General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Fox News
comments

Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "AG Garland will be in a 'really bad spot' if Hunter does not comply: Texas Republican" video.

@matden5595 "He will prosecute hunter and Jim Jordan" members of congress are protected by the speech and debate clause. why don't you democrats ever refer to the more similar cases of steve bannon and peter navarrow? (rhetorical)
28
@freefacts7590 certainly wasn't contempt of congress...
16
@lisahardy9707 "the same reason they have not done that to JIM JORDAN" jordan was a member of congress protected by the speech and debate clause. peter navarrow and steve banno on hte other hand are civilians, like hunter... why not make the more accurate comparison to how they were treated?? why the intentional false analogy?
15
@freefacts7590 BUT GYYYMMMM!
13
@freefacts7590 BUT GYYMMMM!!!
12
@donaldpump8882 jordan was a member of congress when subpoenaed, correct? look up the Speech and Debate Clause, and educate yourself... PLEASE!!!! a better comparison would be to look at other civilians who refused to appear for subpoenas, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. again... EDUCATE YOURSELF!
10
@matden5595 "it’s gonna start for hunter and Jim Jordan" members of congress are protected by the speech and debate clause. why don't you democrats ever refer to the more similar cases of steve bannon and peter navarrow? (rhetorical)
9
@matden5595 BUT GYYMMM!!!!
8
@matden5595 correct, one was a member of congress, one a civilian. yet you want them treated equally. why not use other civilians who are not protected by the speech and debate clause as a more comparable analogy? like peter navarrow and steve bannon? why not?
8
@vinncubus4628 so all they have to do is claim that hunter committed treason? jordan was NEVER accused of treason... you people simply make stuff up and move goal posts to justify and excuse EVERYTHING!
8
@vinncubus4628 when was jordan charged with treason? what was that date?
7
@vinncubus4628 you people have excuses for everything when it related to democrats... hunter is a civilian the speech and debate clause DOES NOT APPLY!! stop with the spin already!
6
@lisahardy9707 BUT GYYYMMMMM!! BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!!!
6
@4touchdownsinonegame178 "Hunter shouldn't comply if Gym Jordan rejected a subpoena from January 6th" speech and debate clause.. a better analogy would be other civilians, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. why are so many of you so uneducated on this stuff???
6
@MarkFaust lol that's about it... 😅
5
@lisahardy9707 speech and debate clause.. a better analogy would be other civilians, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. why are so many of you so uneducated on this stuff???
4
@4touchdownsinonegame178 "Hunter shouldn't comply if Gym Jordan rejected a subpoena from January 6th" hunter defied the subpoena as a civilian, must like peter navarrow and steve bannon did, not a member of congress like jordan who was protected by the speech and debate clause. why the intentional false analogy?
4
clinton is..
4
@4touchdownsinonegame178 BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!! BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!!!!!
4
@PatootysManyMisadvetures "Trump tried claiming Presidential Immunity to get out of his crimes." what crimes?
4
@matden5595 members of congress are protected by the speech and debate clause. why don't you democrats ever refer to the more similar cases of steve bannon and peter navarrow?
4
@freefacts7590 BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!!!
4
@lexluthor9509 "Why aren't 'commoners' protected by the speech and debate clause." did you read it? look into it at all?? educate yourself! I'm not your mommy!
4
@lexluthor9509 "Figments of your tiny imagination don't need scholarly research." so to spite me, you refuse to educate yourself.... democrat voter by chance?
4
@lauriervermette4564 "He did comply. He wants a public hearing" the subpoena was for a deposition, not a congressional hearing. two entirely different things. he does not get to dictate the terms of the deposition. go educate yourself, preferably before you vote again.
4
@simongoh9461 "if the Speech and debate clause protects house members from legal implication. Then why won't they appear for their congressional subpoenas? They should have nothing to fear. I guess they are afraid of the truth" why on earth do you think I can answer on behalf of these people... I'm not a god, like you! example: tell us, god, why hunter refused to appear for his deposition.
3
@nadia0701 "Garland has 2 choices. Enforce subpoenas or not. If the wants to enforce the one on Hunter, he has to do the same on Kevin Mccarthy, Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), and Rep. Mo Brooks (R- Alabama)" good grief.. where do you people come from? this has been spelled out REPETEDLY in this discussion thread!! here, let's make it a riddle this time... what is the big difference between congressional member Kevin Mccarthy, congressional member Scott Perry (R-Pa.), congressional member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), congressional member Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), and congressional member Mo Brooks (R- Alabama)... and CIVILIAN hunter biden?? can you figure that one out..????
3
@harryfarber6435 "And when liz Cheney filed a complaint with the ethics committee, they laughed at her and said “That circus was for reals?"" exactly... it was handled via our justice system's precedence... but they cant stop crying about it.
3
don jr was subpoenaed 5 times, and appeared each time.
3
@matden5595 because it is a false analogy... a very dissimilar case! members of congress are protected by the speech and debate clause. civilians are not. peter navarrow and steve bannon were civilians, just like hunter, who defied congressional subpoenas. hunter should be treated the same way they were, yes?? stop with the false analogies!
3
@bruconicinfernon4noplatoon317 bring back the dictator!!! lol you people are so easily trolled by trump...
3
@bruconicinfernon4noplatoon317 people in the government don't like donald trump??? imagine that....
3
@bradcraig5111 "Garland won't prosecute Hunter. He has nothing to prosecute Jim Jordan for." but when congress refers prosecution to the doj for contempt of congress, garland will prosecute, as he did peter navarrow and steve bannon, correct??
3
yea, except that hunter is a civilian who defied a subpoena, like peter navarrow and steve bannon... not a member of congress protected by the speech and debate clause like jordan. why the intentional false analogy??
2
@matden5595 BUT GYYYMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!
2
@lisahardy9707 "Jim Jordan IGNORED a LEGAL subpoena" correct, and he was, per law, referred to congress for censure. civilians on the other hand, are referred to the doj for prosecution for contempt of congress... just like peter navarrow and steve bannon were. do you understand the difference? have you ever heard of the speech and debate clause? educate yourself! please!
2
BUT GYYMMMM!!!!
2
jordan was a member of congress, not a civilian. look up the speech and debate clause and educate yourself... PLEASE!
2
yea, except that hunter is a civilian who defied a subpoena, like peter navarrow and steve bannon... not a member of congress protected by the speech and debate clause like jordan. why the intentional false analogy??
2
@daviddavis3426 you're talking to uneducated voters.. you would have better luck discussing quantum physics with your lawn furniture.
2
@matden5595 BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!!!!
2
@lauriervermette4564 why is that funny?
1
@simongoh9461 "Hunter has publicly claimed and formally responded that he is happy to appear for questions but in a public setting" he does not get to dictate the terms of the subpoena. do you know how many times trumps son jr was subpoenaed and appeared for closed door depositions? that's right,... 5 times. complied each and every time. what are you crying about again??
1
@michaelgibbons2556 good try though....
1
@evertvdb000 agreed... refer to the doj for prosecution, and let the doj prosecute, like peter navarrow and steve bannon.
1
@PHPyme "Not for plotting a coup as Jordon and others did" you have no evidence anyone "plotted" a "coup".. do you know what accusations such as this, without evidence are called?? that's right... conspiracy theories. I think your tin-foil hat is too tight...
1
BUT GYYYYYMMM........
1
speech and debate clause. went through the proper procedures of the ethics committee. on the other hand, when civilians are referred to the doj for contempt of court, they are prosecuted, like peter navarrow and steve bannon were, correct is hunter a civilian, or a member of congress...?? I cant remember..? <shakes head>
1
they agreed to a public hearing, after the deposition... ya know, like the 5 depositions don jr had to sit for?
1
@daviddavis3426 "Hey dum dum Jordan is a congressman and hunter is not!!" you're talking to uneducated blue voters.. you would have better luck discussing quantum physics with your lawn furniture.
1
GYM!!!!! BUT GYM!!! BUT... BUT GYM!!!!!!
1
@FunnyBoneBob go read it again...
1
@FunnyBoneBob this is like trying to discuss quantum physics with a piece of lawn furniture... if a member of congress refuses to appear for a congressional subpoena, there are remedies for that via congress. if a civilian, such as peter navarrow, steve bannon, or hunter biden refuse to appear for a congressional subpoena, that is referred to the doj for criminal contempt prosecution.. correct???? or let me guess, after peter and steve were prosecuted, everything has changed...????? how pathetic...
1
@voixdelaraison593 "New Republican passed law: NO PRESIDENT CAN WITHDRAW FROM NATO. Even the Republicans don’t TRUST Trump with Putin." yea... cuz the obama/biden admin allowed putin to take crimea, and now the brandon/harris admin is watching putin take the rest of ukraine... makes sense to me!! 😁
1
yea, except that hunter is a civilian who defied a subpoena, like peter navarrow and steve bannon... not a member of congress protected by the speech and debate clause like jordan or mccarthy. why the intentional false analogy??
1
BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!
1
BUT GYYYMMMM!!!!!!!
1
lol he won't even be prosecuted for contempt of congress, like peter navarrow and steve bannon were.
1
R U S S I A !!!!!!!!
1
@The00Dude "91 felonies is no question" question? no... ridiculous? a bit...
1
@cypherphoenix2665 go educate yourself about the speech and debate clause. why do you people never want to mention peter navarrow or steve bannon, who, just like hunter, were civilians who defied congressional subpoenas. why the intentional false analogy comparing a civilian, hunter biden, with a member of congress... jordan? (that's rhetorical, we know why....)
1
@cypherphoenix2665 "In conclusion, no, the S&D clause very unlikely protects him at all. He could be criminally charged, or what would be better: censured or stricken from committee." the democrats chose not to pursue the mater!! stop crying about it!
1
@cypherphoenix2665 "why the intentional false analogy comparing a civilian, hunter biden, with a member of congress... jordan?" Ignoring this rhetorical, I'll answer it: it isn't a false analogy, both defied a law subpoena, conservatives demand Hunter gets arrested while democrats demand both get arrested." so you want members of congress to be treated as civilians regarding congressional subpoenas? lobby your congressmen.. not me. until they, they are treated differently. whether you cry about it, or not...
1
@cypherphoenix2665 "then stop demanding hunter be charged for contempt, until you demand Jim be held in contempt as well" this is like trying to discuss quantum physics with a piece of lawn furniture... if a member of congress refuses to appear for a congressional subpoena, there are remedies for that via congress. if a civilian, such as peter navarrow, steve bannon, or hunter biden refuse to appear for a congressional subpoena, that is referred to the doj for criminal contempt prosecution.. correct???? or let me guess, after peter and steve were prosecuted, everything has changed...????? how pathetic...
1
BUT GYYMMM!!!!
1
@nonotever-cu3nr "hay dufass what's Hunter being investigated for." which investigation are you referring to?
1
@lawrenceleverton7426 "The process of justice is different. One is an elected official the other is a civilian." correct, but these people know very little, and certainly never heard of the Speech and Debate Claus. you would have better luck discussing quantum physics with your lawn furniture.
1
@spider-man910 "FAKE" why did you choose my name to post this? what is it supposed to mean? if you are going to reply to me, please try to communicate in complete sentences. ask your mom to help if you must.....
1
@michaelgibbons2556 lol sorry, it's sarcasm... I know it's hard to read, but yea... just mocking the libs... BUT GYYMMM!!!!! BUT GYYMMM!!!! WHAT ABOUT GYYYMMMM!!!!? lol clowns....
1