Comments by "Martyn Blackburn" (@martynblackburn9632) on "Julia Hartley-Brewer: 'Britain's culture is based on Christian values'" video.

  1. Cultures shift. They are not fixed.
    3
  2. Every person believes their country is the best, the most beautiful, etc.
    3
  3.  @colliehouse3133  They come because of the pull of capitalism, the prosperity. They still believe their country is the best if you ask them.
    2
  4. The royals are not Christians. They are Jabulonites.
    2
  5. The BRF are Jabulonists.
    1
  6. And tea drinking.
    1
  7.  @lizb4156  Culture: the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
    1
  8.  @markdaniels2200  It's the internal religion of European royality which is rooted in Jewish Gnostic freemasonry.
    1
  9.  @markdaniels2200  It's real as in: it's what the royals and the noble families of Europe have historically pre-occupied themselves with alongside the Judaeo-Christian religious system that was invented by Roman aristocrats.
    1
  10. There was no Jesus of the Christians. It was all a plot by Roman aristocrats to parody the Jews of the rebellion around 70 AD.
    1
  11.  @missasinenomine  There is no world to come that we can know and we've always speculated of it. Christianity has no claim to any truth of it. The belief in the soul predates organised religion.
    1
  12.  @missasinenomine  Religion is fake. It's made up from the pagan religions.
    1
  13.  @missasinenomine  I'm afraid that Christianity is more fake than all other religions except the Jedi and the elephant god. Mohammed was at least flesh and blood historical.
    1
  14.  @missasinenomine  Nope. He wasn't. No evidence. People cannot rise from the dead, and that's an old one anyway going right back to Egypt and Sumeria. Because Christianity is a Roman religion it competed with the pagan religions in order to gain converts. The Jesus godman was a pro-Roman satire on the various Jewish rebels who fought against the Romans around 66 AD. Roughly around the same time when the first gospel was written, the author Mark who never knew the godman, and the godman had no birth in that gospel as it was was based upon the style of a Greek epic. Matthew, the second gospel author, was pro-Roman, a Jew working for the Roman aristocracy who corrected Mark's errors concerning Jewish customs whilst introducing the virgin birth and making the whole thing appear historical. This Matthew attempted to link the godman to Jewish prophecy; a literary technique used in typology to show how past events had been fulfilled in recent ones. Luke, the author of the third gospel, was a credulous pagan convert.
    1
  15. What's worse is that Morland is doubly wrong: Christianity didn't even start here, but in Rome in the halls of Vespasian's empire.
    1