Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "McEnany roasts climate activists: 'Do these people have jobs?'" video.

@andrewpriester6994 "They are getting arrested" obviously that's not enough.... how about 2 years in jail? if that doesn't stop them, how about 6 years? "arresting" them so they can brag about it obviously isn't a deterrent.
10
@andrewpriester6994 "They are going to jail" obviously not for long enough. their jail sentences are obviously not deterring them from committing these crimes, over and over and over...
4
@promethiac2641 "They have enough sense to get Fox to give them attention." and you think this attention is somehow good for them and their cause??? so if I p on your car, will I persuade you to think as I do regarding "gun control"?????? you people are sick...
3
@andrewpriester6994 liberalism is a mental disorder.
2
@promethiac2641 "I don't think you know how to argue about climate science" I will debate "climate science" any time with you boy... and you will lose BIGLY! go ahead promethiac.... I DARE YA!!! start the debate... PLEASE!
2
@cellardoor1122 what company is destroying private property?
2
this is legal in London these days?? <shakes head>
2
what the hell does this story have to do with trump??? you people are OBSESSED!
1
liberalism is a mental disorder
1
@promethiac2641 Why do you think there is some controversy over something that you have put no time or energy into learning about and will your position be simply defending the right to mindless self indulgence and extreme consumerism practices? who told you that I have put no time or energy into learning about gorebal warming? do you actually think you're "god"??? Essentially like taking away your birthday so you are in counter protest even though you have no reason to be other than its personal? What is the Scientific Method?.. Lets start there lol what???? you are one strange feller... and of course, I didn't think you would try to have an adult conversation/debate... BUT.... I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and another chance to show everyone that, not only can you have a rational mature conversation, but that you know more about "climate science" than I do... and I will start the conversation over. ok, I believe in natural climate change. I believe the planets climate became warmer and warmer after each and every ice age known to man. do you believe these things? or are you a "climate denier"?
1
@promethiac2641 "I believe that belief is a fart in the wind" that's your response? ok... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt again, and actually help you with your argument... you mentioned the 3rd industrial revolution. ok, great. I will assume you are smart enough not to deny natural climate change. (the planets climate has NEVER been static) ok, so your assertion seems to be that man is contributing to climate change, great!! I'm with you so far... now, if you want to start a discussion about what to do about that, we need to perform a cost/benefit analysis, yes?? I mean, taking any action without first fully understanding what impact it will have, and what the cost of implementing this action will be is totally stupid... I assume we agree on that as well... ok, so let's see if we can agree as to how much man is contributing to the current climate change. I admit that I do not know... maybe you and your team of scientists can help.... according to you and your team of scientists, how much of the current climate change is man causing? is it .0002%? .2%? 2%? 22%? 42%? 62%? 92%? how have you and your team of scientists been able to distinguish between natural, and man-caused climate change, and quantify them??
1
@promethiac2641 "I believe that belief is a fart in the wind" that's your response? ok... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt again, and actually help you with your argument... you mentioned the 3rd industrial revolution. ok, great. I will assume you are smart enough not to deny natural climate change. (the planets climate has NEVER been static) ok, so your assertion seems to be that man is contributing to climate change, great!! I'm with you so far... now, if you want to start a discussion about what to do about that, we need to perform a cost/benefit analysis, yes?? I mean, taking any action without first fully understanding what impact it will have, and what the cost of implementing this action will be is totally stupid... I assume we agree on that as well... ok, so let's see if we can agree as to how much man is contributing to the current climate change. I admit that I do not know... maybe you and your team of scientists can help.... according to you and your team of scientists, how much of the current climate change is man causing? is it .0002%? .2%? 2%? 22%? 42%? 62%? 92%? how have you and your team of scientists been able to distinguish between natural, and man-caused climate change, and quantify them??
1
@promethiac2641 "I believe that belief is a fart in the wind" that's your response? ok... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt again, and actually help you with your argument... you mentioned the 3rd industrial revolution. ok, great. I will assume you are smart enough not to deny natural climate change. (the planets climate has NEVER been static) ok, so your assertion seems to be that man is contributing to climate change, great!! I'm with you so far... now, if you want to start a discussion about what to do about that, we need to perform a cost/benefit analysis, yes?? I mean, taking any action without first fully understanding what impact it will have, and what the cost of implementing this action will be is totally stupid... I assume we agree on that as well... ok, so let's see if we can agree as to how much man is contributing to the current climate change. I admit that I do not know... maybe you and your team of scientists can help.... according to you and your team of scientists, how much of the current climate change is man causing? is it .0002%? .2%? 2%? 22%? 42%? 62%? 92%? how have you and your team of scientists been able to distinguish between natural, and man-caused climate change, and quantify them??
1
@Barbara Tuxley "Republicans who watch Fox News are more than twice as likely to deny human-caused climate change than Republican non-viewers" HI Babs... I'm a republican, who watches fox news, and I believe in human-caused climate change... I'm just not sure to what extent or what to do about it. you seem very knowledgeable and confident with this subject. would you be so kind as to try to help me understand?? ok, as we come up with a plan to somehow control the planets climate, shouldn't we do a cost/benefit analysis to see if our efforts are worth it? how much climate change is human-caused, how do we reduce it, and what is the cost to reduce it?? all questions we need to answer, yes?? ok, let's start with how much climate change is "human-caused". first, let's agree that natural climate change exists. I assume you aren't a climate denier, and agree that the planet's climate has NEVER been static. great... so how much of the current climate change is "human-caused"?? is it .0002%? .02%? 2%? 22%? 62%? 92%? I will admit that I do not know... but again, you seem quite knowledgeable and confident about the subject, so please... I'm politely asking you to give me the number..?? how have you been able to distinguish between natural, and "human-caused" climate change, and quantify them?? and what is the number?
1
@promethiac2641 oh I see... so you can't explain how you have been able to distinguish between natural and human-caused climate change, correct?? so then how can you quantify it? is human-caused climate change responsible for .0002% of the current climate change? or 92% of the current climate change? don't we have to first answer this question before we can conduct a rational cost/benefit analysis??? tell me how much of the current climate change is human-caused.... can we start with that?? or let me guess, you can't quantify human-caused climate change? if you can't quantify it, how the hell do you even know it exists???
1
@promethiac2641 "How do we evaluate whether something is true or not? Repeat an ancillary narrative about how temperatures change? Do we speed up a natural process exponentially through consumer idiocy? Is there mountains of evidence you don't care about? All a big Yes. Do you know what an "invasive species" is?" it is true! human-caused climate change is true!! human-caused climate change is true! human-caused climate change is true!!! I'm just not sure to what extent... does it account for .0002% of the current change happening? .2%? 2%? 22%? 62%? 92%? if it's .0002%? why are we even talking about this??? what's the number???
1
@promethiac2641 "How do we evaluate whether something is true or not? Repeat an ancillary narrative about how temperatures change? Do we speed up a natural process exponentially through consumer idiocy? Is there mountains of evidence you don't care about? All a big Yes. Do you know what an "invasive species" is?" it is true! human-caused climate change is true!! human-caused climate change is true! human-caused climate change is true!!! I'm just not sure to what extent... does it account for .0002% of the current change happening? .2%? 2%? 22%? 62%? 92%? if it's .0002%? why are we even talking about this??? what's the number???
1
@promethiac2641 "Do you care if something is true or not?" sure, but I'm a brandon supporting liberal, so I hold truth over facts....
1
@promethiac2641 "So you don't really take any of this seriously and probably know I'm right about the obvious? lol" sure I take is seriously, but you refuse to advance the conversation. what the hell can we do about the situation? well that depends... is human-caused climate change responsible for .0002% of the current climate change? or 92% of the current climate change??? doesn't that effect how we approach a solution????? but you can't quantify it!!!!!!! so how the hell do we propose any solution??????
1
@KevinHoekman "None, he's ignorant" intentionally spreading lies and disinformation isn't ignorance.. it's evil. these people are sick. liberalism is a mental disorder.
1