Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Joey Jones: What is the diplomatic strategy here?" video.

@scottwasson prosecute trump for trying to steal the election?? have you seen the trailer for the movie "2,000 mules"? I assume you haven't... but then again, you still believe in the russian collusion delusion.
5
@johhny711 trumps election divided america because clinton and the media convinced you that he was "colluding with russia"...
1
@johhny711 was manifort charged with anything related to "colluding with the russians"?? if the mueller report "showed lots of collusion", why was nobody charged with collusion? hmmm......
1
@CB-db1qx "However, the report and investigation did not find direct ties between Trump and Russia." yea, that's what I have been trying to tell you all along....
1
@johhny711 "What Meuller could not prove was Conspiracy the legal standard for which is intent, and almost impossible thing to prove, coordination and intent." yes, this is what I have been trying to tell you all along..
1
@johhny711 "What Meuller could not ( or did not want to) prove was Conspiracy the legal standard for which is intent, and almost impossible thing to prove, coordination and intent." then why do you think the entire mueller probe was launched? are YOU suggesting that the fbi and doj were weaponized for political purposes, knowing they had no chance of conviction?? are you sure you don't want to try to spin this in a different direction??
1
@johhny711 what do you mean collusion was "proven"??? like in a court of law? good grief.....
1
@johhny711 "collusion was proven, Conspiracy was proven but not to a standard that could be relied on to get it past a Jury system" johnny, this is EXACTLY what I'm telling you!!! aren't we in agreement at this point?
1
@johhny711 when trump is convicted of treason, I will agree he is guilty. is that not reasonable and fair enough? just curious johnny, with what came out recently about clinton, do you believe that she is also guilty of spying on a sitting president and guilty of treason? even though evidence has not gone before a jury, and a conviction has not been obtained?? or let me guess.......... that's "different", right????
1
@johhny711 lol it's as if you are absolutely tone deaf as to your own obvious and blatant bias.. but to comment on that last post, "The FBI are independent of any political interference it's called separation of powers in the constitution. If they did investigate Trump they had good reason to as I outlined before." ok, when lisa page from the doj asker her little boyfriend peter strzok at the fbi if trump was going to become president, do you think they were being independent of any political interference when he replied "no, no, we'll stop it"??? not to mention, "if they did investigate trump, they had good reason"?? ok, 3 people have now been charged with lying and providing false information to the fbi and fisa courts to instigate these investigations. are these the guys with the "good reasons" to investigate you're referring to?? good grief johnny... it's as if your brain has somehow become damaged! I mean, I have heard of being blinded by ideology, but this is obsessive... it's as if you have been dumbed down to "orange man bad".......
1
if I asked you why trump was impeached, you would have to google it... not to mention, "president trump" was only impeached once.
1
@johnedgin505 no john... he was no longer in office the second time. but ok, lets say he was impeached twice... do you know how many times he was "acquitted"?? do you know what that means?
1