Comments by "J Smith" (@jsmithmultimediatech) on "Voice of America" channel.

  1.  maccaherrick12  "@Jeremy Smith with a quick look up on Google they seem a pretty stand up family so I'm failing to see what your point was? " The W.H.O. was not founded by the Rothchilds you imbecile, it's not that difficult imbecile, some how you kept babbling on like it was, without having a fucking clue and then came up with this stupid ass comment "I don't need to show you anything I've researched it myself for myself. Suggest you do the same before leaving anymore comments." when in reality you've done fuck all research pmsl Please entertain me with another one of your moronic petty comments dumb ass fuck 😆 Brain damage I suspect? Maybe be less weak and pathetic next time dip shit....
    2
  2.  @drewrussell  with a lack of understanding physics like you evidently have, we'll always have very stupid people unfortunately.
    2
  3. Yet oblivious to the reality that this is a load of bull shit in reality, in essence there's two categories of radiation ionising (CT Scans, X-Rays, the radiation found in nuclear reactorsetc) which can damage DNA and weaken immune systems if Radiation Sickness/Syndrome is diagnosed, non-ionising can't damage DNA ie it can't knock off electrons off of atoms as it simply doesn't have enough power to do so, that's what radio transmitters use in all forms be it 5G or otherwise heck might as well suggest that your wifi radio transmitters cause this virus, it's bat shit fucking stupid to say something as moronic as that pmsl
    2
  4.  @judithkolkman6954  Clearly must be stupid then, rather there's two kinds of radiation ionising (nuclear power and the like) and non-ionising (radiowaves what 5g uses aswell as going all way back to 1g, as well as FM radion and the rest) the earlier has the capability to knock off electrons off of an atom (which causes all kinds of problems if one was to come into contact with a form of ionising radiation largely due to the destruction or damage of DNA at least, which causes (among other things) immuno problems dip shit along with an elevated risk of cancers, non-ionising is far too weak to knock off electrons off of an atom (causing no damage to DNA, you make fa sense) you clearly need to get your head examined brain dead dip shit Do the most basic research into physics idiot
    2
  5.  maccaherrick12  Yeah whatever you say daft pillock, fuck me you do love talking bollocks dont you?😆
    2
  6. LOL why bother creating a new tech like 5G and saying that causes the problems with the virus, if you can use wifi idiot (why not use some other form of radio technology)? You're making about as much logical sense as saying pigs can fly idiot Get your head examined
    1
  7.  @alphabravo999  You don't half talk a load of shit, Gates was born in the 1950s, the WHO was founded in the 1940s think dumb ass
    1
  8.  @judithkolkman6954  You do talk a load of bs
    1
  9.  maccaherrick12  Yet you've show fuck all proof they are who founded the W.H.O. Maybe understand anything abouyt history dumb ass, the WHO was founded in 1948, years before they the Rothchilds lost most of their power, heck even Rockefeller (excuse spelling) have more money than them, the idiocy of the bs you spew is unreal Need to seriously remove that tinfoil hat of your dumb ass
    1
  10.  @judithkolkman6954  Actually what I said about ionising depends upon how many severts vs grays (can never remember which ones which, either garys/gy being how much ionising radiation ones been exposed to to how much one has absorbed being possible severts, might be the other way around, since rather small amounts like those used in clinical imaging using xrays and CT Scans uses ionising radiation, but you seriously arent at all knowledgable are you, might as well be worried about when you get a CT scan thats got far more chances (only permitted to or recommended to have 26 through an entire life time) than radio masts ever will cause 5g or otherwise thats how stupid you sound
    1
  11.  John Branoc  Complete and utter rubbish, if not care to show some actual documentation proving they have said so? No because it simply does not exist, rather actually radiation is put into two categories ionising (far more harmful at lower powers) and non-ionising (takes a lot more power to become ionising), the fact is non-ionising doesnt have enough umph to knock electrons off an atom where as ionising does. Come on you have to have a slight clue about radio waves to understand this. Rather with the likes of microwaves (a conventional kitchen one) is about 700w worth of power on average over a very confined or concentrated space, a phone uses about 1w worth of power spread over a slightly at least larger area, you're essentially talking complete bollocks If not then yeah they've found even CRT monitors and TV's cause harm aswell (actually havent rather no ones studied their effects as it would take many years for that research to be conducted) you're an idiot obviously
    1
  12.  @MegaRyan123456  I don't think this'll ever happen to be quite honest "educate yourself on real science and technical skills" is like talking to a brick wall with these idiots
    1
  13.  maccaherrick12  LOL next you'll say they're the wealthiest in the world... calling that myself bollocks since rather that would be the Waltons, they (the Rothchilds) don't even make the top 10
    1
  14.  John Branoc  Not to mention the numbers of people tearing down mobile network towers or having a go at the techs laying cables nothing to do with 5G, what if a customer whos essentially not well (perhaps nothing to do with the pandemic) and isn't all that mobile and then these morons causing them hassle, I wish you'd think for once about your actions instead of being so incredibly stupid and selfish
    1
  15.  @hummingbirdbumblebee4618  Actually 5G uses high frequencies, you're talking rubbish (HF) to, Very High (is VHF) what essentially radio mics use, or even a conventional radio (DAB), why bother going to the hassle of creating a new tech like 5G when you can just use DAB to do whatever Icke said. Not to mention that there's generally speaking two forms of radiation (have said this a few times in these comments) radiowaves belong to the category of radiation called non-ionising (ie dont have enough power to knock electrons off an atom) microwaves though produce heat albeit with kitchen appliances are in a very tight confined/concentrated space whereas radio waves in the case of 5G by comparison are incredibly low powered compared to the likes of an on average 500-700watt microwave lol. You're far more likely to have damage by having an X-Ray done (a form of ionising radiation just very low amounts) why with CT-Scans they limit the numbers of them you can have within a given time as not to cause the body problems with being exposed to much higher amounts of ionising radiation (nuclear reactors belong as well to the ionising category of radiation) than that of an X-Ray as they're far more detailed
    1
  16. ​ @missingwords6723  If he assumes 5g causes Covid why not previous radio waves, its the same just vastly improved technology lol, it's a pretty stupid theory to be quite honest, was of the belief that ionising radiation is the only one that causes harm to the human body but it's not non-ionising like microwaves can due to heat but that's with microwaves more to do with the power they use (wattage) a kitchen microwave on average uses about 700w of power in a very concentrated space, 5g doesnt its only say 1w of power to a mobile phone spread over a vast area (yet smaller than the likes of 4G). The reality is still holds true for the ionising radiation as it has the power to knock particles off of atoms, the reality is non-ionising would vastly more power to achieve the same result, how heats produced or can kiss goodbye to the concept of how nuclear reactors work essentially lol. He does come up with some interesting ideas but rather 5G with Covid he's full of shit, by contrast why not use DAB radios to transmit why spend lots of money on a new wireless broadband technology when could perfectly use another, its daft
    1
  17.  @David-lb6uf  Just said this exact same thing in another thread - If he assumes 5g causes Covid why not previous radio waves, its the same just vastly improved technology lol, it's a pretty stupid theory to be quite honest, was of the belief that ionising radiation is the only one that causes harm to the human body but it's not non-ionising like microwaves can due to heat but that's with microwaves more to do with the power they use (wattage) a kitchen microwave on average uses about 700w of power in a very concentrated space, 5g doesnt its only say 1w of power to a mobile phone spread over a vast area (yet smaller than the likes of 4G), is like saying a radio signal from a radio station you listen to would cause problems lol. The reality is still holds true for the ionising radiation as it has the power to knock particles off of atoms, the reality is non-ionising would vastly more power to achieve the same result, how heats produced or can kiss goodbye to the concept of how nuclear reactors work essentially lol. He does come up with some interesting ideas but rather 5G with Covid he's full of shit, by contrast why not use DAB radios to transmit why spend lots of money on a new wireless broadband technology when could perfectly use another, its just plain daft
    1
  18. Though when looking into physics, anyone with some understanding would know David Icke is a nutcase at best lol and anyone believing in this nonsense he espouses (with or without any kind of media explaining it to the contrary) deserves ridicule lol
    1
  19. ​ @recordplayerz  The obliviousness of these idiots who think.... well put it this way if 5G was dangerous then why is there the same exact signal thats coming out of every wifi node in the countries where there is one, it's the exact same type of radiation there's no difference between the first ever generation of the G type networks being that they're non-ionising radiation that simply can't damage DNA like ionising can (X-Rays, CT scanners, nuclear reactors of course, apart from CT and X-rays both using the same thing just that CT Scans are far more powerful, they just use different ways of working)
    1
  20. ​ @wakingfromslumber9555 what about non ionising radiation doing nothing to the body, verses ionising with sufficient doses in a given time is enough to cause a whole host of health problems not just immuno issues. Non ionising radiation (of which 5g belongs to, as that's what radiowaves are ) isn't strong enough to knock electrons off of an atom, hence doing nothing to the body. Anyone believing Icke deserves ridicule at best lol Maybe a basic understanding of the subject matter might help?
    1
  21. ​ @kumarapatch1234 Is that another one of those posts were your kind tries to blame it on something completely irrelevant, yes I think so 🤦‍♂️🤣
    1
  22. ​ @GabsSystemsbuster then you've got no idea what you're talking about lol
    1
  23. ​ @GabsSystemsbuster MRI scans entirely disproving your utter nonsense lol, maybe try again and this time locating your brain?😂
    1
  24. ​ @GabsSystemsbuster in reality anyone with a basic knowledge of physics would know that radiowaves are too weak to interfere with atoms, let alone the body's cells lol. It's ionising radiation (radiowaves do not belong to this category of radiation) that has the power to knock an electron off an atom, ie you're entirely more likely to have health problems from a CT or the like scan (uses the same type of radiation that being ionising that X rays use). That health problem being radiation sickness if being exposed to sufficient amounts within perhaps a certain time frame. That would essentially rip the body's makeup apart at the cellular level, including the inability to make new cells, it's quite evidently obvious you've not got a clue lol.
    1