligence supervision and their lawyers face a "Catch 22."
That is, the managers and their lawyers will know the defending Trump Administration federal attorneys have wholly admissible blackmail evidence waiting for them - the details of what was said on those chat channels and how DEI was used to shut up whistle-blowers. And if they go to court, their names will be forever associated with the transcripts of the chat channels which will always be an new job application internet work history search away.
I expect few, if any, would ever find work again as managers.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Also re nightclubs (speaking with professional experince for two decades). Here's my take one why people enjoy them (including me):
- Not all nightclub experiences are the same. There is a big range from Top 40 / pick-up bar, to a dance-oriented night club, to more of a concert/venue style night club. So you might have just been in a terrible place. But I think you also don't have an affinity to the things that make them desirable to some people.
- Nightclubs are one of the few places to hear and dance to certain types of music (electronic music / Hip hop). If you like music that falls into those umbrellas, you might be more disposed to enjoying them
- Nightclubs are one of the few places where you can coordinate a large group of friends going to the same place without booking reservations. This is big in large cities where there is a huge coordination tax due to limited space and high demand. Your 1 bedroom New York or Toronto apartment can't hold a party well, and booking a restaurant reso for 25 people isn't realistic. Meeting up at a nightclub is one solution.
- To Simone's point, group dance has a very unique effect on some people. It's incredibly grounding and restorative to some people. Most times, people go to dance with friends, not with strangers. So dancing with groups of friends is extremely bonding (for some people). Meeting people / stangers is only some people's motivation
- Picking up - Dancing is sometimes a vertical expression of a horizontal desire. This is definitely a component of nightclub culture, but the type of nightclub really comes into it. A top 40 club is very pick-up oriented. A rave/electronic night club is usually more dance/drugs oriented. Different clubs serve different niches
- Drug use - Nightclub are synomonous with drug use, because many drugs are enhanced by music. Also if you really love some types of music, drug use allows you to listen/dance longer than normal
- People with ADHD are usually over represented in long-term nightclub enjoyment. The music/lights/people/chaos is highly stimulating.
- Extroversion is over represented in long-term nightclub enjoyment.
- There is definitely a social narrative of nightclubs being part of a "big night out" or of something that you're supposed to enjoy when young. A lot of people hate night-clubs for the reasons you mentioned, but love music festivals or DYI music events because they remove some of the rough edges.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Found you on side scrollers and have been enjoying a bit of your content. I decided to write a comment because I think I have at least some sort of answer to one of your kind of questions, You were talking about how a lot of Republicans and people generally on the right are focusing on this as a debate when instead of the important issue of "who's actually running this country if that's the elected official". I think a big part of the reason for that which I don't recall you mentioning, is that for a lot of the people on the right, That's not a new question, That's not news, I know that myself who's mostly centrist my parents who are on the right and most of my friends who are also generally libertarian or centrist, have known that Biden wasn't running the country for 2 or 3 years now, since we saw him wandering off stage and wandering past secret service agents instead of going through the door that they were holding open for him, we've all known that he hasn't been in charge, we've all been pretty sure that Kamala isn't in charge, And that's just a question that we've been living with, some of us think that China is some of us think that the wef is some of us think that it's a deep state cabal. Some of us think that it's a cabal of leftist bureaucrats as you hypothesized and many of us just believe that it's some chaotic mess of all of the above. I'm not saying it's at all unimportant, I'm just saying that it wouldn't surprise me if to some degree. The reason why it's not being featured and centered as an object of the news is because for us the only new thing about it is, some of the Democrats have realized what we've already known to be true by observation.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
I'm Jewish in the heart of tech and super liberal area (though I'm an ideas fanatic, so I have friends across the political spectrum). I love friends and networking which has been a business super power especially in tech. I generally seek out interesting people in science, tech, business, finance or anyone who has done deep study in various areas from farming to archeology. Some of these friends get promoted to family status -- that is, they are over all the time, vacation together, looked after each other's kids when necessary etc. At the same time, family is a priority -- we go to events, try to help each other, and frequently invite them to Shabbat and other occasions.
I guess if you want a hunker down culture to survive whatever wave you think is coming, yeah stay in family or tight clan. To me, I'm driven by curiosity of the world and a wider net catches more things. You might say that now, you can get anything online for from your local friendly AI agent, but my life and business has been transformed at various points by just experiencing someone operate in a different way that just makes me realize at a deeper level "Oh, you can do that? Wow!".
It does make me think that maybe you want to tune an AI agent in the culture you want to propagate (for me, that would be literate, curious, learning, business-oriented, risk-taking but also prudent -- save, invest, and keeping the tribe going). That way, the net you'd cast online is biased by that filter.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
I really value this discussion. I consider myself a stoic, striving to act virtuously and rationally. However, I often feel that pursuing these principles can be like throwing pearls before swine. It sometimes seems irrational to do the right thing when doing the wrong thing is often rewarded and the right thing is sometimes punished. Right being the rational, reproduceable, most feasible good.
My approach has been to avoid outright wrongdoing but focus on achieving results through transparent and ethical methods. When confronted, I openly address any perceived shortcomings and invite feedback for improvementāthough, in truth, the gaps often arise because others cut corners or rely on dishonesty to achieve exceptional outcomes.
This approach has led to two distinct reactions: tremendous respect from coworkers and clients or disdain from leadership and dishonest peers. My challenge lies in determining whether itās better to continue doing the right thing, even if it leads to professional martyrdom, or to adopt more "grey" strategies to climb the hierarchy. The ultimate goal would be to use that influence to drive more sustainable, ethical practices.
Additionally, I am finding that ideas and influence are far less effective these days than simple gas lighting and coercion. Helping people understand the problem and giving them tools to fix it often seems satiating enough. Stirring a bit of fear and vague solutions often seems to produce better short term results. I'm trying not to be too cynical, but it's a bit alarming how often I see this. I guess it's a bit of missing the forest for the trees to give too specific of help. Maybe the only real solution is obsession and drowning in work until the mastery overcomes the problems...
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Well, I have been an atheist for the entire 39 years of my life. I was an atheist long before the whole "4 horsemen of atheism" thing which I thought so silly. And I continue to be an atheist after the movement faded.
Despite being an atheist, I consider Christians to be my brothers and sisters, and I prefer people to be CHRISTIANS rather than atheists. I think everybody should be free, but it's better if they are Christians. My wife is religious, I don't mind my kids going to the church. They know my position and my opinions and philosophy, but they are free to believe or not.
PS: I appreciate any good hearted Christian that may pray for me, I really do, but don't waste your time trying to convert me. I'm an evolutionary biologist and my philosophy is very grounded. I'll die an atheist and nothing can change that (hubris, I know, but I also have to be a realist instead of false humble). Despite that, I am an admirer of the figure of Christ, and I see Jesus as a role model to be followed (and that's not small for someone who was raised as an atheist, and not only that, raised by an atheist MARXIST father who is still viciously anti religion). I don't believe in Christ as God, but I place him as the highest aspiration a human could look up to.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Consistency in your political beliefs is a weakness, not a strength. Reality is too complex to be reduced to a 300 page document. What works in one context may not work in another
Think of Mekka vs Medina Islam. It seems strange, that moral rules differ so greatly, based on if you are the group in power or not, but it makes sense from the perspective of the memeplex
Even our body functions in a similar manner. For example, with the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. There is not one optimal state for your body. Digestion is important if you are calm, but not when running away from a tiger.
And stitching together contradicting ideas so your believers can choose to focus on one part of scripture and not another is infinitely easier to design your memeplex around any eventualities. If this happens use Medina Islam, but if this happensā¦
Give your followers the option to rationalize their decision with scripture, after they have judged it fits best in this situation.
The lack of consistency in religions, and the contradictions, are a feature, not a bug
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Iām a wife , a mother and I work professionally. I can see both sides. Eg women at one point said cooking , cleaning , changes diapers , going to PTA meetings, this is it ? I understand MGTOW , my husband had a few friends that had this lifestyle eg one got a PHD , lived on a boat, traveled the world . / i definitely think what worked before will no longer work , I wish everyone the best, i do hope people still learn social skills and donāt lose their humanity ⤠there are good people out there
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Hi Malcolm and Simone, This is kind of a copy paste comment from the previous video but I think it's important,
It's going to seem stupid, but I think that HD cameras and a seating type arrangement would bring in a lot of people to Based Camp. With great lighting setups and nice looking desks and whatnot. Personally I really like your setup, with a single ring light and intimate camera angle. But you would probably get a wider audience with a camera angle where you are 'facing each other', and the camera is merely a ghost like third perspective on the conversation, rather than someone who is being directly engaged with.
This means your super relatable and awesome at building community, but (maybe) most people see the setup and move on to some other guru dude like 'Tom Bilyeu' whos got a 'sweet' setup, (but in my opinion your guys content is the best content currently on the planet.)
Now just to stress again, this is not what I would like more, I absolutely love the way you make your videos. This is just what I think a more general audience would engage with more, and help with reach.
Best! <3
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
The Wachowski situations is absolutely WILD when you look into it.
First, they're co-dependent siblings, extremely obviously, and did everything together ALL of the time. One was the leader, the other the follower. Eventually, once they moved to Hollywood from Chicago, the leader of the pair fell in love with this weird nightclub lesbian dominatrix after being in the weird S&M kink scene in LA for a few years. So the leader (I think it was Larry IIRC) basically went full Van Gogh in order to appeal to this lesbian, and transitioned to being a woman to get with her.
That actually worked for a little while because this lady was an absolute freak with the kink stuff already, but ultimately it didn't work out in the end. There were a bunch of excuses as to why, but I'm guessing the whole "I'll become a woman for you" wasn't enough to get over the fact that the neo-vajayjay wasn't what she preferred. Unfortunately, because the other brother is a complete co-dependent and went through his bro's transition on the sidelines they absorbed that as the thing to do themselves and bingo bango you now have the sisters instead of the brothers, though that took like, another 10 years.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
French guy here (half Louisianese, double nationality, we have strong connexions to the black community), tomato soup aint french, if you are looking for dishes using tomato soup, you'de rather look at the other side of the mediteranean. You both make a lovely couple, and this baby doesnt know his luck; i was so failed by lack of familly structure (46 yo, awfull childhood, and a big part of my life struggling with consequences, juvy, years in jail, etc...) that i really love the idea of a world filled with ppl like you. Another thing i wanted to say is Thomas Sowell has had a hudge influence on black youngsters (this guy saved my sanity btw, big fan, even if i have no guru), did you ever see that clip on YT "stop blaming the white man" ? I'm not shure all of them are voting republican for trump though, they're just nt buying the lefty narative anymore... Greetings from France to the familly. Logics rule ! Dont tread on me, i will fightback ! Get out of my property !
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
In Acts 1:15, after the death and resurrection of Jesus, there were at least 120 followers. Which is more than 50.
It's not clear to me if the "approxemently 120" included women and children. So the number could, potentially, have been 240+. But that is speculation. What the Bible says is "120" and that could have been 120 males, or 120 people. There are of course cultural issues with who was counted.
In John 6:66, we see Jesus was laying down hard truths and many turned away from Him. So at one time His followers could have been hundreds. Or even 1,000+ people (pure speculation, but if he had 300 males following Him, and each of those males had a wife and 2 children, that could be 1,200 people). Don't anyone take this as gospel truth, because the Bible doesn't specify the number following, except in Acts. But it's reasonable speculation and thought exercises.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
One thing to note here about Mexico's immigration policy, because I lived there for two years is this. It might apply to South Americans and other foreigners but it doesn't apply to Americans. Many laws don't. You can buy your way out of anything. Sure, it's illegal on paper to overstay your 6 month welcome, but nothing is going to happen to you if you do. You're a goldmine down there, spending money on their economy. You are in the top 0.1%. So, in practice, the immigration policy is, if you're an American, you can overstay your welcome and at most you'll pay a tiny fine when you leave the country. On paper they can do worse, maybe even ban you, but they won't.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
"It is disturbing how the progressives have stabbed the gay rights mocement in the back, then carved up its corpse, and then wear it like some sort of macabre outfit... They have taken their identity and community away from them and said, 'This identity supports us, so if you no longer support us, you no longer have ownership of your identity over your own struggles."
I'm not gay. I have a few gay and bisexual leaning friends. I can't speak to the actual culture itself, but I completely understand what you're talking about. It's funny that you describe the progressives this way because this is exactly how some people have described their infiltration and takeover of communities I do have direct contact and experience with, particularly gaming and comic books. I'm glad you finally mentioned Gamergate 2 because the first Gamergate, at least in part, was the first real countercultural pushback against the corruption of "woke" influence. I would personally identify it as the first real counter offensive in the culture war. The progs speak as though they're traumatized by it like it was their Vietnam. Gamers believed that the gaming journalists were on our side because they had previously been important spokespeople for defending the community (I hate that manipulative and contrived term, but I'll use it for lack of a better one). They defended us against accusations from the monoculture that games were directly causing real-life violence and that gamers were inherently violent and therefore suspicious. Fast forward to the early 2010s, and all of a sudden, it was the journalists themselves who were attacking gamers and accusing them of being inherently racist, sexist, and homophobic. The vanguard that once protected us and the art form/entertainment medium had turned on it because progressive activists had started to take it over to use its growing platform and influence to further their own goals. Just like Biden's "if you don't know whether to vote for me or Donald Trump, then you ain't black" comment, gaming journalists systematically published articles involving the phrase "Gamers Are Dead" to denounce the "gamer" identity. This was in reaction to elements of the gaming community identifying and calling out their shady and unethical practices in the industry and the primarily San Fransisco-based media apparatus that covered it. Naturally, of course, they accused these gamers of perpetuating the various ists and phobias, partkcularly sexism at the time. It's only natural now that Gamergate 2 would be about calling attention to the various DEI initiatives/ESG agendas that have taken over, diluted, and ironically homogenized the AAA space, and those who do call this out are again called all of the ists and phobes in the book. I may not be gay, but I know this playbook all too well, and unfortunately, the problem is even worse for comic books. It's a small enough industry that they might just be strangling the mainstream comics industry to death. Marvel and DC are on life support, leaving the independent creator owned works, manga, bande dessinee, and crowd funded comics to keep the art form alive.
This is what they do to every single group or subculture they try to co-opt for their revolution. As a comic book reader, I have an example of something very analogous to what you were describing, and you might have a guess at what it is if you've either read the comic or seen the TV show adaptation. What the progressives have done to various groups as you've described it is almost an exact reflection of the Whisperers from The Walking Dead. They're basically a tribalistic anti-civilization doomer cult who try to "return to monke," so to speak. They skin zombies and wear their meat suits as camoflage so that they can safely live and travel among the zombies and even manipulate and stealthily weaponize entire horde movements against their enemies. The only other metaphors that might be equally applicable comparisons are the Borg from Star Trek or the aliens from Invasion of the Body-Snatchers. Ironically, the original 1950s Invasion of the Body-Snatchers was a warning about communist infiltration of local communities and the subversion of American minds.
Sorry to go on, but having come from a relatively conservative Christian community, it's fascinating to hear you describe the gay community and their situation in light of my own experiences from the outside looking in. The conservative evangelicals, whatever their faults, were kinda right when they were raising the alarm bells durimg the gay marriage debate a decade ago. Whatever your position on gay marriage, they accurately warned about basically all of the ways in which we've unraveled as a society in regards to sexual orientation and gender identity ever since. Their position was that the gay marriage decision at the SCOTUS opened the floodgates, and everything else that we've seen would follow and try to force itself into the center of the mainstream. They may have been more or less correct in their assessment, but if your explaination of the situation is correct (I think you're more or less on the money), the conservative evangelicals were unable to really do all that much about it because they misidentified the culprit and the nature of the problem. I think that what they were observing and warning about was the progressive activism within LGBT communities who were pushing for subversion and full blown degeneracy, towards kids in partifular. Their mistake was confusing the progressive LGBT activist movement with the actual gay, bisexual, and trans people in the community itself. The biggest irony is that even back then when evangelicals were denouncing gay marriage and making these warnings, regardless of whatever they thought or felt about homosexual actovity on moral and religious grounds, they accepted the terms that the actual gay community had previously been striving for. Talk to some of the most supposedly anti-gay and anti-gay marriage Christians out there, and 9 out of 10 of them would completely agree with the sentiment that gay, bisexual, and trans people shouldn't be abused or killed for simply being what they are. Maybe I'm off on some of this, but if you take the time to reas this mini essay, I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on all of this if you have any.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I am an active member of the LDS Church (generally referred to as the Mormons) and I appreciate the content you share and your perspectives.
I believe a large part of how religion affects people is influenced by the ways they were raised within (or not) that religion. Sometimes families will focus more on enforcing the rules and regulations (the policies) than understanding the doctrine that serves as the foundation and guidance for life.
I grew up as a very curious and wild child. My family did not try to force me to be strictly feminine (I regularly joined my dad and brothers to go hunting, and I hated shopping). Curiosity was encouraged and I was always asking questions and searching for answers. And a lot of times, I found connections between the more secular subjects and my faith. An astrobiology class in college (at a secular school) strengthened that faith. I nearly went into Anthropology, and have a deep fascination with learning from other cultures and religions. Right now, I currently enjoy the tenets of Taoism and relating them to the doctrine I have as a foundation, that is, that there is a balance to everything (night and day, man and woman) and differences are essential to have this balance. The concept of yin and yang.
I would say, the most important thing is to focus on the values being taught than the current house of policies built on them.
To me, love and choice are central to my religion. Everyone has the agency to choose how they want to live whether I agree with them or not. It is not my jurisdiction to prevent them from making choices that I don't agree with. But I still make an effort to love those that make the choices I disagree with, because that is the foundation of my faith.
Being raised to have a combination of faith and a curious mind has had a huge impact in my life.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Hi, Collins! I've been watching your channel a lot lately. And you inspired me to do an internal exercise of thinking up a religion for myself which strangely enough resulted in me not being able to help myself from following it. It's the most pro-human and pro-natalist cult religion I've ever heard of, even though I've heard of it from myself. Might come off as just ramblings from a mad man. And they are. But here it goes:
Essentially I treated designing existence as if I was designing a game from scratch based on having played it for awhile now. So the first concept I'd have to define would be the nature of consciousness, and that would simply have to be the experiencing of a here and now. Nothing beyond that.
Now applying it to a singular eternal entity would be terribly lonely, inert and could easily fail catastrophically as there would be no off switch for it, no alternatives and so if it got stuck either phisically or metaphorically it would just be eternal torture. So death would have to be a thing in all this. A way of backing out of an itiration that ran its course of a here and now perceived continuum.
So to make it interesting, I'd divide consciousness into several different entities that would themselves divide and generate new entities unique in their code and through the interaction with the environment to generate the illusion of a diverse range of different yourselves. Even though you would essentially experience all of them in different timelines. And generate their existence as whole entities that way. A bit of the psychadelic common description, of "we're all one, man..." As time would appear linear to each during a playthrough, but not in the nature of the game itself.
In short, If I were a bored god with eternity to keep me company. I'd want to experience it throught the eyes of finite entities with no knowledge of that fact, which would reset each time and keep themselves company. That's as good and crazy as I can master it through words. Keep up the great work! Love you guys
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I'm from Canada and I appreciate your coverage of events, though your silence on the trade deficient is pretty deafening, I suspect you noticed how many ways the US makes out ahead, and that the trade deal with have was negotiated by Trump, and was a good deal that's set to expire next year. Even so, it's just good to hear people argue and interpret information without the "lens" of modernity. Like the "lens" was only jammed into society in 2016 or so (2012 technically) and both practically, objectively, and predictably, its a dirty, dirty lens that allows entitled, hand picked elites to live very comfortably, contributing very little of value other than the burden of emotional manipulation and blackmail. I'd like to know what's to be done with these corporate execs that seemed completely fine burning their investor's and employee's futures for BS social causes. Jesus, the Jaguar make over couldn't have come at a worse time could it? If I was Trump or whoever the next PM of Canada will be, I would just send out invited to a big colourful party, located in a ditch, and watch them not find their way out.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
This was overall an episode I can get behind, especially Malcolm's note (marked below as taking place around the 48 minute mark)
One aspect that I think is getting lost here is the narcissistic desire to be special and to be seen as special - which explains the dominance of wolves and dragons among fursonas - they want to claim the coolness factor of these animals. The other animals listed at lower rates also make sense in terms of being unique AMONG wolves and dragons, i.e. 9 wolf people are cool because they are wolves, the 1 rabbit person is special because they are the only 1)
I've also made the connection between furries and a desire for specific, almost granular, control over their identities.
As a human, you develop wrinkles, age, and die. But as an anonymous fursuit, you're immortal.
This plays out in plastic surgery addiction, online filters, and of course gender identity.
35:00 Discusses wanting to mate with something unique that doesn't set off disgust signals
48:00 Speech on the total self indulgence of the movement
Yo surprise Animorphs reference
1:00:00 Mention Harry Potter houses classification system - the interest of which I think supports both of my above points about 1) desire to be special and 2) desire for specific identity control
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
In the Netherlands, we used to have our own indigenous Holebi culture, we legalised marriage equality before any other country and we had our own culture for Holebi's... Then the American cultural colonisation happened. Specifically, the "California Gay" culture took over sometime during the 2000's, today, there is basically no unique gay male culture anywhere in the world among gays younger than 40, in Russia, China, India, Africa, Etc. all gay culture has become the Californian Gay culture.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
This comment is not about the institute, but I just want to say that I'm addicted to this channel, I like how you discuss subjects and the fact that you don't shy away from talking about controversial issues.
That said, I don't agree with a lot of what you say but still I'm addicted because even though you come to different conclusions I like the fact that you have an honest thought process.
To say about what I disagree, let's say that, first of all, I'm very against urban monoculture too, also the way you call it is very fit, knowing how to properly name things is an interesting ability, but I see the solution as another form, like for example, you guys are American, against urban monoculture and you search for solutions in an American framework, I'm Latin American and to be honest I don't think North America and Latin America are too different, Latin America is just more Catholic and poorer but other than that things work pretty much the same, for example, both North America and Latin America are monogamous. Anyway, the thing is that our countries as they are currently are broken, but the way I see the solution is to throw culture away and start with something knew while your solutions is working in something that is more in line of what American culture is, actually my goal is not exactly something knew since my philosophy takes a lot from the Hebrew Bible for example, and what is portrayed in the Hebrew Bible is very different from North and Latin America, for example, the people in the Bible is not a monogamist people.
I'm not someone who is active in trying to make a movement, maybe in the future although by now I don't have resources to make much of a difference in the world, but anyway, from the people that have more presence I would say someone like Andrew Tate or Turd Flinging Monkey would represent my philosophy and my end goals better than you guys, but still I'm very addictive to watching your content, the way I see both your ideals and the ones of the likes of Andrew Tate are both ideals to advance into the future and avoid being destroyed like the people who are part of the urban monoculture will end up being destroyed, but they haven't been put to a test yet, sure for your guys your way is the superior way but the truth is that only time will tell which strategy to survive and progress is the best.
Anyway, as I said, I have my disagreements with you but still your content is very addictive and by interacting with it I feel intelectually stimulated.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I like the nuanced discussion in this video a lot. ...Everywhere in the Islamic world where a Muslim population has "entered the modern world" (women achieve literacy and become educated), the birthrate has crashed (not stabilized and not gently declining). Iran, Turkey, Algeria, Tunisia. By contrast, pre-modern Islamic states (like Afghanistan) retain a high Muslim birthrate - poor societies need children as an old-age insurance policy, among other things. This suggests that Islamic birthrates within Canada will plummet as well. While that doesn't mean that Canada's future will be smooth sailing, it suggests that the Muslim cheerleader at the beginning of the video, is not correct in his view ("All we Canadian Muslims have to do is to sit back, relax, and let things keep going the way they're going. In 60 years, Canada will be ours.")
ā¢ā¢ā¢ā¢
You guys should really try to get David P. Goldman ("Spengler") onto the podcast as a guest. I would SO love to see the three of you interact. :) (Goldman is the author of the 2011 book, "How Civilizations Die ((and why Islam is dying too))". )
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Really interesting video. I have been wrestling a lot with the question of why Iām here. Iām relatively young (29), but also too old to still be figuring this out. Iām married, recently bought a house, and my wife and I are starting to try for kids. I set up my life in a way to optimize for building a family, which is great, but I still feel like there is more. I have a decent job but Iām not particularly passionate about it, and I spend my free time mostly exercising and reading. So Iām not doing badly by any means, but I still have this nagging feeling of what is it for? Simply providing a good life for kids is not enough, there needs to be some additional purpose.
Just thinking out loud hereā¦your videos are insightful and inspire me to find that higher goal.
There really is no cultural teaching of how to answer the question, why am I here? Weāre taught to follow your purpose, but the hard work is actually finding that purpose. Very little guidance on how to find it.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
From what Iāve seen between the both of you, I can gather that your pronatalist philosophy is both free and practical. It doesnāt force people to do or act in certain ways, but it also takes human nature into account. In a very limited way, eugenics isnāt a bad idea. Getting rid of mental illness is something we, as a society, should be striving towards, and eugenics are one of the extremely few ways we can be proactive in combating such traits from manifesting in people. This idea can be taken too far, as all ideas can, but the logic is sound. Just donāt force people to do such a thing. Let the data support positive trends and predict negative trends.
Honestly, an idea being taken too far is how fascism, communism, and current progressive ideology become the way they are: lack of moderation and enforcement of the most extreme version of said ideologies.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I only have one child so far, and she's a baby, but I'm practicing low-effort parenting in a few ways. First, time spent with me is just her watching what I'm doing, usually in a face-out carrier, letting her touch what I'm touching, or sitting on the floor while I prep food or do dishes. She eats what we eat, no baby food. She has no fancy toys, just some rattles and blocks from a thrift store. I'm making a space in the yard where she can hang out and watch bugs and birds. I narrate to her what I'm doing. We go on walks. I don't react to her crying with anything other than checking her physical needs, seeing if she's hungry, etc and as a consequence (i think) she doesn't cry much unless something is actually wrong. She seems genuinely happy to see me or daddy but doesn't throw a fit when I put her down (unless she's sick, which seems to increase her need for comfort quite a bit, in which case I'll hold her a lot). On the occasions that she gets hurt, i check the injury and otherwise just look at her with a neutral expression until she stops crying, give her a smooch and then carry on as if nothing happened. She's too young to understand "brush it off" but it seems like resiliency can be learned early, because other people have commented that she gets over stuff like bonking her noggin or pinching her finger very quickly. It's very hard to not cry when she cries, but I'm doing my best to be a good role model for her.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I'm glad you noticed how socialist portions of the Right are. One of my biggest concerns with Vance is that there's a pretty high chance that's who he is. Yes, he has ties to Thiel and worked in venture capital, but I've seen no sign that he won't go for a large administrative state, protectionism, etc; quite the contrary. Between the Natcon people and the right wing billionaires, I'm currently thinking it's the latter who are more likely to be the ones not understanding what they're being sold in this pick. I'm generally fairly worried that socialism is rising in both parties. Most people don't understand economics. Not looking forward to the changes in the next few decades to the United States if nothing happens to change that. The GOP of the past several decades was better on economics than the GOP of today.
Along the previous lines, I would caution against confusing your portion of the online community for it in its totality. You not hanging out in a region does not mean that they don't matter. And so I'd think it better to describe what you are talking about as referring to a swath of the modern right than it in its entirety. And, of course, not everyone is as online (or, online in political spheres), which also affects how they process things.
You seem to be describing the Natcon people as the same as conservative elites. They are a class of conservative elites, but they are not all of them. I would guess that your typical congressman does not look the same as the Natcon people.
I think you're underestimating how popular a porn ban would be. It would still be unpopular, but at least, before its enactment, more people would be in favor of one than you seem to think, including a lot of Christians.
I found the Dawkins comment that you referred to interesting, as it's far weaker than the sorts of arguments that Malcolm himself referred to about the Arkāit's not really in any way inconsistent or preposterous to believe in the virgin birth of Christ from a theistic perspective, and his acting as if it is indicates that his hangups are not merely, as you put it, ultralogical.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Appreciate you listening! I absolutely agree, of course, that individual apostles do not establish doctrine. The letters (to Lowry Nelson) were signed by the full first presidency at the time and were clear that they were not establishing doctrine, only restating commonly accepted doctrine. I've reproduced the relevant portion below:
"From the days of the Prophet Joseph even until now, it has been the doctrine of the Church, never questioned by any of the Church leaders, that the Negroes are not entitled to the full blessings of the Gospel.
"Furthermore, your ideas, as we understand them, appear to contemplate the intermarriage of the Negro and White races, a concept which has heretofore been most repugnant to most normal-minded people from the ancient patriarchs till now Godās rule for Israel, His Chosen People, has been endogenous. Modern Israel has been similarly directed.
"We are not unmindful of the fact that there is a growing tendency, particularly among some educators, as it manifests itself in this area, toward the breaking down of race barriers in the matter of intermarriage between whites and blacks, but it does not have the sanction of the Church and is contrary to Church doctrine."
"Faithfully yours,
"(signed)
George Albert Smith
J. Reuben Clark, Jr.
David O. McKayā
There is no serious dispute as to whether these points were established doctrine at that time; the idea that they were simply policy emerged retroactively.
I wouldn't describe my reaction to the letter as being offended. Rather, it made me realize the personal moral risk I was taking by letting the LDS frame influence so much of my thought process.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This is an episode I've been waiting for a while. Arguably if you have intelligent enough knights you can ease off on the deontological worldview for them, and instead switch to what I would call the 'questing' model for knights. Consequentialist, but dedicated towards defined goals set by kings that are looking further ahead than the knights. At the core that would still be a system bound by rules.
It's an important caveat to add to Malcolm's point at 13:10 I feel, as he presents a very abstracted way to look at life here. In a vacuum, it is correct that you want the kngihts to bring about a king's vision. However in reality the leader will not be able to spot everyting everwhere, and if an opportunity presents itself to a knight they should capitalise properly. Having an honor code and a quest view seems a lot more applicable to reality.
See it as a guidance system for a larger group of knights, something that allows them to function as a proper army. Junior officers or in other words, higher ranking knights need to lead small bands below them properly while the Kings are involved with the larger picture.
Or let's put it into practice in a non war setting. Generally you will not have an engineer that's designed a bulldozer standing over the shoulder of the machinist making the parts that go into the bulldozer. What goes into turning a block of metal into a functional part is complex, a capable machinist with twenty years experience will still learn new tricks every day. They are however also very much in a knightly occupation: A machinist shapes metal to fit a grander design, and to call back to the example of Bezos no machinist is going to create a company like Amazon. Ergo not only is the 'king' in this case unlikely to know what the knight's considerations are (though this is not impossible) there are likely shortcuts that the machinist can offer to reach a similar result the engineer hasn't thought of.
Honor is important due to the limits it places on the amount of damage knights do to each other when they disagree with a member of their own tribe. People can scoff at the idea due to thinking only of those times honor limited damage to an out group, but consider the following: honor is just another way of phrasing high trust society. A genuine high trust society is enormously more productive, capable and resillient than a low trust one.
I'm thinking of writing a full on essay in support of the natalist movement and it's about how to draw in blue collar workers and such to the cause. The high tech states that you (as in, the Collins) predict will need someone to service the machines, and I'm unable to find much on what your vision is for selecting and promoting capable blue collar workers who can reprogram machines, maintain them, and improvise solutions in case of unexpected breakdowns. Those will happen and you will need someone to go and turn wrenches when the moment comes.
Much as I like to learn from my plumber if he does maintenance on some of my stuff, in the end if shit goes sideways it is going to be vital to have an expert on hand who actually can lay pipe.
Penny for your thoughts?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Regarding "taking responsibility is the ultimate burden and relinquishing responsibility is the ultimate luxury" -
Malcolm has been saying this for a while, and it just hit me uniquely this time in a way that stuck. I'm remebering a quote that I heard from Tony Robbins: "Good times create weak people. Weak people create bad times, Bad times create strong people. Strong people create good times." Having been listening to the personal development podcast space for a while, I'm hopeful that there's a rising counterculture of high-agency, high-responsibility people who are willing to lean into hard things.
One of my hopes was that, in a post-scarcity society-- If no human needs to sit in the driver's seat of an 18-wheeler to transport goods, if no human needs to work at a fast-food restaraunt to serve the food, and if all the stores use self-checkout --- Then won't these bottom-class urban workers be free to do useful things with their lives? Industrial agriculture was necessary to provide for the modern knowledge-work economy of today, so what will happen when the next generation of technology frees up even more workers?
On the other hand, I have some personal friends who are stuck working in food service and retail because they chose not develop specialized employable skills. Currently food service and retail are jobs for unskilled workers, and when these unskilled jobs dry up, maybe these people will just retreat from the economy (sitting on the couch all day) instead of taking up the burden to learn skills.
One of the other things that I've been thinking about: In our current era of scale, it only takes a few prolific content creators to keep a million people sedated in front of YouTube. It only takes a few large-scale manufacturers to create digital devices to the masses. A few intellectuals (especially Peter Diamandis) have said that people will turn to creative self-expression in a post-scarcity world, but I'm scared that people will choose to be infantilized with media instead.
This is a battle that I'm having with myself, that maybe I'm spending too much time with media and need to create space for silence in my life.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I'm 66, a metallurgist by trade, and I work in industrial sales.
This young man is really on his game, and spot on šÆ.
Cold calling is still a valid technique, and I use it (successfully) almost daily, despite the plethora of donut dunkers who excoriate me as being a chump or a dinosaur for doing so, while sitting at a desk, day trading stocks, and playing video games (all on the clock), then waiting for the phone to ring, or sending out emails, in the hopes that it is going to develop business š¤¦š».
The difference is that this young man has no qualms about sending the deadwood packing. Good for him. I only wish more employers would follow suit.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Here is the problem:
Hey Jesus we want to celebrate your birthday , what is the date? Jesus āā¦.ā . Okay , we will pick the date and match it to the solar cycle even though it is almost certainly Not on that date. Jesus, we want to honor you with food and drink, what would you like? ā feed the poor ..ā Okay , we will have an elaborate feast featuring ham. Jesus,ā Iām not a fan of pork in general ā Never mind that , itās what we want. Jesus, we will give gifts to celebrate your birthday what gift can we give to you? Jesus ā Go therefore and make disciples.., Those giving to the lowly are lending to God..ā Okay, we will go into debt to give expensive gifts to our Lowly childrenā. Hey Jesus , about music , we are thinking maybe something festive like ā Last Christmas by George Michael , and Oh, Baby itās cold outsideā they will honor you by honoring ā LOVEā . š right? Oh, and we will prominently feature trees, decked in silver and gold and a fat man , and possibly even a demon named Krampus. It will be GREAT! Hope you like it!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
My husband and I are kind of outliers because we are living very frugally (income is average), definitely making a lot of sacrifices and have to be very financially austere raising 4 children. My husband's job does not provide health insurance benefits for example, so everything we need is always forked over out of pocket at cost. That's probably the biggest downside. My husband is the sole source of income (until the little ones are a little older and I find my hustle or use my own college degree at some point), luckily, he works from home, which allows him to set his own hours so it's definitely not "Trad" though I'm the one housekeeping/cooking, child-rearing, etc. but he's very involved as well. It's a nice balance for us. When I was growing up, I had a very large extended family and was often passed from one Aunt or Uncle or grandparent while my parents worked, and there was so much involvement with extended family. There really isn't any of that now. My great-grandparents and their family were farmers and doctors in a small town, and they had "help" that lived on the property and were part of the family. I have a photo of them, 18 people in all and they include the cook/nanny and the farmhands. It's interesting to think houses were very busy places back then, definitely not a nuclear family.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I believe that Malcolm raises excellent points regarding roman culture and paganism. For those interested in pagan philosophy, cosmogony and overall feel a strong attachment to continuing these ancient practices like me, this is a good episode to reflect on the failings of paganism, accept them, and adopt better practices while keeping the philosophical essence and spiritual root, rather than the heinous cultural practices that developed downstream of pagan practices like the terrible treatment of women and infanticide. I think this can be done easily, as a good thing about paganism is that it is constantly and fluidly changing according to its practitionersā beliefs and environment, as it is not restricted by a biblical text that may no longer reflect reality given enough time. So long as the essence of sacrifice (through offerings) as communing with the divine is maintained, paganism may be reformed and adapted as seen fit by its community (obviously, child and human sacrifice are out of the question, whereas animal sacrifice would require a lot more discussion and oversight today).
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
tldr - being in a more left-leaning environment, you'll be highly exposed to the critiques of right wing figures, and underexposed to critiques of the left. It's not that your own views change that much, but you might overestimate how much left wing politicians views align with them, and overestimate how much right wing politicians views are misaligned with yours.
I would say that I've always been fairly consistently in the middle in terms of my political views, but my perception of who aligns with my views has shifted back and forth depending on my environment. Currently that environment is fairly conservative, especially compared to the progressive/leftist dominated media companies and public institutions that influence Canadian society.
Although I'm aware of the shortcomings of both sides, I'd feel more comfortable voting for the right, because the left has more power to push their bad ideas through unchallenged due to dominating the media, corporate and institutional landscape. The right wing echo chambers are mostly limited to margins of the internet. The left wing echo chambers exist in academia, school boards, medical institutions, unions, government offices...
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Thanks to you two for what you do! I bought the book about religion, and it's very interesting so far. I agree with large chunks of your worldview and would love to start a similar project, but tbh, in building my personal philosophical structure, I always run into trouble at the starting line - good and evil. Getting past Hume's guillotine. Finding a way to assert morality, or that anything in particular "should" or "should not" be. I suspect that I'm not the only one dealing with this kind of foundational philosophical shakiness, and that it plays a role the population decline among members of the supervirus. I want to get past this obstacle and get on your lifeboat, but I don't know how. Would love to know how you all get past this - I see hints of it in your content, and could maybe figure it out with careful study, but I thought maybe I'd just ask directly. A video on it would be amazing, but if you've already covered it, then even just a reference to where would be awesome. Thanks very much!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I am a 42M life-long member of the church coming out of pioneer stock in Utah (one of my ancestors is Charles C. Rich, an apostle under Brigham Young), and also an AI in Finance entrepreneur with three kids (hopefully will get to more -- we've been trying to apply fertility treatments for a while, and we're about to try IVF). I love the church overall, but am very concerned about the falling fertility rate in our membership and also a seeming de-emphasis on traditional family values, and increasing feminism which I don't think helps. You could call me a conservative in the faith, but I'm also mostly a non-literalist. I believe some things literally, like the nature of God, but I think most of the scriptures, including seeming historical narratives in the Bible and Book of Mormon, were largely originally intended to be symbolic, including the New Testament Gospels.
How do I get more involved with index? I want to do what I can to influence the culture from the inside in ways that will help the church to recover its fertility rate, while also trying to create a subculture for my family and others in our faith that feel similarly about the importance of natalism.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
As psychologist Lee Jussim has noted, since "progressives" dominate psychology department professors 20:1 any research which supports a position which progressives dislike e.g. stereotype accuracy, e.g. behavioural genetics, should be assumed as a prior to be more trustworthy and less suspicious than research which supports conclusions progressives like or are neutral towards (e.g. stereotype threat, unconscious bias, childhood interventions having a lasting effect on IQ , any kind of simple intervention being able to make society better) .
This is exactly what we find. Behavioural genetics studies have been unscathed by the replication crisis unlike the field of social psychology with among the highest % dominance of progressives in psychology , which has been ravaged .
It seems obvious that you would need balance of power between opposing faction to keep each other honest and holding each other to high self-critical standards instead of just doing confirmation bias towards their orthodoxy and shunning people who demonstrated unpopular results .
I've seen several psychology researchers and communicators contribute to the ideological dominance of "progressivism" in psychology and shunning of those who contradict "progressive" orthodoxy, then when study after study in their field is found not to replicate and author after author is found to have fabricated data, they shrugs their shoulders and say "not my problem, I won't read their books in the future" .
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Answers to esoteric madness here:
1. Yes it says IN, but Eden just means "pleasure" or "delight", hence in English we just say Paradise i.e Garden of Delight.
2.The Serpent is an old and universal symbol for wisdom. Yes it's not a snake, but it's a metaphor for something extremely knowledgeable and wise. I believe it's the origin of the 3rd eye trope/all seeing eye, as most reptiles in fact have a 3rd eye in the middle of their head, it's not fully developed but can see light and movement, ancient people will have noted this, and come up with the connection of wisdom and "seeing even with your eyes closed", etc.
3. Eve wasn't tricked. God lied, the Serpent told the truth, they did not die, they gained a conscience. Adam and Eve may well be further esoteric titles such as the Serpent.
4. Indeed, the Bible directly states there are other people, not mention during creation, whether they were made by the same god or not seems debatable.
5. Gulf of Persia perhaps, which would imply the Sumerian city of Ur, which makes sense as Hebrews are Babylonian. Or Western Anatolia, which implies Gobekli Tepe and whatever even older civilisations were there.
6. Civilisation likely is 100K years old, but the Bible only dates back to 4000BC, and even that is purely esoteric.
7. The Tree of Life is not in heaven, it's in Eden, the Bible explains that a powerful angel with a flaming sword is set to guard it after what happened with the Serpent and Eve. It's firmly described as being in the centre of the Garden.
8. I'd say the lesson is that both knowledge and wisdom, anything from the mind except from god is bad. If you read the Book of Enoch this is expressly explained. That ignorance is next to godliness.
9. Yes this story is almost universal, and yes the Hebrews seem to of picked it up and taken it to heart. But no they didn't do it altruistically to iron out the kinks, they just massively admired the Hellenic culture brought to them by Alexander the Great, and when Judas Maccabee came to rule a new independent Hebrew state, he structured their nation around a grand opera of a collection and retelling of widely known stories and tropes. It's effectively a state mandated official history, primarily used to give legitimacy to a new state, that wanted to be in the Hellenic world but not ruled by Greek empires.
10. It is a remix of Pandora's Box, it's the explanation of conscience and consciousness. However it's also a remix of Perseus, the Serpent is Perseus, but this time considered evil, seeing his enlightenment as an ungodly curse or burden, not a gift.
11. ?
12. I don't think Eden is some sort of Bifrost, but it's an interesting idea.
13. Matter of opinion. The Bible largely seems to say that since the Fall, life is suffering period, hence the curses god gave.
14. You should read more biology and anatomy.
(you wrote 13 again) 15. Stop watching America day time TV documentaries.
16. People have imaginations, we all come up with our own ideas about stuff. That is why the Mono-myth is so intriguing.
17. I don't know if you mean 14 or 16, but don't take philosophy notes from Back to the Future.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I used books, Internet, and what you all a "phantasy" hands on real life educational experiences, as well as classes in some subjects using more traditional classroom methods when I was homeschooling my two daughters full time. And were not wealthy, even considered below poverty level living on one income, but we had roof over our heads, we traveled, we bought our own car that we paid off and we managed to build some savings too.š And I agree with you, kids need to learn to navigate the world judiciously. Being over protective is as bad as being too permissive as a parent. I remember when my 19 year old went to a party where alcohol was served and she drank some. She never saw us drinking at home because we are not into alcohol, so when she told me, she thought I would be mad. She was surprised that I wasn't. I said to her, Why would I be mad? You are an adult. You had some alcohol, but you didn't get drunk, you used it responsibly. You did well. I have no reason to be mad.š
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Political coalitions are interesting products of their times and leaderships. Obama was able to fashion and keep together a loose coalition of nerdy autistic "new" atheists, science and tech bros, Silicon Valley as well as more traditional progressive groups - women, minorities, LGBT, etc. JFK had this knack too - he could keep a broad tent - the civil rights movement, the urban machines, organized labor and the radical left together. Their successors couldn't replicate these successes.
The Obama coalition was a counter reaction to the George W. Bush presidency, at which conservative Christianity was central. This was just a weaker bloc by the end of the Obama era. Thus the fissures in his coalition became more pressing.
Three other politicians would end up fighting over the left overs: Bernie (fiscal progressives), Hillary (social progressives) and Trump (largely white male, flyover country, left behind by globalization). The weakening of the Reagan Coalition meant that the rationalistic tech bros began to see the feminists and social justice warriors as more of a threat because with the weakening of the religious right, the SJWs became the most dogmatic and irrational faction in politics. As such, they then shed the feminists who had been their allies against Bush, and would therefore pick up men's rights and red pill guys. This transitional coalition was briefly divided between its Bernie Brocialist faction and the libertarian and old right types. This division did not last long. Most of the Bernie Bros followed their guy into the democratic coalition and sorta kinda made peace with the feminists. Meanwhile, guys like Jordan Peterson injected conservative individualism into the "red pill coalition" and they coalesced around Trump against Hillary and now Biden.
Finally the last step is reconciliation with the religious right. There are quite a few reasons for this, despite the irony inherent to it. One is simple politics. Trump courted the religious right as a traditional base of the GOP. And it paid off. Trump got the votes, the religious right got the supreme court appointees, Roe v Wade got overturned, and the red pill coalition more or less made peace with it because it was another win for their guy. But part of this reconciliation went deeper. The red-pill coalition faced a kind of collective existential crisis after ditching religion back in the early 2000s and then facing a cooling of relations with women in tandum with the already isolating effects of the proliferation of social media. Thus came the male loneliness epidemic, the rise of unattached men, falling rates of romantic and sexual involvement, etc. Women were less effected by this due to their ideological beliefs and tribal loyalties filling in the "meaning and purpose" gap. In hindsight, the turning to religion of such men will seem like an obvious reinvention of the wheel - the monastic traditions with their vows of celibacy and chastity are such an obvious hand-in-glove fit for precisely this kind of scenario and have been for millennia. While most men won't go that far, religion providing an answer for men cut adrift by social disfunction and widespread nihilism and cynicism is just what religion has always done. For good or ill, expect more male devotion to the Abrahamic traditions going forward.
Finally, the self-improvement ethos prevalent in the red pill coalition made reconciliation with Christianity all the easier, given the latter's emphasis on self reflection, personal growth and repentance when warranted.
It will be interesting to see where this ends up in the future. I think the red pill coalition's next big thing might be to court not just the white male working class, but actual organized labor. That will be a tall order as the GOP and the unions have been enemies for time out of hand. But Trump's nomination of J.D Vance as his running mate seems like a nod in this direction.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
3:35 I never thought of the roundhead angle, but it makes sense. Puritan opposition to the "papist" elements retained by the church of England, and then actual papists from Austria, Italy, Poland and MƩxico makes a lot of sense. And then Cromwell, Milton, etc. provide actual scripts for self-styled "pagan revivalists" LARPing. I did not know about the Dutch connection to Santa Claus, nor enough about the difference between Dutch Protestants and Roundheads to comment, but learning that is why I watch you.
Interestingly in Guatemala I watch facebook videos of people carrying a large trunk of a tree taller than the parish church, which men in masks do a jump off of in a ceremony called palo volador. They do it in Mexico too, but they traded the traditional tree trunk for a dedicated steel pole a few decades back. Catholic syncretism is a real thing, and they do all kinds of things like calling priests "father" and bowing down before graven images which Protestants have been pointing and sputtering about ever since Luther nailed his theses to the door. ”Viva Cristo Rey! Tomorrow is the day of Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe, Empress of the Americas.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Cool song. I like the ultranationalist anime waifu of excellent stock, and the EctoLife (TM) product placement at 2:15.
If you want more complex music for cheaper, you can try Sunno. Unfortunately, it doesn't actually require as much musicianship as you sounded like you thought AI does, even like only 1 or 2 years since ChatGPT was released. I am actually a musician who writes really complex intricate stuff, and if Sunno gave me way more control over what the output is aside from just vague textual genre descriptions and the output was half as good as the actual super-automated output, it would be 10x as satisfying and I would use it way more often.
But unfortunately, the AI is like one of those super controlling moms that wants to do 100% of everything for their kids with no input from them instead of letting them do anything for themselves or decide anything ever, and actually deeply enjoys the learned helplessness and reproductive nonviability of their children as adult losers because they think it will make them dependent for longer (no idea what that's like), which is why we'll all be living in some kind of weird Matrix vs. Planet of the Axxx vs. Idxxcracy hybrid dystopia world, and of course we all know the etymology of the word Matrix and why it was chosen for the concept.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Love your channel. Deeply upset by this episode. As a centrist global warming absolutely should be non-partisan and the number one issue for anyone who cares about the overall future of humanity. The reason that we care about global warming in an accelerated rate is 1) due to the fact that the extreme weather conditions will predominantly affect humans in vulnerable areas like Pacific Islands, but obviously humans in economically more productive countries as well. 2) global warming creates increased zoonotic infections, asthma, medication storage issues etc for humans everywhere eg covid. 3) although we can be upset that people who work for the sake of these issues are not effective (agree) and that individual level changes donāt help much (unless they can affect votes to enact systemic change), this is often due to lack of money or lack of appropriate managers heading the fight, or that itās overly bureaucratic. The CIA has had representation on this issue for literally decades, and people who worked with it BEMOAN the fact that it was completely destroyed by bureaucrats, politicians and yellow tape. The solution is that big business owners need to make this a priority, governments need to give serious tax incentives for people who are willing to put effort into creating long-term solutions for this, we need smarter brighter people attached to it regarding renewable energy and sequestration⦠not just people who have more altruistic world views. Itās definitely not just the flowers. And almost all the educated elite concerned about this know that itās not alterable at an individual level that is quite frankly the government as backed by current big business gaslighting individuals into thinking itās their fault, and truly the best way to ensure the next generation produces at a greater scale in economically productive countries is addressing this issue as the number one. Affordable childcare or better parental leave options and tax breaks for children would be solution number 2. I work with gen z on rotating basis, by the hundreds - they are terrified of bringing kids into the world where they feel perceived natural instability, and where government is letting them down to spearhead a change.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So you're saying . . . as the production of something becomes 'optimised' the possibilities for variation from the optimum plummet. ie Optimising cars for minimal wind resistance comes to mind.
Another analogy I recall is Brachiopod fossils. There was a tendency for a persistent (10M's to 100M years) (root) species occupying a given ocean niche to spin off short lived species with wildly different shell ornamentation that evolve to occupy nearby niches (say muddier or stonier). Ultimately, though, the root species didn't have the genetic potential (constrained by path dependence) for a new species derived from it to optimally exploit such niches and eventually a different animal family (Gastropoda bivalvia) has taken over.
So, if you want to gather social influence, there is maybe 2 paths:
1) become an excellent Youtube (or Tiktok) influencer, who accidentally optimises for the selection algorthim (say "Primitive Technology") or who deliberately optimises for the selection algorthim (say "Mr Beast")
2) think differently about social influence (ie how do bivalves differ from brachiopods? Physiologically, life strategy, ?)
My thought for you (@SimoneandMalcolm), in looking at current North American society post covid is to focus towards both the current pre-K and homeschooling (pro-family/anti-orthodoxy) move and towards the emergence of AI ie build a trial AI tutor. I expect lots of other people are thinking this, so maybe seek them out.
An AI is the way to get away from the Baumol effect of needing human teachers (ie to industrial scale personalised teaching). While an LLM based AI hallucinating is much like an adult spinning a just so story for kids, its real world consequences are much less than in the adult professions of say Engineering, Law, etc
All the best
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Youtube is becoming nearly unwatchable without adblock, especially if the video treads on these sorts of topics. I'm watching from my phone, and every 1-3 minutes, I get a 20-80 minute ad. I can barely keep track of what you're talking about, because I have to skip another ad every other minute. Please, tell me you're at least monetizing it and making a few cents off the adbomination? Though, TBH, since you're wealthy, ostere, and investing strategically, I'm more willing to skip than I would be for creators whose job is Youtube. (I've been skipping more on those today, though. The infomercials every other minute are just absurd, and mostly scams or snakeoil (so scams). )
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree with almost everything you guys say, and Iāve been binge-watching your channel today, since Iām down after a minor medical procedure.
So of course I am going to nitpick about a tangential point! You significantly overstate the wine study. For one thing, the participants werenāt sommeliers, or even really experts. They were undergraduates! Ok, studying enology at the University of Bordeaux, so they may have liked and enjoyed wines. But they were still college kids.
For another, they werenāt tested on their ability to determine red or white. They were given white wines dyed red, and they used terms more closely associated with red wines. It wasnāt a direct test.
For what itās worth, my wife and I often have dinner parties where we serve wine in opaque bags. We will frequently include a cheap grocery store wine, a midrange wine, and an expensive wine. I wish our friends chose the cheap stuff, but they invariably hone in on the pricey stuff.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why are so many in the comments assuming that the kid is the user of the social media, as opposed to being on it. .
My daughters have IG and FB accounts that are curated for hobbies and books. They take pictures, and help write the caption, and I post it. They never see the comments, and never interact. Family follows and Noone else. Not private.
That way, when they hit the workforce, they will have 6-10 years of knitting, crochet, sewing, flower arranging, and non-fiction book reviews.
Market positioning as wholesome, patient, attentive to detail and intellectual.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've long suspected that Biden wouldn't be the 2024 Democratic nominee, but I've been hearing good arguments lately that might be changing my mind on that. People are obviously clamoring for a new candidate now, but I've been hearing more and more frequently that the rumor mill in DC suggests that they're stuck with Biden whether they want him or not. They simply don't have and can't get all the money they need in order to successfully field a brand new candidate so late in the game with only 4 months and change before the election. Their only chance at a new candidate is forcing Biden to resign and following the chain of succession, but as you so well pointed out, Harris might be even more hated than Biden is. Hypothetically, they might be able to throw in somebody else (and whether they end up running this year or in 2028, I think Gavin Newsom and Michelle Obama would be dangerous and difficult opponents), but I'm pretty sure it's against campaign finance law to just give Biden's war chest over to his newly appointed successor. If they were planning to replace him, this had to have heen financially planned well in advance, and the fact they haven't pulled the trigger on replacing Biden yet with such little time left on the clock suggests to me that either the Democratic party were deluded enough to believe it wouldn't be necessary or that there was enough internal pushback from Biden and his people to prevent that from happening. Either way, regardless of the eleventh hour panicking that's been going on, I don't think they have any good options left.
Based on the various stories I've heard from many people who have met or personally know Donald Trump, I think Simone has the better read on who he actually is as a person. I think he absolutely did start to feel bad for Biden at some point in the debate. My guess is that it was probably around the time he said that he had no clue what Biden was saying. I think be fumbled the ball a bit in his response to a couple of questions that he should have had locked down (his Charlottesville response comes immediately to mind), but on the whole, he did exactly what he needed to do. Even though CNN and the Biden team made sure that all of the cards were stacked in Biden's favor, what they didn't seem to realize, which thankfully Trump and his team did, is that all Trump needed to do was look composed, competant, and sensible, then just let Biden talk long enough to stumble into an embarassing senior moment. Unfortunately, for everyone involved and everyone who watched, the entire debate turned into an embarrassing senior moment...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Never thought that Jon Stewart could be the Democrats antidote to rid the woke left, but boy does that make sense! If the Republicans were able to allow Trump, a celebrity businessman with zero political experience, to win the primary nomination AND win presidency, then Democrats have their shot too if they brought Stewart in.
The only problem? Jon has very vocal in calling out the bs but he keeps bending the knee. Notice when Jon left the Daily Show and just kept it low, there was NO ONE to keep the left in check. Maher dropped his disdain for the woke, but I donāt think he grasps he is one of the condescending leftists who contributed to giving these people more power to abuse. Meanwhile Jon calls out the BS but is not condescending to that extent he wonāt listen to other peopleās concerns and not talk down to them. He might rebuttal with a quirky joke that can sting, but Jon at least is aware how out of touch the Democrats, not just the left, the Democrats have been. Itās too bad he joined with the TDS cause if he didnāt go down that avenue, I think he would have won a lot of the early Trump supporters that originally were in Obamaās camp but were labeled as deplorables, racist, and garbage just because they believed in Trump.
And while I donāt always agree with Jon, I do admire his dedication to actually look after the firefighters who are going through severe health issues related to being in the action of 9/11. So Jon at least has one little experience with politics and he has to go to Congress to get the fund to look after our New York heroes. Itās funny how at least HE has proven to be more useful than Hollywood in the last 10 years and he was missing for most of it lol.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
One thing to keep in mind when talking about concord and it's flop is that it was a live service game. This is really important because it lives and days based on the number of its concurent players. And you can compare it to its competitors like OW2, TF2, Paladins, even games like fortnite, apex legends, league of legends, dota2, to an extend since they are all live service games. Single player games, the ones you mentioned skyrim and harry potter, are supposed to have fever players so long after release, that fact that they still have a large amount of people playing them is credit to their quality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's kind of hilarious that Hakuna Matata was by far the most popular song from the Lion King, and as a kid I never even realized that that was connected to the downfall in any way. I guess that's how you get away with sneaking conservative messaging into Hollywood back then (now you just barely can at all), which is to pretend like you're glorifying the status quo ideology of liberalism, hedonism, materialism, etc., but then you demonstrate what that leads to in a low-key way that smarter or more responsible people can still draw the right conclusion from, which is basically what the Barbie movie was. The Horseshoe takes on that (Knowles, Connor Tomlinson, etc.) were way, way better than the dxmb Shapiro/Walsh type takes where they just bxrn a doll in a trxsh can or whatever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You two are very fascinating an unique philosophically and politically. Many contradiction - but that's good, because it shows you are firing your own path. I particularly mean the strange combination of believing in evoltuion, understanding that health requires understanding of our natural conditions, being pro-natal, and doing the trad-wife thing, and acknowledging sex differences - with being transhuman, hating the human condition and wanting to overcome it, praising this idea that humanity will overcome all of its curses (including 'women lusting after men', so that surely means an end to sexuality, sex difference, and/or heterosexuality). Another contradition in this video - is hating the left for glorifying sins - but also then saying that the essence of humanity is in 'what we chose for ourselves', and saying that god is humanity, and worshipping god is serving future humanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This was one of my favorite anime when I was younger (I think I only saw the first 2 seasons though), and I always just thought of it as extremely effective pro-masculinity propaganda to indoctrinate young, weak boys into becoming men in a much more effective, thorough, holistic, morally balanced, solidly oriented, and fun way than most typical Shounen anime (which as a genre as a whole is orders of magnitude better than the crap the West had devolved into even back then). I wasn't really familiar with the concept of natalism back then, but I always had this Musk sort of ideology since I was a toddler that intelligent human life should be preserved somewhere in the universe as long as possible.
But for some reason I never tied that to the concrete process of having kids or the things it takes for people to be able to do that (materially, spiritually, culturally, etc.) until I became anti-woke during the last election cycle and realized how evil leftism and even more recently liberalism are, and then sort of exhausted a much larger share of the entire rightism rabbit hole than most people who just become mildly anti-woke based on 1 or 2 issues that bother them about the left.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1