Hearted Youtube comments on Future Vision (@F_Vision) channel.

  1. Seems like bio-diesel would accomplish same thing, a lot easier. Just burn corn oil.
    5
  2. Use as a range extender would eliminate range anxiety for me so let's see it used that way. Maybe the 1 stroke terminology is derived from the fact that you have 2 strokes, 2 pistons in 1 cylinder which equals 1.
    5
  3. I like the healthy criticism of the author. Definitely, it's just another implementation of two-stroke opposite piston design, widely used in German submarine diesels or Ukrainian T64, T84 tanks or BTR4 APC. More of marketing, less of technologies. Substituting piston rods and crankshaft with wavelike structure may have some sense. However, it may be similarly used in standard four-stroke engines as wells. Nothing revolutionary, sorry.
    5
  4. I was glad when, a third of the way through the video, he said it's a 2-stroke engine, not a 1-stroke. Apart from the opposed piston arrangement, which complicates the design, It has fairly classical 2-stroke type scavenging, opening the inlet and exhaust ports at the same time, so it is unlikely to be as efficient as a 4-stroke, as a small amount of the uncombusted intake gasses will escape through the exhaust port before it closes. The video says at one point that it doesn't burn oil - which is an advantage - no quibbling about that. However, the video doesn't expand on how that is achieved. Does it have a sump? My first thought was "Does it use 2-stroke oil?" - but I guess it doesn't. However, pistons do need lubricating. It says, though, that the combustion chamber in a regular 2S is located above the piston, and combustion energy is transferred to the piston, but the conbustion chamber doesn't contribute to the motion. It only absorbs the heat generated - but this engine has pistons on both sides of the combusion chamber, allowing more efficient absorbtion of combusion energy. I guess it runs a lot hotter, then! Is that good? Most engines have cooling, either by a water jacket and radiator, or by cooling fins. How does this one get rid of the heat? However - regardless of its advantages, it has a bigger problem than that! In a few years, it looks like internal combustion engines will be banned in new cars, so this engine has a future of about 10 years at best. Probably less! When motorists stop buying fuel, a lot of fuel stations will close. Fuel will become difficult to find - and its price will go up, so all I.C. engines will become unpopular - including ones with a "wavy component".
    5
  5. this is a marvelous invention now at a single combustion twice the power very very smart, fuel efficient, space efficient, and material efficient to produce also its easier to maintenance since its too small.
    5
  6. This reminds me of the lack of reliability of the 1.0 Ecoboost-engine.
    5
  7. Way to many draw back on this tech. So many people have already proven why it will not work.
    5
  8. I love your pronunciation! This is how we like to call it, the Porschie Taken! It's so cute! 🧸🐣🐶🐱🍓🍭🎠💕
    5
  9. The oul industry maintained its dominance because it is still the best source of energy for transport. Hydrogen will become important when people recover from the delusion that battery EVs are feasible.
    4
  10. Hydrogen Hamro and Tolib 🪂
    4
  11. It could be an alternative but electric car is the most efficient one
    4
  12. In 1980s maybe, not today
    4
  13. Something is wrong with this report. We have a hydrogen burning ice and we have storsge tanks that are pressurized to keep Hydrogen liquid. Refuelling ststions to refill the car's tank. So far so good. But then you go on to say the car has a fuel cell which we know is a device that converts hydrogen to electricity and that electricity is stored in a smaller than ev style battery. This electricity powers an electric motor as propulsion for the car. This would be an EV car and not an ICE car. Two totally different cars. So which is it?
    4
  14. How much would one of these cost? Is it cheaper than EV?
    4
  15. It will be flop. Where can I fill up with hydrogen? It is also highly explosive. If EVs catch fire, hydrogen cars will blow up to smithereens.
    4
  16. I did a running cost calculation of bying a Tesla model 3 vs a similar priced ICE car. in the worst case scenario, the running cost of a model 3 was 1/3 of the ICE car. Its closer to 1/6 of the cost for most likely scenario. Unless price of oil fall 1/3, I don't know how ICE can compete in the future...
    4
  17. The hydrogen infrastructure is worse then the EV fast charging infrastructure
    4
  18. Why use electricity to make hydrogen to put in a car where it makes electricity to charge batteries to run the car? Very inefficient.
    4
  19. Wait, what? The Honda workers are all wearing Toyota caps.
    4
  20. I think hydrogen works better for the trucks. A large Conakry could handle the fleet maintence and help build the truck refueling stations along the freeway. For consumers it doesn't make sense to me. Unless u could piggyback on the truck hydrogen infrastructure down the road
    4
  21. Why buy EV vehicles and create complex problems when there are simple solutions like synthetic fuel and hydrogen? IC engines are reliable , have familiar technology, Using synthetic fuel or hydrogen for IC engine provides environmental benefits. Who says that using electric vehicles can save the world. It's a false economy. If anyone is buying electric vehicles to save the world, They are deluded. EV vehicles will definitely cause headaches for consumers. EVs are not successful in many applications. EVs impact the environment in many ways during production and use. Full EV adoption is not practical at all. EV batteries have massively increased demand for precious metals , which are mined using heavy diesel equipment . The process ruins surrounding land and habitats for 100s of miles . Electric cars are supposed to help the planet , but their batteries definitely create the next trash problem. And sometimes , lithium - ion batteries explode . Electric cars certainly reduce your carbon footprint , but making the lithium - ion batteries could emit 74 % more CO2 than for conventional cars .
    4
  22. Napier built this 100 years ago
    4
  23. Developing an ICE engine at this point is futile. There will never be enough demand to warrant it.
    4
  24. I was. Hoping to. HEAR. it. Run. !!!
    4
  25. What about cooling and cooling fluid circulation ? I'm sure heat is generated and air cooling doesn't seem ideal to maintain decent working temperatures !
    4
  26. A smaller, higher rev model would be great to power a generator for a hybrid.
    4
  27. Looks very good engine, hope they can make hybrid with this.
    4
  28. Reciprocating steam engines are 1 stroke.. Most steam locomotives are 1 stroke.
    4
  29. exhaust piston runs hot all the time? how are the mmissions from it?
    4
  30. Awesome!
    4
  31. Imagine this little engine (or smaller) powering a generator to link on a EV motor. Jep,...I like that.
    4
  32. The biggest weakness of two-stroke engines is its oil burning property, which renders them unacceptable in terms of pollution reduction efforts.
    4
  33. Hydrogen is what this society needs, but arrogance wii stop progress.
    4
  34. A 1300km / 800 mile battery isn't just a 30 to 50% increase but actually a 170% to 250% increase from the current Taycan range which is amazing. I really hope this battery comes out and actually allows for such range. It would be incredible.
    4
  35. I have always been a bit of an EV sceptic so I welcome any efforts to develop hydrogen technology further. See, lithium batteries just can't carry a car as far as a full tank of fuel, nor can they be as durable. It just won't work.
    4
  36. Hydrogen (H2) is not water (H2O) and it is extremely expensive to make Hydrogen out of water. It is much easier to make hydrogen from methane, but that releases CO2. Almost all H2 is produced this way.
    4
  37. Really? Then quickly launch into mass production... See how it performs in the open market.
    4
  38. But I’m confused, synthetic fuel is already a thing… so why EV, why a hydrogen combustion either?
    3
  39. Looks like a great solution if you like complex technology that promises great racing performance. Not sure how the efficiency looks like when considering that hydrogen produced from renewables is done with a process that may reach 70% efficiency. Then the transport and storage may take some substantial investments and cost. After that the hydrogen is used in the vehicle with an efficiency that is less than 50%. Seems like very little effect for a lot of input when compared to a fully electric value chain.
    3
  40. My only hope is that it would be affordable
    3
  41. I like noisy cars, but children suffering from autism don't. That's why I drive cars with a quiet engine.
    3
  42. Great video!
    3
  43. 👍👍
    3
  44. Biggest drawback refueling US infrastructure. Only a few in California.
    3
  45. And the earth is flat.
    3
  46. The minions follow the leader. I guess they will get it in 5 years, 5 years ago it was a bit unclear but 2023 serius? 7:31 they look very optimistic and happy 🤣
    3
  47. I want to explore H-engines alot more. I prefer this to EV-lithium batteries. In need an SUV. And as you say there needs to be H refuelling infrastructure in place.
    3
  48. What if the esquwators in turkie was all electrik when the earthquake hit .
    3
  49. One thing for sure the EV will still win the drag race.
    3
  50. toyota has been running a pure hydrogen car in california for over 4 years .
    3