Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Supreme Court rules Trump immune from criminal prosecution for 'official acts'" video.

correct, the justice department should not be going after presidents/former presidents for actions taken while conducting official business as president.
9
bad times for dems..
8
@conniefan123 "Alright, so convicted felons is gonna be the new norm for america." first of all, take an english class... secondly, stop persecuting your political opponents and trying to take them off of ballots. why not run on your performance and platform instead?
8
bad times for the dems
6
@ChristinaRoDyk besides, I wasn't celebrating anything, just point out that these are bad times for the dems..
5
@ChristinaRoDyk take a look at the jack smith election case...
5
@paulrickman7549 lol
4
@43supermm I use PDFs every day, what is so wrong with them?
3
@43supermm PDFs are great and very useful. why do you want the fbi to get rid of them comrade?
2
@ekay9783 doing things while senator does not count...
2
@dozersdady "we are not talking about a cop doing twice the speed limit while responding to call." what are we talking about? do you even know??
2
@Mizzy3030 "No way. I am happy Biden can now find ways to subvert the certification on Jan 6, 2025." ummm............... not a republican voter are ya?
2
@dozersdady do you believe that former president should be charged with crimes or be held civically liable for damage caused related to collateral damage?
1
@dozersdady or do you think they should be immune from prosecution as these actions were taken under the duties of the presidency?
1
@dozersdady "that is not against the law " interesting... killing innocent civilians is not a crime. trump should have done this, instead of questing the election results. then you people wouldn't be prosecuting him for anything... MAKES SENSE TO ME!!! LOL
1
@dozersdady "immunity grants relief of punishment from breaking established law so I ask again what law would a president need to break in the course of there duties." already answered. again, none, that I'm aware of. yet you don't' answer questions. funny how that works. you expect me to answer your questions REPEATEDLY! but won't answer mine... regarding the 2020 election, what established law did trump violate? you won't/can't answer...
1
@dozersdady many civilians were also taken out. this is known as "collateral damage". the unintentional killing of innocent civilians.
1
@43supermm "By supporting a billionaire?" exactly!!!! a billionaire who is giving up his wealth to serve his country. instead of a career politician who is giving up his country for his wealth...
1
@user-pe3fk1fb1o the same reason people give money to multi-millionaire joe biden. no one in modern history that I'm aware of has ever been expected to pay for their own campaign. not to mention all the laws regarding who can spend what were, when and how during a campaign. why do you see everything in the world so differently when it comes to one man?? T D S !!! the man OBVIOUSLY didn't get into politics to make money... like the brandons of the world.. is the point. instead of living a relaxed passive life of the rich and famous, he is enduring what he is for you and me... you're just not smart enough to see that.
1
tough times for the dems...
1
@dozersdady "ok so if you don't think a president needs to break laws in order to perform there duties then you should agree there's no need for immunity." you obviously do not understand what this ruling is about...... let me try to help you... presidents do things like order drone strikes against our enemies. many past presidents have done this...
1
@dozersdady why not run on your performance and platform? instead of trying to take your opponent off of ballots and imprison him???
1
@billydoyle9984 "Front fictitious companies for self-serving profit is not "official"" now you're dragging biden and his family into this??
1
@dozersdady none that I'm aware of... THAT"S THE POINT!! persecuting/prosecuting a president for doing his job his not something we are going to tolerate in this country!
1
@dozersdady "ok I'll try to dumb this down for you. What laws would a president need to break in his duties that would require immunity." EXACTLY!!! the point of this ruling is to prevent political persecution of current and former presidents for performing activities considered to be their normal duties/job!! finally waking up??
1