Comments by "Styxhexenhammer666" (@Styxhexenhammer666) on "Is John Kasich's political experience hurting his 2016 bid?" video.

  1. Trump is the inevitable nominee. Now is the time to prepare for the general election against equally inevitable Hillary. You should be thanking your lucky stars- Trump is the strongest candidate since Reagan and Hillary arguably weaker than Mondale, who was equally out of step with the youth and with working class suburban white voters. I foresee a landslide for Trump; he will turn the lakes region into a group of swing states and probably walk away not just with Ohio but also Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. He will retain the entire deep south (an area Bubba cracked apart in the 1990s with massive turnout in urban communities.) He has an outside shot of even turning New York red because his hometown happens to be the one blue part of an otherwise largely red state (upstate New York is red with the exception of Albany and its outlying areas.) He would lose Iowa because of his somewhat lower appeal to the far right republicans there, but New Hampshire would likely go red along with Vegas-centric business democrat Nevada.
    3
  2. Hillary genuine? You're either smoking crack or a Cruz fan.
    2
  3. Kasich is incapable of becoming the nominee. You have to win eight states to be considered on the second ballot. Kasich has won just one state and has no chance at all of winning seven more. As such, any delegates he has are unbound on the second ballot and his name won't be there to vote for. As for Cruz he can't compete in most of the remaining (northeastern) states. Trump is the inevitable nominee.
    1
  4. Reagan was well behind Carter for most of the election in 1980 and many speculated he would never be capable of beating him. Such polling is literally useless, historically.
    1
  5. Not significantly more sophisticated, no. We're already in the second term of Jimmy Carter 2.0
    1