Comments by "" (@DanielSMatthews) on "British nuclear submarine HMS Astute docks in Perth" video.

That is not what they are for, the point of that ship is to burn China or Russia back to the stone age if they attack anyone else and to do that they need to be able to slip into deep water and move around the worlds oceans undetected for months on end so that they can't be neutralised.
6
@Heath Inglis In the past Russia threatened to nuke China and it was Nixon who stopped them by telling them that the USA would nuke them if they tried. Strange but true.
3
@adamali2886 You are obviously just a pathetic troll, or a genuine natural idiot. Did you understand a word of what I wrote?
2
Heheheh, nah the convict colonies were on the other side of the continent, coincidently they are all locked out of WA at the moment anyway.
2
@adamali2886 The Russians are actually family, related to those you think they oppose. Go and do some genealogy research, you will be surprised by who is just part of one huge and powerful family tree.
1
@Andrew-is7rs BGM/UGM-109 Tomahawk
1
@Andrew-is7rs ;-) Sure. Capable or configured, there is a difference.
1
Minute Man I was thinking about taking out military assets, whereas you were thinking about murdering civilians, that says a lot about the difference between us. See my other comments if you want a clue as to what I was talking about, because until you actually know that you are not in a position to claim anything about what I wrote, moron. Hmm perhaps I should spell it out for you a Tomahawk fired from that sub if it was off the coast from Shanghai can hit everything from Hong Kong to Vladivostok, so go and look up what sort of payload it is capable of delivering.
1
@Andrew-is7rs I was thinking about taking out military assets, whereas you were thinking about murdering civilians, that says a lot about the difference between us. See my other comments if you want a clue as to what I was talking about, because until you actually know that you are not in a position to claim anything about what I wrote, moron. Hmm perhaps I should spell it out for you a Tomahawk fired from that sub if it was off the coast from Shanghai can hit everything from Hong Kong to Vladivostok, so go and look up what sort of payload it is capable of delivering. Show me where my previous words are inconsistent with the above information, or GTFO.
1
@lovelock512 Read my other comments, I already pointed out exactly what they are really capable of. Not point BSing about it given it is all just public knowledge anyway.
1
@eyeofthetiger6002 Or you don't actually know what I was referring to. Sheesh you people are idiots. Read what I wrote and tell me where that includes a reference to killing everyone completely rather than destroying their technology. Then go and read up on the capability of cruise missiles and their different payloads.
1
@eyeofthetiger6002 I could, but that would be because I was in knowledge management for the largest military contractor in Australia, so I have a clue. That same company managed and built much of Australia's infrastructure. So you see I could in fact detail how you could surgically cripple a nation the size of the USA or China using cruise missiles and tactical warheads. How old are you, you seem rather naive and childlike.
1
@eyeofthetiger6002 You'll get nothing from me. There may already be white papers covering such threats that are in the public domain. Search for "Critical infrastructure" etc. The saner people in the US gov are actually seriously concerned about such threats. You do know that there are people who just model these things for a job? Like I asked before, how old are you?
1
@brothermaynard3200 Yeah so my point is valid enough. BTW My family arrived in WA as free settlers on a ship call the Lotus.
1