Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Trump lawyer: This is complete injustice" video.

  1. per the 8th amendment, yes.. this is exactly why it was written...
    10
  2.  @massonh7476  dude.. you're spamming.... we get it already.
    7
  3.  @dogged_cont3nder548  exactly.. it's rather obviously unconstitutional. if this isn't the reason the 8th was written, what the hell was the purpose of the amendment????
    5
  4.  @hanshansen3885  "Maybe you should read the court rulings as they clearly lay out the reasoning behind the amount." did you read it?? if so, can you please provide a brief summary of the reason for the amount?? or.. let me guess..... that's asking too much....... lol you didn't read it either, and have no clue yourself. now, instead of providing a brief reasoning, after I very politely asked.. take your time to reply with some personal insults and name calling instead,,, lol
    4
  5.  @drhotchkiss  "she actually made that statement" cite the quote then......
    4
  6.  @Spilatro702  hey!!! splatto chimes in with some personal attacks and insults!! how are ya buddy? 😃
    2
  7.  listlessvessels5  what law school did she attend?
    2
  8.  @hanshansen3885  "ill gotten gains" is NOT a crime... if you believe it is... CITE THE CRIMINAL STATUTE!
    1
  9. you keep posting this... we get it already.
    1
  10.  @hanshansen3885  "On top of this there are pre-judgment interest on each of the ill-gotten gains." what "ill gotten gains"??? I do not understand this term that you are throwing around... please define "ill gotten gains". PLEASE????
    1
  11.  @hanshansen3885  "It seems like one of the comments in the summary didnt make it through, so Ill rephrase. Ill-gotten interest savings on loans towards 4 properties: $168,040,168" what lender filed a complaint claiming they were defrauded and lost this amount of money in interest? can you name that "victim"?
    1
  12.  @hanshansen3885  google, why do you keep deleting my question for this guy??
    1
  13.  @hanshansen3885  "It seems like one of the comments in the summary didnt make it through, so Ill rephrase. Ill-gotten interest savings on loans towards 4 properties: $168,040,168" what lender claimed they lost this amount in interest?
    1
  14.  @hanshansen3885  "ill gotten gains"... this is what you come up with to bankrupt and imprison political rivals?? good grief comrade!
    1
  15.  @hanshansen3885  do you honestly believe that if mar a lago were put on the market today it would sell for $18mil or less???? seriously?? do you honestly believe that's all it's worth??? I don't even think that YOU believe the stuff you're shoveling.....
    1
  16.  @hanshansen3885  what google??? why can't I ask this guy if he honestly believes that mar a lago is worth $18mil or less? how does this question violate your terms...??? <shakes head>
    1
  17.  @hanshansen3885  "You asked for a brief summary for the amount and I gave you that. I have used the same legal terms as the court documents." so then you do not understand the document, correct?? if you cannot define, and do not know what an "ill gotten gain" is, then you cannot possibly understand the document. is this correct? like I said, this guy simply made up this term, to take down a politician he does not like, correct?? what LAW was violated???? WHO was the victim???? old school kgb stuff here.... show me the man, and I will find you a crime...
    1
  18.  @hanshansen3885  "You ask a lot of questions which you can easily find the answers to if you read the court rulings" NO! what I did was asked you a bunch of que4stions which you admittedly CANNOT answer! you don't understand what you believe! you are a classic kool aid drinker...
    1
  19.  @finderskeepers1993  "we did read it . Don't try and make things up because you can't read or back your arguments." why I keep asking you p[eople questions, idk.... but: 1. what do you believe my argument to be? 2. what did I "make up"? two more questions that will NOT be answered.....
    1
  20.  @pelargonium  "A $450,000,000 judgement is not cruel and unusual punishment for a multi-billionaire." your opinion is appreciated. do you have examples of precedent rulings you can rely on to support your opinion? oh that's right, no one has ever even been prosecuted for this in the history of our country... let alone fined a half billion dollars for a victimless "crime" that no one has been criminally charged with... good job comrade...
    1
  21.  @hanshansen3885  watching you and your little buddies here team up to try to defend this, and still fail is rather pathetic..... amusing, but pathetic... it is indefensible! you look like clowns trying! twisting yourselves into little pretzels trying to justify something that you know is wrong.. using terms straight from the ruling, than NONE OF YOU UNDERSTAND! what a sad and pathetic people we americans have become...
    1
  22.  @hanshansen3885  "Ill-gotten gains are profit in one way or another that are acquired through illegal means" so a crime was committed, yes?????? what crime was committed? who was the victim of the crime? why no criminal charges? none of this makes any damned sense, and you know it.......
    1
  23.  @hanshansen3885  ""so a crime was committed, yes?????? what crime was committed? who was the victim of the crime?" Asked and already answered." lol now you are going to try to get me to chase my own tale around in circles... good grief! there was no crime! that's a fact! there were no criminal charges! that's a fact! if there was a crime, whatever it was.. WHY NO CRIMINAL CHARGES????? can answer that???
    1
  24.  @hanshansen3885  ""why no criminal charges?" Because it is a civil case. The NY AG decided not to bring criminal charges" WHY NOT??????
    1
  25.  @hanshansen3885  THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME!
    1
  26.  @hanshansen3885  THERE WAS NO VICTIM OF A CRIME!
    1
  27.  @hanshansen3885  THERE IS NOTHING TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES ON!!!
    1
  28.  @hanshansen3885  you obviously dont know what you are talking about hans... you say there is a crime, yet can't name the crime. you cannot define "ill gottern gains", yet claim the document is based on this term...
    1
  29.  @hanshansen3885  "The sale of Ferry Point which resulted in ill-gotten profits of $60 million." how is the sale of a property for profit "ill gotten gains"?? people do this in america... EVERY DAY!!!!!!! do every american who has flipped a property for a property is now a criminal?? so you ever stop and listen to what you are saying???? this is ludicrous!
    1
  30.  @hanshansen3885  you claim there was a crime, but cannot name a victim.... let alone cite the criminal statute.
    1
  31.  @hanshansen3885  "The NY AG decided not to bring criminal charges." wouldn't a criminal conviction be extremely valuable in the civil case???? yet we skipped the criminal case, which actually requires evidence and a jury... and simply sued the guy for "ill gotten gains"....? (whatever those are?) good job comrade...
    1
  32.  @hanshansen3885  I guess 91 felony criminal charges just wasn't enough.. seems excessive to most rational people....
    1
  33.  @pelargonium  "Cruel and unusual would be a $500,000,000 fine for someone who makes $50,000 per year." this is your opinion, correct? I appreciate that... obviously you have very little money. NOBODY has a half BILLION dollars laying around in cash..... and let me ask you this, although asking folks on the left questions is a complete waste opf time... what do you think the appropriate fine could be when there was no crime, and no victim seeking compensation?
    1
  34.  @pelargonium  "Criminal charges are not necessary or relevant to this civil case." I did not suggest that they were... you are answering a question that was not asked. I am simply trying to have someone, anyone suggest why no criminal charges were filed! are you the one who can finally offer a suggestion?? I didn't think so......
    1
  35.  @pelargonium  "Who cares, it's not relevant" I do not know what you are referring to. Please try to communicate in complete sentences.
    1
  36.  @hanshansen3885  google..???? what is wrong with this post?? and why do you shadow ban people like this??? you leave the comment showing, so the one posting thinks that it's up... but the publica cant see it..?? pathetic... ok, let's try this post another way.. "NY Executive Law § 63(12)" not a law... it's a description of general duties.. good grief.
    1
  37.  @hanshansen3885  New York Consolidated Laws, Executive Law - EXC § 63. General duties New York Executive Law § 63(12), sometimes called simply "63 12" or "63(12)",[2] is a New York law that gives the Attorney General of New York broad powers[3] to investigate and prosecute cases of alleged civil fraud.[2][4] Due to its broad definitions,[5] section 63(12) provides the AG with far-reaching powers to issue subpoenas, as well as low legal hurdles to do so.[6] google, this is factual information, that I can find ON YOUR PLATFORM! why can't I post this here??
    1
  38.  @hanshansen3885  ok, so it is the questioning who the victim is that is not allowed on this platform..
    1
  39.  @hanshansen3885  preach the approved information or get off the platform!! lol
    1
  40.  @hanshansen3885  good grief hans.. you haven't been able to rationally answer ANY of my questions...
    1
  41.  @hanshansen3885  google... why cant I ask this guy these questions??? good grief, let's try them one by one...
    1
  42.  @hanshansen3885  "Searching for the law on wiki only gives you a general description." it's not a law.. it's a "general description of duties".. at least that's the title that I found.. where did you get your law degree? may I politely ask?
    1
  43.  @hanshansen3885  of course, you aren't even trying to answer ANY of my questions.. here are just a couple that you keep ignoring:
    1
  44.  @hanshansen3885  can you define the "market place"?
    1
  45.  @hanshansen3885  what do you think the appropriate fine could be when there was no crime, and no victim seeking compensation?
    1
  46.  @hanshansen3885  but again, you will simply duck, dodge, spin and weave...
    1
  47.  @hanshansen3885  ok, let's break this down.. and this is WITH google protecting you.... SPECIFICALLY, who was defrauded?
    1
  48.  @hanshansen3885  who was the victim?
    1
  49.  @hanshansen3885  think of how this conversation would go if google WASN"T protecting you......
    1
  50.  @hanshansen3885  "The sale of the Old Post Office which resulted in ill-gotten profits of $126,828,600." how did you quantify this? where did you get this number? who quantifies it? the same guy who said mar a lago is worth $18mil???? please tell me no.... please tell me you have a legitimate source for that number...
    1
  51.  @pelargonium  "$450,000,000 was the amount of ill-gotten gains, which was proven in court" and who was the victim?
    1
  52. because the "legitimate news media" doesn't want americans to hear directly from these people. it must be "filtered" to "protect" the public... lol
    1
  53. google...????
    1
  54.  @thaisstone5192  "Hey, not my problem you ditched your civics classes." lol that's what I thought.... never time for an explanation of things you claim to know, but always time for a personal insult... you can't even explain why the bill of rights itself was written!!! not who.. not when... not where.... but WHY! you don't even know that... let alone why any particular amendment was written.. feel free to prove me wrong. or just reply with more personal insults....
    1
  55.  @thaisstone5192  "WRONG." oh, ok.. then may I politely ask you to please provide a brief explanation as to why the 8th amendment was written?
    1
  56.  @ceterisparibus51  ""we get it already." The vast majority of you clearly do not." gee.. an adolescent insult... democrat voter by chance??
    1
  57.  @hanshansen3885  "The sale of the Old Post Office which resulted in ill-gotten profits of $126,828,600." again, please explain how the sale of a property for profit is considered "ill gotten gains", and why are no other amiericans beiing prosecuted for this?? I'VE DONE IT!!!!!! why do you believe I was not indicted and prosecuted? good grief.....
    1