Comments by "" (@urrywest) on "Fact-check: Disinformation about the killing of civilians in Bucha? | DW News" video.

It neither proves or disproves that russian millatary was behind those deaths. The UN said they don't need any investigation or proof.
2
@netzoned There is a deep dive into facts..... Like there is a fly on a dead human body... or they were wearling a certain brand of paints. Not that that addresses anything pertentent... The main narrative around the bodies is that they were extra judcial pont blank range killing by russians. There is no independent varification of that claim... From the video evidence there are people who claim that the bodies were less than two days old and that there was no on line evidence of bodies before that... That was after the retreat of the russians. You can be sure that the russians won't retreat again unless there is a treaty to do so.
1
@netzoned I tend to think it follows the similar pattern as the other reportings in the western media... False flag, justifcation for war for dollar dominance, natural resources... I listened to scott ritter's assesment of the bodies here as well...
1
@netzoned The point I was making in an earlier comment is that the video IS a deep dive into facts that don't address how those bodies got there and how they died.... Or it doesn't address the central issue.
1
I am not sure it matters what happened anymore.... They are doing the typical 'can you prove russia didn't do it?' Technicque... When they start making possible allogations and ask people to prove them wrong, it seems like the facts don't matter anymore. They have done this with the most outlandish allogations imaginable.... The technique is this: they make a claim that is outlandish, they back up that claim with a bombarment of factual statments, some of wich are clearly true and others that are clearly fabricated, if some of those claims are adjacent to the allogation, they keep on saying that they are proof that the allogation is true because it is adjacent to the allogation.
1