Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "High-stakes North Carolina case could change election laws" video.

  1.  @DRKrust492  "No. Our elections are secure." how do you know?
    2
  2.  jooday  "apparently you've never read the constitution section 1 article 4 is literally about full credit and good faith aka you have to share records with other states such as evidence, court hearing etc" was your version of our constitution printed in china? Article I Section 4 The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
    2
  3.  @vet137  "Let's go BANNON!" bannon?? who the hell is that? I think you mean brandon..
    1
  4. correct
    1
  5.  @elizabethhallwalker2332  T R U M P !!
    1
  6. some folks do not like our constitution. it's what protects us from the fascists, and they hate that.
    1
  7.  @pluntchgunster6156  "It hasn't been active for 200 years. We must have all been fascist this entire time" what hasn't been active for 200 years? our constitution? gerrymandering?
    1
  8. you fascist dults think when it rains the doj should go after trump with an indictment....
    1
  9.  @AndrewDeLong  "If judicial review is removed, you'll likely never see a state flip to the other party ever again. This will basically stand to codify Gerrymandering" couldn't the folks of any state elect a legislature that would gerrymander the other way?? oh, but that would give the people actual power, and we can't allow that, now can we...
    1
  10. only extremist tyrants would allow judges to re-write laws from the bench..
    1
  11.  @JS-kj6qf  "not sure I understand." naaahhhhhh..... really?
    1
  12. dude... we just sat a justice on the bench who can't tell us what a woman is.... and you're whining about what again??
    1
  13. "Every state should be operating the same way for every federal election!!!!" go read the us constitution. if you want to make revisions, there are provisions for that.
    1
  14.  @JohnB-zu5pr  "Everyone should vote not every American citizen just every one" are you suggesting that non-citizens should vote?
    1
  15.  @possumverde  "State Supreme Courts have always been responsible for interpreting the laws of their state." what law were they interpreting and what was their interpretation?
    1
  16.  @DotHacker99  "dipsh** that's literally a state SC's purpose. It also ties into our system of checks & balances. Legislatures have NEVER and should NEVER be able to circumvent this system" what's with the anger, and name calling..??? anyway.... what is the state SC's purpose? to interpret law? I never suggested otherwise. I simply asked, in the context of this video and conversation, what law were they interpreting and what was their interpretation? and you became angry and unhinged. why not simply answer my question instead? given the fact that state legislatures have always been allowed to gerrymander, what law were they interpreting and what was their interpretation?
    1
  17. what frightens you so much..?
    1
  18. @Dennis Plum "People motivated by ideology as opposed to non partial fairness even if that means going aginst they're own beliefs, something this court clearly isn't able to do." oh... so which way must they rule to be non-partial and fair? I'm guessing it's the way that you would agree with? <shakes head>
    1
  19.  @DRKrust492  "Mail in ballots are fine." let me guess... you're a democrat?
    1
  20. we better do something to restore confidence.........
    1
  21. that's what the us constitution says...
    1