Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "AFP News Agency" channel.

  1. 158
  2. 14
  3. 10
  4. 9
  5. 8
  6. Dictatoship (4:29) Yes, in custody without trial is not in prison. (9:07) "You're meeting Europe's last dictator. ... There is some truth in this joke" (9:49) "... nor scientists have ever defined what a dictatorship is. It's not defined, and that's it." (11:12) "So yes, our system is tougher, I do not exclude the term authoritarian, but in no case dictatorship. [...] What resources does Belarus have to dictate things to France?" (15:44) "... because if there is a sudden famine there will be dictatorship everywhere including in France." (48:11) Lukashenko obviously has (as a patialy self declared dictator and assumingly with agricultural roots) not the slightest idea about declarations related to international law! Oppression (23:50) "And where is Protasevich? (dissident journalist arrested on Ryanair aircraft) He is living a quiet life in his own country [now after we have convinced hin]. He does not want to go to the West [because our murderer squadrons are everywhere]. He has grown up and understands that this is his land and his country." (29:15) When you mistreat people, you are too stupid to hide it. (29:31) "And you eliminated them" ?!? [Lukashenko mentioned: yellow vests, NL protesters, Polish women] Souvereignty (24:20) France just used its souvereignty to impose own sanctions on the trade with Belarusia, which can alwys be done in addition to any UN recommendations. Ukaine (30:46) So when a country buys long-distance weapons, Russia regards it as legitimate, to destroy such property and more. However, puppets like Zelinskiy and Putin make secret contracts to copy Western war technology by dismantling delivered weapons ... At this point, least Zelinskiy's hypocrisy is reveales by Lukashenko (34:50) "What the people wanted or didn't want, It was never about that!" Mercenaries, Georgian snipers instigated the bloodshed between the people and the police back in 2014! Question remains: Who is the true victim and who shoots on own people ?!? Perversion and blackmail in perfection: (37:45) Because "The whole Ukraine was ready to go to war." [Or prepared for self defense!?!] (44:51 ) Lukashenko regards the Ukrain military movement of four divisions on Ukraine's very own territory as an act of aggression !?! "On the eve of the war, the Russiangovernment, the president of Russia turned to you [the West], asking you for security guarantees. [...The West] didn't even sign a simple peace of paper. That means that you wanted the war. You [The West] started it." (46:08) Lukashenko claims, NATO would have attacked Russia, altough no additional army soldiers have been called for duty. (51:06) "Russia has not declared a military mobilisation.They are fighting with their regular troops, the professionals under contract that it has available [=mercenaries!]! Putin (59:46) "And Putin is a person who follows orders, who acts [obeys]." :D :D I knew it :) Reporter (40:10) Lives in Russia. (43:53) That is probably why he has to think that NATO and EU are the aggressors when they sell weapons to Ukraine. He seems not even to know that the special military operation was sold in the West as Russian help for Donbas and Luhansk region to implement mor independent self-determination according to the performed referendum. Every Russian military movement beyond those two regions are clearly and aggressively violating international law! [The parental roots are likely: father GDR, mother France]
    8
  7. 8
  8. 7
  9. 7
  10. 6
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. Dictatoship (4:29) Yes, in custody without trial is not in prison. (9:07) "You're meeting Europe's last dictator. ... There is some truth in this joke" (9:49) "... nor scientists have ever defined what a dictatorship is. It's not defined, and that's it." (11:12) "So yes, our system is tougher, I do not exclude the term authoritarian, but in no case dictatorship. [...] What resources does Belarus have to dictate things to France?" (15:44) "... because if there is a sudden famine there will be dictatorship everywhere including in France." (48:11) Lukashenko obviously has (as a patialy self declared dictator and assumingly with agricultural roots) not the slightest idea about declarations related to international law! Oppression (23:50) "And where is Protasevich? (dissident journalist arrested on Ryanair aircraft) He is living a quiet life in his own country [now after we have convinced hin]. He does not want to go to the West [because our murderer squadrons are everywhere]. He has grown up and understands that this is his land and his country." (29:15) When you mistreat people, you are too stupid to hide it. (29:31) "And you eliminated them" ?!? [Lukashenko mentioned: yellow vests, NL protesters, Polish women] Souvereignty (24:20) France just used its souvereignty to impose own sanctions on the trade with Belarusia, which can alwys be done in addition to any UN recommendations. Ukaine (30:46) So when a country buys long-distance weapons, Russia regards it as legitimate, to destroy such property and more. However, puppets like Zelinskiy and Putin make secret contracts to copy Western war technology by dismantling delivered weapons ... At this point, least Zelinskiy's hypocrisy is reveales by Lukashenko (34:50) "What the people wanted or didn't want, It was never about that!" Mercenaries, Georgian snipers instigated the bloodshed between the people and the police back in 2014! Question remains: Who is the true victim and who shoots on own people ?!? Perversion and blackmail in perfection: (37:45) Because "The whole Ukraine was ready to go to war." [Or prepared for self defense!?!] (44:51 ) Lukashenko regards the Ukrain military movement of four divisions on Ukraine's very own territory as an act of aggression !?! "On the eve of the war, the Russiangovernment, the president of Russia turned to you [the West], asking you for security guarantees. [...The West] didn't even sign a simple peace of paper. That means that you wanted the war. You [The West] started it." (46:08) Lukashenko claims, NATO would have attacked Russia, altough no additional army soldiers have been called for duty. (51:06) "Russia has not declared a military mobilisation.They are fighting with their regular troops, the professionals under contract that it has available [=mercenaries!]! Putin (59:46) "And Putin is a person who follows orders, who acts [obeys]." :D :D I knew it :) Reporter (40:10) Lives in Russia. (43:53) That is probably why he has to think that NATO and EU are the aggressors when they sell weapons to Ukraine. He seems not even to know that the special military operation was sold in the West as Russian help for Donbas and Luhansk region to implement mor independent self-determination according to the performed referendum. Every Russian military movement beyond those two regions are clearly and aggressively violating international law! [The parental roots are likely: father GDR, mother France]
    4
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. Just another hypocritical lip service from those who make money with their armaments industry while more or less obviously supporting the wanted Puti-linsky theater! - The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be adapted to current global needs! Let's abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority by the General Assembly !!! Not only the states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of an international task force for fair referendums (plebiscites), coordinated by the UNO in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia). Do we really only applaud to those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as good individual suggestions for a fair dispute resolution are rewarded again (and corresponding improved regulations are compared, discussed and established), we can climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
    2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. Just another hypocritical lip service from those who make money with their armaments industry while more or less obviously supporting the wanted Puti-linsky theater! - The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be adapted to current global needs! Let's abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority by the General Assembly !!! Not only the states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of an international task force for fair referendums (plebiscites), coordinated by the UNO in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia). Do we really only applaud to those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as good individual suggestions for a fair dispute resolution are rewarded again (and corresponding improved regulations are compared, discussed and established), we can climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
    2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. Dictatoship (4:29) Yes, in custody without trial is not in prison. (9:07) "You're meeting Europe's last dictator. ... There is some truth in this joke" (9:49) "... nor scientists have ever defined what a dictatorship is. It's not defined, and that's it." (11:12) "So yes, our system is tougher, I do not exclude the term authoritarian, but in no case dictatorship. [...] What resources does Belarus have to dictate things to France?" (15:44) "... because if there is a sudden famine there will be dictatorship everywhere including in France." (48:11) Lukashenko obviously has (as a patialy self declared dictator and assumingly with agricultural roots) not the slightest idea about declarations related to international law! Oppression (23:50) "And where is Protasevich? (dissident journalist arrested on Ryanair aircraft) He is living a quiet life in his own country [now after we have convinced hin]. He does not want to go to the West [because our murderer squadrons are everywhere]. He has grown up and understands that this is his land and his country." (29:15) When you mistreat people, you are too stupid to hide it. (29:31) "And you eliminated them" ?!? [Lukashenko mentioned: yellow vests, NL protesters, Polish women] Souvereignty (24:20) France just used its souvereignty to impose own sanctions on the trade with Belarusia, which can alwys be done in addition to any UN recommendations. Ukaine (30:46) So when a country buys long-distance weapons, Russia regards it as legitimate, to destroy such property and more. However, puppets like Zelinskiy and Putin make secret contracts to copy Western war technology by dismantling delivered weapons ... At this point, least Zelinskiy's hypocrisy is reveales by Lukashenko (34:50) "What the people wanted or didn't want, It was never about that!" Mercenaries, Georgian snipers instigated the bloodshed between the people and the police back in 2014! Question remains: Who is the true victim and who shoots on own people ?!? Perversion and blackmail in perfection: (37:45) Because "The whole Ukraine was ready to go to war." [Or prepared for self defense!?!] (44:51 ) Lukashenko regards the Ukrain military movement of four divisions on Ukraine's very own territory as an act of aggression !?! "On the eve of the war, the Russiangovernment, the president of Russia turned to you [the West], asking you for security guarantees. [...The West] didn't even sign a simple peace of paper. That means that you wanted the war. You [The West] started it." (46:08) Lukashenko claims, NATO would have attacked Russia, altough no additional army soldiers have been called for duty. (51:06) "Russia has not declared a military mobilisation.They are fighting with their regular troops, the professionals under contract that it has available [=mercenaries!]! Putin (59:46) "And Putin is a person who follows orders, who acts [obeys]." :D :D I knew it :) Reporter (40:10) Lives in Russia. (43:53) That is probably why he has to think that NATO and EU are the aggressors when they sell weapons to Ukraine. He seems not even to know that the special military operation was sold in the West as Russian help for Donbas and Luhansk region to implement mor independent self-determination according to the performed referendum. Every Russian military movement beyond those two regions are clearly and aggressively violating international law! [The parental roots are likely: father GDR, mother France]
    1
  233.  @marcusonesimus3400  Well, in contrast to many media, you at least clearly address the obvious deficits of current world politics. However, I was not able to derive a useful suggestion for remedying these shortcomings from your analysis. If the current legal basis of the UNO is too bad to be able to appear as a fair "world police" to promote peace, then another supranational global organizational unit with correspondingly (better) effective bodies (legislative, executive, judiciary...) is required. I had already clearly mentioned my suggestions for improving the current misery: Remove the right of veto for cross-border aggressors, reduce the quorum for international, military-armed peace missions to a 2/3 majority, fair referendums (plebiscites) on the desired sovereignty status of a disputed region. The dissemination of either cooperative or exclusionary ideologies is a matter of sponsored teaching as well as individual preference. Jeremiah 9 7 Therefore thus says the Lord of hosts, “Behold, I will refine them [through suffering] and test them; For how else should I deal with the daughter of My people? 8 “Their tongue is a murderous arrow; It speaks deceit; With his mouth one speaks peace to his neighbor, But in his heart he lays traps and waits in ambush for him. 26 [...] for all these nations are uncircumcised (sinful, impure), and all the house of Israel are uncircumcised in heart.” The question that each member of society must ask themselves is: Which persons from our community do I voluntarily support with my words and deeds because I consider their knowledge and behavior to be suitable for guiding the whole community in a holistic, meaningful and sustainable way? Systematic improvements grow from the grassroots and do not fall from the tree in the manner of charitable gifts.
    1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1