Comments by "" (@DanielSMatthews) on "Social media platforms should 'bear more of the burden' to keep users safe online" video.

But you use a fake name.
5
@OilCanHarry2U But you can't prove that, see the problem there?
4
What would you know about parenting Dave?
3
@OilCanHarry2U How about you start using your real name, instead of operating from behind an alias… it’s gutless and the cowards way, to not to use your real name.
3
Try posting the URL to the Australian federal government website for reporting online abuse and it just gets deleted, Sky news and or Youtube are complete hypocrites.
2
@OilCanHarry2U So you can't prove what you have claimed?
2
Lucifer Black is a sociopath who seems to be a Labor Party "attack troll".
2
Set up an AO layer in the internet and do as you please in a realm where everyone consents to the same more relaxed terms of service.
2
Try posting the URL to the Australian federal government website for reporting online abuse and it just gets deleted, Sky news and or Youtube are complete hypocrites.
1
@mkhud50n "The people that invented the internet" were academics and researchers and we all used our real ID and were contactable via our university email addresses, the problem started when we let cretins like you into our world.
1
@axle.australian.patriot A stolen and unlocked mobile phone is all it takes to make yourself anonymous.
1
@axle.australian.patriot I'm not going to publicly describe how you are wrong except to claim that based on my technical knowledge it is not difficult for determined criminals to operate without detection and there will probably never be a way to entirely stop that, in fact the more the government constrains people the more they will set up systems that circumvent monitoring and surveillance and then the criminals will just come along and exploit that as they exploit the backdoors in systems that governments arranged to exist for their convenience.
1
@axle.australian.patriot There are 100% secure systems, just not in the hands of (most) civilians. It is entirely possible to mathematically define a 100% secure system, and computers are just a manifestation of mathematics. The ID issue is a complete red herring, as I already pointed out people get their ID stolen all of the time. It does not stop real criminals and agents of foreign governments.
1
@axle.australian.patriot Did you know that it is possible to build computer systems where the instructions give a different result every time they are executed and the only way to compile code to run on such a system is if you have the right encryption keys? Secure systems are entirely possible, you just can't buy them, but some people do know who to build them, even if it is just in a field programmable gate array where all of the details vanish the moment it is powered down. You can't even physically steal those systems to use them or work out how they function without a military style attack on the facility, and even then the chances are you'd trigger the self destruct before you got your hands even near them. Same with communications protocols, there are systems that are mathematically unbreakable because they use one time pads. Combine the two technologies and you have a system that cannot be snooped on or compromised by a third party.
1
@axle.australian.patriot Yes I have seen the damage to free and legitimate discourse that Ai filters can do, note the small i for "not very intelligent at all". :-) But I do think that they could do better too, unfortunately the people controlling them are also tempted to use such systems as political filters in what amounts to an attack on the democratic process.
1
@OilCanHarry2U Prove it.
1