Hearted Youtube comments on TIKhistory (@TheImperatorKnight) channel.
-
874
-
863
-
862
-
862
-
859
-
the video is good, but there are a few points that are worth adding or correcting:
Firstly, Plotinus was not a Christian, he was a pagan, but some of his students were Christians and ended up influencing early Christianity. It's important to define this because the relationship between Christianity and Platonist philosophy changes depending on the period.
Secondly, Plotinus didn't just disagree with some Gnostics, his thought was incompatible with any Gnostic strand. Gnosticism is based on dualism, the idea that matter and soul are completely separate. Neoplatonism has its main thesis in the idea of monism, that the physical world and the world of ideas coexist and are not separate.
Thirdly, as important as Saint Thomas Aquinas was for the development of Western thought, to associate the Renaissance as a sequence of his thought is absurd. Historically, the renaissance occurred through the reintroduction of Neoplatonist thought in the West, especially by the Greek philosopher Gemistos Plethon, who was an influence on the creation of the Platonist academy in Florence.
Fourthly, Kant did not revive Platonism, because the philosophical current never died.
Fifthly, Nietzsche was not a hermetic, his thinking was based on biology and materialism, far removed from any dualist theory. His greatest influence, apart from Schopenhauer, whom he sought to surpass, was Heraclitus, who was also not a dualist.
Sixthly, although Giovane Gentile was an important fascist intellectual, it makes much more sense to trace the political origins of fascism to Georges Sorel's national syndicalist movement.
Seventh, as much as the video identifies the origins of the mystical aspects of Nazism, it fails to identify its political origins which are unknown even to the people who propagate these ideas. National socialism is an Austrian ideology developed by several individuals, but primarily by a man called Rudolf Jung, who was responsible for giving the ideology its theoretical body, in his main work “Der Nationale Sozialismus: Seine Grundlagen, Sein Werdegang, und Seine Ziele”, or “National Socialism: its Foundations, its Development, and its Goals”, which was published in 1919. I've always been fascinated by the fact that people discuss national socialism so much, but few people are able to pinpoint the creator of the ideology (Jung himself considered himself the Marx of national socialism).
Eighthly, Julius Evola was never of the third position, Evola was a reactionary with various mystical influences, he was always critical of the political aspects of fascism and national socialism, but this association exists in people's minds because he already praised mystical ideas that existed specifically in the SS. He didn't approve of national socialism because he saw it as a plebeian and anti-aristocratic movement, but he saw something of value in the SS, as conservative and noble. He even has a book called “Fascism seen from the right” in which he criticizes fascism for being a revolutionary and nationalist ideology derived from the French extreme left. Associating evola with the third position is wrong, but there are people who take inspiration from some of evola's positions, but this is generally the meme ideology of the dissident internet right, which associates antogonistic thinkers (it's a question of vibes, not ideology).
The video is good, but as the subjects covered are obscure by nature, it ends up creating some meaningless and superficial associations, connecting things that should be more separate (as in the case of the renaissance), or ignoring fundamental pieces (such as Sorel and Rudulf Jung). Despite this, the video is a great starting point to discuss these topics.
858
-
854
-
853
-
850
-
849
-
846
-
845
-
844
-
842
-
832
-
830
-
818
-
817
-
801
-
799
-
793
-
793
-
791
-
785
-
780
-
774
-
773
-
772
-
770
-
765
-
759
-
757
-
755
-
753
-
747
-
743
-
743
-
740
-
731
-
721
-
717
-
714
-
710
-
702
-
693
-
689
-
684
-
680
-
679
-
679