Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Juror excused after concerns over aspects of identity made public" video.

you cant even tell us what crime he committed..... go sit down
10
@adamk.7177 "he committed fraud" then why no fraud charge those of us with brains wonder...?
5
@gretchengraef3012 yea... like how they say they have no feelings towards trump, then they discover their social media posts...
4
yes it is...
4
"The courts hands are tied, cannot impose real law on trump" 91 criminal counts, and multiple civil cases... and you're STILL WHINING??!!!???? geeze......
3
@AlarKemmotar "you keep saying this, but the indictment lists exactly what he's charged with, and is freely available online." americans seem to believe that fraud is the crime. americans do not know what crime was committed but if you want to chat... not that you will answer any questions, but here are a couple of good ones.. what is "hush money"? wasn't the campaign funds looked into years ago? if this is about a federal campaign violation, why is a state prosecuting?
3
@SteveGillham because you cannot articulate a crime.
3
he might insurrect them... lol
3
@SteveGillham you obviously do not understand the difference between criminal and civil law. liability is determined in civil trials. guilt is determined in criminal trials. blue voter are ya??
2
@jpvoodoo5522 "Technically, he is in contempt of court" how so? because you hate him?
2
@sherriserino7864 "WRONG - FRAUD he committed FRAUD" then why no fraud charge those of us with brains wonder...?
2
or jesus christ's...
1
@itsenergybob8917 but he didnt yell fire in a theatre... what EXACTLY did he say that you believe he should be imprisoned for?
1
for what? google, why can't I ask this?
1
awwwe... lol
1
who did he harass?? names? dates? quotes? of course not..
1
contempt for what? the "speech restriction" will never be enforced... they know they will never be upheld.. instant appeal win.
1
lock him up for what?
1
@jpvoodoo5522 um, when was trump summoned to be a juror??
1
they won't enforce them because they know they are unconstitutional... it's all a game..
1
they aren't going to enforce them because they know they are not valid..
1
@FredGoldust fascism...
1
for what? google, why can't I ask this?
1
@JohnDoe-pk2hs the question has been deleted 3 previous times... related to the case and the topic of this video we are posting under, what crime was committed?
1
@cybertoe1221 "The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974" great!!!! an actual answer!!! I appreciate that! one simple follow up... if this is a FEDERAL ELECTION issue, why is a state prosecuting?
1
@pedalingprospector2007 "Is your comprehension that bad? How many times do they have to say, "...falsifying business records"?" sounds exactly like another case regarding another high ranking political figure google "candidate and party fined"... sorry, google won't allow me to be more specific
1
@pedalingprospector2007 2016 election
1
@pedalingprospector2007 candidate and party committee fined for falsifying records
1
@pedalingprospector2007 no criminal trials...
1
@pedalingprospector2007 why the selective prosecution do ya think?
1
ummm.... so you have never heard of prosecutorial discretion? there was an extremely similar case in 2016 that was resolved with fines...
1
@StellaSable4891 do you honestly still believe it is about rich vs poor?
1
@lindarockafellow5058 "He broke the law! " you cant even tell us what law he broke....
1
@itsenergybob8917 they are never going to enforce these "speech restrictions" they know it would be an instant appeal win..
1
not gonna happen... the gag order is, well.... google won't let me educate you, but there will be no enforcement, trust me.
1
@StellaSable4891 can you answer any of my questions?? what is "hush money"? wasn't the campaign funds looked into years ago? if this is about a FEDERAL CAMPAIGN violation, why is a state prosecuting?
1
@HelynnHeels how did he intimidate a juror? he is allowed to speak in the courtroom... did he say something in particular that you know of?
1