General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

Previous
16
Next
...
All

John Roberts do you see anyone, state or fed, investigating hunters art deals? why not?
1
@domusdebellum3042 that hillary clinton got 4 men dead?
1
yea.... must be something for them to do this!! like the house investigation of russian collusion... and the senate investigation of russian collusion... and the fbi investigation of russian collusion... and the mueller investigation of russian collusion.... dam you're gullible mike!
1
@kathyadrian7996 are you asking me for a source? that's not really your reply to my comment, is it? requesting a source that a man hasn't been convicted of a crime?? wow kathy, either you were asking someone else for a source, and simply have no reply to my last post, or that was a horrible defeat...............
1
@davedee6745 oh no dave.... oh no............... registering to vote, and requesting a mail in ballot are two very different things. good grief dave........... <shakes head>
1
@davedee6745 wait a minute... california has MASS - "unsolicited" mail in ballots.... nobody is checking IDs at these drop boxes! good grief dave...... wise up!
1
@tallen4520 do you really have to ask..??
1
@jeffprescher6145 good grief, I cant believe I have to explain this to yet another liberal.... spending money on infrastructure is not a good thing! to quote from your post... "The money allocated to such expenditures should go to American contractors and provide opportunity for more jobs. Growth in commerce and tax revenue offset the investment." offset the investment?? what does that mean? more jobs? growth in commerce? tax revenue?? do you not understand where the government gets money?? here, let me spell this out, again, using some arbitrary numbers... lets suppose the gov. spends $1bil on infrastructure, creating great paying jobs, (woohoo!) and taxing those paychecks at 30% (creating tax revenue). the gov. would get back 30% of $1bil - $300mil. now, let's suppose the gov. spends that entire revenue, $300mil, on...... infrastructure! creating great paying jobs, (woohoo!) and taxing those paychecks at 30% (creating tax revenue). the gov. would get back 30% of $30omil - $90mil. now, let's suppose the gov. spends that entire revenue, $90 mil, on...... infrastructure! creating great paying jobs, (woohoo!) and taxing those paychecks at 30% (creating tax revenue). the gov. would get back 30% of $90 mil - $27mil. now, let's suppose the gov. spends that entire revenue, $27 mil, on...... infrastructure! creating great paying jobs, (woohoo!) and taxing those paychecks at 30% (creating tax revenue). the gov. would get back 30% of $27 mil - $8.1mil. are you starting to notice a pattern here jeff! giving americans paychecks, with money that must first be taken from americans, does not generate or create wealth, increased tax revenue, or growth in commerce! taking money from my paycheck, to provide me with another paycheck, doesn't work!! you would think this was common sense, no??? close your eyes, and think really hard about it jeff!! taking %30 of YOUR money, to give you paychecks with the money I took FROM YOU, will quickly lead to your going broke! wise up.....
1
@philmienus2382 "They dont want drama on their cmmnt section" or anything said that makes anyone on the left look bad....
1
now I'm completely banned?? how pathetic... HOW DOES IT FEEL?
1
@philmienus2382 geeze google, now you have folks from both sides complaining about your censorship...
1
@philmienus2382 "ts probably a word, link, and copy paste filter set up by forbes. U cant even have proper discussion at this point making everyone think you did not reply to them. My cmnts shows to me but when i made a fake account yesterdey the dont show in this thread." I do the same thing phil. you dont even have to set up a fake account, just go to youtube on another browser, and don't sign into your account. it's amazing how many of my posts do not show. I saw a noticeable increase in censorship about 6 weeks ago. youtube is owned by google. very left....... example: you can actually search the video of biden confessing on video to committing bribery and watch the video yourself ON YOUTUBE! but I cannot quote from that video confession in these comments... go figure.
1
@philmienus2382 "Please enlighten our non cult brain on how any of this is related to freedom of speech?" um, ok... strange question, but... the last one certainly, "false statements"? is this for claiming an election was rigged, like clinton and abrams have done for years? they have the 1st amendment right to claim elections are rigged. of course they aren't prosecuted for that!!! donald trump on the other hand.. seems not to have that same protection of freedom of speech. you asked....
1
@philmienus2382 "Georgia indictment with their charges -Violating Georgia's racketeering act: -Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer: -Conspiracy to impersonate a public officer -Conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree -False statements and writings and filing false documents:" racketeering requires one coordinated criminal act. once again, what was the criminal act all of these folks were working towards? (again, you can't answer... rhetorical at this point) solicitation of violation of oath. what question was asked that was a violation of an oath? conspiracy to impersonate a public officer? is this a joke? so he thought about pretending to be a police officer or something?? good grief.... conspiracy to commit forgery. not criminal forgery, but he thought about it??? pathetic... false statements? again, after 250 years, we are suddenly going to prosecute a politician for lying???? wow...... again, thanks for your response, but I must say... what a pathetic people we americans have become.
1
@philmienus2382 "Jack smith j6 indictment with their charges -conspiracy to defraud the United States, -conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, -obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights -attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights. Article tittle "What's in the Jan. 6 Trump indictment"abc news" all of these are conspiracies or "attempts" to an action??? that's all they could come up with?? conspiracy to defraud? not criminal fraud.... conspiracy to think about committing criminal fraud.... conspiracy to obstruct? not criminal obstruction.... conspiracy to think about committing a criminal obstruction... obstruction of an official proceeding. ok, what did he do, pull a fire alarm? no.... once again, what was his ACTION that obstructed a proceeding? THERE WAS NONE! meanwhile, the guy who actually pulled a fire alarm to obstruct a proceeding is not being criminally prosecuted. imagine that. an attempt to obstruct a proceeding. once again, what action did he take to attempt to obstruct a proceeding? can you answer that? (at this point, that's rhetorical) conspiracy against rights? wtf does that even mean?? this all looks pathetic and desperate. 250 years without charging a president with a crime, then we get 91 BS counts ;like this?? pathetic and desperate! YOU are being subjugated! you just don't seem to understand what is happening to you. YOU are being subjugated, and all you can do is bark and clap like a trained seal.... how sad. but I will at least say, thanks for the response.
1
@L._Diaz you could answer my question in two words!!! but for some reason, you wont.... or maybe you actually CAN'T!
1
@L._Diaz Im not looking for ten-point answer, Im looking for a one- or two-word action that is illegal. examples: stole something. shot someone. vandalized something/place. what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
@philmienus2382 key words phil are "actions" and "illegal"...
1
@philmienus2382 is English your second... or third language??? here is what my question was: "what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?" your answer: "first of i answered your question of list of crimes trump is being charged with on 2 separate indictment regarding election." there is no "action" mentioned in your answer! I will take the time to ask my question again, and explain it in more detail. now, this all started when diaz stated: "This defense is not going anywhere because he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made😂. It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." "I'll repeat the second part again.... he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made... It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." I then asked, what "action" (ACTION) did trump take that was in violation of a criminal statute? can you answer that question? I'm looking for an ACTION that trump took that was illegal. give it another try??
1
@philmienus2382 what actions did trump take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
"...he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made😂. It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
@L._Diaz "...he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made😂. It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
@L._Diaz pretty typical response from liberals though... both you and phil are doing it in the same discussion thread! there is no answer posted, yet you will spend the next three days telling me how you have already answered the question. wouldn't it be easier to simply copy and paste your answer and post it again? go ahead and try it, then simply post, "posted it again", and I will let you know if I see it. but this is asking far too much... isn't it?
1
@L._Diaz never got any answer to the question diaz... maybe google zapped your answer too.
1
@philmienus2382 "reminder to read my answer to your question" didn't see it phil. maybe the google mods zapped it. must have gotten fact checked...
1
@L._Diaz "...he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made😂. It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
@L._Diaz "...he's not being prosecuted for the speech he made😂. It's the actions he took and set into motion up to that point." what actions did he take that were in criminal violation of a law?
1
it's called being subjugated.
1
@jeangillespie1173 "Guns are not the only source of inflicting harm, don't you know?!!" guns don't inflict harm at all... or anything else for that matter. human beings inflict harm... using various types of hardware. (or hands/feet)
1
@Randy_Savage_ohyeah exactly big jim..
1
@roseromans8497 "most of your statement is inaccurate bit I will just address basics...Kevin Mccarthy had a chance to appoint 5" and pelosi said they were the wrong 5, so they chose not to participate, which was fine with me. never before has the majority party chosen which minority members could and couldn't participate in a hearing such as this.. so one sided and unfair its pathetic. russian collusion delusion. impeachment 1.0. impeachment 2.0. and now, impeachment 3.0. americans are tired of this crap rose... I have never seen the government more afraid of anything in my life! democrats and the deep state are TERRIFIED of donald j trump.. it's kind of hilarious to watch!
1
@SimbaC2007 "'armed' meaning anything that can have non-lethal or lethal consequences." What does a gun do? Lethal damage am I wrong am right?" I can take off my tee shirt, and snap your butt with it! that would be non-lethal assault, correct? I can take my shoe off, and non-lethally assault you with it, correct? so according to your stupid definition of an "armed insurrection".. every single person there was armed with some form of a "weapon", correct? good grief... the level of desperation regarding this issue is pathetic!
1
@SimbaC2007 cassidy testified about how "she heard someone else describe something to the effect of"....... "I did not understand your point since you just cut off the sentence? So how is that a flop for the comittee if you don't give context and finish a sentence?" lol are you kidding? the point is this woman's "testimony" is at best third hand hearsay. think of it this way... didn't the dopes running this committee interview this witness before they put her on this prime time nationally televised clown show? of course they did... so if they knew she was going to give a bunch of hearsay nonsense that occurred between trump and the limo driver, why not go straight to the source, and simply subpoena the limo driver?? hmmm....... geee.... I wonder why they chose not to do such a thing.......
1
@kurthayhurst1138 "Lonnie Coffman had a gun on his person and was arrested on Capital grounds" cnn, msnbc and the nyt's have all kept this story buried for a year and a half?? ok..........
1
@almostthere2024 "So the Magnetometers were lying? You guys are real scared of machines, ain't ya?" lying magnetometers? wtf are you talking about?
1
@roseromans8497 "interesting that you arent willing to use the word weapons." because most people connect "arms" with "firearms".... weapons can be anything.
1
@kurthayhurst1138 "the 4th was a guy from AL named Lonnie Coffman. They were all arrested on Capital grounds or property".... "Several Glock handguns, an AR, 1000 plus rounds of ammo, smoke bombs and 11 molotov cocktails. All that I mentioned were in Lonnie Coffman's truck which was picked up several blocks away. " was this on capital grounds? or several blocks away? you contradict yourself in your own post!
1
@roseromans8497 "Don't be so quick to zing...if you watched the hearing which I am assuming you did not, they played scanner audio of law enforcement officers identifying and some video of armed indiduals in trees and i saw weapons flag poles etc used to assault officers during the "tourist visit"" I watch my share of msnbc and cnn to try to keep up with this tuff... but cant understand why they are not showing these videos!!!? why do you think they are not showing them to the american people?
1
@SimbaC2007 "You can't just clasify different cases as one. The Cassidy Case was to show how tyranic Donald trump" actually that's not true... cassidy testified about how "she heard someone else describe something to the effect of"....... cassidy was a huge flop for this committee.
1
@SimbaC2007 "Did I ever mention anyone having a gun the title of the video mentions 'armed' meaning anything that can have non-lethal or lethal consequences." so now you're telling me that the right to keep and bear arms refers to a pair of flip flops?? this is pathetic desperation at this point. good grief, the left is losing badly......
1
@roseromans8497 "It's not a trial but all who are adamantly disputing what is being presented have been invited to go share their proof under oath. Funny thing when given that opportunity they fight it and when legally required to comply plead the fifth." "invited to share..." the "opportunity..."?? there is no defense team in the room rose!! republicans named 3 members to be on this committee, pelosi and the democrats said no way! we will pick 2 never-trumper republicans to claim this is bi-partisan, but you get no say!! geeze rose, are you even aware that pelosi was the one in charge of the capital police that day? she is one of the most key witnesses of the entire thing! yet she is the presiding judge??????? how does that makes sense to you? this entire thing is a joke....
1
@jhutch1470 "There's your problem. They are not leaders. They are servants." these people don't know their backsides from a hole in the ground...
1
@canderson5098 impeachment 3.0 isn't going any better than the other 2..... just another partisan clown show.. btw, have you ever seen the government of this country more afraid of anything before in your life? democrats and the deep state are TERRIFIED of donald j trump...
1
@amycaitlyn1120 why do you think the media buried this information for a year and a half? cnn and msnbc have been protecting trump all this time??? something smells.....
1
@YZ250W1 "He's whining like a little girl! What a crybaby! "You people" I'm not a Democrat little Nazi. Try again!" you accuse others of "whining like a little girl"! and calling them a "crybaby"!! and you can't see how astoundingly ironic that is???? good grief.....
1
yea, I don't get the "rage" thing in the video title... if that's "raging", what the hell was al gore doing the other day?
1
@travisfoster1071 I used "bare"??? ok... if you say so, obviously a mistake but... liberals never let a chance to attack others slip by....
1
@justafig "mo Ron" that's it...??? I mean, if you have an issue with a comment I made, please, address it like an adult. <shakes head>
1
@bruconicinfernon4noplatoon317 "Other countries have weapons banned. And only the criminals have weapons. And they never have this problem." yea, ya don't hear about shootings like this in north korea or china... those people are rather well controlled. go live there if you want to live without freedom. some of us are willing to accept the risks associated with living in a free and open society.... now put your mask on and get back under your mothers bed before someone shoots you, or you get covid...
1
hell yes!!
1

Previous
16
Next
...
All