Comments by "J Drake1994" (@JDrakeify) on "Owen Jones meets Michael Moore | 'Trump is like the sound of dying dinosaurs'" video.
-
7
-
5
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
***** And I am not denying that communism is a form of socialism, I am just saying that one form is good and another is bad, very much like what you say about capitalism. And whilst it is true that they often have shared roots, democratic socialism did not spring from communism, both of them sprung from marxism, which is not totally the same as either.
Social Democracy originated as a democratic route to Marxism (which the man himself supported) but in time it moved toward becoming its own ideology advocating a mixed economy. The Labour Party, for instance, has never been a Marxist party.In fact, it was the likes of Attlee who helped to set up NATO and our nuclear deterrent, in alliance with the US. Nye Bevan advocated sending tanks to Berlin during Stalin's blockade there. So whilst both ideologies are socialist, there is a very, very, clear dividing line between the two.
1
-
1
-
1
-
PraxeoLiberty Fascism is an ideology where governments send there own citizens into camps for disagreeing with them, or even for just being ethnically different. Don't cheapen it by reducing it to mean government regulation of business.
It baffles me that people can somehow fail to see that a less regulated market generally leads to more powerful big business and worse conditions for the average worker. We have had two eras of capitalism which were less regulated, the victorian era and the neoliberal era from about 1980 onwards, and in both cases we have big business become more powerful and workers rights and pay go down at the same time in comparison to the post war era where there was greater regulation, less inequality, and also less financial crises. That is because the more free the market is, the more it is a survival of the fittest, which is a situation that favours the strongest and most powerful.
Not only that, but if big businesses wanted greater regulation, they clearly wouldnt move countries to get away from them, as part of the race to the bottom perpetuated by the free market. And they would be overwhelmingly backing the likes of Jeremy Corbyn or Bernie Sanders, who want the most of it. Instead they spend millions to fund there opponents and warn of apocalyptic outcomes if they win power. It is laughable to suggest that they would somehow stand to gain more than anyone else from left wing leadership, they seem to have a pretty good idea themselves that it is right wing economics that can do the most for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1