Comments by "Terence Field" (@terencefield3204) on "The Spectator" channel.

  1. 51
  2. 48
  3. 23
  4. 14
  5. 14
  6. 13
  7. 13
  8. 13
  9. 11
  10. 11
  11. 10
  12. 10
  13. 9
  14. 8
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 8
  18. 8
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. THis is the recipe of the particularly British state - socialists pretty much uninterrupted since 1945. The 'Tories' were avowed 'we are all socialisrts now' from 45 to 79. The ONLY regime that modestly cut the state spend, added a modicum of personal wealth and inter-genertional wealth was the Thatcher regime. After that sharp reversal. The consequences of state fiscal and monetary policy was de-industrialisation, cultural evisceration, the creation of a poverty leve find nowhere else in the developed world - even thought eh UK is a VERY low productivity, low living standard, low-value added rentier economy and society. The private school rabbit for the socialist hounds to eat is a ratchet towards an already extremely soviet state. I hear nothing from the left that suggests the degenerate policies they applied from 1945 will other than intensify. Thus I rejoice in not any longer living there. The angle of decline is steeper, after the madnesses of Brown Blaire, then the insanity of the removal of the Conservatives and their replacement by ultra radical nationalist brexit populists. Both parties are a mirror to the catastrophe. There is no hope there. The private schools are a problem because the state schools are dreadful. The Private health system is a problem because the NHS is appalling. Neither party in that miserable bitter failed island society have any ideas to change any of the rot there. The woman sounds like a standard bitter enforcing leftie from 1945. He sounds economical with the actualite. Hopeless place. Emigrate if you possibly can BY the way, I was educated at a Grammar School, and there was probably an arithmetic majority of poor and working-class kids there. They were culturally disadvantaged, not be the 11 plus. I understand that 0ver 85% of the professional cadres in England are populated by the products of the private schools which educate about 10% of the indigenous. A disaster. Indian caste system, not a European country BUT Labour loves a captive electorate of dirt poor people; their urban funding policies and so much else guarantee it continues. The Cons loathe the middle classes. 19th Century Britian seems eternal. But with none of the advantages the 19th century bestowed upon it.
    4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. It has been long the case that the BBC prefers not to recall the three injunctions that were his its charter, To educate to inform to entertain. In the Audi decades of my life, the BBC do its great credit. Did all of those things. Since Burt It has Italia abandoned them. Now the squalor is limited to reflecting the lives of the inhabitants of the poisoned island. It reflects the worst of their lives It also Lies to them It patronizes and insults them It creates political fantasy as a means of expressing its power Laughs at structures and ancient previously highly effective in sustaining a monocultural society of immense and staggering achievement. Teaches the young to the past It succeeds in alienating one generation from the other. It lies about integration of society by falsely suggesting multiculturalism is both high functioning and active in the real world when, in fact, all that is achieved is ghetto, living and immense violence where none existed before. The BBC is held in contempt as antisemitic and rightly so The United States Almost universally holds it in contempt, irrespective of whether they are GOP or Democrat by inclination. The power of the BBC is the wishes to and can In reality make or break government. I believe that the BBC is more manipulative, more dishonest, and more deeply and trenched in the business of thought control then was actually achieved in the great dictatorship in Europe in the 20th century. I see no way of reducing its authority. It is one reason among many that would cause one to immigrate to fresh air and better climes.
    2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. The point of the inquiry is to give the false impression to the proles that they have some kind of influence on the corrupted state. Nothing more. Cynical marketing techniques as old as time.  Hancock is the new Guy Fawkes. It is that same state whose clearly ruthless present Head of State lied about Mau Mau and cosied up to tribal Africans and the inheritors of extreme violence (NOT any sort of freedom struggle, an obvious unhidden inter tribal violence that also slaughtered Europeans in large numbers) and in the course dumping on the people his parents relied upon to sustain their political economy in Africa under different circumstances.  The state consumes its subjects, at will, to sustain centres of power and control.  Hence the mindset of the Mail, the Mirror, the Express, each saying to their prole supporters 'THEY are doing 'it' (whatever oppression 'it' happens to be at the time) to US' But not to the Harmsorths of this world. They are just fine. They are always just fine, as Murdoch and the rest are just fine now. One minute the soldiers, the police, the civil servants sustaining the state are cynically sold as heroes and given medals and such like, a full generation or so later, they are sold as the racist suppressors of a violent dead and evil Imperial system. My, the Chinese must be snapping at the heels of the West in East Africa! I guess the British are fearful of the French experience in north west Africa to resort to this nonsense. Then there is the fools-gold glory of the so called Commonwealth. Got to give that a lease of life for the Head of State not to be a mere local papier-mache would-be Autocrat. Not forgetting Obama's daddy, and the even more cyclical British sending bucket loads of compensatory money to mau man retirees to make Obama feel little docile PC Britain was his friend. Crawling creates contempt. Read Rory Stewart's utterly depressing but clearly honest book on Kenya/Africa and the irrelevance of the British there now !!! If I were a servant of the British state, and I were asked to put my life on the line, say to confront the Muslims in their violent marches through British cities, by the ministers appointed by this King's Prime Minister, I would refuse I would go home, have a cup tea, a slice of cake, and avoid the next monarch, in fifty years time or so, sidling up to the Muslim government there in Number 10 and saying that I was a bloodthirsty monster of a policeman in trying to suppress the righteous Muslim marches in 2023. No no no. Stay at home police army and security people. Drink tea, eat cake, play with your children, cuddle your wives and girlfriends and have nothing to do with your corrupted power elites. You are in their descendent's sights.
    2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101.  @steveis33  The law, in most circumstances, suggests that 'ignorance is no defence'. That applies here .The broad mass of your electorate is composed of people of around average, maybe a little above, often significantly below the mean IQ. That means for very many, they have not the means nor the inclination to grasp complex, sophisticated, multvariate matters. Nor do they like to engage in conceptual thought. Normally that does matter. A bone head with a red flag screams 'workers demand more' on the one hand, and a faux-toff ( and perhaps now and then a real one) screams ' Do not give in to the overspenders, tradition is what counts', waving often a little blue flag, and then the people vote for their ancient and moth-eaten prejudices. ( there used to be a nice little yellow flag argument for the earnest kind-hearted intellectuals but that sees to have been largely dispensed with now) Brexit was something else. And there, your mass universal suffrage democracy simply spawned liars, mountebanks, common snake-oil salesmen, street odd-balls, the odd peddler of limited 'truth' and even people like Johnson and Red Buses and Turks-soon-to-be-Under-The-Bed. It was open season on referendum nonsense. And your Parliament had it s legs shot out at the knee. In all of that, NO intelligent, complex, sophisticated, conceptualisation of any sort of future. So your hordes did what they always did. Dusted off their often (but not always) mindless prejudices, and marked their cards. There is no 'pro' to nationalism, to jingoism, to foreigner-hate, to xenophobia, to the marketing cynicism that is 'global Britian'. There are only 'cons'. So you are, as the Bard would say but never did, entirely 'stuffed'.
    1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1