Hearted Youtube comments on The Rational National (@therationalnational) channel.

  1. 3600
  2. 2600
  3. 2400
  4. 2200
  5. 2100
  6. 1800
  7. 1700
  8. 1700
  9. 1700
  10. 1600
  11. 1600
  12. 1500
  13. 1500
  14. 1400
  15. 1400
  16. 1400
  17. 1400
  18. 1400
  19. 1300
  20. 1300
  21. 1300
  22. 1200
  23. 1200
  24. 1200
  25. 1200
  26. 1200
  27. 1200
  28. 1200
  29. 1200
  30. 1100
  31. 1100
  32. 1100
  33. 1100
  34. 1100
  35. 1100
  36. 1100
  37. 1100
  38. 1000
  39. 1000
  40. 1000
  41. 1000
  42. 1000
  43. 1000
  44. 1000
  45. 996
  46. 986
  47. 980
  48. 977
  49. 962
  50. 956
  51. 953
  52. 940
  53. 938
  54. 929
  55. 916
  56. 908
  57. 895
  58. 871
  59. 857
  60. 857
  61. 845
  62. 835
  63. 832
  64. 829
  65. 827
  66. 821
  67. 819
  68. 815
  69. 815
  70. 814
  71. 809
  72. 803
  73. 801
  74. 798
  75. 795
  76. 795
  77. 789
  78. 788
  79. 785
  80. 784
  81. 781
  82. 778
  83. 777
  84. 776
  85. 775
  86. 767
  87. 763
  88. 754
  89. 752
  90. 737
  91. 736
  92. 729
  93. 729
  94. 728
  95. 707
  96. 705
  97. 702
  98. 700
  99. 695
  100. 693
  101. 684
  102. 680
  103. 678
  104. 673
  105. 671
  106. 662
  107. 659
  108. 656
  109. 651
  110. 647
  111. 646
  112. 646
  113. 645
  114. 642
  115. 640
  116. 636
  117. 631
  118. 619
  119. 614
  120. 613
  121. 610
  122. 607
  123. 607
  124. 603
  125. 599
  126. 593
  127. 593
  128. 593
  129. 592
  130. 588
  131. 587
  132. 586
  133. 584
  134. 572
  135. 569
  136. 562
  137. 561
  138. 553
  139. 552
  140. 547
  141. 543
  142. 543
  143. 543
  144. 542
  145. 541
  146. 535
  147. 533
  148. 529
  149. 529
  150. 528
  151. 524
  152. 524
  153. 520
  154. 519
  155. 514
  156. 514
  157. 510
  158. 509
  159. 505
  160. 504
  161. 502
  162. 502
  163. 500
  164. 496
  165. 494
  166. 493
  167. 490
  168. 490
  169. 490
  170. 475
  171. 474
  172. 473
  173. 473
  174. 472
  175. 471
  176. 469
  177. 469
  178. 467
  179. 465
  180. 464
  181. 463
  182. 458
  183. 451
  184. 445
  185. 444
  186. 440
  187. 438
  188. 438
  189. 436
  190. 435
  191. 433
  192. 431
  193. 429
  194. 429
  195. 425
  196. 424
  197. 421
  198. 420
  199. 420
  200. 419
  201. 418
  202. 411
  203. 409
  204. 408
  205. 407
  206. 405
  207. 404
  208. 403
  209. 401
  210. 400
  211. 398
  212. 397
  213. 397
  214. 397
  215. 395
  216. 391
  217. 390
  218. 389
  219. 386
  220. 386
  221. 381
  222. 380
  223. 378
  224. 377
  225. 377
  226. 376
  227. 372
  228. 372
  229. 369
  230. 368
  231. 367
  232. 367
  233. 367
  234. 365
  235. 364
  236. 363
  237. 362
  238. 362
  239. 359
  240. 359
  241. 357
  242. 356
  243. 356
  244. 354
  245. 354
  246. 353
  247. 352
  248. 351
  249. 350
  250. 349
  251. 349
  252. 348
  253. 348
  254. 348
  255. 348
  256. 345
  257. 344
  258. 342
  259. 342
  260. 341
  261. 341
  262. 341
  263. 341
  264. 339
  265. 339
  266. 338
  267. 338
  268. 336
  269. 336
  270. 334
  271. 332
  272. 331
  273. 331
  274. 330
  275. 330
  276. 329
  277. 327
  278. 327
  279. 325
  280. 325
  281. 324
  282. 324
  283. 323
  284. 322
  285. 322
  286. 320
  287. 319
  288. 317
  289. 317
  290. 316
  291. 316
  292. 315
  293. 313
  294. 313
  295. 312
  296. 312
  297. 311
  298. 311
  299. 308
  300. 307
  301. 307
  302. 306
  303. 305
  304. 305
  305. 304
  306. 303
  307. 302
  308. 302
  309. 301
  310. 301
  311. 301
  312. 301
  313. 300
  314. 299
  315. 299
  316. 299
  317. 298
  318. 296
  319. 295
  320. 295
  321. 294
  322. 293
  323. 293
  324. 292
  325. 292
  326. 291
  327. 290
  328. 289
  329. 288
  330. 288
  331. 287
  332. 285
  333. 284
  334. With all due respect to Joy Reid, she does NOT know what the fuck she is talking about with regard to the recent special election in Montana! As a Montanan who knew nothing about Quist, I was eager to find out what he stood for - especially compared to Greg Gianforte, who is a billionaire. Gianforte ran - and LOST - in the 2016 gubernatorial race in Montana. His number one rival/opponent was Steve Bullock, the incumbent, Democratic governor of Montana! Quist did NOT run a good campaign - contrary to Bernie Sander's own statement that "Quist ran a good campaign". Quist did not run a campaign that even remotely resembled the kind of campaign Bernie ran in 2016. I am not sure why Bernie said he did run a good campaign or why Quist did not run one more like Bernie's. Whatever the case, this is an entirely different topic, worthy of full discussion apart from this one. Quist's campaign was predominantly negative. It focused on Gianforte and how 'awful' he was as compared with himself. The only positive things that he included in any of his commercial advertisements were: 1) a promise that he would not institute a sales tax in Montana; 2) a commitment to keeping our public lands open to the public and; 3) a vague assurance that he would not support the 'healthcare' legislation recently passed by Congress and being considered in the Senate. Quist also did what just about every Democrat running for office in Montana does. He showed his support for gun owners. The way he did this was cringe-worthy at best. Quist proudly showed himself carrying a rifle and took a shot at a computer that I believe was supposed to belong to Gianforte. WTF?? To me, this election offered further proof that a negative campaign is a LOSING campaign!! To be sure, Quist had to beat insurmountable odds to win. Gianforte was heavily favored to win this election. After all, Montana had voted in favor of Trump over Clinton by a spread of 21 points. As such, Quist had to run a nearly flawless campaign if he ever hoped to win the election. He did not come close to running a flawless campaign. A final word for those people who have derided and chastised Montanans for electing a person into office who body-slammed a reporter (Yes, Chris Hayes, I am including you as one of the 'deriders') - let me make one thing perfectly clear! The body-slamming incident occurred on the eve of the election. By that time, more than two-thirds of Montanans had already submitted their ballots on it! If this had happened BEFORE most of us had already voted, I believe that Gianforte would have LOST!!
    283
  335. 282
  336. 282
  337. 280
  338. 280
  339. 279
  340. 279
  341. 278
  342. 276
  343. 276
  344. 275
  345. 275
  346. 274
  347. 273
  348. 270
  349. 270
  350. 269
  351. 268
  352. 267
  353. 266
  354. 266
  355. 264
  356. 263
  357. 263
  358. 262
  359. 261
  360. 260
  361. 257
  362. 257
  363. 256
  364. 255
  365. 254
  366. 254
  367. 253
  368. 253
  369. 251
  370. 250
  371. 250
  372. 250
  373. 249
  374. 248
  375. 248
  376. 247
  377. 246
  378. 246
  379. 246
  380. 243
  381. 243
  382. 243
  383. 243
  384. 243
  385. 242
  386. 241
  387. 241
  388. 240
  389. 239
  390. 238
  391. 238
  392. 238
  393. 237
  394. 234
  395. 234
  396. 233
  397. 232
  398. 232
  399. 231
  400. 231
  401. 231
  402. 231
  403. 230
  404. 230
  405. 230
  406. 229
  407. 229
  408. 229
  409. 228
  410. 228
  411. 228
  412. 228
  413. 227
  414. 227
  415. 226
  416. 226
  417. 226
  418. 226
  419. 225
  420. 224
  421. 222
  422. 221
  423. 219
  424. 219
  425. 219
  426. 218
  427. 215
  428. 214
  429. 213
  430. 213
  431. 213
  432. 213
  433. 213
  434. 213
  435. 213
  436. 212
  437. 212
  438. 211
  439. 210
  440. 210
  441. 210
  442. 210
  443. 209
  444. 208
  445. 208
  446. 207
  447. 206
  448. 206
  449. 205
  450. 205
  451. 203
  452. 202
  453. 202
  454. 202
  455. 201
  456. 200
  457. 200
  458. 200
  459. 199
  460. 198
  461. 198
  462. 198
  463. 197
  464. 197
  465. 197
  466. 196
  467. 196
  468. 196
  469. 195
  470. 195
  471. 194
  472. 194
  473. 193
  474. 193
  475. 193
  476. 193
  477. 193
  478. 191
  479. 190
  480. 189
  481. 189
  482. 189
  483. 188
  484. 187
  485. 187
  486. 186
  487. 186
  488. 186
  489. 186
  490. 186
  491. 186
  492. 186
  493. 185
  494. 184
  495. 184
  496. 184
  497. 183
  498. 183
  499. 182
  500. 182
  501. 181
  502. 181
  503. 180
  504. 180
  505. 180
  506. 179
  507. 179
  508. 177
  509. 176
  510. 176
  511. 175
  512. 174
  513. 173
  514. 173
  515. 173
  516. 172
  517. 172
  518. 172
  519. 171
  520. 171
  521. 171
  522. 171
  523. 170
  524. 170
  525. 170
  526. 170
  527. 169
  528. 169
  529. 169
  530. 169
  531. 168
  532. 168
  533. 168
  534. 167
  535. 167
  536. 167
  537. 167
  538. 167
  539. 166
  540. 166
  541. 165
  542. 164
  543. 164
  544. 164
  545. 164
  546. 164
  547. 164
  548. 164
  549. 164
  550. 163
  551. 162
  552. 162
  553. 162
  554. 162
  555. 162
  556. 162
  557. 162
  558. 162
  559. 162
  560. 161
  561. 161
  562. 161
  563. 160
  564. 160
  565. 160
  566. 159
  567. 159
  568. 158
  569. 158
  570. 157
  571. 157
  572. 157
  573. 156
  574. 155
  575. 155
  576. 154
  577. 154
  578. 154
  579. 154
  580. 154
  581. 154
  582. 153
  583. 153
  584. 153
  585. 153
  586. 153
  587. 152
  588. 152
  589. 152
  590. 152
  591. 151
  592. 151
  593. 151
  594. 151
  595. 150
  596. 150
  597. 150
  598. 150
  599. 150
  600. 150
  601. 150
  602. 149
  603. 149
  604. 149
  605. 149
  606. 149
  607. 148
  608. 147
  609. 147
  610. 147
  611. 147
  612. 146
  613. 146
  614. 146
  615. 145
  616. 145
  617. 144
  618. 144
  619. 144
  620. 144
  621. 144
  622. 143
  623. 143
  624. 143
  625. 143
  626. 142
  627. 142
  628. 142
  629. 142
  630. 142
  631. 141
  632. 140
  633. 140
  634. 140
  635. 140
  636. 139
  637. 139
  638. 138
  639. 138
  640. 138
  641. 138
  642. 138
  643. 138
  644. 138
  645. 137
  646. 137
  647. 136
  648. 136
  649. 135
  650. 135
  651. 134
  652. 134
  653. 134
  654. 134
  655. 134
  656. 133
  657. 133
  658. 133
  659. 133
  660. 132
  661. 132
  662. 132
  663. 131
  664. 131
  665. 131
  666. 131
  667. 130
  668. 130
  669. 130
  670. 130
  671. 130
  672. 130
  673. 129
  674. 129
  675. 129
  676. 129
  677. 128
  678. 128
  679. 128
  680. 128
  681. 127
  682. 127
  683. 127
  684. 127
  685. 127
  686. 127
  687. 127
  688. 127
  689. 127
  690. 127
  691. 126
  692. 126
  693. 125
  694. 124
  695. 124
  696. 123
  697. 123
  698. 123
  699. 123
  700. 123
  701. 123
  702. 123
  703. 123
  704. 123
  705. 123
  706. 123
  707. 123
  708. 122
  709. 122
  710. 122
  711. 122
  712. 122
  713. 121
  714. 121
  715. 121
  716. 121
  717. 120
  718. 120
  719. 119
  720. 119
  721. 119
  722. 119
  723. 119
  724. 119
  725. 118
  726. 118
  727. 118
  728. 118
  729. 117
  730. 117
  731. 117
  732. 117
  733. 117
  734. 116
  735. 116
  736. 115
  737. 115
  738. 115
  739. 115
  740. 114
  741. 114
  742. 113
  743. 113
  744. 112
  745. 112
  746. 111
  747. 111
  748. 111
  749. 111
  750. 111
  751. 111
  752. 111
  753. 111
  754. 110
  755. 110
  756. 110
  757. 110
  758. 110
  759. 109
  760. 109
  761. 109
  762. 109
  763. 109
  764. 109
  765. 109
  766. 108
  767. 108
  768. 108
  769. 108
  770. 108
  771. 108
  772. 108
  773. 108
  774. 107
  775. 107
  776. 107
  777. 107
  778. 107
  779. 107
  780. 107
  781. 106
  782. 106
  783. 106
  784. 106
  785. 106
  786. 106
  787. 106
  788. 106
  789. 105
  790. 105
  791. 105
  792. 105
  793. 105
  794. 104
  795. 104
  796. 104
  797. 104
  798. 104
  799. 104
  800. 103
  801. 103
  802. 103
  803. 103
  804. 103
  805. 103
  806. 103
  807. 103
  808. 103
  809. 103
  810. 103
  811. 103
  812. 102
  813. 102
  814. 102
  815. 102
  816. 102
  817. 102
  818. 102
  819. 102
  820. 101
  821. 101
  822. 101
  823. 101
  824. 101
  825. 101
  826. 101
  827. 100
  828. 100
  829. 100
  830. 100
  831. 100
  832. 100
  833. 100
  834. 100
  835. 100
  836. 100
  837. 100
  838. 100
  839. 99
  840. 99
  841. 99
  842. 99
  843. 99
  844. 99
  845. 99
  846. 99
  847. 99
  848. 99
  849. 98
  850. 98
  851. 98
  852. 97
  853. 97
  854. 97
  855. 97
  856. 97
  857. 96
  858. 96
  859. 96
  860. 96
  861. 95
  862. 95
  863. 95
  864. 95
  865. 95
  866. 95
  867. 95
  868. 94
  869. 94
  870. 94
  871. 94
  872. 94
  873. 94
  874. 94
  875. 93
  876. 93
  877. 93
  878. 93
  879. 93
  880. 93
  881. 93
  882. 93
  883. 92
  884. 92
  885. 92
  886. 92
  887. 92
  888. 92
  889. 91
  890. 91
  891. 91
  892. 91
  893. 91
  894. 91
  895. 91
  896. 91
  897. 91
  898. 90
  899. 90
  900. 90
  901. 90
  902. 89
  903. 89
  904. 89
  905. 89
  906. 89
  907. 89
  908. 89
  909. 89
  910. 88
  911. 88
  912. 88
  913. 88
  914. 88
  915. 88
  916. 88
  917. 88
  918. 88
  919. 87
  920. 87
  921. 87
  922. 87
  923. 87
  924. 87
  925. 87
  926. 87
  927. 86
  928. 86
  929. 86
  930. 86
  931. 85
  932. 85
  933. 85
  934. 85
  935. 85
  936. 85
  937. 85
  938. 85
  939. 85
  940. 84
  941. 84
  942. 84
  943. 84
  944. 84
  945. 84
  946. 84
  947. 84
  948. 83
  949. 83
  950. 83
  951. 83
  952. 83
  953. 83
  954. 82
  955. 82
  956. 82
  957. 82
  958. 82
  959. 82
  960. 82
  961. 81
  962. 81
  963. 81
  964. 81
  965. 81
  966. 81
  967. 81
  968. 81
  969. 81
  970. 81
  971. 81
  972. 81
  973. 81
  974. 80
  975. 80
  976. 80
  977. 80
  978. 80
  979. 80
  980. 80
  981. 80
  982. 80
  983. 79
  984. 79
  985. 79
  986. 79
  987. 79
  988. 79
  989. 78
  990. 78
  991. 78
  992. 78
  993. 77
  994. 77
  995. 77
  996. 77
  997. 77
  998. 77
  999. 77
  1000. 76
  1001. 76
  1002. 76
  1003. 76
  1004. 76
  1005. 76
  1006. 76
  1007. 75
  1008. 75
  1009. 75
  1010. 75
  1011. 75
  1012. 75
  1013. 74
  1014. 74
  1015. 74
  1016. 74
  1017. 74
  1018. 74
  1019. 74
  1020. 74
  1021. 73
  1022. 73
  1023. 73
  1024. 73
  1025. 73
  1026. 73
  1027. 73
  1028. 73
  1029. 73
  1030. 73
  1031. 73
  1032. 73
  1033. 73
  1034. 72
  1035. 72
  1036. 72
  1037. 72
  1038. 72
  1039. 72
  1040. 72
  1041. 72
  1042. 72
  1043. 72
  1044. 72
  1045. 72
  1046. 71
  1047. 71
  1048. 71
  1049. 71
  1050. 71
  1051. 71
  1052. 71
  1053. 71
  1054. 71
  1055. 71
  1056. 71
  1057. 70
  1058. 70
  1059. 70
  1060. 70
  1061. 70
  1062. 70
  1063. 70
  1064. 70
  1065. 70
  1066. 70
  1067. 70
  1068. 70
  1069. 70
  1070. 70
  1071. 70
  1072. 69
  1073. 69
  1074. 69
  1075. 69
  1076. 69
  1077. 69
  1078. 69
  1079. 69
  1080. 69
  1081. 69
  1082. 69
  1083. 69
  1084. 68
  1085. 68
  1086. 68
  1087. 68
  1088. 68
  1089. 68
  1090. 68
  1091. 68
  1092. 68
  1093. 68
  1094. 68
  1095. 68
  1096. 67
  1097. 67
  1098. 67
  1099. 67
  1100. 67
  1101. 67
  1102. 67
  1103. 67
  1104. 67
  1105. 67
  1106. 67
  1107. 66
  1108. 66
  1109. 66
  1110. 66
  1111. 66
  1112. 66
  1113. 66
  1114. 66
  1115. 66
  1116. 66
  1117. 66
  1118. 66
  1119. 66
  1120. 66
  1121. 66
  1122. 66
  1123. 66
  1124. 66
  1125. 66
  1126. 66
  1127. 65
  1128. 65
  1129. 65
  1130. 65
  1131. 65
  1132. 65
  1133. 65
  1134. 65
  1135. 65
  1136. 65
  1137. 65
  1138. 65
  1139. 65
  1140. 65
  1141. 65
  1142. 65
  1143. 64
  1144. 64
  1145. 64
  1146. 64
  1147. 64
  1148. 64
  1149. 64
  1150. 64
  1151. 64
  1152. 64
  1153. 64
  1154. 64
  1155. 63
  1156. 63
  1157. 63
  1158. 63
  1159. 63
  1160. 63
  1161. 63
  1162. 63
  1163. 63
  1164. 63
  1165. 63
  1166. 63
  1167. 62
  1168. 62
  1169. 62
  1170. 62
  1171. 62
  1172. 62
  1173. 62
  1174. 62
  1175. 62
  1176. 62
  1177. 62
  1178. 62
  1179. 62
  1180. 62
  1181. 62
  1182. 62
  1183. 62
  1184. 62
  1185. 62
  1186. 61
  1187. 61
  1188. 61
  1189. 61
  1190. 61
  1191. 61
  1192. 61
  1193. 61
  1194. 61
  1195. 61
  1196. 61
  1197. 61
  1198. 61
  1199. 60
  1200. 60
  1201. 60
  1202. 60
  1203. 60
  1204. 60
  1205. 60
  1206. 59
  1207. 59
  1208. 59
  1209. 59
  1210. 59
  1211. 59
  1212. 59
  1213. 59
  1214. 59
  1215. 59
  1216. 59
  1217. 59
  1218. 59
  1219. 59
  1220. 58
  1221. 58
  1222. 58
  1223. 58
  1224. 58
  1225. 58
  1226. 58
  1227. 58
  1228. 58
  1229. 58
  1230. 58
  1231. 58
  1232. 58
  1233. 58
  1234. 58
  1235. 58
  1236. 58
  1237. 58
  1238. 58
  1239. 58
  1240. 58
  1241. 58
  1242. 58
  1243. 58
  1244. 57
  1245. 57
  1246. 57
  1247. Thank you. I hadnā€™t read any of the previous posts in question and I didnā€™t care to because I knew they were from a time when he was a conservative, he has always owned his prior views, and I know what his views are now. Now that I have seen one, if this is representative of the other comments, what the hell! I can totally hear him saying that and I know that it was a backhanded comment about himself and not actually about women. As a woman, I canā€™t even describe my feelings about what I hope is a change to the systematic discrimination/abuse of women in this country. However, there have been instances where I feel condemnation has been unwarranted and a definite (and I hate to use a trump term) witchhunt. You canā€™t take issue with every comment made in the past (and Iā€™m not talking about actual criminal action) especially if it is obvious that person no longer shares that view. This is definitely one of them. A hypocrite who believes one thing and says another and even those who have changed their talking points for monetary reasons is one thing. Someone who has grown, changed their views and now fights for a new cause has nothing in common with that. And Iā€™m not using the term ā€œgrownā€ to mean from a young person to an adult. The argument that he was 29 or so when he made the comments is irrelevant and stupid. It is personal growth which can happen when youā€™re 20 or 80. I feel the Justice Democrats were wrong and that they were untruthful in their comments. I think they were reacting out of fear. The cause is really starting to gain ground and I think they did not want to taint it with any controversy. However, I think theyā€™ve achieved the opposite. It definitely shouldā€™ve been addressed but in an honest less knee-jerk fashion. I still believe in the candidates and in Justice Democrats and will continue to support both. But I hope they will reassess and walk back their comments on Cenk. Theyā€™ve made an issue over what I feel is a non-issue.
    57
  1248. 57
  1249. 57
  1250. 57
  1251. 57
  1252. 57
  1253. 57
  1254. 57
  1255. 57
  1256. 57
  1257. 57
  1258. 57
  1259. 57
  1260. 57
  1261. 57
  1262. 57
  1263. 57
  1264. 57
  1265. 57
  1266. 57
  1267. 57
  1268. 57
  1269. 57
  1270. 56
  1271. 56
  1272. 56
  1273. 56
  1274. 56
  1275. 56
  1276. 56
  1277. 56
  1278. 56
  1279. 56
  1280. 56
  1281. 56
  1282. 56
  1283. 56
  1284. 56
  1285. 56
  1286. 56
  1287. 56
  1288. 55
  1289. 55
  1290. 55
  1291. 55
  1292. 55
  1293. 55
  1294. 55
  1295. 55
  1296. 55
  1297. 55
  1298. 55
  1299. 55
  1300. 55
  1301. 55
  1302. 54
  1303. 54
  1304. 54
  1305. 54
  1306. 54
  1307. 54
  1308. 54
  1309. 54
  1310. 54
  1311. 54
  1312. 54
  1313. 54
  1314. 54
  1315. 54
  1316. 54
  1317. 54
  1318. 53
  1319. 53
  1320. 53
  1321. 53
  1322. 53
  1323. 53
  1324. 53
  1325. 53
  1326. 53
  1327. 53
  1328. 53
  1329. 53
  1330. 53
  1331. 53
  1332. 53
  1333. 53
  1334. 53
  1335. 53
  1336. 52
  1337. 52
  1338. 52
  1339. 52
  1340. 52
  1341. 52
  1342. 52
  1343. 52
  1344. 52
  1345. 52
  1346. 52
  1347. 52
  1348. 52
  1349. 52
  1350. 52
  1351. 52
  1352. 52
  1353. 52
  1354. 52
  1355. 52
  1356. 52
  1357. 52
  1358. 51
  1359. 51
  1360. 51
  1361. 51
  1362. 51
  1363. 51
  1364. 51
  1365. 51
  1366. 51
  1367. 51
  1368. 51
  1369. 51
  1370. 51
  1371. 51
  1372. 51
  1373. 51
  1374. 51
  1375. 51
  1376. 51
  1377. 51
  1378. 51
  1379. 51
  1380. 51
  1381. 51
  1382. 51
  1383. 51
  1384. 51
  1385. 50
  1386. 50
  1387. 50
  1388. 50
  1389. 50
  1390. 50
  1391. 50
  1392. 50
  1393. 50
  1394. 50
  1395. 50
  1396. 50
  1397. 50
  1398. 50
  1399. 50
  1400. 50
  1401. 50
  1402. 50
  1403. 50
  1404. 49
  1405. 49
  1406. 49
  1407. 49
  1408. 49
  1409. 49
  1410. 49
  1411. 49
  1412. 49
  1413. 49
  1414. 49
  1415. 49
  1416. 49
  1417. 49
  1418. 49
  1419. 49
  1420. 49
  1421. 49
  1422. 49
  1423. 49
  1424. 49
  1425. 49
  1426. 49
  1427. 48
  1428. 48
  1429. 48
  1430. 48
  1431. 48
  1432. 48
  1433. 48
  1434. 48
  1435. 48
  1436. 48
  1437. 48
  1438. 48
  1439. 48
  1440. 48
  1441. 48
  1442. 48
  1443. 48
  1444. 48
  1445. 48
  1446. 48
  1447. 48
  1448. 48
  1449. 48
  1450. 47
  1451. 47
  1452. 47
  1453. 47
  1454. 47
  1455. 47
  1456. 47
  1457. 47
  1458. 47
  1459. 47
  1460. 47
  1461. 47
  1462. 47
  1463. 47
  1464. 47
  1465. 47
  1466. 47
  1467. 47
  1468. 47
  1469. 46
  1470. 46
  1471. 46
  1472. 46
  1473. 46
  1474. 46
  1475. 46
  1476. 46
  1477. 46
  1478. 46
  1479. 46
  1480. 46
  1481. 46
  1482. 46
  1483. 46
  1484. 46
  1485. 46
  1486. 46
  1487. 46
  1488. 46
  1489. 46
  1490. 46
  1491. 46
  1492. 46
  1493. 46
  1494. 45
  1495. 45
  1496. 45
  1497. 45
  1498. 45
  1499. 45
  1500. 45
  1501. 45
  1502. 45
  1503. 45
  1504. 45
  1505. 45
  1506. 45
  1507. 45
  1508. 45
  1509. 45
  1510. 45
  1511. 45
  1512. 45
  1513. 45
  1514. 45
  1515. 45
  1516. 45
  1517. 45
  1518. 45
  1519. 44
  1520. 44
  1521. 44
  1522. 44
  1523. 44
  1524. 44
  1525. 44
  1526. 44
  1527. 44
  1528. 44
  1529. 44
  1530. 44
  1531. 44
  1532. 44
  1533. 44
  1534. 44
  1535. 44
  1536. 44
  1537. 44
  1538. 44
  1539. 44
  1540. 44
  1541. 43
  1542. 43
  1543. 43
  1544. 43
  1545. 43
  1546. 43
  1547. 43
  1548. 43
  1549. 43
  1550. 43
  1551. 43
  1552. 43
  1553. 43
  1554. 43
  1555. 43
  1556. 43
  1557. 43
  1558. 43
  1559. 43
  1560. 43
  1561. 43
  1562. 43
  1563. 43
  1564. 43
  1565. 43
  1566. 43
  1567. 43
  1568. 42
  1569. 42
  1570. 42
  1571. 42
  1572. 42
  1573. 42
  1574. 42
  1575. 42
  1576. 42
  1577. 42
  1578. 42
  1579. 42
  1580. 42
  1581. 42
  1582. 42
  1583. 42
  1584. 42
  1585. 41
  1586. 41
  1587. 41
  1588. 41
  1589. 41
  1590. 41
  1591. 41
  1592. 41
  1593. 41
  1594. 41
  1595. 41
  1596. 41
  1597. 41
  1598. 41
  1599. 41
  1600. 41
  1601. 41
  1602. 41
  1603. 41
  1604. 41
  1605. 41
  1606. 41
  1607. 41
  1608. 41
  1609. 41
  1610. 41
  1611. 41
  1612. 41
  1613. 41
  1614. 41
  1615. 41
  1616. 41
  1617. 40
  1618. 40
  1619. 40
  1620. 40
  1621. 40
  1622. 40
  1623. 40
  1624. 40
  1625. 40
  1626. 40
  1627. 40
  1628. 40
  1629. 40
  1630. 40
  1631. 40
  1632. 40
  1633. 40
  1634. 40
  1635. 40
  1636. 40
  1637. 40
  1638. 40
  1639. 40
  1640. 40
  1641. 40
  1642. 39
  1643. 39
  1644. 39
  1645. 39
  1646. 39
  1647. 39
  1648. 39
  1649. 39
  1650. 39
  1651. 39
  1652. 39
  1653. 39
  1654. 39
  1655. 39
  1656. 39
  1657. 39
  1658. 39
  1659. My country, Portugal, is a good example of how neoliberal/neoconservative politics and austerity are absolutely ineffective and hurt the middle class. After the 2008 financial crisis, we had a center right party in power (who, ironically, got elected for criticizing the previous government's plans for austerity) that spent 4 years implementing austerity: more taxes, higher taxes, frozen career progression, cuts to social security, pensions, etc. The middle class took a giant toll because the party wanted to appease the UE and the IMF, the latter even sent a special team called "troika" to analyze our situation, that advised our government to implement even more austerity. After 4 years, the middle class was poorer, the economy was worse, unemployment was worse, AND a half a dozen of the biggest banks crashed (despite "troika's" thorough analysis, they seemed to have missed that coming). No one was held accountable for the banks, and tax payers ended up having to inject millions back into them 2015 elections come, and while that same party (actually a coalition of 2 right wing parties) had the highest percentage of the vote, there were more votes on the left dispersed over 3 different parties. So they decided to make a coalition of their own and ended up being the ones holding government. The right wing coalition called it a coup, said the "devil" was coming because a left coalition would overspend and bankrupt the country. The new left wing government ended austerity, returned people their pensions and their salaries, raised the minimum wage, and more... Results? The economy is flourishing, unemployment has been reduced significantly, exports are higher, the deficit is the lowest it's ever been in the past 40 years.
    39
  1660. 39
  1661. 39
  1662. 39
  1663. 39
  1664. 39
  1665. 39
  1666. 39
  1667. 39
  1668. 39
  1669. 39
  1670. 39
  1671. 39
  1672. 39
  1673. 39
  1674. 39
  1675. 39
  1676. 39
  1677. 38
  1678. 38
  1679. 38
  1680. 38
  1681. 38
  1682. 38
  1683. 38
  1684. 38
  1685. 38
  1686. 38
  1687. 38
  1688. 38
  1689. 38
  1690. 38
  1691. 38
  1692. 38
  1693. 38
  1694. 38
  1695. 38
  1696. 38
  1697. 38
  1698. 38
  1699. 38
  1700. 38
  1701. 38
  1702. 38
  1703. 38
  1704. 38
  1705. 38
  1706. 37
  1707. 37
  1708. 37
  1709. 37
  1710. 37
  1711. 37
  1712. 37
  1713. 37
  1714. 37
  1715. 37
  1716. 37
  1717. 37
  1718. 37
  1719. 37
  1720. 37
  1721. 37
  1722. 37
  1723. 37
  1724. 37
  1725. 37
  1726. 37
  1727. 37
  1728. 37
  1729. 37
  1730. 37
  1731. 37
  1732. 37
  1733. 37
  1734. 37
  1735. 37
  1736. 37
  1737. 36
  1738. 36
  1739. 36
  1740. 36
  1741. 36
  1742. 36
  1743. 36
  1744. 36
  1745. 36
  1746. 36
  1747. 36
  1748. 36
  1749. 36
  1750. 36
  1751. 36
  1752. 36
  1753. 36
  1754. 36
  1755. 36
  1756. 36
  1757. 36
  1758. 36
  1759. 36
  1760. 36
  1761. 36
  1762. 36
  1763. 36
  1764. 36
  1765. 36
  1766. 36
  1767. 36
  1768. 36
  1769. 36
  1770. 36
  1771. 35
  1772. 35
  1773. 35
  1774. 35
  1775. 35
  1776. 35
  1777. 35
  1778. 35
  1779. 35
  1780. 35
  1781. 35
  1782. 35
  1783. 35
  1784. 35
  1785. 35
  1786. 35
  1787. 35
  1788. 35
  1789. 35
  1790. 35
  1791. 35
  1792. 35
  1793. 35
  1794. 35
  1795. 35
  1796. 35
  1797. 35
  1798. 35
  1799. 35
  1800. 35
  1801. 35
  1802. 35
  1803. 35
  1804. 35
  1805. 35
  1806. 35
  1807. 35
  1808. 35
  1809. 35
  1810. 34
  1811. 34
  1812. 34
  1813. 34
  1814. 34
  1815. 34
  1816. 34
  1817. 34
  1818. 34
  1819. 34
  1820. 34
  1821. 34
  1822. 34
  1823. 34
  1824. 34
  1825. 34
  1826. 34
  1827. 34
  1828. 34
  1829. 34
  1830. 34
  1831. 34
  1832. 34
  1833. 34
  1834. 34
  1835. 34
  1836. 34
  1837. 34
  1838. 34
  1839. 34
  1840. 34
  1841. 34
  1842. 34
  1843. 34
  1844. 34
  1845. 33
  1846. 33
  1847. 33
  1848. 33
  1849. 33
  1850. 33
  1851. 33
  1852. 33
  1853. 33
  1854. 33
  1855. 33
  1856. 33
  1857. 33
  1858. 33
  1859. 33
  1860. 33
  1861. 33
  1862. 33
  1863. 33
  1864. 33
  1865. 33
  1866. 33
  1867. 33
  1868. 33
  1869. 33
  1870. 33
  1871. 33
  1872. 33
  1873. 33
  1874. 33
  1875. Dean Cutler I once believed that. And I grant you you have a noble intention, Iā€™m sure. However you do realize that your right-libertarian/anarcho capitalist vision would completely destroy civil rights in the United States, right? It would quickly revert back into pre-civil rights era savagery. After the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts you get considerable more racial equality and national prosperity, despite the reduction of some negative freedom, I believe net freedom for all peoples was increased. Pure negative freedom would undermine all progress towards racial/sexual/religious freedom. Thatā€™s why during the civil rights era the bigots of the south switched from language of segregation to language of negative freedom, and freedom of association. Thatā€™s why they say ā€œitā€™s my right to live in peaceā€ or ā€œI can discriminate against who I like. Itā€™s my right.ā€ To enforce de facto, not de jure, segregation. Thatā€™s why the Republican Party of today has its strongest supporters in the same states that supported Jim Crow and made up the Confederacy, for one. Itā€™s all told to us very well in a book called ā€œWhite Flightā€ by Kevin Kruse. The local white homeowners in Atlanta resisted actual desegregation for many years after old Jim Crow laws were repealed, until the civil rights legislation came in. This phenomenon actually spread in the reaction to civil rights in the 70s, and civil rights has been able to curb it to a great extent. But they continue to be successful at it in many ways to this day. Youā€™ve heard of white flight, the practice of redlining, and the tyranny of local homeownersā€™ associations. Read the Kruse book. Understand it. Youā€™re young I imagine and so am I. We donā€™t really appreciate how terrible things were in those times. We imagined people would just play nice once you remove the state. Not true. You say we shouldnā€™t interfere in private business, well then does that mean youā€™re ok with legalizing slavery? I know slavery was often enforced by states, but often times it operated outside of the law, and if thereā€™s no government there thereā€™s very little to prevent slave markets from being established. Look at Africa. Iā€™m not talking Stalinism or authoritarianism, but you do need strong liberal (in the classical sense) government to enforce these norms. Sorry. Iā€™m sure youā€™ll come around.
    33
  1876. 33
  1877. 33
  1878. 33
  1879. 33
  1880. 33
  1881. 33
  1882. 33
  1883. 33
  1884. 32
  1885. 32
  1886. 32
  1887. 32
  1888. 32
  1889. 32
  1890. 32
  1891. 32
  1892. 32
  1893. 32
  1894. 32
  1895. 32
  1896. 32
  1897. 32
  1898. 32
  1899. 32
  1900. 32
  1901. 32
  1902. 32
  1903. 32
  1904. 32
  1905. 32
  1906. 32
  1907. 32
  1908. 32
  1909. 32
  1910. 32
  1911. 32
  1912. 32
  1913. 32
  1914. 32
  1915. 32
  1916. 32
  1917. 32
  1918. 32
  1919. 32
  1920. 32
  1921. 32
  1922. 32
  1923. 32
  1924. 32
  1925. 32
  1926. 32
  1927. 32
  1928. 32
  1929. 32
  1930. 32
  1931. 32
  1932. 32
  1933. 32
  1934. 32
  1935. 32
  1936. 32
  1937. 31
  1938. 31
  1939. 31
  1940. 31
  1941. 31
  1942. 31
  1943. 31
  1944. 31
  1945. 31
  1946. 31
  1947. 31
  1948. 31
  1949. 31
  1950. 31
  1951. 31
  1952. 31
  1953. 31
  1954. 31
  1955. 31
  1956. 31
  1957. 31
  1958. 31
  1959. 31
  1960. 31
  1961. 31
  1962. 31
  1963. 31
  1964. 31
  1965. 31
  1966. 31
  1967. 31
  1968. 31
  1969. 31
  1970. 31
  1971. 31
  1972. 30
  1973. 30
  1974. 30
  1975. 30
  1976. 30
  1977. 30
  1978. 30
  1979. 30
  1980. 30
  1981. 30
  1982. 30
  1983. 30
  1984. 30
  1985. 30
  1986. 30
  1987. 30
  1988. 30
  1989. 30
  1990. 30
  1991. 30
  1992. 30
  1993. 30
  1994. 30
  1995. 30
  1996. 30
  1997. 30
  1998. 30
  1999. 30
  2000. 30
  2001. 30
  2002. 30
  2003. 30
  2004. 30
  2005. 30
  2006. 30
  2007. 30
  2008. 30
  2009. 30
  2010. 30
  2011. 30
  2012. 30
  2013. 30
  2014. 29
  2015. 29
  2016. 29
  2017. De-platforming is a very effective way to diminish the influence of any individual who may pose as a threat to anyone, especially if we are speaking on conspiracy theorists and reactionary-minded individuals who would create a cesspool of misinformation. Though, it is much easier when those have a smaller circle of influence to de-platform than those with a larger base. However, the endgame remains the same and that is the individual cannot espouse rhetoric on a larger scale. Those who are ardent "free-speech activists" don't seem to understand that, in the most civil libertarian means, we police ourselves, and thus, we do have the right to object and even take action to reassure that deplorable hate speech or misinformation cannot be further spread. Sadly, they prefer to exercise a sense of entitlement, as oppose to exercising personal accountability when it happens. When it comes to social networks, as long as they have guidelines, and if individuals wind up breaking them, they have every right to remove them from their platform, especially if we are talking about individuals like Alex Jones. They are still free to speak their rhetoric, but YouTube does not have to be forced to accommodate that individual, under the false pretense of free speech. If there is a slippery slope to be had, it is how we allow those on the Right to manipulate the conversation and create a false narrative, basically confusing the general populace, who are very simple in their thinking and bring to respond in a very fear-based manner. And thus, the result of that is what occurred in 2016, when Agent Orange was elected in the White House. So, "more speech" is never the answer in this regard. That's often regurgitated by those from a position a privilege, and not by those who are genuinely concerned about providing a more equitable future for everyone.
    29
  2018. 29
  2019. 29
  2020. 29
  2021. 29
  2022. 29
  2023. 29
  2024. 29
  2025. 29
  2026. 29
  2027. 29
  2028. 29
  2029. 29
  2030. 29
  2031. 29
  2032. 29
  2033. 29
  2034. 29
  2035. 29
  2036. 29
  2037. 29
  2038. 29
  2039. 29
  2040. 29
  2041. 29
  2042. 29
  2043. 29
  2044. 29
  2045. 29
  2046. 29
  2047. 29
  2048. 29
  2049. 29
  2050. 29
  2051. 28
  2052. 28
  2053. 28
  2054. 28
  2055. 28
  2056. 28
  2057. 28
  2058. 28
  2059. 28
  2060. 28
  2061. 28
  2062. 28
  2063. 28
  2064. 28
  2065. 28
  2066. 28
  2067. 28
  2068. 28
  2069. 28
  2070. 28
  2071. 28
  2072. 28
  2073. 28
  2074. 28
  2075. 28
  2076. 28
  2077. 28
  2078. 28
  2079. 28
  2080. 28
  2081. 28
  2082. 28
  2083. 28
  2084. 28
  2085. 28
  2086. 28
  2087. 28
  2088. 28
  2089. 28
  2090. 28
  2091. 28
  2092. 28
  2093. 28
  2094. 28
  2095. 28
  2096. 28
  2097. 28
  2098. 28
  2099. 28
  2100. 28
  2101. 28
  2102. 27
  2103. 27
  2104. 27
  2105. 27
  2106. 27
  2107. 27
  2108. 27
  2109. 27
  2110. 27
  2111. 27
  2112. 27
  2113. 27
  2114. 27
  2115. 27
  2116. 27
  2117. 27
  2118. 27
  2119. 27
  2120. 27
  2121. 27
  2122. 27
  2123. 27
  2124. 27
  2125. 27
  2126. 27
  2127. 27
  2128. 27
  2129. 27
  2130. 27
  2131. 27
  2132. 27
  2133. 27
  2134. 27
  2135. 27
  2136. 27
  2137. 27
  2138. 27
  2139. 27
  2140. 27
  2141. 27
  2142. 27
  2143. 27
  2144. 27
  2145. 26
  2146. 26
  2147. 26
  2148. 26
  2149. 26
  2150. 26
  2151. 26
  2152. 26
  2153. 26
  2154. 26
  2155. 26
  2156. 26
  2157. 26
  2158. 26
  2159. 26
  2160. 26
  2161. 26
  2162. 26
  2163. 26
  2164. 26
  2165. 26
  2166. 26
  2167. 26
  2168. 26
  2169. 26
  2170. David, I actually very much agree with most of what you said. You are right, this is in fact a culture war issue. What's amazing is that I probably would have disagreed with you earlier in the year, but the issue with Sarah Huckabee Sanders is what opened my eyes. People on the left are almost always playing defence against the the right while simultaneously defending the right as well. Trump enacts a terrible and fascist policy that separates children from their parents, a member from his administration is politely asked to leave a restuarant after a vote from the working staff; because customers there may have a problem with her being there due to the administration's horrible actions, the right makes it seem like they're always being victimized by the left, and the response from the many on the left is "we shouldn't let this happen because it might set a precedent where people begin kicking others out of restuarants because of differing political views". If the right shared this same principle, I'd agree. The problem is many on the right claim that private businesses SHOULD have the right to do just that. The right uses the left's fears of the possibility of them being censored or in some way having a privilege taken away against them. People on the right would NEVER defend the left the way the left is defending Alex Jones. This gives Alex Jones and others like him more power. Reasons like this is why the playing field is not even. I am concerned that this might set a precedent, but I am more concerned about the precedent that has been set already. If you don't learn from history you are doomed to repeat it. It is possible that this might set a precedent, but history has shown us that it is a GUARANTEE that the right will use their power to shame, silence, and defame their opposition. Alex Jones is not a victim. He brought this on himself. He has caused others to be victims. We can not continue to let the right play the victim and 'free speech' card. They do not care about freedom of speech or expression. If they did they would want the NFL to rehire Colin Kaepernick the way the left wants Alex Jones to be replatformed. The right has control of every branch of government, they most likely will in the future control the Supreme Court. They accuse the left on shutting down speech at college campuses when recent data has proven the right shuts down speech a lot more; and they are now trying to punish teachers who criticize or have disagreements with their side while trying to change academia to benefit their ideology. They accuse the left of of worshiping celebrities but they love Trump, Regan, and others like Kid Rock (who at least at one time wanted to run for office). Many people on the left did not want Oprah to run for President when it was believed she might. They accuse the left of being cult like but they are the ones who never criticize their leaders / representatives. I still remember progressives getting upset with Bernie when he endorsed Hillary Clinton and when he went on that tour with Tom Perez. I should make it clear that not everyone on the right likes Trump or is a bad person. I've ranted enough. Good video.
    26
  2171. 26
  2172. 26
  2173. 26
  2174. 26
  2175. 26
  2176. 26
  2177. 26
  2178. 26
  2179. 26
  2180. 26
  2181. 26
  2182. 26
  2183. 26
  2184. 26
  2185. 26
  2186. 26
  2187. 26
  2188. 26
  2189. 26
  2190. 25
  2191. 25
  2192. 25
  2193. 25
  2194. 25
  2195. 25
  2196. 25
  2197. 25
  2198. 25
  2199. 25
  2200. 25
  2201. 25
  2202. 25
  2203. 25
  2204. 25
  2205. 25
  2206. 25
  2207. 25
  2208. 25
  2209. 25
  2210. 25
  2211. 25
  2212. 25
  2213. 25
  2214. 25
  2215. 25
  2216. 25
  2217. 25
  2218. 25
  2219. 25
  2220. 25
  2221. 25
  2222. 25
  2223. 25
  2224. 25
  2225. 25
  2226. 25
  2227. 25
  2228. 25
  2229. 25
  2230. 25
  2231. 25
  2232. 25
  2233. 25
  2234. 25
  2235. 25
  2236. 25
  2237. 25
  2238. 25
  2239. 25
  2240. 25
  2241. 24
  2242. 24
  2243. 24
  2244. 24
  2245. 24
  2246. 24
  2247. 24
  2248. 24
  2249. 24
  2250. 24
  2251. 24
  2252. 24
  2253. 24
  2254. 24
  2255. 24
  2256. 24
  2257. 24
  2258. 24
  2259. 24
  2260. 24
  2261. 24
  2262. 24
  2263. 24
  2264. 24
  2265. 24
  2266. 24
  2267. 24
  2268. 24
  2269. 24
  2270. 24
  2271. 24
  2272. 24
  2273. 24
  2274. 24
  2275. 24
  2276. 24
  2277. 24
  2278. 24
  2279. 24
  2280. 24
  2281. 24
  2282. 24
  2283. 24
  2284. 24
  2285. 24
  2286. I think I am SOLD on the NDP now. If what he is saying stays true.... I know he has my vote! I voted conservative last time because I felt they were the least offensive. If Jagmeet Singh sticks to and runs on what he just said, it's a done deal for me! Now onto my comments. Your basic income argument.... It's a complex argument... If Welfare and min wage becomes the same..... I am sure for some it would be hard to motivate them to continue to work.... I feel radical changes need to be made within those programs to prevent abuse.... But I do feel it would be great that if you honestly fell on hard times, that the government will properly support you... Also looking at Canada Pension.... They deserve more no doubt.... but the money needs to come from somewhere.... but if you worked min wage jobs your whole life or just a little over... How can you expect to retire and survive when your only going to get 55% of your original wages moving forward. Worse yet now you likely have all kinds of medications that are expensive.... So on that note I do hope something can be done for government coverage of that. Just like our healthcare. and Dentistry should also be considered part of health care! If he is able to generate enough money from his changes to policy, I fully support this happening! Please keep reporting about him! as well about all the other candidates in our next election! Having you spoon feed me all this is allot more easy then me spending hours digging online for information!
    24
  2287. 23
  2288. 23
  2289. 23
  2290. 23
  2291. 23
  2292. 23
  2293. 23
  2294. 23
  2295. 23
  2296. 23
  2297. 23
  2298. 23
  2299. 23
  2300. 23
  2301. 23
  2302. 23
  2303. 23
  2304. 23
  2305. 23
  2306. 23
  2307. 23
  2308. 23
  2309. 23
  2310. 23
  2311. 23
  2312. 23
  2313. 23
  2314. 23
  2315. 23
  2316. 23
  2317. 23
  2318. 23
  2319. 23
  2320. 23
  2321. 23
  2322. 23
  2323. 23
  2324. 23
  2325. 23
  2326. 23
  2327. 23
  2328. 23
  2329. 23
  2330. 23
  2331. 23
  2332. 23
  2333. 23
  2334. 23
  2335. 23
  2336. 23
  2337. 23
  2338. 23
  2339. 23
  2340. 23
  2341. 23
  2342. 23
  2343. 23
  2344. 23
  2345. 23
  2346. 23
  2347. 22
  2348. 22
  2349. 22
  2350. 22
  2351. 22
  2352. 22
  2353. 22
  2354. 22
  2355. 22
  2356. 22
  2357. 22
  2358. 22
  2359. 22
  2360. 22
  2361. 22
  2362. 22
  2363. 22
  2364. 22
  2365. 22
  2366. 22
  2367. 22
  2368. 22
  2369. 22
  2370. 22
  2371. 22
  2372. 22
  2373. 22
  2374. 22
  2375. 22
  2376. 22
  2377. 22
  2378. 22
  2379. 22
  2380. 22
  2381. 22
  2382. 22
  2383. 22
  2384. 22
  2385. 22
  2386. 22
  2387. 22
  2388. 22
  2389. 22
  2390. 22
  2391. 22
  2392. 22
  2393. 22
  2394. 22
  2395. 22
  2396. 22
  2397. 22
  2398. 22
  2399. 21
  2400. 21
  2401. 21
  2402. 21
  2403. 21
  2404. 21
  2405. 21
  2406. 21
  2407. 21
  2408. 21
  2409. 21
  2410. 21
  2411. 21
  2412. 21
  2413. 21
  2414. 21
  2415. 21
  2416. 21
  2417. 21
  2418. 21
  2419. 21
  2420. 21
  2421. 21
  2422. 21
  2423. 21
  2424. 21
  2425. 21
  2426. 21
  2427. 21
  2428. 21
  2429. 21
  2430. 21
  2431. 21
  2432. 21
  2433. 21
  2434. 21
  2435. 21
  2436. 21
  2437. 21
  2438. 21
  2439. 21
  2440. 21
  2441. 21
  2442. 21
  2443. 21
  2444. 21
  2445. 21
  2446. 21
  2447. 21
  2448. 21
  2449. 21
  2450. 21
  2451. 21
  2452. 21
  2453. 21
  2454. 21
  2455. 21
  2456. 21
  2457. 21
  2458. 21
  2459. 21
  2460. 21
  2461. 20
  2462. 20
  2463. 20
  2464. 20
  2465. 20
  2466. 20
  2467. 20
  2468. 20
  2469. 20
  2470. 20
  2471. 20
  2472. 20
  2473. 20
  2474. 20
  2475. 20
  2476. 20
  2477. 20
  2478. 20
  2479. 20
  2480. 20
  2481. 20
  2482. 20
  2483. 20
  2484. 20
  2485. 20
  2486. 20
  2487. 20
  2488. 20
  2489. 20
  2490. 20
  2491. 20
  2492. 20
  2493. 20
  2494. 20
  2495. 20
  2496. 20
  2497. 20
  2498. 20
  2499. 20
  2500. 20
  2501. 20
  2502. 20
  2503. 20
  2504. 20
  2505. 20
  2506. 20
  2507. 20
  2508. 20
  2509. 20
  2510. 20
  2511. 20
  2512. 20
  2513. 20
  2514. 20
  2515. 19
  2516. 19
  2517. 19
  2518. 19
  2519. 19
  2520. 19
  2521. 19
  2522. 19
  2523. 19
  2524. 19
  2525. 19
  2526. 19
  2527. 19
  2528. 19
  2529. 19
  2530. 19
  2531. 19
  2532. 19
  2533. 19
  2534. 19
  2535. 19
  2536. 19
  2537. 19
  2538. 19
  2539. 19
  2540. 19
  2541. 19
  2542. 19
  2543. 19
  2544. 19
  2545. 19
  2546. 19
  2547. 19
  2548. 19
  2549. 19
  2550. 19
  2551. 19
  2552. 19
  2553. 19
  2554. 19
  2555. 19
  2556. 19
  2557. 19
  2558. 19
  2559. 19
  2560. 19
  2561. 19
  2562. 19
  2563. 19
  2564. 19
  2565. 19
  2566. 19
  2567. 19
  2568. 19
  2569. 19
  2570. 19
  2571. 19
  2572. 19
  2573. 19
  2574. The Bee Movie recently came on Netflix, and me and my family decided to watch it for the meme. I largely enjoyed, but as the movie went on I noticed something sinister. The Bee Movie is fascist propaganda. My family thought I was insane but it's true. Let's look at the story here. Barry B. Benson, faced with the soul-sucking repetitiveness of proletarian life working for Honex, decides to try to free himself and goes outside of the hive. After doing outside stuff, he figures out that bees are being exploited by humans, because humans are expropriating their honey/surplus value. Barry, having achieved class consciousness, starts a lawsuit/proletarian revolution. Barry, with the help of the bee proletariat, wins. Post-scarcity is reached, and fully automated luxury bee communism is achieved. It should be paradise. However, this is not where the movie ends. Because of some bullshit mismanagement, bees just stop doing anything, including pollination. The world's vegetation begins to die, and Barry has to deal with the guilt of closing his class-traitor girlfriend's flower shop and spelling the end of life on earth as we know it. To solve the issue, the bees work with the humans to solve the crisis, and afterwards, bees continue to make honey and allow humans to use it. In other words, they solve their problems by ending fully automated luxury bee communism and promoting FUCKING CLASS COLLABORATION. How dare Jerry Seinfeld imply that fully automated luxury bee communism would doom us? How dare he try to tell us that fascist class collaboration is the answer? Who knew that by watching and sharing increasingly accelerating apian cinematic memes we were helping the enemy? I don't beelieve it.
    19
  2575. 19
  2576. 19
  2577. 19
  2578. 19
  2579. 19
  2580. 19
  2581. 19
  2582. 19
  2583. 19
  2584. 19
  2585. 18
  2586. 18
  2587. 18
  2588. 18
  2589. 18
  2590. 18
  2591. 18
  2592. 18
  2593. 18
  2594. 18
  2595. 18
  2596. 18
  2597. 18
  2598. 18
  2599. 18
  2600. 18
  2601. 18
  2602. 18
  2603. 18
  2604. 18
  2605. 18
  2606. 18
  2607. 18
  2608. 18
  2609. 18
  2610. 18
  2611. 18
  2612. 18
  2613. 18
  2614. 18
  2615. 18
  2616. 18
  2617. 18
  2618. 18
  2619. 18
  2620. 18
  2621. 18
  2622. 18
  2623. 18
  2624. 18
  2625. 18
  2626. 18
  2627. 18
  2628. 18
  2629. 18
  2630. 18
  2631. 18
  2632. 18
  2633. 18
  2634. 18
  2635. 18
  2636. 18
  2637. 18
  2638. 18
  2639. 18
  2640. 18
  2641. 18
  2642. 18
  2643. 18
  2644. 18
  2645. 18
  2646. 18
  2647. 18
  2648. 18
  2649. 18
  2650. 18
  2651. 18
  2652. 18
  2653. 18
  2654. 18
  2655. 18
  2656. 18
  2657. 18
  2658. 18
  2659. 18
  2660. 18
  2661. 17
  2662. 17
  2663. 17
  2664. 17
  2665. 17
  2666. 17
  2667. 17
  2668. 17
  2669. 17
  2670. 17
  2671. 17
  2672. 17
  2673. 17
  2674. 17
  2675. 17
  2676. 17
  2677. 17
  2678. 17
  2679. 17
  2680. 17
  2681. 17
  2682. 17
  2683. 17
  2684. 17
  2685. 17
  2686. 17
  2687. 17
  2688. 17
  2689. 17
  2690. 17
  2691. 17
  2692. 17
  2693. 17
  2694. 17
  2695. 17
  2696. 17
  2697. 17
  2698. 17
  2699. 17
  2700. 17
  2701. 17
  2702. 17
  2703. 17
  2704. 17
  2705. 17
  2706. 17
  2707. 17
  2708. 17
  2709. 17
  2710. 17
  2711. 17
  2712. 17
  2713. 17
  2714. 17
  2715. 17
  2716. 17
  2717. 17
  2718. 17
  2719. 17
  2720. 17
  2721. 17
  2722. 17
  2723. 17
  2724. 17
  2725. 17
  2726. 17
  2727. 17
  2728. 17
  2729. 17
  2730. 17
  2731. 17
  2732. 17
  2733. 16
  2734. 16
  2735. 16
  2736. 16
  2737. 16
  2738. 16
  2739. 16
  2740. 16
  2741. 16
  2742. 16
  2743. 16
  2744. 16
  2745. 16
  2746. 16
  2747. 16
  2748. 16
  2749. 16
  2750. 16
  2751. 16
  2752. 16
  2753. 16
  2754. 16
  2755. 16
  2756. 16
  2757. 16
  2758. 16
  2759. 16
  2760. 16
  2761. 16
  2762. 16
  2763. 16
  2764. 16
  2765. 16
  2766. 16
  2767. 16
  2768. 16
  2769. 16
  2770. 16
  2771. 16
  2772. 16
  2773. 16
  2774. 16
  2775. 16
  2776. 16
  2777. 16
  2778. 16
  2779. 16
  2780. 16
  2781. 16
  2782. 16
  2783. 16
  2784. 16
  2785. 16
  2786. 16
  2787. 16
  2788. 16
  2789. 16
  2790. 16
  2791. 16
  2792. 16
  2793. 16
  2794. 16
  2795. 16
  2796. 16
  2797. 16
  2798. 16
  2799. The problem lies in the voters as well. You have to be a party member, paying your dues, and take marching orders from their rich donors, or you are not a Democrat. Wait, what? If liberal Democrats truly care about pulling the American political system back from the right, they need to stop making excuses for their elected officials and realize they are simply not fighting for them. They are the ones who make the remark that Bernie's progressive policies are like a dream, but you would think they would rather have someone fight to get the best possible outcomes rather than handicapping themselves with "incremental change". Bernie's been saying the same things in Congress for decades for crying out loud. I am pretty sure Bernie would love his fight end in a dream come true. The worst part is how they allow Republicans to set the tone excusing Democrats for not being able to accomplish their goals. Progressive policies aren't possible because Republicans will obstruct, but of course they will! They are fighting for what their constituents and donors want and our Democratic officials need to do the same on their end with US being the people they listen to, but as long as the voters don't put their feet to the fire, they won't care. Obama needed to fight for the single payer option and not outright take it off the table as he did, and by doing so, he weaken his position in the negotiating table from the start! It's amazing how many Democrats don't see that stating "we have to be realistic" without noticing that that's not how you barter. You set the price you ultimately want and come down to what the buyer is willing to pay. Democrats are the worst negotiators in the world, but that's probably why many business owners are Republicans.
    16
  2800. 16
  2801. 16
  2802. 16
  2803. 16
  2804. 15
  2805. 15
  2806. 15
  2807. 15
  2808. 15
  2809. 15
  2810. 15
  2811. 15
  2812. 15
  2813. 15
  2814. 15
  2815. 15
  2816. 15
  2817. 15
  2818. 15
  2819. 15
  2820. 15
  2821. 15
  2822. 15
  2823. 15
  2824. 15
  2825. 15
  2826. 15
  2827. 15
  2828. 15
  2829. 15
  2830. 15
  2831. 15
  2832. 15
  2833. 15
  2834. 15
  2835. 15
  2836. 15
  2837. 15
  2838. 15
  2839. 15
  2840. 15
  2841. 15
  2842. 15
  2843. 15
  2844. 15
  2845. 15
  2846. 15
  2847. 15
  2848. 15
  2849. 15
  2850. 15
  2851. 15
  2852. 15
  2853. 15
  2854. 15
  2855. 15
  2856. 15
  2857. 15
  2858. 15
  2859. 15
  2860. 15
  2861. 15
  2862. 15
  2863. 15
  2864. 15
  2865. 15
  2866. 15
  2867. 15
  2868. 15
  2869. 15
  2870. 15
  2871. 15
  2872. 14
  2873. 14
  2874. 14
  2875. 14
  2876. 14
  2877. 14
  2878. 14
  2879. 14
  2880. 14
  2881. 14
  2882. 14
  2883. 14
  2884. 14
  2885. 14
  2886. 14
  2887. 14
  2888. 14
  2889. 14
  2890. 14
  2891. 14
  2892. 14
  2893. 14
  2894. 14
  2895. 14
  2896. 14
  2897. 14
  2898. 14
  2899. 14
  2900. 14
  2901. 14
  2902. 14
  2903. 14
  2904. 14
  2905. 14
  2906. Another sellout corporate Democrat that wants to appeal to the moderate base in the Republican Party. turn his back on the left Progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Ask Hillary Clinton how that strategy work for her. These Democrats care about one thing and that's corporations and rich people. we can all owe that to Bill Clinton because he turned the Democratic party into a party that sought all out the rich corporate interest and the elite billionaire donors to replace unions and workers as a source of money. They sold the Democratic Party to the rich people for price. Give us your billions and will do your bidding. to hell with the unions and The Working Man. All of the policies coming out of Clinton's Administration and Obama's administration have benefited for the larger degree the rich and the corporations. they refused hold the rich, Banks, and their corporations accountable for the crimes and in justices that they've done. they refused to free the American public from the grip of the military industrial complex that fills the coffers of these rich people and their corporations. NAFTA was a giveaway to the rich. The Affordable Care Act was a giveaway to the rich to the insurance companies. Obama made the Bush tax cuts permanent another big plus for the rich. Clinton deregulated the financial sector another big win for the rich. Bill Clinton decimated welfare. Obama didn't end the never ending wars in the Middle East that keep sucking money out government Treasury because these puppets are handpicked and groomed by the rich to deceive us that we are living in a democracy. They talk all these Grand lofty leftist ideals. They know the language well but they also know how to sell you on the line that my hands were tied. I had to reach across the aisle. better yet with Obama ,the obstruction argument, but Republicans could not obstruct him the first two years he had total control. neither bill or obama did anything to do away with right to work laws, which would be a big boost to unions. Neither bill or obama bring the minimum wage up to what it truly should be which is right around $21 an hour. Neither one of them did anything to fight the prison industrial complex that the rich and EnRich themselves off of. Bill Clinton's crime bill only made the prison industrial complex more potent. Obama didn't hold any of the bankers that caused the crash in 2008 accountable. Not a single CEO went to jail for all of the financial destruction they sowed. People lost their jobs. People lost their savings. People lost their homes. People lost their 401K retirement. some people lost their lives because they couldn't take the fact that he lost everything. some people committed suicide. some people lost all of the above, But the fat cats on Wall Street got richer and so has Obama. Obama has collected I think about $120 million dollars from the bankers since he left office. It's his back pay. The same way the clintons have collected their back pay for their faithful service to the rich and their corporations and Banks. Hope we can believe in? NOPE! Obama took hope and turned us all into DOPES. You can't even get them to stand for the fight for $15 min wage. However now that there's a Republican president and everything is controlled by Republicans they will pound their chest and make all these GRANDIOSE Progressive demands because they know they don't have the power to do it. if they ever do happen to get the power, they will be doing the same thing the Republicans are doing now with what they promised their base. They will be reneging and lying and backtracking and saying we can't do it. we don't really know what to do with how to start it or we don't have a plan to get it started. It is all an elaborate con game.
    14
  2907. 14
  2908. 14
  2909. 14
  2910. 14
  2911. 14
  2912. 14
  2913. 14
  2914. 14
  2915. 14
  2916. 14
  2917. 14
  2918. 14
  2919. 14
  2920. 14
  2921. 14
  2922. 14
  2923. 14
  2924. 14
  2925. 14
  2926. 14
  2927. 14
  2928. 14
  2929. 14
  2930. 14
  2931. 14
  2932. 14
  2933. 14
  2934. 14
  2935. 14
  2936. 14
  2937. Jordan Peterson is eloquent and exhudes a certain charm that many of his young followers find very attactive. However, behind that layer, deep down, there is an intolerance and hatred that he rationalizes to himself and others as a righteous struggle against evil forces that would corrupt, enslave and destroy civilization, namely, Marxism and Postmodernism. However, he refuses to understand that Marxism and Postmodernism are complex, diverse historical movements in which many of their major thinkers often disagree with each other. He is very skillful at using logical fallacies, like strawman, false cause, red herring and unwarranted generalization. He seems to be almost a cult figure as exemplified by the vitriol that many of his followers throw at anyone who has the temerity to say anything critical of him. I wonder how many of his followers have read Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Gramsci, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, etc. Or when it comes to Postmodernism, how many of his followers have read Jaques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, etc.? And not just read, but how many have honestly, with an open mind, tried to understand what these thinkers said? It's a lot easier to read some quick Wikipedia summaries and to believe that one has understood those thinkers, and then to believe Jordan Peterson's interpretation. What I find most disturbing in Jordan Peterson is his desire or need to impose on his students his own distorted interpretations. Sure, there is much to criticize in Marxism, Postmodernism and in what goes on in the culture today, but to demonize Marxism and Post-modernism and to want others to accept that demonization is not what an open minded, responsible educator does.
    14
  2938. 14
  2939. 14
  2940. 14
  2941. 14
  2942. 14
  2943. 14
  2944. 14
  2945. 14
  2946. 14
  2947. 14
  2948. 14
  2949. 14
  2950. 13
  2951. 13
  2952. 13
  2953. 13
  2954. 13
  2955. 13
  2956. 13
  2957. 13
  2958. 13
  2959. 13
  2960. 13
  2961. 13
  2962. 13
  2963. 13
  2964. 13
  2965. 13
  2966. 13
  2967. 13
  2968. 13
  2969. 13
  2970. 13
  2971. 13
  2972. 13
  2973. 13
  2974. 13
  2975. 13
  2976. 13
  2977. 13
  2978. 13
  2979. 13
  2980. 13
  2981. 13
  2982. 13
  2983. 13
  2984. 13
  2985. 13
  2986. 13
  2987. 13
  2988. 13
  2989. 13
  2990. 13
  2991. 13
  2992. 13
  2993. 13
  2994. 13
  2995. 13
  2996. 13
  2997. 13
  2998. itsinmyvein - I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what you're saying in your post. At one point, you characterize different races as being different species. And you describe them as not being able to or not wanting to reproduce together. Neanderthals were a separate and distinct species from homo sapiens sapiens, but the two groups reproduced together. Not only that, they produced viable offspring, and there are many homo sapiens sapiens living today with Neanderthal genes. Then you started speaking of North Koreans being a separate and distinct race. There has only been a separation between North Korea and South Korea since 1945. My father is older than that. No new "race" was produced by making a geopolitical boundary 73 years ago. And then you claimed that Native Americans were a separate and distinct race, when they actually descended from populations in Asia and share many of the same genetic traits with those populations today. There was no genetic analysis, when Europeans first arrived that demonstrated that Native Americans were a separate and distinct race. I'm not sure why you identified yourself as a student of behavioral biology, either. If you understand the scientific method, you should know that it doesn't use appeals to authority. And, by your own claim, you're just a student anyway. And behavioral biology isn't the same thing as studying the genetic traits of various populations of humans (although, maybe you had some course that you think informs your positions). I could post sources to support my previous post, but that's not the subject of this video. In addition, I really don't care to fight that fight. Almost everyone has been socialized to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans. To many people, it's a significant part of their sense of self. They want to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans. And there is even a lot of race-based scientific research because almost all scientists have been socialized to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans and there is a good deal of funding for such research. But none of it is scientifically valid because none of it uses discrete samples.
    13
  2999. 13
  3000. 13
  3001. 13
  3002. 13
  3003. 13
  3004. 13
  3005. 13
  3006. 13
  3007. 13
  3008. 13
  3009. 13
  3010. 13
  3011. 13
  3012. 13
  3013. 13
  3014. 13
  3015. 13
  3016. 13
  3017. 13
  3018. 13
  3019. 13
  3020. 13
  3021. 12
  3022. 12
  3023. 12
  3024. 12
  3025. 12
  3026. 12
  3027. 12
  3028. 12
  3029. 12
  3030. 12
  3031. 12
  3032. 12
  3033. 12
  3034. 12
  3035. 12
  3036. 12
  3037. 12
  3038. 12
  3039. 12
  3040. 12
  3041. 12
  3042. 12
  3043. 12
  3044. 12
  3045. 12
  3046. 12
  3047. 12
  3048. 12
  3049. 12
  3050. 12
  3051. 12
  3052. 12
  3053. 12
  3054. 12
  3055. 12
  3056. 12
  3057. 12
  3058. 12
  3059. 12
  3060. 12
  3061. 12
  3062. 12
  3063. 12
  3064. 12
  3065. 12
  3066. 12
  3067. 12
  3068. 12
  3069. 12
  3070. 12
  3071. 12
  3072. 12
  3073. 12
  3074. 12
  3075. 12
  3076. 12
  3077. 12
  3078. 12
  3079. 12
  3080. 12
  3081. 12
  3082. 12
  3083. 12
  3084. 12
  3085. 12
  3086. 12
  3087. I totally agree with you, Mr National. I think the reason why this journalist thought she had Jeremy over a barrel is because in 1984 (when I was 15šŸ˜ÆšŸ˜Æ) the Northern Ireland peace talks were in complete disarray. Jeremy C had a large hand in negotiating the deal that eventually brought about peace. It was pure shit stirring on Sky's part, which is why I will not buy into their TV subscription service. Not only is it shit stirring, but it goes to show that there are no depths to which Murdoch's henchmen will stoop, no one's sensitivities they care about. It wouldn't matter to them if - as a result of their shit-stirring - troubles in N.I. Started again. As long as they could point their finger at the person they were attempting to destroy. If anything, I think Rational National does Sky News a favour by insinuating that one interviewer was at fault. It was the whole network, that's been out to destroy Jeremy Corbyn ever since he gained a position of power within the Labour Party. He is dangerous to Sky, because,it's largely owned by Rupert Murdoch who stands to have a much higher tax bill should Labour under JC ever take power. Tony Blair, the last labour leader who won an election here, was more right wing than even Margaret Thatcher was totally bought out by Murdoch - you scratch my back and I'll make sure my newspaper group will cover you favourably. Corbyn has more scruples than that. The fact that Sky won't ever come outright and ask, "Why do you want to raise taxes for the super-rich, thereby depriving Rupert Murdoch, our boss, of a few quid?" shows that they know how incorrect the question is. So they try to find something else to string him up with. It makes my blood boil.
    12
  3088. 12
  3089. 12
  3090. 12
  3091. 12
  3092. 12
  3093. 12
  3094. 12
  3095. 12
  3096. 12
  3097. 12
  3098. 12
  3099. 12
  3100. 12
  3101. 12
  3102. 12
  3103. 12
  3104. 12
  3105. 12
  3106. 12
  3107. 12
  3108. 12
  3109. 12
  3110. 12
  3111. 12
  3112. 12
  3113. 12
  3114. 12
  3115. 12
  3116. 12
  3117. 12
  3118. 12
  3119. 12
  3120. 12
  3121. 12
  3122. 12
  3123. 11
  3124. 11
  3125. 11
  3126. 11
  3127. 11
  3128. 11
  3129. 11
  3130. 11
  3131. 11
  3132. 11
  3133. 11
  3134. 11
  3135. 11
  3136. 11
  3137. 11
  3138. 11
  3139. 11
  3140. 11
  3141. 11
  3142. 11
  3143. 11
  3144. 11
  3145. 11
  3146. 11
  3147. 11
  3148. 11
  3149. 11
  3150. 11
  3151. 11
  3152. 11
  3153. 11
  3154. 11
  3155. 11
  3156. 11
  3157. 11
  3158. 11
  3159. 11
  3160. 11
  3161. 11
  3162. 11
  3163. 11
  3164. 11
  3165. 11
  3166. 11
  3167. 11
  3168. 11
  3169. 11
  3170. 11
  3171. 11
  3172. 11
  3173. 11
  3174. 11
  3175. 11
  3176. 11
  3177. 11
  3178. 11
  3179. 11
  3180. 11
  3181. 11
  3182. 11
  3183. 11
  3184. 11
  3185. 11
  3186. 11
  3187. 11
  3188. 11
  3189. 11
  3190. 11
  3191. 11
  3192. 11
  3193. 11
  3194. 11
  3195. 11
  3196. 11
  3197. 11
  3198. 11
  3199. 11
  3200. 11
  3201. 11
  3202. 11
  3203. 11
  3204. 11
  3205. 11
  3206. 11
  3207. 11
  3208. 11
  3209. 11
  3210. 11
  3211. 11
  3212. 11
  3213. 11
  3214. 11
  3215. 11
  3216. 11
  3217. 11
  3218. 11
  3219. 11
  3220. 11
  3221. 11
  3222. 11
  3223. 11
  3224. 10
  3225. 10
  3226. 10
  3227. 10
  3228. 10
  3229. 10
  3230. 10
  3231. 10
  3232. 10
  3233. 10
  3234. 10
  3235. 10
  3236. 10
  3237. 10
  3238. 10
  3239. 10
  3240. 10
  3241. 10
  3242. 10
  3243. 10
  3244. 10
  3245. 10
  3246. 10
  3247. 10
  3248. 10
  3249. 10
  3250. 10
  3251. 10
  3252. 10
  3253. 10
  3254. 10
  3255. 10
  3256. 10
  3257. 10
  3258. 10
  3259. 10
  3260. 10
  3261. 10
  3262. 10
  3263. 10
  3264. 10
  3265. 10
  3266. 10
  3267. 10
  3268. 10
  3269. 10
  3270. 10
  3271. 10
  3272. 10
  3273. 10
  3274. Now I know you're a Right wing boot licker ( undoubtedly hiding behind the infantile title of a "classic liberal") Re. your question ( that you added after the fact...another trait of the Right wing...subterfuge)...Trudeau is a conservative as he, and his Lib's, are Ā also into the maintenance of the economic status quo. Has Mr. Trudeau, and his Lib's, done anything re. the unsustainably low corporate tax rate?...Has Mr. Trudeau done anything about the massive public to private wealth transference ( see: Triple P's re. infrastructure)? Anything about wage stagnation?...Anything about Bill C-51 ( the surveillance state) other than renaming it?...Anything about electoral reform? Subsidies to profitable oil and gas corporations? I'll await your Albertan/rural Canadian response on those...The Lib's are Con's with a smile...They DO give the odd offset on social issues. This is what they use to differentiate themselves from the Con's ( like the corporate Democrats in the US). On economic matters, and that is where the rubber meets the proverbial road, I defy anyone to tell me the difference. Re. That you actually think the Nazi's were of "the Left"...Again,now I know you're a Right wing boot licker...I suppose you think that, because of the verbiage, East Germany was called the "Democratic Republic of Germany" and it was also a "democracy". I also assume the because of this that Eric Honecker , and his STASI< were staunch defenders of democracy?...And seeing as you're a fan of definitions and a fan of "running a country like a business", let's get one from the source and not Mr. Webster..."Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of the state and corporate power..."...Benito Mussolini...He was the co-author of the Fascist manifesto, by the way... The rest is a miss mash of Paul Joseph Watson/ Jordan Peterson pseudo intellectual drivel I'm not prepared to spend any time on...And my point stands... You're a Right wing boot licker,drunk on your own version of identity politics and economics, and The Rebel is where you belong..
    10
  3275. 10
  3276. 10
  3277. 10
  3278. 10
  3279. 10
  3280. 10
  3281. 10
  3282. 10
  3283. 10
  3284. 10
  3285. 10
  3286. 10
  3287. 10
  3288. 10
  3289. 10
  3290. 10
  3291. 10
  3292. 10
  3293. 10
  3294. 10
  3295. 10
  3296. 10
  3297. 10
  3298. 10
  3299. 10
  3300. 10
  3301. 10
  3302. 10
  3303. 10
  3304. 10
  3305. 10
  3306. 10
  3307. 10
  3308. 10
  3309. 10
  3310. 10
  3311. 10
  3312. 10
  3313. 10
  3314. 10
  3315. 10
  3316. 10
  3317. 10
  3318. 10
  3319. 10
  3320. 10
  3321. 10
  3322. 10
  3323. 10
  3324. 10
  3325. 10
  3326. 10
  3327. 9
  3328. 9
  3329. 9
  3330. 9
  3331. 9
  3332. 9
  3333. 9
  3334. 9
  3335. 9
  3336. 9
  3337. 9
  3338. 9
  3339. 9
  3340. 9
  3341. 9
  3342. 9
  3343. 9
  3344. 9
  3345. 9
  3346. 9
  3347. 9
  3348. 9
  3349. 9
  3350. 9
  3351. 9
  3352. Interesting that the downvotes actually don't have many arguments. Two thoughts. 1. On the video itself. The current internet-obsession with "principles" lacks any understanding of nuance or the word "principle" itself. To most so-called free-speech advocates: all speech is equal, all speech should be encouraged, and all speech should be represented in the mainstream. I really appreciated your breakdown of this issue because you hit back against the idea that if one supports free speech, one must also support the subsidization and propagation of that speech or they are unprincipled. This is a false dichotomy and a ridiculous idea in general. 1a. It's very difficult to have this discussion in this manner without appearing to be an apologist for one's own side while condemning the same behaviour of the opposite. While I think you did well, this is a point We - as in The Left, broadly - must make often and must support with as much evidence as possible, logical and experiential. I've been thinking of it in terms of a logical syllogism, which would be ideal, but I have not yet found the simple, decisive, convincing argument I'm striving for. By what method can We achieve this in the same way the absolutists achieve have? 1b. Maher actually is being principled - if his position is that all speech among public figures should be debated, discussed, and criticised without fear of such significant harm to their private life. Just as you are being principled in your own position. He's certainly incorrect on the bullying part, though. 2. The best counterargument against the boycott, in my estimation, is that no mob-mentality should be encouraged in any charged issue, especially when it comes to one's career and health (losing one's job and experiencing public evisceration is certainly not good for one's health). While I may be in favour of certain results, I actually do disagree with the method Mr. Hogg is using to achieve his desired outcome. The Center and the Left are coming together to boycott Laura Ingraham, but what will happen if the Center and the Right come together against a socialist, communist, or "social justice warrior?" This is not a slippery-slope, it is a reasonable comparison, and I believe the result will be the same. Such extreme tactics should never be employed against one's enemies if they do not wish to experience the same in response. Nor should they prod a hungry wolf. Further, Mr. Hogg appears to be advocating boycott of Ms. Ingraham largely in response to her unprofessional criticism of his private life, not due to the views you allege. In my opinion this is a significant tactical flaw, as it allows those broadly concerned with the tenor of political debate to criticise Hogg's escalation of the situation, rather than engaging with the substance of any argument against her show. Thus, I do hope that Hogg and others learn from this and their next target is properly deconstructed, as Nathan Robinson so expertly did in his article on Ben Shapiro ("The Cool Kid's Philosopher"). Great video as always, David! Cheers
    9
  3353. 9
  3354. 9
  3355. 9
  3356. 9
  3357. As a Quebecer, I've got a couple of things to say. First of, let's note that the Quebec's liberal party is the right wing party in the assembly, let's not fool ourselves. Secondly, this is important to note tant a couple of years back the Parti QuƩbƩcois tried to ban all visible religious symbols for public employees, not reciepients, which actually would be king of secular, I think it's unessessary, but as a quebecer I know how people hate religion here, not just ''other religions'', all of them, so I get where the sentiment comes from. What the liberals tried here is to implement religious neutrality, not the saparation of church and stat, but neutrality which is different. They tried to end the debate but haven't because their law is really dum. You gotta understand, with winter, it is sometimes a necessity to have your face covered in quebec, believe me. This is now a law that can be implemented, it's realy dumb. thirdly, it is interesting that the Liberals did this because they are the party taht most imigrants vote for, and they usually feel targeted by those mesures. The liberal party isn't a xenophobic party overall, they just wanted to close a debate but ended with a dumb law. Finally, it is very very important to understand the views people have of religion in quebec. Recently I saw a poll stating that only 34% of people believed in God, that's realy fucking low. The catholic church fucked us up so bad we ended up hating every thing reminding us of religious control of people. This anti-religious symbol sentiment is not all racism and xenephobia, English Canada tend to judge us very rapidly without trying to understand our history and culture and it gets really fucking frusfrating. And btw, for fucks sake, take the old fucking crucifix down my assembly.
    9
  3358. 9
  3359. 9
  3360. 9
  3361. 9
  3362. 9
  3363. 9
  3364. 9
  3365. 9
  3366. 9
  3367. 9
  3368. 9
  3369. 9
  3370. 9
  3371. 9
  3372. 9
  3373. 9
  3374. 9
  3375. 9
  3376. 9
  3377. 9
  3378. 9
  3379. 9
  3380. 9
  3381. 9
  3382. 9
  3383. 9
  3384. 9
  3385. 9
  3386. 9
  3387. 9
  3388. 9
  3389. 9
  3390. 9
  3391. 9
  3392. 9
  3393. 9
  3394. 9
  3395. 9
  3396. I really appreciated what Mr. Roland Martin explained - and when he stated "there is a big difference between His-Story and History! So aptly put! I am a 71 year old Canadian - who - just a few years ago, learned what was done to OUR Indigenous peoples when a Tuberculosis Epidemic began to decimate their population - our Government at the time, did basically NOTHING about this - because it was assumed only our Indigenous population was affected, so what the hell, let 'em die off! However, WHEN this terrible disease ALSO began affecting so-called White people - well then, MY GOD, the Canadian Govt. at the time "We have to DO something"! They then made sure the Indigenous people had their own hospitals - the whites had THEIR own hospitals! When it was discovered that a certain experimental surgery, which entailed the removal of a rib - DID NOT work - Doctors stopped doing this to patients in the so-called White Hospitals within 6 months! In the Indigenous hospitals - this failed experiment was STILL PRACTICED for THREE YEARS!!! THIS is why, to this day, you can still see some Indigenous Elders who were subjected to this disgusting practice - they appear slumped or not fully upright. I WAS NEVER TAUGHT THIS HISTORY IN SCHOOL! WHY NOT!!!! I am SURE no one is taught THIS or any other UGLY CRAP our Canadian Government has practiced -- anywhere in my country. WHY NOT!!! THIS IS PART OF OUR HISTORY - instead we are taught his-story or their story! This is DISGUSTING!!! How can ANY COUNTRY learn, grow, and advance toward a more peaceful, respectful understand of so-called "others" and become truly ONE, as a nation, as a global entity, as anything humane - IF WE ARE NOT TAUGHT THE FAILINGS OF OUR OWN GOVERNMENTS!!! PEOPLE EVERYWHERE, whatever our nationality - learn from our mistakes - not our successes! I am FURIOUS at my Canadian education - and at ANY country's educational system that does NOT teach TRUTH! TRUTH IS POWER!!! I want TRUE HISTORY taught in every single one of our schools - right across Canada - THE above and every other UGLY Piece of History is our RIGHT TO KNOW as citizens of our country! TRUE HISTORY - NOT HIS-STORY.
    9
  3397. 9
  3398. 9
  3399. 9
  3400. 9
  3401. 9
  3402. 9
  3403. 9
  3404. 9
  3405. 9
  3406. 9
  3407. 9
  3408. 9
  3409. 9
  3410. 9
  3411. 9
  3412. 9
  3413. 9
  3414. 9
  3415. 9
  3416. 9
  3417. 9
  3418. 9
  3419. 9
  3420. 9
  3421. 9
  3422. 9
  3423. 9
  3424. 9
  3425. 9
  3426. 9
  3427. 9
  3428. 9
  3429. 9
  3430. 9
  3431. 9
  3432. 9
  3433. 9
  3434. 9
  3435. 9
  3436. 8
  3437. 8
  3438. 8
  3439. 8
  3440. 8
  3441. 8
  3442. 8
  3443. 8
  3444. 8
  3445. 8
  3446. 8
  3447. 8
  3448. 8
  3449. 8
  3450. 8
  3451. 8
  3452. 8
  3453. 8
  3454. 8
  3455. 8
  3456. 8
  3457. 8
  3458. 8
  3459. 8
  3460. 8
  3461. 8
  3462. 8
  3463. 8
  3464. 8
  3465. 8
  3466. 8
  3467. 8
  3468. 8
  3469. 8
  3470. 8
  3471. 8
  3472. 8
  3473. 8
  3474. 8
  3475. 8
  3476. 8
  3477. 8
  3478. 8
  3479. 8
  3480. 8
  3481. 8
  3482. 8
  3483. 8
  3484. 8
  3485. 8
  3486. 8
  3487. 8
  3488. 8
  3489. 8
  3490. 8
  3491. 8
  3492. 8
  3493. 8
  3494. 8
  3495. 8
  3496. 8
  3497. 8
  3498. 8
  3499. 8
  3500. 8
  3501. 8
  3502. 8
  3503. 8
  3504. 8
  3505. 8
  3506. 8
  3507. 8
  3508. 8
  3509. 8
  3510. 8
  3511. 8
  3512. 8
  3513. 8
  3514. 8
  3515. 8
  3516. 8
  3517. 8
  3518. 8
  3519. 8
  3520. 8
  3521. 8
  3522. 8
  3523. 8
  3524. 8
  3525. 8
  3526. 8
  3527. 8
  3528. 8
  3529. 8
  3530. 8
  3531. 8
  3532. 8
  3533. 8
  3534. 8
  3535. 8
  3536. 8
  3537. 8
  3538. 8
  3539. 8
  3540. 8
  3541. 8
  3542. 8
  3543. 8
  3544. 8
  3545. 8
  3546. 8
  3547. 8
  3548. 8
  3549. 8
  3550. 8
  3551. 8
  3552. 8
  3553. 8
  3554. 8
  3555. 8
  3556. 8
  3557. 8
  3558. 7
  3559. 7
  3560. 7
  3561. 7
  3562. 7
  3563. 7
  3564. 7
  3565. 7
  3566. 7
  3567. 7
  3568. 7
  3569. 7
  3570. 7
  3571. 7
  3572. 7
  3573. 7
  3574. 7
  3575. 7
  3576. 7
  3577. 7
  3578. 7
  3579. 7
  3580. 7
  3581. 7
  3582. 7
  3583. 7
  3584. 7
  3585. 7
  3586. 7
  3587. 7
  3588. 7
  3589. 7
  3590. 7
  3591. 7
  3592. 7
  3593. 7
  3594. 7
  3595. 7
  3596. 7
  3597. 7
  3598. 7
  3599. 7
  3600. 7
  3601. 7
  3602. 7
  3603. 7
  3604. 7
  3605. 7
  3606. 7
  3607. 7
  3608. 7
  3609. 7
  3610. 7
  3611. 7
  3612. 7
  3613. 7
  3614. 7
  3615. 7
  3616. 7
  3617. 7
  3618. 7
  3619. 7
  3620. 7
  3621. 7
  3622. 7
  3623. 7
  3624. 7
  3625. 7
  3626. 7
  3627. 7
  3628. 7
  3629. 7
  3630. 7
  3631. 7
  3632. 7
  3633. 7
  3634. 7
  3635. 7
  3636. 7
  3637. 7
  3638. 7
  3639. 7
  3640. 7
  3641. 7
  3642. 7
  3643. 7
  3644. 7
  3645. 7
  3646. 7
  3647. 7
  3648. 7
  3649. 7
  3650. 7
  3651. 7
  3652. 7
  3653. 7
  3654. 7
  3655. 7
  3656. 7
  3657. 7
  3658. 7
  3659. 7
  3660. 7
  3661. 7
  3662. 7
  3663. 7
  3664. 7
  3665. 7
  3666. 7
  3667. 7
  3668. 7
  3669. 7
  3670. 7
  3671. 7
  3672. 7
  3673. 7
  3674. 7
  3675. 7
  3676. 7
  3677. Things we could do immediately are decriminalize, then legalize (and regulate) all naturally occurring drugs. But even before we did that, we could make these drugs readily available to people. People hooked on opioids and other drugs could go to "drug dispensing centers" and get a minimum amount of the drug on which they are addicted. This would cause the demand for drugs - from cartels - to DROP! Addicts would no longer have to engage in illegal, immoral or criminal behaviors to get these drugs. By getting a minimum amount of the drug on which they are addicted, they could be STABILIZED!! And during this period of stabilization, outreach workers could meet with them and find out what THEY want and need for themselves and their lives. They would NOT be treated as if they were damaged, flawed or BAD! The problem with so many countries - and the USA is one of the worst - is in the way we approach mind-altering substances in the first place. Our country sends out very mixed messages about them. On the one hand, alcohol, cigarettes and caffeine are legal. All three of these substances can - and do - lead to death in the people who use them. On the other hand, drugs like marijuana, amphetamines and heroin are illegal. Why do we legalize some - but not the other - drugs? Much of it depends upon who is using them. Cocaine was legal in this country back in the 1920's. It wasn't until People of Color and members of other minority groups started using them (and this became known to government officials) that the government decided to make them ILLEGAL!! In essence, our government used the legal system as a means to punish members of minority communities. And once they did this, they could have police pick them up and charge them with a crime for using substances. Once charged, they could throw the book at them and put them in prisons and jails. Once imprisoned, they could use the inmates for slave labor for a variety of companies and jobs. A lesser-known motivation for charging and imprisoning People of Color was to turn them back into slaves. A whole lot of people were not happy when People of Color were freed from slavery. THIS was one, very effective strategy these folks could use to, in essence, engage in slavery practices but NOT have it called slavery.
    7
  3678. 7
  3679. 7
  3680. 7
  3681. 7
  3682. 7
  3683. 7
  3684. 7
  3685. 7
  3686. 7
  3687. 7
  3688. 7
  3689. 7
  3690. 7
  3691. 7
  3692. 7
  3693. 7
  3694. 7
  3695. 7
  3696. 7
  3697. 7
  3698. 7
  3699. 7
  3700. 7
  3701. 6
  3702. 6
  3703. 6
  3704. 6
  3705. 6
  3706. 6
  3707. 6
  3708. 6
  3709. 6
  3710. 6
  3711. 6
  3712. 6
  3713. 6
  3714. 6
  3715. 6
  3716. +Furious Styles -- where's your data on this issue? I found one that studied 20+ years worth of data, and they came to the conclusion of "no". Here you go, the consensus report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine for 2017; https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23550/the-economic-and-fiscal-consequences-of-immigration In it they state that "the Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration finds that the long-term impact of immigration on the wages and employment of native-born workers overall is very small, and that any negative impacts are most likely to be found for prior immigrants or native-born high school dropouts. First-generation immigrants are more costly to governments than are the native-born, but the second generation are among the strongest fiscal and economic contributors in the U.S. This report concludes that immigration has an overall positive impact on long-run economic growth in the U.S." The immigration policy has absolutely nothing to do with living wage increases; wages have been stagnant for decades, and the lack of regulation on the issue is what lead to the drastically shitty decline this country has been in. That problem has been around waaaaaaaaay before DACA, and way before any significant influx of immigrants. Besides that, I find it odd how on the one hand folks say immigrants hurt wages for the working poor, yet simultaneously fight against any effort to raise the wages of said working poor. Priorities in this country are out of wack.
    6
  3717. 6
  3718. 6
  3719. 6
  3720. 6
  3721. 6
  3722. 6
  3723. 6
  3724. 6
  3725. 6
  3726. 6
  3727. 6
  3728. 6
  3729. 6
  3730. 6
  3731. 6
  3732. 6
  3733. 6
  3734. 6
  3735. 6
  3736. 6
  3737. 6
  3738. 6
  3739. 6
  3740. 6
  3741. 6
  3742. 6
  3743. This news story is like so many news stories that the media uses to control public sentiment and public opinion. In 2010 Barack Obama authorized the assassination of an American citizen, in Yemen. This citizen wasn't charged, or convicted of any crime. This goes against US law and policy. The administration was sued by the ACLU but nothing came of it, the issue was a minor talking point in the 2012 election. There are laws and protections that are supposed to prevent the government from illegally entering your home, seizing you property, and imprisoning ANYONE of us without just cause, much less terminating a human life. Omar Khadr is a born Canadian citizen. Like every other individual on this planet, he has the right to his beliefs, religion and to pursue those beliefs as long as they don't infringe on anyone else's rights and freedom. The Iraq war and every other war since which the US has spearheaded in that region has never been supported by any Canadian Prime Minister, except the Conservatives under Stephen Harper. While I might not agree with what Omar Khadr did in going to war, regardless of which side, he is entitled to follow his conscience and his God. After being captured as a child soldier he was taken to Guantanamo, tortured denied his basic human rights, and left without the protection of every Canadian citizen, which is guaranteed by our "Charter of Rights and Freedoms" because of his beliefs, and the side he chose to support. The Stephen Harper government basically left this child to die. If this was a child captured by the Germans in WW2, and the possibility to return this child to his homeland presented itself, it would have been done without a second thought. The Honourable Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did the right thing in acknowledging and righting the abuse of a Canadian citizen. He made sure the laws and rules of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms are applied to every citizen, and it isn't determined by your religion, your ethnicity, or any other affiliation, than you are a Canadian citizen. I don't believe in, or support wars, but the media which is controlled by entities who feel it is appropriate to take away peoples rights in the court of public opinion and have their causes supported as wrong as they may be, needs to be addressed.
    6
  3744. 6
  3745. 6
  3746. 6
  3747. 6
  3748. 6
  3749. 6
  3750. 6
  3751. 6
  3752. 6
  3753. 6
  3754. 6
  3755. 6
  3756. 6
  3757. 6
  3758. 6
  3759. 6
  3760. 6
  3761. 6
  3762. 6
  3763. 6
  3764. 6
  3765. 6
  3766. 6
  3767. 6
  3768. 6
  3769. 6
  3770. 6
  3771. 6
  3772. 6
  3773. 6
  3774. 6
  3775. 6
  3776. 6
  3777. 6
  3778. 6
  3779. 6
  3780. 6
  3781. 6
  3782. 6
  3783. 6
  3784. 6
  3785. 6
  3786. 6
  3787. 6
  3788. 6
  3789. 6
  3790. 6
  3791. 6
  3792. 6
  3793. 6
  3794. 6
  3795. 6
  3796. 6
  3797. 6
  3798. Dyson did a great job here in the debate. No one is brave enough to call this pseudointellectual out on his bullshit. JPs argument about "what percentage" is ridiculous. It's akin to saying, "How much black paint do I have to apply to my face before it becomes black face? Does a dot count?" It's a mindless retort, and completely obfuscates the simple realities of race relations in the US. Privilege is obvious to anyone who has any sense of how the world works. I have had a tough life. And yet, I understand that my personal circumstances in life would be even harder had I possessed melanin in my skin. I wouldn't retort by saying, as Peterson has, "you know nothing about me or my background!". It sounds so childish, and intellectually dishonest. How is this so difficult to understand? You have to be oblivious not to notice. It's no wonder why Dyson exploded as he did. Although, his explosion was precise and cutting. So you have two options, either blacks are genetically inferior and that's why they suffer. Or, everyone is pretty much the same, we are all the same species, but some struggle more than others for psychosocial reasons. Since race is meaningless in the study of anthropology, since there is more genetic differences within a racial group than opposing racial groups, the answer is clearly the psychosocial option. Identical twins given to poor and rich foster homes had different IQ scores; The twin living in the rich household had 10 IQ points higher than the twin raised poor. We know how IQ is affected by environment. It's why no scientist would claim that IQ is only a genetic factor but of various factors. Btw, when is JP going to that church with Dyson?
    6
  3799. 6
  3800. 6
  3801. 6
  3802. 6
  3803. 6
  3804. 6
  3805. 6
  3806. 6
  3807. 6
  3808. 6
  3809. 6
  3810. 6
  3811. 6
  3812. 6
  3813. 6
  3814. 6
  3815. 6
  3816. 6
  3817. 6
  3818. 6
  3819. 6
  3820. 6
  3821. 6
  3822. 6
  3823. 6
  3824. 6
  3825. 6
  3826. 6
  3827. 6
  3828. 6
  3829. 6
  3830. 6
  3831. 6
  3832. 6
  3833. 6
  3834. 6
  3835. 6
  3836. 6
  3837. 6
  3838. 6
  3839. 6
  3840. 6
  3841. 6
  3842. 6
  3843. 6
  3844. 6
  3845. 6
  3846. 6
  3847. 6
  3848. 6
  3849. 6
  3850. 6
  3851. 6
  3852. 6
  3853. 6
  3854. 6
  3855. 6
  3856. 6
  3857. 5
  3858. 5
  3859. 5
  3860. I think we are having a big problem with the caveats employers seem to be taking advantage of between hiring fulltime employees versus part-time employees, with the latter being cheaper for them. PT or contract employees do not have the same entitlements or benefits as fulltime employees, it is much easier to terminate them, and employees do not have to guarantee 40 hours of work per week. PT employees can also be paid much less than fulltime employees by considering them as "entry level", which is not clearly defined. Unions have been declining when we really need them, people think dues are a reason to not have a union, but they will fight for you and protect you. It's worth it to have their expertise and knowledge on your side. We need some form of regulation for PT & FT, with a minimum requirement of FT employees based upon a complex consideration of company size and business levels etc. Or to require that only actual entry level positions are paid minimum wage, with wages increasing with seniority/responsibilities/education etc. FT is only described as "35-40 hr/wk". Most people are being grossly underpaid, and no one who works should be under the poverty level, or struggling to make ends meet. Often employers offer extra hours, so you end up working 40 hours, but your schedule is only 25. All the FT with none of the benefits. We need better wages and better management of tax dollars. That would make a huge difference in our quality of life. $15/hr is great for minimum wage, but any job that isn't entry level should be paid more than that, we shouldn't all be paid the minimum simply because companies want to pocket more money. It's disgraceful mistreatment of the people they rely on to make the company profitable in the first place. * Edit, that job loss myth doesn't take jobs created into account either.
    5
  3861. 5
  3862. 5
  3863. 5
  3864. 5
  3865. 5
  3866. 5
  3867. 5
  3868. 5
  3869. 5
  3870. 5
  3871. 5
  3872. 5
  3873. 5
  3874. 5
  3875. 5
  3876. 5
  3877. 5
  3878. 5
  3879. 5
  3880. 5
  3881. 5
  3882. 5
  3883. 5
  3884. 5
  3885. 5
  3886. 5
  3887. 5
  3888. 5
  3889. 5
  3890. 5
  3891. 5
  3892. 5
  3893. 5
  3894. 5
  3895. 5
  3896. 5
  3897. 5
  3898. 5
  3899. 5
  3900. 5
  3901. 5
  3902. 5
  3903. 5
  3904. 5
  3905. 5
  3906. 5
  3907. 5
  3908. 5
  3909. 5
  3910. 5
  3911. 5
  3912. 5
  3913. 5
  3914. 5
  3915. 5
  3916. 5
  3917. 5
  3918. 5
  3919. 5
  3920. 5
  3921. 5
  3922. 5
  3923. 5
  3924. 5
  3925. 5
  3926. 5
  3927. 5
  3928. 5
  3929. 5
  3930. 5
  3931. 5
  3932. 5
  3933. 5
  3934. 5
  3935. 5
  3936. 5
  3937. 5
  3938. 5
  3939. 5
  3940. 5
  3941. 5
  3942. 5
  3943. 5
  3944. 5
  3945. 5
  3946. 5
  3947. 5
  3948. 5
  3949. 5
  3950. 5
  3951. 5
  3952. 5
  3953. 5
  3954. 5
  3955. 5
  3956. 5
  3957. 5
  3958. 5
  3959. 5
  3960. 5
  3961. 5
  3962. 5
  3963. 5
  3964. 5
  3965. 5
  3966. 5
  3967. 5
  3968. 5
  3969. 5
  3970. 5
  3971. 5
  3972. 5
  3973. 5
  3974. 5
  3975. 5
  3976. 5
  3977. 5
  3978. 5
  3979. 5
  3980. 5
  3981. 5
  3982. 5
  3983. 5
  3984. 5
  3985. 5
  3986. 5
  3987. Right on. I just wrote about the Alabama election and weā€™re in total agreement. Doug Jones won in large part because of the African-American vote on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2017. He also won because Roy Moore was a horrible candidate who drove enough people to vote for Jones or write in another candidate. If not for the allegations, Mooreā€™s nutty self could have easily won. Sadly, the Democratic establishment will take all the wrong lessons from this. They believe that centrism is the answer but it is the scourge of the Democratic Party. Itā€™s a huge reason why many people lost their safety net during the Clinton years it and it is part of the reason the party is decimated across the country. Also, centrism signals the Democratsā€™ capitulation to the Republicans. Centrists do not make good candidates, but populists do. Again, Jones won due to extenuating circumstances. Jones only won by a point and he didnā€™t even win half the vote. There was a perfect storm created in the aftermath of the Harvey Weinstein revelations and the amount of fail on the Republican side. Democrats would do well to take care of the people who really make up their base and stop with this cutesy centrist BS. BTW, I love seeing the amount of research you do for your videos. Hereā€™s the post I wrote for anyone whoā€™s interested: https://shmaltzandmenudo.wordpress.com/2017/12/13/if-you-told-me-that-alabama-could-turn-blue/ I made it scannable for the most part, but the best sections are at the end.
    5
  3988. 5
  3989. 5
  3990. 5
  3991. 5
  3992. 5
  3993. 5
  3994. 5
  3995. 5
  3996. 5
  3997. 5
  3998. 5
  3999. 5
  4000. 5
  4001. 5
  4002. 5
  4003. 5
  4004. 5
  4005. 5
  4006. 5
  4007. 5
  4008. 5
  4009. 5
  4010. 5
  4011. 5
  4012. 5
  4013. 5
  4014. 5
  4015. 5
  4016. 5
  4017. 5
  4018. 5
  4019. 5
  4020. 5
  4021. 5
  4022. 5
  4023. 5
  4024. 5
  4025. 5
  4026. 5
  4027. 5
  4028. 5
  4029. 5
  4030. 5
  4031. 5
  4032. 5
  4033. 5
  4034. 5
  4035. 5
  4036. 5
  4037. 5
  4038. 5
  4039. 5
  4040. 5
  4041. 5
  4042. 5
  4043. 5
  4044. 5
  4045. 5
  4046. 5
  4047. 5
  4048. 5
  4049. 5
  4050. 5
  4051. 5
  4052. 5
  4053. 5
  4054. 5
  4055. 5
  4056. 5
  4057. 5
  4058. 5
  4059. 5
  4060. 5
  4061. 5
  4062. 4
  4063. 4
  4064. 4
  4065. 4
  4066. 4
  4067. 4
  4068. 4
  4069. 4
  4070. 4
  4071. 4
  4072. 4
  4073. 4
  4074. 4
  4075. 4
  4076. 4
  4077. 4
  4078. 4
  4079. 4
  4080. 4
  4081. 4
  4082. 4
  4083. 4
  4084. 4
  4085. 4
  4086. 4
  4087. 4
  4088. 4
  4089. 4
  4090. Hey David, my apologies after a long night of studying, but I think you've missed the mark pretty badly on Mr. Jones. As someone who ran as a local candidate in the past, I believe you're aware that what's on a website is not representative of the entirety of what you're running on. Even though Jones is running for senate, which seems like something that should have big, national implications, the races are often heavily focused on local issues. So let me give you a brief rundown of things Doug Jones is on record as being for. Doug Jones has publicly called for protecting teacher's unions and expanding funding to public schools. Doug Jones has advocated for strong, protected voting rights laws (one of the very most important issues in the US, period). Doug Jones has advocated for expanding Medicaid in the state, advocated for Healthcare as a human right, and has endorsed universal Healthcare. Doug Jones has advocated for public investment(!!) in jobs across struggling rural communities. Doug Jones has also advocated for a living wage - and let me stop you for a moment as well. A living wage in and of itself is a huge commitment. A lack of specificity on this issue is not inherently negative. Perhaps more importantly, we need to get this idea of "$15 or bust" out of our heads. $10/hr in Alabama is likely a living wage across most of that state, and a system that guarantees a living wage to everyone could be effectively regulated county-by-county. While most of these seem moderate or "establishment" in a national context, Doug Jones is likely the furthest left candidate for national office in Alabama in two decades. He is certainly the furthest left Democrat. Leftists should be cheering for his victory and immediately pushing him to be more specific, more committed, and more progressive. Lastly, on the topic of voters, enthusiasm and the party. Doug Jones is not the most charismatic guy, no issue there. But we should not be looking at this on an individual level. There are critical flaws and failures in the structure of the Democratic party that have nothing to do with political issues. As the party currently stands, it could magically have the strongest, most popular platform ever, and many of these candidates would still lose! You cannot consistently win on charisma or issues alone, you also need the systems behind you that make everything go. I'd highly suggest tuning into the Democratic Reform Commission and listening to what folks like Nomiki Konst and Nina Turner have to say, if you haven't already. I really rambled after all! I really do hope you read at least a little bit of it. Thank you for the video and cheers.
    4
  4091. 4
  4092. 4
  4093. 4
  4094. 4
  4095. 4
  4096. 4
  4097. 4
  4098. 4
  4099. 4
  4100. 4
  4101. 4
  4102. 4
  4103. 4
  4104. What a conceited, selfish prick. Not everyone wants to be a billionaire, you know. It's not "aspirational" for me to be like this greedy, out-of-touch, vapid loser who thinks there's nothing more to life than hoarding money, than conspicuously gorging himself at a lavish banquet right in the middle of a widespread famine while the planet boils and multiple species are going extinct at an alarming rate. My own fiscal "aspiration" is to finally have basic financial security for my children and I so that we can, oh, I don't know, maybe have a decent home, take a week's vacation every couple of years, get a proper education and someday retire in comfort and dignity. We're not asking for a lot, and we're all too happy to work for it; I work too fucking hard to struggle so much to feed my children, to live paycheck to paycheck. Yes, sometimes I skip meals so that my kids don't have to. Yes, I once nearly died of sepsis from an easily treatable illness simply for lack of health care coverage. And yes, affordable housing is so scarce where I live that my two kids and I have been tripled up in my mother's spare bedroom since January because even most 1 bedroom apartments are wildly out of reach here. Food, health care, and shelter; I'm not asking for a lot when I work so hard to feed and nurture people for a living, especially when I live in the richest country mankind has ever seen. But people like this sanctimonious asshole aren't satisfied with merely being fabulously wealthy. They want to buy our government too, so they can continue to siphon our own meager wealth on up to themselves. And they won't be satisfied until they have all of it. Whew! You were right, David, that really pissed me off! Especially since he name-checked my own senator, Ron Wyden, who is just a corporatist in sheep's clothing. At least we still have Sen. Merkley here in Oregon, who actually fights to get money out of politics.
    4
  4105. 4
  4106. 4
  4107. 4
  4108. 4
  4109. 4
  4110. 4
  4111. 4
  4112. 4
  4113. 4
  4114. 4
  4115. 4
  4116. 4
  4117. 4
  4118. 4
  4119. 4
  4120. 4
  4121. 4
  4122. 4
  4123. 4
  4124. 4
  4125. 4
  4126. 4
  4127. 4
  4128. 4
  4129. 4
  4130. 4
  4131. 4
  4132. 4
  4133. 4
  4134. 4
  4135. 4
  4136. 4
  4137. 4
  4138. 4
  4139. 4
  4140. 4
  4141. 4
  4142. 4
  4143. 4
  4144. 4
  4145. 4
  4146. 4
  4147. 4
  4148. 4
  4149. 4
  4150. 4
  4151. 4
  4152. 4
  4153. 4
  4154. 4
  4155. 4
  4156. 4
  4157. 4
  4158. 4
  4159. 4
  4160. 4
  4161. 4
  4162. 4
  4163. 4
  4164. 4
  4165. 4
  4166. 4
  4167. 4
  4168. 4
  4169. 4
  4170. 4
  4171. 4
  4172. 4
  4173. 4
  4174. 4
  4175. 4
  4176. 4
  4177. 4
  4178. 4
  4179. 4
  4180. 4
  4181. 4
  4182. 4
  4183. 4
  4184. 4
  4185. 4
  4186. 4
  4187. 4
  4188. Not trying to be a douche but how much does it cost to put up a channel like yours ? I love what you do but basically you're just giving your insights and opinions on topics of the day. Same as I am doing. Yes I know you put a lot of time into it. I put a lot of time into trying to educate myself on what's going on in our government and economic policies. I think you will get enough support to keep doing what you are passionate about. As do I but I don't do it because I think that's my ticket to riches. Much like authors if what you say is of enough interest then people will pay to hear what you have to say. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that Google/ YouTube has to try and squash public discourse but they aren't banning you. Just cutting off your purse strings. Thereby discouraging those like you from making this your life's work. Keep doing what you're doing. You are building your brand. Explore other avenues of revenue. Maybe you won't get rich but you'll never work a day in your life if you truly love what you do. You are very good @ what you do. You'll get by until we get another way to be compensated by another medium provider. Every band wants to be a rock star but not everyone gets to reach that level. But the true lovers & artists keep doing what makes their life fulfilled at whatever level they can keep doing it. Like Debbie Lusignan, Tim Black, etc... you have a following that will support you. I don't believe it's about the money for you so don't make it about the money. Do what you love, it comes through. When people see that they'll come through for you. Best of luck , I will support you in your endeavors because you do the community a noble service.
    4
  4189. 4
  4190. 4
  4191. 4
  4192. 4
  4193. 4
  4194. 4
  4195. 4
  4196. 4
  4197. 4
  4198. 4
  4199. 4
  4200. 4
  4201. 4
  4202. 4
  4203. 4
  4204. 4
  4205. 4
  4206. 4
  4207. 4
  4208. 4
  4209. 4
  4210. 4
  4211. 4
  4212. 4
  4213. 4
  4214. 4
  4215. 4
  4216. 4
  4217. 4
  4218. 4
  4219. 4
  4220. 4
  4221. 4
  4222. 4
  4223. 4
  4224. 4
  4225. 4
  4226. 4
  4227. 4
  4228. I have an idea on rebuilding Puerto Rico, our inner cites and blighted industrial towns leveraging Bernie's plan. I am a Bernie Bro but admit I was unaware he had a similar plan. Here's the deal called Inside Out and Bottoms Up Infrastructure Renewal: 1. Inside out is the rule that says the majority of the labor force, the guys with the picks the shovels, the jack hammer, the labor must come from the unemployed native inhabitant (whether the island or the inner city or WV coal town or my home town, Chester PA). Inside out also means the white collar work, the financial planning, the civil engineering, the urban planning, including multi-purpose neighborhoods, architecture, hybrid renewable power grid and seeding the ability for sustained industrial capacity (jobs), are done by students, interns, grads, and post grads who come form the communities effect. This means HBCU, Puerto Rican schools, Community colleges, local state school, and native graduates. The skin in the game is brown, black and white skin, aligned to the neighborhood or community. This ensure a major chunk of the money is spent on blue and white collar labor from the inside out. An outside in imports labor from outside the community. There is little to no distribution of earnings to benefit the community. There is little to no lasting benefit to locals either. Their pride, like the air, is sucked out of the people. They sit, like animals in the zoo, withing for their cagfe to be cleaned and some food and water left in the dark corner. 2. Bottoms up - The companies who lead the redevelopment, or reconstruction, or resurrection (pick a word) effort are small banks, and small businesses. These business must lead the financial and infrastructure planning but must hire from the inside out through apprenticeships and subcontract to start up cooperatives (employee-owned small businesses, professional and manual labor. Doing so ensure the proper distribution of funds throughout the work force, and a focus on the objective, rebuilding for the present and future well being of the inhabitants. At the same time, you have funded a job and skills training program, where workers learn a trade, like masonry, carpentry, even modern alternative energy skills. You have also taken the folks form the towns an villages who went to school an placed them next to savvy, more senior business and professional people where they learn real-world business, social, technical, and engineering, panning, manufacturing and lifecycle skills. A Top Down methodology begins with the largest investment banks, largest engineering firms, and the largest city planners and real estate developers. They all will take a significant cut of the funding for high salaries, bonuses, befits and other remuneration. Their work will not employ indigenous people, but the haute classe, from the blue blooded universities, and privileged classes. Their objective will be the highest return on their investments by taking the grant money and putting it to work to gentrify the area, creating office space, apartments and town houses to be filled by the rich, many foreign (international) wealthy. I don't have time to go on. I am a slow typist and as you can see make a lot of mistakes. But eh idea of an inside out and top down is the best way to create more jobs for more Americans that resurrects our fallen, blighted communities, incorporates the latest in alternative energy generation, the best ideas in urban planning, and plants the seeds for renewed growth in our industrial capacity. This reduced poverty and crime, provides good work for our under and unemployed, for our kids coming out of college, for small businesses, regional banks and local governments. I realize I under-expressed the need to pull in manufacturing companies into the master plan, but you get the idea. It would be damn sad if Goldman Sachs and Halliburton get the contract to rebuild Puerto Rico or any place. Thanks .
    4
  4229. 4
  4230. 4
  4231. 4
  4232. 4
  4233. 4
  4234. 4
  4235. 4
  4236. 4
  4237. 4
  4238. 4
  4239. 4
  4240. 4
  4241. 4
  4242. 4
  4243. 4
  4244. 4
  4245. 4
  4246. 4
  4247. 4
  4248. 4
  4249. 4
  4250. 4
  4251. 4
  4252. 4
  4253. 4
  4254. 4
  4255. 4
  4256. 4
  4257. 4
  4258. 4
  4259. 4
  4260. 4
  4261. 4
  4262. 4
  4263. 4
  4264. 4
  4265. 4
  4266. 4
  4267. 4
  4268. 4
  4269. 4
  4270. 4
  4271. 4
  4272. 4
  4273. 4
  4274. 4
  4275. 4
  4276. 4
  4277. 4
  4278. 4
  4279. 4
  4280. 4
  4281. 4
  4282. 4
  4283. 4
  4284. 4
  4285. 4
  4286. 4
  4287. 4
  4288. 4
  4289. 4
  4290. 4
  4291. 4
  4292. 4
  4293. 4
  4294. 4
  4295. 4
  4296. 4
  4297. 4
  4298. 4
  4299. 4
  4300. 4
  4301. 4
  4302. 4
  4303. 4
  4304. 4
  4305. 4
  4306. 4
  4307. 4
  4308. 4
  4309. 4
  4310. 4
  4311. 3
  4312. 3
  4313. 3
  4314. 3
  4315. 3
  4316. 3
  4317. 3
  4318. 3
  4319. 3
  4320. 3
  4321. 3
  4322. 3
  4323. 3
  4324. 3
  4325. 3
  4326. 3
  4327. 3
  4328. 3
  4329. 3
  4330. 3
  4331. 3
  4332. 3
  4333. 3
  4334. 3
  4335. 3
  4336. 3
  4337. 3
  4338. 3
  4339. 3
  4340. 3
  4341. 3
  4342. 3
  4343. 3
  4344. 3
  4345. 3
  4346. 3
  4347. 3
  4348. 3
  4349. 3
  4350. 3
  4351. 3
  4352. 3
  4353. 3
  4354. 3
  4355. 3
  4356. 3
  4357. 3
  4358. 3
  4359. 3
  4360. "Ford ran for the 2014 Toronto mayoral election and lost. In 2011, Ford promoted an alternative plan for the Port Lands district of Toronto, including a monorail, a boat-in hotel, the world's largest Ferris wheel and a mega-mall. The plan was ridiculed in the media and council voted it downā€”including by members of the mayoral executive committee. Ford caused controversy after revealing that his brother Rob would be served a subpoena if Rob's friend and driver Alexander Lisi went to court over charges of extortion. Ford commented that the subpoena was in "payback" of Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair not getting a contract renewal with the Toronto Police Service, saying "This is why we need a change at the top", in regards to Blair's contract. Blair filed a defamation lawsuit, demanding a written apology in exchange for dropping the suit. Ford apologized verbally and then later apologized and retracted the comments in writing. An investigative report by The Globe and Mail published in May 2013 alleged that Ford sold hashish at James Gardens for several years in the 1980s, based on interviews with anonymous sources. Ford, who had never been charged with an offence, denied the allegations and accused the newspaper of unfairly targeting his brother, then-Mayor Rob Ford. The newspaper defended its report and its use of anonymous sources at an Ontario Press Council hearing, which dismissed complaints against the newspaper and found that its coverage was "fair and ethical". Ford said at the time that he planned to sue the newspaper for libel. When asked in a 2018 interview why he had not sued, he replied that he had decided a lawsuit would be a "waste of time". In regards to Northern Ontario, Ford criticized the Liberal government for not proceeding quickly enough to develop the Northern Ontario Ring of Fire, saying that he'd get on a bulldozer himself if necessary. His comments in regards to Ring of Fire development have been criticized as being "simplistic" and disregarding the patience required to negotiate with Indigenous peoples in regards to land claims and ensuring Indigenous communities receive a share of any economic gains." Yeah, "not" a loser, I guess.
    3
  4361. 3
  4362. 3
  4363. 3
  4364. 3
  4365. 3
  4366. 3
  4367. 3
  4368. 3
  4369. 3
  4370. 3
  4371. 3
  4372. 3
  4373. 3
  4374. 3
  4375. 3
  4376. 3
  4377. 3
  4378. 3
  4379. 3
  4380. 3
  4381. 3
  4382. 3
  4383. 3
  4384. 3
  4385. 3
  4386. 3
  4387. 3
  4388. 3
  4389. 3
  4390. 3
  4391. 3
  4392. 3
  4393. 3
  4394. 3
  4395. 3
  4396. 3
  4397. 3
  4398. 3
  4399. 3
  4400. 3
  4401. 3
  4402. 3
  4403. 3
  4404. 3
  4405. 3
  4406. 3
  4407. 3
  4408. 3
  4409. 3
  4410. 3
  4411. 3
  4412. 3
  4413. 3
  4414. 3
  4415. 3
  4416. 3
  4417. 3
  4418. 3
  4419. 3
  4420. 3
  4421. 3
  4422. 3
  4423. 3
  4424. 3
  4425. 3
  4426. 3
  4427. 3
  4428. 3
  4429. 3
  4430. 3
  4431. 3
  4432. 3
  4433. 3
  4434. 3
  4435. 3
  4436. 3
  4437. 3
  4438. 3
  4439. 3
  4440. 3
  4441. 3
  4442. 3
  4443. 3
  4444. 3
  4445. 3
  4446. 3
  4447. 3
  4448. 3
  4449. 3
  4450. 3
  4451. 3
  4452. 3
  4453. 3
  4454. 3
  4455. 3
  4456. 3
  4457. 3
  4458. 3
  4459. As a New Zealander watching all the way from Perth, Western Australia (yes, quite the mouthful), I only started taking an interest in US politics the moment I learned about Bernie Sanders and his progressive platform and having the courage to stand against the 1%. And then, Jeremy Corbyn emerged as UK Labour Party Leader along with the mass media smear campaign launched against him at every turn leading into the Brexit referendum and of course, last week's Snap Election resulting in his ultimate surge in popularity. Such an astonishing result that was. For a long time, I have been in search of independent media challenging what the corporate wing has been churning out over the years and funnily enough, that all began with Russell Brand's Trews lol. Then I stumbled upon TYT, which lead to the likes of Jimmy Dore, Kyle Kulinski's Secular Talk and The Humanist Report AND NOW most recently - your show, so I thank you for providing an honest and for lack of a better word, 'rational' point of view where other so-called progressive platforms choose to attack other outlets for disagreeing with their POVs (not naming names), so keep up the good work indeed, Dave. I'll become a Patron for sure - no worries mate! :) In other news, however, NZ is holding an election in September, just saying. Our last PM John Key was a stooge for Obama and was blatantly in support of the TPP which I do believe his resignation was the best thing he ever did. Furthermore, also believing he resigned because Trump became President which "was" going to derail his hopes of the TPP ever going ahead. Key was a Merill-Lynch banker on Wall Street btw so that too oughta tell you something. Anyway, NZ needs change as much as the UK and US but we're still a long way from the style of policies that Corbyn and Sanders are offering.
    3
  4460. 3
  4461. 3
  4462. 3
  4463. 3
  4464. 3
  4465. 3
  4466. 3
  4467. 3
  4468. 3
  4469. 3
  4470. 3
  4471. 3
  4472. 3
  4473. 3
  4474. 3
  4475. 3
  4476. 3
  4477. 3
  4478. 3
  4479. 3
  4480. 3
  4481. 3
  4482. 3
  4483. 3
  4484. 3
  4485. 3
  4486. 3
  4487. 3
  4488. 3
  4489. 3
  4490. 3
  4491. 3
  4492. 3
  4493. 3
  4494. 3
  4495. 3
  4496. 3
  4497. 3
  4498. 3
  4499. 3
  4500. 3
  4501. 3
  4502. 3
  4503. 3
  4504. 3
  4505. 3
  4506. 3
  4507. 3
  4508. 3
  4509. 3
  4510. 3
  4511. 3
  4512. 3
  4513. 3
  4514. 3
  4515. 3
  4516. 3
  4517. 3
  4518. 3
  4519. 3
  4520. 3
  4521. David, only a few questions / commemts here in general and not being patronizing and these can be rhetorical obviously. do you incorporate SEO / keyword research? Just testing freestyle can help too while learning the more technical stuff that one doesnt know yet. For instance try simple tests like adding a politically relevant banking topic bc 1st national bank of texas is trending or has a high payout ad search. If someone says Hillary always reply when you can adding the word Clinton because it ranks higher with both words. Bernie Sanders? throw in 2016. Bernie Sanders 2016 is highest ranked. This are just random madeup tweaks or examples. Need more than twitter to draw more viewers. Need other owned sites as both draws and $ streams and backups, like syndicating your videos and content across media. People have complained about losing hundreds of videos. Heartbreaking stuff. Cant one request review of any demonitization with standard cut and paste replies to save time? Do the videos in question say they were demonitized or are there just no adsense ad bot matches from adverters at this time? Campaigns begin and end and advertizers change paramaters. Like they may not want to be on a national anthem protest video etc. after the first week when things get nastier so they exclude those matches on videos. Or they just want the first week of a video. You already know a this type stuff, so who am I talking to. You know about how the ad bots work now by checking out key things about your video, your audience, the devices they use, the comments, what they are guessing are your audience demographic etc... advertizers have their own bots and prowl and go bid in bot to bot auctions with youtube bots arbitraging the bids. Creators need to get an overview if they dont already have an idea of how to find the best ways to work the arena so to speak. I would be sure to put an educational fair use statement in the descriptions of videos when using video clips, including news clips, from others? Avoid other ppls music (and use nice free music) but I think you already avoid the music issue. which is a little saddish bc music is so good. but tricky. There are free tools that can help with optimization to improve your earnings where small techniques and tweaks and tips can add up. I will be back with one sample link to a guy on youtube who has a recent listing of top ten free keyword tools. https://youtu.be/qclUCIApN_o look in his description of his video he has the links. FYI on this video of yours I got three different ads run. google, kfc and a wordswift or some program that helps fill out forms automatically. Edit: do triple stack playlists? your playlists are under utilized. linked / affiliate marketing? where do ppl order your tshirt mug cap calendar etc? Where is your downloadable ebook... A Canadian's View of The State of American Progressive Politics? based off your channel. Sponsors. Mail Time where people send you money and gifts to your PO Box. Honestly some ppl will do that rather than PayPal or Patreon, but that too.
    3
  4522. 3
  4523. 3
  4524. 3
  4525. 3
  4526. 3
  4527. 3
  4528. 3
  4529. 3
  4530. 3
  4531. 3
  4532. 3
  4533. 3
  4534. 3
  4535. 3
  4536. 3
  4537. 3
  4538. 3
  4539. 3
  4540. 3
  4541. 3
  4542. 3
  4543. 3
  4544. 3
  4545. 3
  4546. 3
  4547. 3
  4548. 3
  4549. 3
  4550. 3
  4551. 3
  4552. 3
  4553. 3
  4554. 3
  4555. 3
  4556. 3
  4557. 3
  4558. 3
  4559. 3
  4560. 3
  4561. 3
  4562. 3
  4563. 3
  4564. 3
  4565. 3
  4566. 3
  4567. 3
  4568. 3
  4569. 3
  4570. 3
  4571. 3
  4572. 3
  4573. 3
  4574. 3
  4575. 3
  4576. 3
  4577. 3
  4578. 3
  4579. 3
  4580. 3
  4581. 3
  4582. 3
  4583. 3
  4584. 3
  4585. 3
  4586. 3
  4587. 3
  4588. 3
  4589. 3
  4590. 3
  4591. 3
  4592. 3
  4593. 3
  4594. 3
  4595. 3
  4596. 3
  4597. 3
  4598. 3
  4599. 3
  4600. 3
  4601. 3
  4602. 3
  4603. 3
  4604. 3
  4605. 3
  4606. 3
  4607. 3
  4608. 3
  4609. 3
  4610. 3
  4611. 3
  4612. 3
  4613. 3
  4614. 3
  4615. 3
  4616. 3
  4617. 3
  4618. 3
  4619. 3
  4620. 3
  4621. 3
  4622. 3
  4623. 3
  4624. 3
  4625. 3
  4626. 3
  4627. 3
  4628. 3
  4629. 3
  4630. 3
  4631. 3
  4632. 3
  4633. 3
  4634. 3
  4635. 3
  4636. 3
  4637. 3
  4638. 3
  4639. 3
  4640. 3
  4641. 3
  4642. 3
  4643. 3
  4644. 3
  4645. 3
  4646. 3
  4647. 3
  4648. 3
  4649. 3
  4650. 3
  4651. 3
  4652. 3
  4653. 3
  4654. 3
  4655. 3
  4656. 3
  4657. 3
  4658. 3
  4659. 3
  4660. 3
  4661. 3
  4662. 3
  4663. 3
  4664. 3
  4665. 3
  4666. 3
  4667. 3
  4668. 3
  4669. 3
  4670. 3
  4671. 3
  4672. 3
  4673. 3
  4674. 3
  4675. 3
  4676. 3
  4677. 3
  4678. 3
  4679. 3
  4680. 3
  4681. 3
  4682. 3
  4683. 3
  4684. 3
  4685. 3
  4686. 3
  4687. 3
  4688. 3
  4689. 3
  4690. 3
  4691. 3
  4692. 3
  4693. 3
  4694. 3
  4695. 3
  4696. 3
  4697. 3
  4698. 3
  4699. 3
  4700. 3
  4701. 3
  4702. 3
  4703. 3
  4704. 3
  4705. 3
  4706. 3
  4707. 3
  4708. 2
  4709. 2
  4710. 2
  4711. 2
  4712. 2
  4713. 2
  4714. 2
  4715. 2
  4716. 2
  4717. 2
  4718. 2
  4719. 2
  4720. 2
  4721. 2
  4722. 2
  4723. 2
  4724. 2
  4725. 2
  4726. 2
  4727. 2
  4728. 2
  4729. 2
  4730. 2
  4731. 2
  4732. 2
  4733. 2
  4734. 2
  4735. 2
  4736. 2
  4737. 2
  4738. 2
  4739. 2
  4740. 2
  4741. 2
  4742. 2
  4743. 2
  4744. 2
  4745. 2
  4746. 2
  4747. 2
  4748. 2
  4749. 2
  4750. 2
  4751. 2
  4752. 2
  4753. 2
  4754. 2
  4755. 2
  4756. 2
  4757. 2
  4758. 2
  4759. 2
  4760. 2
  4761. 2
  4762. 2
  4763. 2
  4764. 2
  4765. I understand the sentiment completely, and in the case of the United States and Britain, and likely the rest of Europe, a socialist revolution seems on the rise, and for good reason. Corporations have really manipulated their political systems unabashedly. Now the chickens are coming home to roost, and the backlash is nigh. But Canada is a bit different. It's been implementing progressive policies incrementally, and the neoliberals that run Canada are actually liberals (and also literally Liberal, as in their party name). They have their buddies in the corporate sector, but by and large the corporate sector likes all of the social programs implemented by the government, because that means they have less social programs that they need to implemented for their own employees. Also for the most part, corporations don't bear a big burden of the social programs, it's mostly paid for through income and sales taxes. Corporate taxes in Canada are pretty low. Corporations have no reason to be against social programs, and actually benefit from them. So unlike American Democrats, who are neoliberals but are actually old-school conservatives, Canadian neoliberals are old-school liberals. So there isn't really a groundswell of support for NDP or other far-left parties, because the center-left party has been by and large responsive to Canadian's demands. This happens in both the provincial and federal levels, the Liberals seem to draw on massive support because no one is really too worried about them cutting social programs. Now, I think one problem with the Liberals is that they get into power and do break some promises. Such as Trudeau reneging on his promise to reform the Canadian electoral system, because now that he's in power, he's happy that the existing system got him elected. If he was smart, then he should have gone through with his promise, and likely he would've been voted back in with another majority because he actually did keep his promise. For that reason alone, I'd be inclined to vote NDP this time.
    2
  4766. 2
  4767. 2
  4768. 2
  4769. 2
  4770. 2
  4771. 2
  4772. 2
  4773. 2
  4774. 2
  4775. 2
  4776. 2
  4777. 2
  4778. 2
  4779. 2
  4780. 2
  4781. 2
  4782. 2
  4783. 2
  4784. 2
  4785. 2
  4786. 2
  4787. 2
  4788. 2
  4789. 2
  4790. 2
  4791. 2
  4792. 2
  4793. 2
  4794. 2
  4795. 2
  4796. 2
  4797. 2
  4798. 2
  4799. 2
  4800. 2
  4801. 2
  4802. 2
  4803. 2
  4804. 2
  4805. 2
  4806. 2
  4807. 2
  4808. 2
  4809. 2
  4810. 2
  4811. 2
  4812. 2
  4813. 2
  4814. 2
  4815. 2
  4816. 2
  4817. 2
  4818. 2
  4819. 2
  4820. 2
  4821. 2
  4822. 2
  4823. 2
  4824. 2
  4825. 2
  4826. 2
  4827. 2
  4828. 2
  4829. 2
  4830. 2
  4831. 2
  4832. 2
  4833. 2
  4834. 2
  4835. 2
  4836. 2
  4837. 2
  4838. 2
  4839. 2
  4840. 2
  4841. 2
  4842. 2
  4843. 2
  4844. 2
  4845. 2
  4846. 2
  4847. 2
  4848. 2
  4849. 2
  4850. 2
  4851. 2
  4852. 2
  4853. 2
  4854. 2
  4855. 2
  4856. 2
  4857. 2
  4858. 2
  4859. 2
  4860. 2
  4861. 2
  4862. First of all,why is she even asking this guy? And why should she care what this one person thinks?This dude looks terrified. Shouldn't he be frightened of white supremacists and people running around with automatic weapons? With his attitude,why doesn't he hop on the GOP train? What is his actual ideology as a democrat anyway? Nothing is mentioned beside his obvious terror and Donald status .David is absolutely correct in that they are advertising their corruption just by entertaining this conversation,by him being her guest and seeming to be unaware of what they just revealed as if it is totally normal and acceptable for this one guy to be her single guest , who has on one one's with a cable host and multiple US senators and can threaten them with his fearful opinion WOW, is the corruption so everyday,deep and normalized that it probably floats right over the heads of most viewers,not setting off the appropriate radars and alarms?Additionally,if Mr billionaire( uhh-oh I said the offending adjective and it is interesting that he identifies the word as descriptor rather than noun) is not into the GOP tax cuts and other cow towing to their wealthy donors ,what is this terror that strikes his heart in regard to progressives ?He is on a pedestal but it is simply subconscious and therefore so is the fear of the fall? David puts a spotlight on Another relavent topic and gives us an excellent take on this skewed disfunctional, obfuscated issue that may not be covered anywhere else or by anyone else but the estute David Doel. My extended babbling rant is over...I certainly was triggered!
    2
  4863. 2
  4864. 2
  4865. 2
  4866. 2
  4867. 2
  4868. 2
  4869. 2
  4870. 2
  4871. 2
  4872. 2
  4873. 2
  4874. 2
  4875. 2
  4876. 2
  4877. 2
  4878. 2
  4879. 2
  4880. 2
  4881. 2
  4882. 2
  4883. 2
  4884. 2
  4885. 2
  4886. 2
  4887. 2
  4888. 2
  4889. 2
  4890. 2
  4891. 2
  4892. 2
  4893. 2
  4894. 2
  4895. 2
  4896. 2
  4897. 2
  4898. 2
  4899. 2
  4900. 2
  4901. 2
  4902. 2
  4903. 2
  4904. 2
  4905. 2
  4906. 2
  4907. 2
  4908. 2
  4909. 2
  4910. 2
  4911. 2
  4912. 2
  4913. 2
  4914. 2
  4915. 2
  4916. 2
  4917. 2
  4918. 2
  4919. 2
  4920. 2
  4921. 2
  4922. 2
  4923. 2
  4924. 2
  4925. 2
  4926. 2
  4927. 2
  4928. 2
  4929. 2
  4930. 2
  4931. 2
  4932. 2
  4933. 2
  4934. 2
  4935. 2
  4936. 2
  4937. 2
  4938. 2
  4939. 2
  4940. 2
  4941. 2
  4942. 2
  4943. 2
  4944. 2
  4945. 2
  4946. 2
  4947. 2
  4948. 2
  4949. 2
  4950. 2
  4951. 2
  4952. 2
  4953. 2
  4954. 2
  4955. 2
  4956. 2
  4957. 2
  4958. 2
  4959. 2
  4960. 2
  4961. 2
  4962. 2
  4963. 2
  4964. 2
  4965. 2
  4966. 2
  4967. 2
  4968. 2
  4969. 2
  4970. 2
  4971. 2
  4972. 2
  4973. 2
  4974. 2
  4975. 2
  4976. 2
  4977. 2
  4978. 2
  4979. 2
  4980. 2
  4981. 2
  4982. 2
  4983. 2
  4984. 2
  4985. 2
  4986. 2
  4987. 2
  4988. 2
  4989. 2
  4990. 2
  4991. 2
  4992. 2
  4993. 2
  4994. 2
  4995. 2
  4996. 2
  4997. 2
  4998. 2
  4999. 2
  5000. 2
  5001. 2
  5002. 2
  5003. 2
  5004. 2
  5005. 2
  5006. 2
  5007. 2
  5008. 2
  5009. 2
  5010. 2
  5011. 2
  5012. 2
  5013. 2
  5014. 2
  5015. 2
  5016. 2
  5017. 2
  5018. 2
  5019. Lets be honest to all. Whether you like Jeremy Corbyn or Not. I can actually show you UK newspapers that were hostile and went pass the mark in personal attacks on the man. He showed dignity and professionalism most of times when ever he was asked to appear on the " UK Media". Theresa May, lost a lot of credibility around the Uk in regards to her refusal to debate to the nation about her Manifesto against Jeremy Corbyn and the Political leaders from the Uk - leading up to the debate about their manifesto. PEOPLE DON'T FORGET THESE THINGS David Cameron (TORY) called out Gordon Brown (LABOUR) to appear on a live Debate and he really didn't want to appear. And eventual he did When Theresa May and the Tory Party finally did come out clean about the Tory manifesto - it shocked alot of people around the UK - even amoungst Tory supporters - who couldn't believe what they were hearing. And to top it all it wasn't costed!!! The Labour party lost the General Election that is fact. But, they "Won" over the minds of a lot of people around the country as they wanted to discuss policies (*which they costed!!) - instead of smearing people/s. People want to know what yo are going to try an help them - Not wanting hear about "Smears" about people all the time People general do not like "bullies"; and the countless amounts of peoples that have come out and stated that they were wrong about Jeremy Corbyn is eye opening as well. The same peoples/media outlets that were for the Tory party are now attacking Theresa May and why did she call or an early election and her manifesto.....
    2
  5020. 2
  5021. 2
  5022. 2
  5023. 2
  5024. 2
  5025. 2
  5026. 2
  5027. 2
  5028. 2
  5029. 2
  5030. 2
  5031. 2
  5032. 2
  5033. 2
  5034. 2
  5035. 2
  5036. 2
  5037. 2
  5038. 2
  5039. 2
  5040. 2
  5041. 2
  5042. 2
  5043. 2
  5044. 2
  5045. 2
  5046. 2
  5047. 2
  5048. 2
  5049. 2
  5050. 2
  5051. 2
  5052. 2
  5053. 2
  5054. 2
  5055. 2
  5056. 2
  5057. 2
  5058. 2
  5059. 2
  5060. 2
  5061. 2
  5062. 2
  5063. 2
  5064. 2
  5065. 2
  5066. 2
  5067. 2
  5068. 2
  5069. 2
  5070. 2
  5071. 2
  5072. 2
  5073. 2
  5074. 2
  5075. 2
  5076. 2
  5077. 2
  5078. 2
  5079. 2
  5080. I have one point of contention with the "you have nothing to worry about" statement - but it actually agrees with your overall argument. YouTube has had multiple controversies around restricting access to and inexplicably punishing channels that produce LGBTQ+ content. Users viewing the site in restricted mode - something parents use to filter out content that isn't meant for children - often have these channels totally filtered out, with few if any of their videos visible. This is true even for channels specifically geared towards LGBTQ+ youth. And this is just one aspect of the ongoing treating of this demographic on YouTube (and on other sites besides, including Twitter and digital storefronts like Steam). So these users actually do have a lot to worry about. This, though, is why you're still right that the slippery slope argument is fallacious. Because we're already at the bottom of the slope - anybody who tells a trans content creator that they shouldn't be excited about Alex Jones getting the boot because they might be next doesn't understand that these creators are ALREADY being hit with unfair treatment. ALEX JONES is the "next" on the slippery slope. The same is true for Twitter, which refuses to punish Alex Jones and openly lies to its users by saying that Jones as never broken their terms of service - many users can tell you about how they've had accounts suspended or otherwise punished just for calling Jones bigoted after going on one of his bigoted, conspiracy-theory-fueled screeds. So do you really have nothing to worry about if you're not constantly peddling conspiracy theories and hate speech? Well, you do, actually - turns out marginalized people are also marginalized on the internet. Big surprise. But that's exactly why nobody can defend Jones by saying that we'll be next - we were first, actually. YOU'RE next. And that's a good thing, because at some point we have to step back and accept the burden of needing to look at the world and decide what is and isn't acceptable. And Alex Jones is not acceptable.
    2
  5081. 2
  5082. 2
  5083. 2
  5084. 2
  5085. 2
  5086. 2
  5087. 2
  5088. 2
  5089. 2
  5090. 2
  5091. 2
  5092. 2
  5093. 2
  5094. 2
  5095. 2
  5096. 2
  5097. 2
  5098. 2
  5099. 2
  5100. 2
  5101. 2
  5102. 2
  5103. 2
  5104. Add a link to your favorite book/cd/etc. to the description in your video, to your Amazon Associates Program. You get about 5% of every sale forever and ever. If you wonder why: because Youtube was ultimately taken over by Google. See Dejanews. http://www.fastusenet.org/blog/what-is-dejanews-where-did-it-go.html By the way my channel of many years was blocked for some mysterious reason. They never said why, so I'd have to guess. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Google-Acquires-Dejacom-17652.asp Why Dejanews was important: "DejaNews revolutionized the nature of Usenet. First, it offered a Web-based view of Usenet. Although Web browsers dating back to Mosaic include the ability to read and post on Usenet, many users never explored those features. DejaNews' Web interface exposed Usenet to millions of Web users; in fact, many new users thought that DejaNews was Usenet." What happened when Google took over: "As for the Google takeover, Deja's rich structured-searching functionality was lost, replaced by Google's much simpler interface. Google admitted the shortcomings of its search interface, while attempting to emphasize the positive: "The current beta service available on this site lacks browsing, posting, and many other important features. We are working hard to provide these. Due to the logistical and financial constraints of the Deja service, there was no viable way to keep the service going. Now that the Usenet data has been safely archived, we are focusing our efforts on implementing these important features. Please bear with us during this transition."" ""Deja Refugee," who requested anonymity in order to protect professional relationships, also noted the link-rot effect of the abrupt switchover: "As of February 12, all the major search engines, including Googleā€”and some Web sites of Google's own search engine customersā€”now have THOUSANDS OF INDEXED WEB PAGES WITH LINKS GOOGLE HAS BROKENā€”links to Deja articles which no longer work. For that matter, many of Deja's postings themselves contain links (also presumably now broken) to other postings. In other words, Google has instantaneously devalued the content it acquired." "Search engine experts also took note. Greg R. Notess commented on searchengineshowdown.com: "The database is considerably smaller and the search features much less powerful than we had on Deja last week.""
    2
  5105. 2
  5106. 2
  5107. 2
  5108. 2
  5109. 2
  5110. 2
  5111. 2
  5112. 2
  5113. 2
  5114. 2
  5115. 2
  5116. 2
  5117. 2
  5118. 2
  5119. 2
  5120. 2
  5121. 2
  5122. 2
  5123. 2
  5124. 2
  5125. 2
  5126. 2
  5127. 2
  5128. 2
  5129. 2
  5130. 2
  5131. 2
  5132. 2
  5133. 2
  5134. 2
  5135. 2
  5136. 2
  5137. 2
  5138. 2
  5139. 2
  5140. 2
  5141. 2
  5142. 2
  5143. 2
  5144. 2
  5145. 2
  5146. 2
  5147. 2
  5148. 2
  5149. 2
  5150. 2
  5151. 2
  5152. 2
  5153. 2
  5154. 2
  5155. 2
  5156. 2
  5157. 2
  5158. 2
  5159. 2
  5160. 2
  5161. 2
  5162. 2
  5163. 2
  5164. 2
  5165. 2
  5166. 2
  5167. 2
  5168. 2
  5169. 2
  5170. 2
  5171. 2
  5172. 2
  5173. 2
  5174. 2
  5175. 2
  5176. 2
  5177. 2
  5178. 2
  5179. 2
  5180. 2
  5181. 2
  5182. 2
  5183. 2
  5184. 2
  5185. 2
  5186. 2
  5187. 2
  5188. 2
  5189. 2
  5190. 2
  5191. 2
  5192. 2
  5193. 2
  5194. 2
  5195. 2
  5196. 2
  5197. 2
  5198. 2
  5199. 2
  5200. 2
  5201. 2
  5202. 2
  5203. 2
  5204. 2
  5205. 2
  5206. 2
  5207. 2
  5208. 2
  5209. 2
  5210. 2
  5211. 2
  5212. 2
  5213. 2
  5214. 2
  5215. 2
  5216. 2
  5217. 2
  5218. 2
  5219. 2
  5220. 2
  5221. 2
  5222. 2
  5223. 2
  5224. 2
  5225. 2
  5226. 2
  5227. 2
  5228. 2
  5229. 2
  5230. 2
  5231. 2
  5232. 2
  5233. 2
  5234. 2
  5235. 2
  5236. 2
  5237. 2
  5238. 2
  5239. 2
  5240. 2
  5241. 2
  5242. 2
  5243. 2
  5244. 2
  5245. 2
  5246. 2
  5247. 2
  5248. 2
  5249. 2
  5250. 2
  5251. 2
  5252. 2
  5253. 2
  5254. 2
  5255. 2
  5256. 2
  5257. 2
  5258. 2
  5259. 2
  5260. 2
  5261. 2
  5262. 2
  5263. 2
  5264. 2
  5265. 2
  5266. 2
  5267. 2
  5268. 2
  5269. 2
  5270. 2
  5271. 2
  5272. 2
  5273. 2
  5274. 2
  5275. 2
  5276. 2
  5277. 2
  5278. 2
  5279. 2
  5280. 2
  5281. 2
  5282. 2
  5283. 2
  5284. 2
  5285. 2
  5286. 2
  5287. 2
  5288. 2
  5289. 2
  5290. 2
  5291. 2
  5292. 2
  5293. 2
  5294. 2
  5295. 2
  5296. 2
  5297. 2
  5298. 2
  5299. 2
  5300. 2
  5301. 2
  5302. 2
  5303. 2
  5304. 2
  5305. 2
  5306. 2
  5307. 2
  5308. 2
  5309. 2
  5310. 2
  5311. 2
  5312. 2
  5313. 2
  5314. 2
  5315. 2
  5316. 2
  5317. 2
  5318. 2
  5319. 2
  5320. 2
  5321. 2
  5322. 2
  5323. 2
  5324. 2
  5325. 2
  5326. 2
  5327. 2
  5328. 2
  5329. 2
  5330. 2
  5331. 2
  5332. 2
  5333. 2
  5334. 2
  5335. 2
  5336. 2
  5337. 2
  5338. 2
  5339. 2
  5340. 2
  5341. 2
  5342. 2
  5343. 2
  5344. 2
  5345. 2
  5346. 2
  5347. 2
  5348. 2
  5349. 2
  5350. 2
  5351. 2
  5352. 2
  5353. 2
  5354. 2
  5355. 2
  5356. 2
  5357. 2
  5358. 2
  5359. 2
  5360. 2
  5361. 2
  5362. 2
  5363. 2
  5364. 2
  5365. 2
  5366. 2
  5367. 2
  5368. 2
  5369. 2
  5370. 2
  5371. 2
  5372. 2
  5373. 2
  5374. 2
  5375. 2
  5376. 2
  5377. 2
  5378. 2
  5379. 2
  5380. 2
  5381. 2
  5382. 2
  5383. 2
  5384. 2
  5385. 2
  5386. 2
  5387. 2
  5388. 2
  5389. 2
  5390. 2
  5391. 2
  5392. 2
  5393. 2
  5394. 2
  5395. 2
  5396. 2
  5397. 2
  5398. 2
  5399. 2
  5400. 2
  5401. 2
  5402. 2
  5403. 2
  5404. 2
  5405. 2
  5406. 2
  5407. 2
  5408. 2
  5409. 2
  5410. 2
  5411. 2
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1