Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Former Trump attorney sees no ‘probable cause’ in affidavit" video.

@CaptainGoodguySentientAI "hey brah — we need to know how many other boxes of classified information did trump have and which of our foreign adversaries did he sell them to." all they had to do was call him, and schedule a time to meet him there again... the files were secure, weren't they? the fbi was there just a few weeks earlier, and asked that an additional lock was added to the door, and the trump team complied. if they wanted to go through the boxes, again... why not make a simple phone call? regarding selling classified materials to foreign adversaries.. I know nothing about that?? who told you about evidence of that??? let me guess... msnbc?
8
@CaptainGoodguySentientAI "explain why he should explain." because the poster that you are referring to, was referring to this statement.. "If any of us had done what trump did, we’d be in prison awaiting trial, at the very least." this makes an assertion that the trump has committed a crime.... shouldn't someone making an assertion that a former president committed a crime be able to back up that assertion with some facts? or, I forgot... you people hold truth over facts.... <rolls eyes>
7
@OtayBuckwheat "After retrieving top secret documents they felt there was probable cause to go back and look for more, which they found. What's so hard to understand?" why didn't they just call, and say hey, we are coming back over...?
3
@rigelloar7474 the accused wants the unredacted file released... the accusers do not..... hmmmm..
2
@harryfarber6435 "@Otay Buckwheat, you got all that from this video? Top secret documents wasn’t even mentioned once." harry, apparently, you just didn't listen to the video hard enough.... (sarcasm should be obvious)
2
"The probable cause has been redacted, amiga." well that should help with the tension and divide in the country..
2
@rigelloar7474 "Transparency = Trump takes the 5th? Get yourself an enema, better make it two!" government transparency, and a private citizens exercising his constitutional rights have nothing to do with one another..... what has happened to our education system???
1
@rigelloar7474 "Reality is the ultimate indivisibility of ALL energetic and material processes. Everything has to do with everything, Einstein. It is your birth right to "believe" otherwise, but that would be a fool's indulgence. God bless." not sure what the hell that has to do with my post, but I have to admit, I'm actually aroused..... thanks
1
@UCJk2RVqafpqkWhmLaD4Esuw "Trump's Administration was constantly cleaning up cheeto and ketchup stains in the White House." lol now there's an intelligent comment!! I think we've found an actual live biden voter!
1
@gene8172 "Not my fault, nor my problem." oh... ok, well... 1 - I assume that you are not an american.. 2 - then why the hell are you commenting about it?
1
@gene8172 "I am an American. I am commenting because I am waiting for a part to arrive to fix my bike, and due to the current water ban in my city, I can't go out and water my tomatoes yet." so you're an american, but you don't think that the divide in this country is your problem? wow.... well at least you're an obedient little american... obey those Bans.... no wonder you don't think the divide in this country isn't your problem....... <shakes head>
1
@schmarpsywinkleurnklabean659 T"rump's idiotic previous crimes are probable cause enough to understand he is a conman, but we Todd did Republicans can't seem to understand what I'm saying." that's because what you're saying is absolutely ridiculous!! ok.... previous crimes... name one! and don't even try!!! here, let me help you not make yourself look more dumb than you already have... it is impossible for you to name a previous crime, because the man has never been convicted of a crime. you see, here in america, citizens are presumed to be innocent, until proven guilty in a court of law. trump has never been proven guilty of committing any crime in a court of law... secondly, being convicted of a crime is not probable cause for future search. lastly, understanding a man is a conman does not give legal authority to issue a search warrant. now run along and play...
1
@someguy5438 "the term alternative facts was actually coined by the Trump administration." oh ok... tuesday, August 6, 2019, des moines, iowa. Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden told a crowd of supporters on Tuesday that "we choose truth over facts," apparently referring to the Democratic Party. when and where did the "trump administration" coin the term "alternative facts"? thanks.
1
@Kyle-vb9jp yea kyle, the parties have both changed for sure..
1
@kathysmith4160 "We have the Truth & Facts on our side." you have witch hunt after witch hunt... here, lets take a look.... russian collusion delusion. People convicted of fabricating evidence to get fisa warrants. fbi investigation. house investigation. senate investigation. special counsel investigation. impeachment 1.0. impeachment 2.0. michael cohen, personal lawyers home raided. rudy guiliani, pewrsonal lawyers home raided. nt ag investigation. ga ag investigation. jan 6 house investigation. former president, and likely political opponent of the sitting presidents home raided... do you know what AL of these "investigations" have in common?? NO CRIMES! at this point, how many functioning brain cells does it take to figure out the man is being politically persecuted?? 6..? 9 at most..???
1
@kathysmith4160 "They were NOT secure. Why don't you read the real Facts for a change." so the fbi didn't request an additional lock? or trump refused?? and if the documents were unsecured, why did the fbi need to bring people that could break into a safe???? hmmm....
1
@Kyle-vb9jp "I really hate the way Trumps conduct is, how he seems to stir the pot between the people, and just seem to make things worse. I get called a liberal for that by the Trump party because they don't understand what a Republican is, they think, the only way to be a Republican is to like Trump. Brainless as hell. He's a person, not a party" ah, I see, so if trump "stirred the pot" less, you would like him... how about if trump gets back into office he launches multiple impeachments and investigations into his political opponents..?? would you like him better then? would that be stirring the pot less? here, lets take a look, shall we..? russian collusion delusion. People convicted of fabricating evidence to get fisa warrants. fbi investigation. house investigation. senate investigation. special counsel investigation. impeachment 1.0. impeachment 2.0. michael cohen, personal lawyers home raided. rudy guiliani, personal lawyers home raided. ny ag investigation. ga ag investigation. jan 6 house investigation. former president, and likely political opponent of the sitting presidents home raided... and all you can do is lecture conservative about how trump stirs the pot too much???? referring to what?? "mean tweets"?? talk about brainless as hell... you dot get called a liberal because you think trump stirs the pot too much... you get called a liberal because you're an idiot.. leave the mean tweets and personality out of it!! get over it! stick to actions and results! do you criticize bide and his administration for "stirring the pot"?? raiding a former presidents home is not stirring the pot??? but you remain silent on that one, don't you... you would rather a "nice president" who, I guess in your opinion, doesn't stir the pot?? well how's sleepy joe workin out for ya..???
1
@laughyoassoff4715 "it was an informant who tipped the fbi about the documents possibly being at mar-a-lago" the fbi was at mar a lago just a few weeks prior... THEY KNEW THE DOCUMENTS WERE THERE!!! I'll repeat that question... "snitching for what"??
1