Comments by "" (@DanielSMatthews) on "Australia has 'very good cyber-offensive capability' amid regional tensions in Asia-Pacific" video.

  1. Well it was more of an act than and Act.
    4
  2.  @tilapiadave3234  When the court cases start they will be coming for you "Dave".
    3
  3. There are systems that cannot be hacked and there have been for many years, but civilians are not allowed to have access to them, unless they are smart enough to build them themselves.
    3
  4. Cyber-offensive capability used on non-military targets is terrorism.
    1
  5.  @alanakafang6143  Every system you have ever been near perhaps. Imagine a system at the hardware level that was even worse than Malbolge to understand because instructions never worked the same way twice and the changes were cryptographically keyed. You know what the real problem is, the ADF can't protect civilians without giving them systems that are hardened to the point where the police and intelligence services could not hack into them either. They keep us vulnerable deliberately.
    1
  6.  @jacksoncremean1664  See my other comment, I doubt you have a clue what I am even talking about.
    1
  7.  @alanakafang6143  Not sure what you are smoking mate but I worked for a defence contractor and know what systems have actually been available for several decades. A port being open is not the issue, it is the code running the service monitoring that port that you are confusing and no data gets to that point before it has passed potential scrutiny. What you Window$ weenies do is amature hour and irrelevant to the point I made, obviously.
    1
  8.  @alanakafang6143  Hah, you have no idea even how private and public key pairs work.
    1