Comments by "A Y" (@MrAnthero7) on "TaiwanPlus Docs" channel.

  1. 2
  2.  @daryl_s  1) The Taiwanese identity that you speak of didn't really exist until the 1900's after Japan's occupation. The earliest Chinese immigrants were Ming dynasty loyalists and soldiers, not fisherman. Also, if you really want to talk about identity, various nationwide polls show that the vast majority of Taiwanese (70-90% if I recall) do indeed identify as "ethnic Chinese." The identities of "Taiwanese" and "Chinese" aren't necessarily mutually exclusive terms. I am Taiwanese myself, at the same time I also identify as being of Chinese ancestry and ethnicity. 2) What you described rarely happened. While some intermarriage with indigenous did occur during the early periods of Chinese immigration, most Han settlers didn't "adapt minority dialects." Actually, it was the other way around. The Han Chinese population quickly outnumbered the indigenous Austronesians, and some Indigenous Formosans were actually assimilated into the Han population. This is evidenced by the fact that before the island was ceded to Japan, majority of Taiwanese were speaking "Taiwanese" aka Minnan/Hokkien which is a Chinese language, NOT indigenous to Taiwan, and distinctly different from the Austronesian languages that Indigenous speak. 3) You mentioned that Mandarin isn't a naturally occurring phenomenon. Sure, but the same could be said for the so called "native" languages Taiwanese and Hakka. Early Han immigrants literally colonized Taiwan and performed cultural genocide on Taiwan's original inhabitants whose culture, language and homelands were basically destroyed. Would you claim that's an "organic" progression of Taiwanese society?
    1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1