Comments by "" (@boghopper5463) on "COVID-19: What could the Omicron variant mean for herd immunity?" video.

@NunyaHarmonee ivermectin is too effective, too easy, and way to cheap.
14
@NunyaHarmonee ivermectin is too effective, too easy, and way to cheap.
11
@anniecouillard482 ivermectin is used by millions of people safely every day to prevent river blindness. it has been proven effective against covid. it's cheap, and easy to distribute. what could possibly be the downside? this whole thing has never been about health.
7
herd immunity is what happens when further transmission of a virus is prevented by having enough people who, having had the virus, no longer cary it, or by means of a vaccine that prevents transmission. this is not that vaccine and we are doing our darnedest to see that those who are at minimal risk and who might contribute to the herd are compromised by this completely ineffective therapy.
2
@jorgee7470 Why COVID-19 is not so spread in Africa: How does Ivermectin affect it? “The morbidity and mortality in the onchocerciasis endemic countries are lesser than those in the non-endemic ones. The community-directed onchocerciasis treatment with ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in morbidity and fatality rate in Africa. In areas where ivermectin is distributed to and used by the entire population, it leads to a significant reduction in mortality.
2
@shizuokaBLUES Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies “Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 72% [55‑82%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials. •Statistically signicant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 27 studies show statistically signicant improvements in isolation. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.
1
@shizuokaBLUES Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in Covid-19 Furthermore, by the 27th of February, the results of 42 clinical trials, including approximately 15,000 patients (both registered and unregistered studies) have been subjected to a meta-analysis after exclusion of biasing factors. It was found that 83% showed improvements with early treatment, 51% improved during late-stage treatment, and there was an 89% prevention of onset rate noted. This confirms the usefulness of ivermectin.
1
@sierrakilogulf which explains the panic perfectly
1
@jorgee7470 Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies “Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 72% [55‑82%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials. •Statistically signicant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 27 studies show statistically signicant improvements in isolation. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.
1
@jorgee7470 Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in Covid-19 Furthermore, by the 27th of February, the results of 42 clinical trials, including approximately 15,000 patients (both registered and unregistered studies) have been subjected to a meta-analysis after exclusion of biasing factors. It was found that 83% showed improvements with early treatment, 51% improved during late-stage treatment, and there was an 89% prevention of onset rate noted. This confirms the usefulness of ivermectin.
1
@jorgee7470 if you're not seeing it, then someone is editing it as in what i see, it's obvious. as to why i don't post links and sources: try it, and see what happens. medrx, japan journal of antibiotics
1
@jorgee7470 ah, sorry Darlene. now we know you are a waste of time. no where in the world has any of the alleged corona viruses ever been isolated and purified from a living host. all genomes have been derived from computer modelling based on genetic fragments obtained from a soup of alleged virus and growth media, host tissues, antibiotics, poisons and other crap. don't take my word for it, ask around.
1
@jorgee7470 take it up with our hosts. and while you are at it, ask them why they find the science behind this issue so offensive.
1