Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Pennsylvania Candidate Attacked Outside Home" video.
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@moonshoes11 all of your last three replies are about ME!!!
typical liberal... you're losing this debate BADLY. so you focus on the person, rather than the subject.
please reply, and comment on the following.
the planet is estimated to be between 4 and 4.5 BILLION years old, correct?
the planets climate has never been known to have been static for any length of time, correct? (if you believe that it has, give me the time period)
your "scientists" and "experts" are now telling you that after 4.5 BILLION years, 100% of the planets climate change is caused by man, and you believe them, correct?
now, will you address any of those three questions? or will you run away, or reply with more personal attacks and adolescent name calling?
1
-
1
-
@moonshoes11 ok moon. so question 1 for you, do you believe in natural climate change.
I'll pose that as rhetorical, and not insult you.. you are obviously smart enough to know that the planet's climate has warmed after each and every ice age that we know of.
ok, so now your "climate experts" are claiming that humans are causing global warming. (I thought we called it climate change now so we can include cold, droughts, etc?) anyway....
ok, so we agree that there is natural, and human caused climate change. so what??? do you think you can somehow control the planets climate???
how so?
eliminating fossil fuels, and destroying our economy, bringing untold poverty and misery to tens and tens of millions of americans?
shouldn't we at the very least perform a cost / benefit analysis?
how do we do a cost / benefit analysis? don't we first need to know how much of the climate change is human-caused vs natural?
is human-caused responsible for .0002% of the current climate change? .02%? 2%? 22%? 32%? 62%? 92%?
what's the number?
have your "climate experts" explained how they have figured out how to differentiate natural vs natural climate change, and quantify it????
it cant be 100% like you suggested (or your "experts" suggested) unless they are natural climate change deniers...
do they deny that natural climate change exists???
do your "experts" believe the planet's climate is somehow supposed to be static, for the first time in the history of the planet??
that's absurd...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1