Comments by "Voix de la raison" (@voixdelaraison593) on "'Confused' Biden struggles while discussing 'opposition' Hamas" video.

APPEALS COURT RULING: Trump does not have any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct”.
2
APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump does not have unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power — the recognition and implementation of election results. We cannot accept that the office of the presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter.”
2
@kendrasmith6637 ⁠ APPEALS COURT RULING: Trump does not have any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct”.
2
@mhughes1160 ⁠ APPEALS COURT RULING: Trump does not have any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct”.
2
@stevencorey7702 How Sad that his CULT FOLLOWERS have to declare him innocent but the EVIDENCE clearly shows he is guilty 😂😂😂
2
@remnard1 With Clarence Thomas excluded because his wife was involved in the INSURRECTION, SCOTUS will find Trump GUILTY. ✌️
2
APPEALS COURT RULING: “Former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant”. 😂😂😂
2
@massonh7476 APPEALS COURT RULING: “Former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal”.
2
@Doc_Holiday APPEALS COURT RULING: Trump does not have any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct”.
2
@chevy3022 Known Russian Troll Account 🇷🇺🤡
2
@Thoth_al_Khem APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump’s conduct conflicts with his constitutional mandate to enforce the laws governing the process of electing the new president. The criminal charges against him, if proven true, amount to an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government”.
2
@massonh7476 😂😂😂
2
@drewdrew7968 So Johnny Balnis, how many accounts do you have? More than 30, 50, 100? What’s the standard allotment for a Russian Troll 🤡 like you?
2
@Thoth_al_Khem APPEALS COURT RULING: Trump does not have any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct”.
2
@Thoth_al_Khem APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump’s conduct conflicts with his constitutional mandate to enforce the laws governing the process of electing the new president. The criminal charges against him, if proven true, amount to an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government”.
2
@Thoth_al_Khem APPEALS COURT RULING: “Former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant”.
2
@chevy3022 Don’t have to accuse you of being a Russian Troll, the evidence is OVERWHELMING. When Putin shut the Russian Internet down for 9 hrs, you stoped posting for 9hrs. ✌️
2
@chevy3022 Johnny Balnis own up to who you are. ✌️
2
@chevy3022 👈🏻Known Russian Troll Account - According to our Counterintelligence Reports, Putin has spent more than $550 million on Social Media to support Trump. Why you ask? Simple… ROI with MAGAts.
2
@JOECURR1488 APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump’s conduct conflicts with his constitutional mandate to enforce the laws governing the process of electing the new president. The criminal charges against him, if proven true, amount to an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government”.
2
@mhughes1160 APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump’s conduct conflicts with his constitutional mandate to enforce the laws governing the process of electing the new president. The criminal charges against him, if proven true, amount to an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government”.
1
@stevencorey7702 Why not add to the bill that Black is White and Evil is Good 😂😂😂
1
@robertconville6269 APPEALS COURT RULING: “Trump does not have unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power — the recognition and implementation of election results. We cannot accept that the office of the presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter.”
1