Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "DOJ's criminal investigation of Trump picks up steam" video.

  1. I saw nothing.... just a one sided clown show.
    24
  2.  @debscamera2572  "Yeah, every time he got away with it, he got bolder." every time he got away with what? ok... this is where you give me some bs excuse as to why you won't answer.... attack me personally,,,,, then run away...... GO!
    4
  3. defense? we have only seen hearing presented by a one sided circus committee... there has been NO defense...
    2
  4. I watched, and saw the one sided clown show make the same case that you did...
    2
  5.  @nmdakini358  "it’s easy to blame Biden for our economic woes but a little research will reveal this is a world wide economic downturn, the US is not alone in this. It would be happening if Trump was in office." so what do you think is causing this world wide economic downturn?
    1
  6.  @nmdakini358  "over population which has spawned local conflicts in many places, displacing people and destroying infrastructure and food production." example as to how this affected the world's economy..?? where has this happen, and how did it affect the entire globe? "Then the change in climate" example as to how this has impacted the global economy? "Then there was us a pandemic, a black swan event upending all kinds of social structures." ok... but weren't we coming out of the shutdowns pretty well a year ago? then what happened...??? the rest of you post is...... anyway.... most of the worlds economic problems are being driven by our war on fossil fuels. examples? sure.... day 1biden launched his war on fossil fuel. US inflation february 2021: 1.7% US inflation today: 9.1% (Bloomberg) -- US consumer confidence declined in July to the lowest level since February 2021 on dimmer views of the economy amid persistent inflation. but let me guess.... this war on fossil fuels has nothing to do with any of that right...???? <rolls eyes>
    1
  7.  @thilli1859  "The evidence is quite astounding against trump here." evidence of what? and please... don't give me the msnbc talking points about "collusion".... "treason"..... "insurrection"..... what evidence of what crime have you seen?
    1
  8.  @kb-xp1zu  "Nope. Prosecuting people who commit crime" yea... just like the doj prosecuted clinton when she committed obvious felony crimes. oh wait..... never mind..
    1
  9. "So many crimes." name 3. and not the msnbc talking points about "treason".... "collusion".... "insurrection"..... hell, name 1 crime that you are actually aware of......
    1
  10.  @Miller_Time  "I truly would like to know what you guys think happened on the 6th. Go ahead. Enlighten me" there was a mostly peaceful protest... antifa and fbi informants antagonized the crowd. there was an astounding lack of security. capital police let people into the capital, and escorted them around. a capital police officer shot and killed an unarmed woman. trump pre-approved 20,000 guardsmen to protect the capital and proceedings. trump told the crowd to peacefully and patriotically march to the capital. hours later, trump told the crown to stand down. (not much of a leader of an insurrection is he...?) what else do you want to know..?
    1
  11.  @davetheseller6678  "Great at leading an insurrection lol" he pre-approved 20,000 guardsmen to protect the capital building. he told the people to "peacefully ad patriotically march to the capital". two hours later he put out a statement and told the mob to stand down. and you call this "great at leading an insurrection"???? good grief dave.... you're a classic kool aid drinker. stop and think about what you're saying!
    1
  12.  @Nedemis  "You do realize that it's been ALL Republicans testifying before the committee, don't you?" you mean the disgruntled former employer never-trumpers...?? yes..... I know that. that's the point. it was all one sided. why weren't the republicans allowed to choose members to participate on the committee again??? oh yea... they wanted it to be one sided....
    1
  13.  @lg7841  you mean the disgruntled former employer never-trumpers...?? yes..... I know that. that's the point. it was all one sided. why weren't the republicans allowed to choose members to participate on the committee again??? oh yea... they wanted it to be one sided....
    1
  14.  @deadLEE15  "testimonies from Trump's own cabinet and family... yeah one sided" you mean the democrat chosen disgruntled former employer never-trumpers...?? yes..... I know that. that's the point. it was all one sided. why weren't the republicans allowed to choose members to participate on the committee again??? oh yea... they wanted it to be one sided....
    1
  15.  @madgodloki  "lol 😆 We can't help you if you're looking with your hands over your eyes." the same tired (non)answer..... "Oh but I do love how the big defense is he said to the armed mob to go peacefully interrupt the process of transferring power." trump said to "interrupt" something?? when??? can you quote him?? if your case is so strong, why do you STILL need to make up fake facts!!?? trump never told anyone to interrupt anything! you made that up! you're a liar!
    1
  16.  @madgodloki  "what do you think a mob of protestors outside the capitol while the transfer of power was happening was supposed to do?" play with themselves..?? who cares? it's irrelevant.. "I'm guessing when trump said "we won't take back our country by being weak" he wasn't referring to the armed mob that he let in his rally to be strong and change things by force?" oh...ok, so you want to lock a political opponent in a cage for the rest of his life because you are "guessing" that he meant something when he spoke?? ok comrade.. "what else would an angry protest stand to achieve if not halting or changing the outcome of the transfer of power?" again, maybe they were there to play with themselves... who knows... here's what I do know after 6 weeks of congressional hearings: 1- trump never directed anyone to become violent. 2 - trump never directed anyone to enter the capital. 3 - trump never directed anyone to stop any proceedings. those are facts jack... I'm sorry that you don't like them... wipe your tears, and get over it.
    1
  17.  @deadLEE15  "why weren't the republicans allowed to chose members to participate on the committee again" hahahahaha. They WERE chosen by republicans on the committee." House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made his picks for a select committee charged with investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, a GOP source tells Forbes – but House Speaker Pelosi has the final say over appointments to the panel. Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.)Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.)Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas)and Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.). NONE of these people were on the committee... it was a sham... the first time in history that a committee majority disallowed ALL appointees made by the minority party, and hand picked members for the minority party.. what an obvious joke...
    1
  18.  @lg7841  "You believe a criminal should be allowed to be on his own jury?" why not? key witnesses are running the whole scam.... what crime will trump be indicted for? can you answer that simple question? and not msnbc talking points about "collusion"... and "treason"... and "insurrection".... what actual crime will he be indicted for? and why, a year and half later, hasn't this happened??????
    1
  19.  @deadLEE15  "Those people were rejected because they were implicated in january 6th . You can't just serve as a juror in your own investigations of a crime LOL. " and why not??? why wasn't the guard that trump approved (20,000 strong) employed? the sergeant at arms reports to nancy pelosi. she is a key witness... but she's running the entire committee?? ok..... and maybe you can shed some light on that for us.... if trump staged this "insurrection", why do you think he pre-approved the mobilization of guardsmen to secure the capital, on the day he planned his "insurrection"??? this makes sense to you?? why wasn't the guard mobilized?? who the hell is ray epps?? 6 weeks of hearings, and these things weren't even discussed????? what a joke....
    1
  20.  @deadLEE15  ""And why not" omg, if you don't understand why you can't be a juror in your own criminal investigation, then there is no hope to explain anything to you. BTW everything else you suggested is confirmed lies by spread by Trump. Look it up, you won't." oh...ok. well do you think pelosi should be running this committee when the sergeant at arms of the capital police reports to her? isn't she a key witness as to why the security broke down? should she at least be questioned?? or.... can her own committee question her..??? hmmm.... that is kind of a conundrum, but you're ok with that, right..???
    1
  21.  @lg7841  by the way LG, do you think biden should be indicted / court marshalled for dereliction of duties regarding the southern border?? I mean, that one is a pretty cut and dry case, no????? why do you think he won't be indicted / court marshalled for dereliction of duties, while trump is indicted / court marshalled for dereliction of duties?? why do you think that is? do you think our justice system has been politically weaponized?? (rhetorical)
    1
  22.  @lg7841  I addressed your military law you cited LG. you can't court marshal the commander in chief for disobeying an order.
    1
  23. fox doesn't support trump much more than msnbc...
    1