Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "NATO Backtracks on Sending Troops to Ukraine, France Persists | Breaking News With The Enforcer" video.

 @T3RS1 I support this and have been suggesting similar since April '22! Only to defend, not to cross sovereign borders.
5
@wut3358 I would have in a heartbeat, if I knew I had even a 10% chance to be accepted. Physically, I'd be more of a hindrance than a help. 😔 And I don't suggest we do this, lightly. Based on what we've seen, I firmly believe it would not escalate things to the degree the opposition claims it would... they've proven themselves to only be posturing and blowing hot air. To escalate it to the degree they have said would be their assured demise and, we all know, their guy loves his life/position WAAYY too much, and wouldn't want to risk it!
4
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Agreed. Also as you said to Wut, reminded me of a point I left out: Individuals going to help is, unfortunately, SIGNIFICANTLY different than if our countries helped. Individuals go there with nothing but themselves. Whereas a country has their entire arsenal and logistics chain to support them. The former is helpful, but the risk of loses is unchanged; however, the latter ensures triumph and with minimal loss. My entire point of us going in isn't to assure a win because that's already going to happen... it's to prevent further loss, because they've already suffered and endured enough in that regard! (YT likes to remove my comments lately and I've kinda learned what it is I say that will trigger that automated response. That's why I've not used certain terms and not mentioned proper names. Even then, I suspect this will still get removed... but we shall see... 🤞😔🤞)
1