Comments by "Kyle Stubbs" (@kylestubbs8867) on "Religious Hack Evicts His Needy Tenants" video.

  1. Broadly speaking, if you have explain how you can still be a good Christian after doing something detrimental… then you’re not a good Christian.
    5
  2. They didn’t determine that. They’re saying that it’s not a great look. If Ramsey really is a good Christian, why does he need to insist that kicking out all those tenants wasn’t his fault?
    3
  3. Who were his “tenants”? As best I can tell, Jesus didn’t run an apartment building. Heck, his parents were turned away from an inn just before he was born. Why would anyone revere him if he didn’t sympathize with evicted tenants?
    2
  4. Well, it shouldn’t be. Broadly speaking, if you have to explain how something doesn’t disqualify you from being a good Christian… then it does.
    2
  5. Broadly speaking, if you have to explain why something you’ve done doesn’t make you a bad Christian… then it does.
    2
  6. We do place judgement on all landlords. It’s just that Christian landlords hold themselves to the standards of “Thou shalt not steal” and “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house”. So it’s especially suspicious when they have to justify similar-looking actions.
    2
  7. Well, there you go. You could believably say you need the money, and feel no need to insist on an ethereal moral standard.
    2
  8. So there are footnotes after “Thou shalt not steal” and “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods”?
    1
  9. More like religion was poisoned. “Thou shalt not steal” didn’t originally come down with any footnotes.
    1
  10. Perhaps he didn’t need to. Judas’s sinful actions are known worldwide today, and after the one that cost Jesus his life, he felt such remorse that he committed suicide. It’s the way we recognize what terrible sins this poser has committed today. Well… most of us.
    1
  11. Thou shalt not steal. Written at a time before any asterisks could be added.
    1
  12. That’s right. Because “bad” would be an inadequate descriptor. Better ones would be “loathsome” and “sociopathic”.
    1