Comments by "Jon Smith" (@jonsmith5058) on "Gove's housing plan, Labour scrap £28 billion green pledge and Tucker Carlson v Putin | Podcast #39" video.

Also Ava: Justifies how Taylor should use a private jet because flying commerical would mean she gets too much attention, but things its wrong she gets too much attention at a football match and should be left alone. Frankly, I'd much rather Taylor put her energy into whinging that she should be able to fly commerical in peace and have a smaller carbon footprint then whinge that shes should be able to watch her boyfriend play football in a stadium she flew to on her private jet.
2
@ollyfirth4641 If you really think its just about that you aren't paying attention. This is clearly a straw that broke the camels back for some people. I gave up on Starmer a long time ago and wouldnt have voted for him whilst he led the party, it was his response on Israel that made me full on protest against his leadership though. We each have our limits and as Ollie said, many of us are fed up of being told to 'take our medicine' and tolerate him.
1
@ollyfirth4641 whats up with it? He’s been excusing and defending Israels genocide. He would rather let thousands of Palestinians die rather than deal with a false accusation of anti semistism. THATS whats wrong. I get that anti semitism took down Corbyn, and specifically because he backed Palestine over Israel and not cause he actually was remotely anti-semetic. But Starmer cannot prioritize appeasing those hateful liars who make those claims over tens of thousands of lives being genocided by Israel. He did though.
1
@ollyfirth4641 if it doesnt make a difference then why didnt he just say ceasefire instead of tying himself in knots trying to say a different term to appease Israel. If its all the same thing why did he hammer the party hard to only say the soundbites Israel wanted and to spread their propaganda? The difference it makes is showing us and Israel he prioritizes their support of him over the thousands dead. I will not tolerate a leader like that.
1
@GoldnDusty It is not sexist unless they exploit her specifically as a woman in my opinion. They are simply exploiting her fame. Lets say Prince Harry started dating an athlete in the US and it suddenly attracted a ton of interest in that sport, its not 'sexist' for the division to then exploit his fame to attract more fans. Its just exploitative to someone who happens to be a woman highly associated with sexism due to her early career. Taylor quite literally dedicated her life to be uber famous and clearly thinks she is so important she can fly for 15 minutes across a city on a private jet. She chose a lifestyle of insane exposure, this is the price you pay, you do not get peace and quiet if you go to a football game. Its the very same reason Eva said she cannot go on a commerical flight as she would be mobbed. You give up the expectation of 'being normal' and getting to go to a sports game without people gawking. Shes not in a cage, she put herself on a throne and now complains she doesn't get to be left alone when it suits her.
1
@alex4251 They have 'other priorities' as they say, such as giving the finger to the unions, being too busy to repeal the laws that limit protesting and basically just cosplaying as Tories getting along with making bankers happy. I really hope Starmer just clutch defeat from the jaws of victory and creates a hung parliament. We obviously cannot afford any more years of Tory, but I've been saying for a long time, Starmer will not improve anything, he will be a caretaker at best and slow a decline and create the stage for more rabid Tories to return.
1