Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Judge will grant Jack Smith gag order on Trump ‘if they have to,’ says former U.S. attorney" video.

  1. I must have missed it... what does "if they have to" mean??? they will if they have to.... to achieve what? saying derogatory things about people is protected in america. so is saying things that "could lead to a threat"... (which could be any damned thing..)
    6
  2. for what?
    5
  3.  @nonearlylove  "NANCY Ended Trump..! 100%" why not let the america people decide..?
    3
  4.  @northpole8634  "Just woke up from a long coma? Yes?" gee, no answer to my question, but you respond with a personal attack instead... I'm going to go out on a limb here... do you vote for democrats by chance?
    3
  5.  @Nic1Moreno  "are you that lazy ? Too hard to use that Internet to look for answers you have toask strangers" yet another personal attack, no answer... I'm beginning to see a pattern from you liberals...
    2
  6. "Justice seems to be so slow to bite." depends on what political party you belong to. if you belong to the right political party, the statute of limitations is simply allowed run out....
    2
  7.  @simongarrettmusic  "Justice seems to be so slow to bite." if you're a democrat, yes... is this ok to post?
    2
  8.  @msabccbscnnoanfoxnews  "catch up" well there's the second personal attack, still no answer to my question..
    2
  9.  @msabccbscnnoanfoxnews  "how about you tell us what he didn’t do, might be easier." if that's the case it should be very easy for you to explain why he should be put in a cage... can you do that?
    2
  10.  @northpole8634  "Pay attention to the facts. Don't be lazy." another personal attack... no answer...
    2
  11. if you're a democrat, yes... statute of limitations simply run out.... republicans are prosecuted at record speed! googies, will you please explain how this violates your terms??
    1
  12.  @therock8288  "read all the indictments. The info is there. After you read them you will know the charges." typically, unless folks are a risk for violence or flight, we wait until convicted until we put them in cages... with trump, you just want to skip all the conviction stuff, correct?
    1
  13.  @raztastic  "Like they would have if it was literally anyone else. They would not have bail." yea... like how hunter got to post bail for his tax charges... oh wait, the statute of limitations was allowed to simply run out... yet you whine about what preferential treatment trump gets??? good grief....
    1
  14. if you're a democrat, yes... statute of limitations simply run out.... republicans are prosecuted at record speed!
    1
  15.  @raztastic  "did... did you just bring a point where someone was not charged with something, then try to use it to justify why they got to post bail (remember, they didnt have bail because they weren't charged), against someone who was charged and was allowed to post bail?" no. I didn't name anyone who hasn't been charged with a crime, did I???? the only name I mentioned was hunter. has hunter been charged with a crime?? YES!!!!!! was he forced to post bail?? NO!!! and then you call ME dumb?
    1
  16.  @raztastic  "Also, you are no longer considered a bot. A bot would not be THIS dumb. pretty dumb yes, but not THIS dumb lol" hey googies, what the flock?? I don't say things like this, yet all my posts get banned, while these stay??? how does it feel to be on the wrong side and resort to censorship to prop up a failing ideology?
    1
  17.  @raztastic  "Also, you are no longer considered a bot. A bot would not be THIS dumb. pretty dumb yes, but not THIS dumb lol" hey googies, what the flock?? I don't say things like this, yet all my posts get banned, while these stay??? how does it feel to be on the wrong side and resort to censorship to prop up a failing ideology?
    1
  18.  @Peter-hs7zn  "for talking to much ??" seems to be the case peter.. these people are DESPERATELY afraid of this man...
    1
  19. goooGLE! goooGLE! goooGLE!
    1
  20.  @amberandrews6842  they don't want to publicly admit the laptop is real.... just keep it on the downlow.. they start making that a spectacle, then they have to admit to the existence of the "deep state"(that doesn't exist wink wink) when 51 intel/former intel officials colluded to lie to the american people to sway an election, etc... just keep quiet about the laptop, please...
    1
  21.  @joca6282  "Move to Russia." you still don't believe that russian collusion hoax was real, do you??
    1
  22.  @msabccbscnnoanfoxnews  "Well, he’s trying to intimidate witnesses" is this someone's opinion?? so you want to restrict a man's constitutional rights because of a trump haters opinion? is this correct comrade?
    1
  23.  @Nolegu  "He very well did attempt to intimidate witnesses already" this is an opinion, correct?
    1
  24. how does it feel google?
    1
  25. "Also, you are no longer considered a bot. A bot would not be THIS dumb. pretty dumb yes, but not THIS dumb lol" google allows these types of posts. so long as you're on their side....
    1
  26. but when I post it, it gets shadow banned....
    1