Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Colorado Republicans ask US Supreme Court to overturn Trump's ballot ban" video.

  1.  @goomyworms3130  a write in for trump will NOT be counted.. part of this ruling.
    8
  2.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  agreed, anyone convicted of insurrection should be barred from office.. that doesn't mean that anyone that msdnc says committed insurrection is barred from office.... you people are sick, and frightened.
    7
  3.  @nosuchthing8  "Based on?" simply say that he participated in an insurrection. no trial or even charges required, correct? isn't that the precedent being set here????
    6
  4.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "what if multiple judges affirm donny was involved? What then kid. Sick and frightened is donny right now" judges do not get to "affirm guilt" in the usa. good grief... PLEASE, try to help yourself, and print, AND ACTUALLY READ a copy of our constitution and bill of rights! comrade...
    6
  5.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "Nope, there was a 5 day trial where evidence was shown and witnesses were questioned." and who was the lead for the defense counsel? can you name that person? can you name anyone on the defense team? was this a criminal trial?
    5
  6.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "well, you want to call me names? Then too chicken to answer me? Snowflakes are a rightwing thing" I didn't call you any names.. take an english course, please.
    5
  7.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "it was a trump guy and i already told you no, it wasnt criminal. If you want to know more seeing as you are completely unaware, look it up." ok, so you cant name a single person on the defense team, and it was not a criminal, but a civil trial, yes? great.. who was the plaintiff that has standing to file this civil case? give me a name?
    4
  8.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "the appilite court can affim a lower courts ruling. Like what happened here. So one found him guilty amd four affirmed it" found him guilty... without a trial or opportunity to present a defense... is this correct comrade?
    4
  9. can you quote this order?
    3
  10.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  so it was a civil trial, with no defense, and no plaintiff... is this correct?
    3
  11.  @jasonbourne2318  name them.
    2
  12. there was no insurrection to lend aid or comfort to...
    2
  13.  @siberianbear450  "It's crazy to think that the Supreme Court of Colorado is mostly Republican" lol name the "republican" judges on the co supreme court..?? GO!
    2
  14.  @siberianbear450  lol name the "republican" judges on the co supreme court..?? GO!
    2
  15.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "not dreampt, covicted." convicted? of what? now we're back to a criminal trial?? do you know the difference between a criminal conviction and a civil judgement? you're running yourself in clown circles at this point.... good grief.
    2
  16.  @markoconnell804  these people are literally sick.. did you see this foolery guy is now back to a criminal trial, because he doesn't even understand what he is saying?? can't make this stuff up!!!! although it is frightening that these people are allowed to vote.
    1
  17. "In the 4 hours after Trump ordered his minions to charge the capitol" can you quote this order?
    1
  18.  @cocabevzan2320  "it’s too much animosity" the hell did you think would happen as one party tries to fundamentally transform the country?
    1
  19.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "5 republicans and two independents." name them.
    1
  20. lol
    1
  21.  @markoconnell804  "Where is it written that you can be dreamed guilty...." dreamed guilty! that about sums it up! lol
    1
  22.  @davids.2703  "the courts make that determination. That's the only appropriate authority we have." so any "court" in the country can simply state that "we/I believe biden participated in insurrection" and keep him off of the ballot for that state? is that the precedent being set?
    1
  23.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  I would simply stop clicking on the reply button if I were you.....
    1
  24.  @pefo1674  "14A sec3 does not need a conviction..." so then who gets to determine whether or not an american has participated in insurrection?
    1
  25.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "not dreampt, covicted." go take an english class, please! dreampt..... low iq voter. gee, I wonder which party....
    1
  26.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "innsurrection is a much harder burden of proof. Why would he when the charges of hampering a congressional proceeding is easier to prove and still decades of jail time." so according to you, the reason that trump has not even been criminally charged with insurrection is due to a lack of evidence. is this correct? why is trump being kept off of the colorado ballot again?
    1
  27.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  i just read the thread and he made you look really bad. Hell, yo dididnt even know a trial happened did you? All you have are some spelling mistakes and you think that makes your position right lol" come on.. at this point you jump in with nothing but personal attacks?? another democrat voter by chance? but ok... if you want to jump in.... if there was a trail, name the defense teams lead counsel? give me a name.
    1
  28.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  "the more i read your post the worse it gets. To say you are intellectually dishonest is putting it lightly" again, nothing but personal attacks to offer... a democrat voter by chance? what was I dishonest about? specifically? or is this just a pathetic drive-by insulting..??
    1
  29.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  are you aware of ANY evidence presented at this "trial"? if so, what was it..?
    1
  30.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  ok... personal isults, plenty... but you cannot name a single person on the defense team nor name a single piece of evidence that was presented at this trial, is this correct? msdnc simply told you there was a trial and you said.. pass the kool aid, yes? courts/judges do not get to decide guilt in america. as I told your little buddy.. PLEASE print AND READ a copy of our constitution and bill of rights. this is as stupid as trump being found civilly liable for a sexual assault for which absolutely no evidence was ever presented in any court on planet earth! you people are sick!
    1
  31.  @markoconnell804  americans, who hate america enough to fundamentally transform it, by any means necessary... be safe, and prepared brother.
    1
  32.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  so now one secretary of state has determined trump committed "insurrection", again, without a trial? this isn't even a judge!!! you people are sick.... literally sick. brainwashed...
    1
  33.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  so now one secretary of state has determined trump committed "insurrection", again, without a trial? this isn't even a judge!!! you people are sick.... literally sick. brainwashed...
    1
  34.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  google? why can't I post this? come on.. at this point you jump in with nothing but personal attacks?? another democrat voter by chance? but ok... if you want to jump in.... if there was a trail, name the defense teams lead counsel? give me a name.
    1
  35.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  again google, why can't I [post this and defend myself? I can be insulted, but not defend myself? how does it feel? "the more i read your post the worse it gets. To say you are intellectually dishonest is putting it lightly" again, nothing but personal attacks to offer... a democrat voter by chance? what was I dishonest about? specifically? or is this just a pathetic drive-by insulting..??
    1
  36.  @Trumpsucks-hn7oh  ok google, can I at last politely ask this question? hey, trumpsucks! (let me guess google, this guy can post under this name, but I cant address him by this name??) are you going to tell me that the maine secretary of state also held a trial??
    1
  37.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  let me guess... the secretary of state of maine also held a trial??
    1
  38.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "dont like states having their own laws, too bad." what state laws are you referring to? are you talking about a state secretary of state being able to remove someone form a coresidential ballot?? so now any state can simply remove any candidate that the secretary of state doesn't like? and this is "democracy"? and you think this will end well?? you think you're doing this to "save democracy"?? good grief....
    1
  39.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  taking democracy from the people, in order to save democracy... all part of the "fundamental transformation", yes?
    1
  40.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "maine and colorado." these are states.. I didn't ask you about sates.
    1
  41.  @TomFoolery-eo4lr  "you seem to think anything you have to say on this will matter. It doesnt" we both know these rulings will be overturned, and you think your blather about them means something?
    1
  42.  @pefo1674  "But then you´d have to use non-"alternative" facts..." ummmm..... huh?
    1
  43.  @cloudbase7799  "It's entirely reasonable. Based on the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, we can remove Biden from ballots for bribery, treason, and failing to uphold the Constitution." correct... no need to even formally charge him with any of these...
    1
  44.  @tye829  "Ivy League doesn't have anything to do with it. It has more to do with being able to read and understand American law." understanding what american law? can you specifically cite the statute that was used to determine this ruling..? what "law" are you referring to?
    1
  45.  @jasonbourne2318  dude... you're unhinged. get the help that you need. (you don't own any firearms, do you???)
    1
  46.  @jasonbourne2318  "Republicans filed the lawsuit" name them.
    1
  47. should be 9 - 0, but the libs will divide... divide... divide.....
    1