Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Michael Cohen’s attacks will be ‘fast and furious’: Juan Williams" video.

  1.  @genehensley3012  for what this week??? 🤦‍♂
    13
  2. and his pals on the prosecution team...
    10
  3. there isn't even a crime here...
    10
  4. 2 weeks in, and you cant even tell us what crime he is on trial for...
    9
  5. what is "hush money"??
    6
  6. lol rooting for him to do what? pick up another perjury charge?? 🤦‍♂
    6
  7. now??? like yesterday you would have??? 😂😅🤣😁😆🤣😂
    5
  8.  @nicooosterlynck4030  oh... you mean a nondisclosure agreement??? aren't those legal???
    4
  9. hatred.
    4
  10.  @Swampfox953  hatred is all they have....
    4
  11. well the whole thing is pretty darned boring.... what's the crime again?? this is more like watching general hospital reruns from the 80's....
    4
  12.  @Cupid-Stunt  ok, so how was this legal document "falsified"... 34 TIMES!!???? can you explain????
    3
  13.  @Cupid-Stunt  "Agreements have documents?" yes, a nondisclosure agreement would be considered to be a "document" personal in my opinion, but if you insist it was done on behalf of one of trumps businesses, whatever... not going to argue that here
    3
  14.  @KevinHoekman  they do try to defend the indefensible...
    3
  15. well the prosecution had better get to the part where they present evidence of a crime pretty quick.....
    3
  16. lol 10 days in, and you still can't tell me what the crime is....
    2
  17. you were cheated at birth.....
    2
  18.  @TrumpRapedJeanCarrol  nondisclosure agreements are legal.
    1
  19. define "intimidating" the witness? do you have an example???
    1
  20. can you define "hush money"??
    1
  21.  @TrumpRapedJeanCarrol  "So is what Trump did" what did he do? what "business records" were falsified?
    1
  22.  @tony84.  8 years, and still holding them until the opportune moment...?? 🤦‍♂
    1
  23.  @Cupid-Stunt  much like this prosecution team, you are running yourself in circles, desperately trying to find something to call a "crime".....
    1
  24.  @Cupid-Stunt  "What document?" exactly......
    1
  25.  @petergijsbrechts5154  election interference.
    1
  26.  @petergijsbrechts5154  election
    1
  27.  @Cupid-Stunt  ok, nondisclosure agreements are legal, correct??
    1
  28.  @petergijsbrechts5154  doing his job?? what do you think his job is?? we are entering week 4 of this trial. yes? yes. 34 counts of "falsifying business records". yes? yes. you still cant tell me what "business records" were "falsified". yes? yes. were they loan applications? contracts? more property appraisals? you don't know. at this point it is the judges job to stop this!!!!!! wise up.
    1
  29.  @Cupid-Stunt  good grief google... ok, lets shorten this down as much as possible....
    1
  30.  @Cupid-Stunt  "Agreements have documents" hey!!!!!! finally getting somewhere!!!! this is the first time anyone has even suggested that they know what documents were "falsified"!! so this case is about 34 counts of falsifying the same "nondisclosure agreement", which is legal, correct??? so how was this nondisclosure agreement falsified... 34 TIMES????? please explain further!!?????
    1
  31.  @knelson3484  "Yeah, you keep telling yourself that" well maybe you can help me..??? 34 counts: falsifying business records". 10 days into the prosecution's case... can you tell me what business records were falsified? loan applications? contracts of some kind? more property appraisals?? 10 days in, and NOBODY KNOWS!!!! what a clown show this has turned into.....
    1
  32.  @nicooosterlynck4030  why you suppose the media keeps using this term "hush money" when it is really a legal nondisclosure agreement? hmmmm........ gee, I wonder if that's intentional........
    1
  33.  @petergijsbrechts5154  interference
    1