General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
J Smith
TalkTV
comments
Comments by "J Smith" (@jsmithmultimediatech) on "TalkTV" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@andyharpist2938 Probably some kind of distraction I'd have thought but then I don't know really is all I'd have thought it would be
3
@cd764 I really wouldn't worry its likely a load of hot air
3
@truckerfromreno Labour factually speaking only piloted sanctions when they were in power on a limited area, they may have rolled it out elsewhere, but the Tories just did so without any regard. They have always said as a last resort, but its always the first one.
3
@kevinsyd2012 Its got little to nothing to do with work though, it has everything to do with how a health problem be it physical or mental affects the claimant.
3
@kevinsyd2012 No its not
2
@forza223bowe5 Yeah and you're not talking complete and utter bollocks :)
2
"Take heart, my British cousins. Our founding Fathers weren't stupid men" aye far from it actually so far removed its yeah.....
2
@thelastvbuck I'm not unfortunately
2
@Chaggy1978 Yeah even other coronaviruses you build up usually immunity when dealing with them being out in the big bad world gradually so then you dont have as worse symptoms if you had gotten then all in one go, thats how logically its meant to work
2
@pamphlet3560 I dont think it's cars, it's spending money equally as bad though
2
@ccavazzi6671 🤣😂🤣😂after laughing my ass off why didnt (as it's a protected group black people are and saying racist things is categorically illegal) why didn't they go to the police or report it to the family at least? Because they're talking bs thats why!
2
@kevinsyd2012 ie some use it to stay in work, ie the mobility component possibly? You really should have an idea what you're talking about! Also I know for a fact they do checks on people's medical records to verify if they're telling the truth or not.
2
@johnvaughan4894 Go on then go, not that I'd think anyone could care less, though in reality she did babble on about it being a criminal conviction when it's not thats about the only thing she got categorically wrong, Rees Mogg's error was mentioning of a jury (is a flat out load of bs to put it bluntly)is like saying (which is what a conviction depends upon) is a judge passing sentencing, not all cases go to trial (admitting the guilt of a case then it won't go to trial obviously). Is equally as stupid to say what Rees Moggy said is accurate, that the rate of transmission of the virus, that caused the pandemic depends on the weather, was as if to say we're the only country to have weather, or that viruses dont exist in hotter climbs (when least some do, it just wasn't known at the time then if this mutation of a coronavirus would).
1
Says it here exactly what I was saying https://youtu.be/Ka_IOAc8IWM?t=372 another of him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Xsuy-pqAwA he even mentions Ian Cutler going to meet him this is Ian http://www.cameraassassin.co.uk/ and the beall and end all Cutler wasn't included in the Leveson enquiry you know why, because he'd have slaughtered them (the industry he worked for) it really was just a bs smoke screen and fuck all else.
1
What's worse is they're all the same politicians that is more or less (maybe just the career ones perhaps I dont really know tbh) but considering this now with that interview BH gave from what this video is about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka_IOAc8IWM (why I don't vote not supporting a bunch of quite frankly dickheads who are power hungry) rather is yeah why they wanted to make it so that take night clubs there's a reason why on the rules or whatever you'd call them like dress code etc and then down the line in most clubs there's going to be one about undercover/un-uniformed police skulking around doing drug searches on people, Think from what I can remember the bill for to allow for that was going through the usual processes in parliament it got to I think was the 1st reading, but 2nd it didn't get any further from that (think there's at least three readings but thats going off the top of my head), now to get it passed they needed what I'd call a scapegoat so they asked BH about ecstacy that's why really he was set up for it to get that bill passsed, that's the overall idea to this now he's still being got at for it over and over again about something he said, now his fellow East 17 band member Tony said previously even to BH talking about E in exactly the same manner really but he never got the same treatment why?
1
@JulieMalone-oy1ll "you need to grow up" what for voicing an opinion, the irony of what you said is immense!
1
@JcakRitchie What planet are you on, as it certainly is not earth
1
@JcakRitchie haha no not at all lol you're just daft 🤣😂
1
@LordoftheFleet In any case there's a far more natural way of as such doing vaccinations or rather instead of.... the vast majority (if not all) viruses need an acidic cell to bind to and dump their RNA into a cell (this one being the ACE2 receptor) RNA being the actual code blocks of DNA, where it replicates in the cell (the incubation period) then the cell explodes thats when you get the symptoms. By changing your body's cells to alkali prevents a virus cell from binding to anything, by drinking more acidic drinks or foods even
1
Yeah rather if we were able to actually properly lockdown would indeed work, thing is you cant do that people need to get food etc is sort of a false point of doing it really, not really speaking from either side its the generall full on truth of it, its like I think they said pointless
1
@sharonsmithson3603 Because of my health improving (physical rather) due to things I am doing myself yeah I'll get on stuff like that profusely! They twist what the genuine epidemiologists are saying like forgot her name but one professor who is part or works for the Oxford University said exactly what I just stated more or less or her work states that in summary. Is literally as I see it making a mockery of their work, their works to essentially during times like this not to prevent deaths (as those are always going to happen regardless) but to try and minimalize them as much as its possible to do so I'd almost want to call it coporate maybe manslaughter but to the word corporate I dont really know....
1
@lewiskirby9829 You quite evidently either didn't watch it at all or much of it, has to be one of the most stupid uninformed comments I've ever read. Well done!
1
@petelong5708 🤣🤣Oh how I love these comments about Farage's idiocy, not a one of his followers can grasp the concept of just because ones popular, doesnt mean they have a high approval rating lol (infact Farage's is pretty bleak lol).
1
@paulp4243 No just merely correcting you at least half of what you said is rubbish
1
@paulp4243 The law not permitting a child of the monarch from marrying a Catholic was changed at least back in 2012, though the Monarch can't since they're of course the head of the CofE, has been a law since 1701. Legally speaking (though would be met with huge outrage) can marry anyone of any other faith, the reality was it wasn't within the sights of the law makers at the time and hasn't been to include other faiths in the Succession to the Crown Act.
1
@Paragon62 😂😂🤦♂🤦♂Your kind are certainly entertaining, whats your next hilarious one going to be about, just because Farage is popular makes his approval rating high lol, is what some other Reform supporter said to me haha was honestly the most entertaining load of bs I've ever heard of.
1
The Republic of Ireland has fuck all to do with the UK (Northern Ireland is not Britain is part of the UK though), maybe know what you're talking about dumb Yanks?
1
Yup with the so called 'lie detector tests' rather they arent I don't believe even called that by the people who conduct them, they're called polygraph tests and apart from some specific things they use them for like the CIA forgot why exactly they're used for applicants into the service and are others. They aren't I don't believe admissible as evidence in any court in any state in the US, they're just kind of a way of swaying people investigating somethings opinion thats all. What I'd be interested and concerns me at least slightly is I know for a fact some polygraph tests come back inconclusive, not exactly sure what makes a test inconclusive but they do happen, I wonder by whatever method someone modified the result and said if inconclusive they lied, wouldn't surprise me in the least! One example of a way of swaying opinions was the Travis Walton alien abduction case, after Walton had gone missing all of his work colleagues cutting down tree's offered to have a polygraph done and all but one passed it (though some say it was for them to get out of a really bad contract, was allegedly found in some petrol station butt naked in whatever it was either days or weeks later).
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All