Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @Fedupnow  so let me get this straight, now they are saying that trump told his LAWYER to do something that was illegal... the LAWYER says nothing and does not advise his client that this act is illegal.. then the LAWYER proceeds with the legal act... and now trump is on trial??? why isn't this lawyer as criminally liable as trump? shouldn't they BOTH be defendants??? what the hell is going on..?????
    1
  2.  @RR64434  lol
    1
  3.  @Jessiejam-44  "WOW! And I guess they dont work for the President.?.?." they're not supposed to.. they are supposed to work for we the people. if they simply worked for the president, a president could use them to take out political rivals... wait a minute... maybe you're on to something here!!? well they damned sure never worked for trump, I can tell ya that much... they are still desperately trying to take that man down.
    1
  4.  @Unknown-fl7dj  the democrats had control of the house and senate from 2018 to 2022. why do you think they did no investigation of this? they impeached trump over a phone call, but didn't want to touch this??? yea... ok.
    1
  5.  @Unknown-fl7dj  "And under what branch of government do you think the FBI is a part of? The executive branch. And what administration was at the head of the executive branch in 2019? Trump. Do you understand how the government works?" so let me get this straight... you believe that trump was in control of the fbi? the fbi that illegally launched and perused the russian collusion hoax against him? is that what you think?? lisa page - DOJ: trump isn't going to become president, right? right?? peter strzok - fbi: no! no he won't! we'll stop it! these are the folks you believe trump was controlling? good grief....
    1
  6.  @roisright6855  "That went to Trump’s son in law from the Saudi’s…but that’s no big deal!😂" why do you think nobody ever investigated that?
    1
  7.  @gregcarnovale5391  "already gave you the info." lol do you not understand that I can go back through the thread messages??? good grief! 🤡
    1
  8.  @gregcarnovale5391  "last we heard it was 2 billion from the saudis" when did this take place? democrats impeached him for a phone call, but didnt look into this??? lol ok.....
    1
  9. I give up, how many?
    1
  10.  @lindamckenzie8630  lol
    1
  11.  @MikeW165  "Prove it" the doj, fbi and cia are looking into it! lisa page, peter strzok and john brennan are all on it! let's see what they come up with.... google, how does this violate your terms?? how does it feel....?
    1
  12.  @MikeW165  "Prove it" the doj, fbi and cia are looking into it! lisa page, peter strzok and john brennan are all on it! let's see what they come up with....
    1
  13.  @MikeW165  there were no firearms discharged, other than the one capital police officer's when he used a firearm to cause the only homicide of the day as he murdered babbitt...
    1
  14.  @MikeW165  <------------- 🤡
    1
  15.  @MikeW165  "Literally been in place since the 80s" I didn't ask you how long the guidelines have been in place. I asked what specific guidelines you were referring to! then you criticize me for "moving goal posts"? you don't answer the question that I asked, and answer a question that I didn't ask?? <shakes head>
    1
  16.  @MikeW165  "I've seen the unedited tapes so I know propaganda when I see it" the tapes you saw were edited propaganda! I mean, good grief.... let me guess, this is where you simply reply with "wrong"? democrat voters... I tell ya........
    1
  17.  @rbarclay6529  "haven't seen those tapes where are they?" actually, search "people walking through capital between ropes" ON THIS VERY PLATFORM!!!!!!!! but you still won't see it...
    1
  18.  @MikeW165  "Wrong" well gee, I guess that solves that.... oh, my lying eyes..
    1
  19.  @wadap0  "The "stupid" line of questioning is based on the claims/lies of right-wingers." says the guy who still believes the russian collusion hoax was real, and cheered on two phony impeachments..
    1
  20.  @Randomjackass135  "But your side has no evidence" when you say "your side", exactly who are you referring to?
    1
  21.  @magatism  ok magadude.. by the way, the debt ceiling bill passed was horrible for conservative americans. as usual, the republicans got rolled... gave the dems what they wanted, and got nothing in return. post trump same old same old....
    1
  22.  @yepyep340  lol
    1
  23.  @yepyep340  you people are obsessed with locking this man up....
    1
  24.  @PisgahGravelProject  "Don't hold your breath. No crime proven. No punishment given" peter strzok and lisa page are working on the proof... <shakes head>
    1
  25. too busy trying to take trump down...
    1
  26.  @patricktaylor5802  jordan was a member of congress protected by the speech and debate clause. a better comparison would be to look at other civilians who don't show up, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. both were prosecuted. why is this so different?
    1
  27.  @patricktaylor5802  "Because he showed up. He wanted it before the public" the one being subpoenaed doesn't get to set the rules... he was subpoenaed for a deposition, not a hearing... do you understand the difference?
    1
  28. it is fair and balanced. jym, like eric holder, were state officials when subpoenaed. neither were prosecuted for not showing up. fair... balanced.... civilians on the other hand, are prosecuted for not showing up, like peter navarrow, steve bannon and hunte.... well not hunter... not fair... not balance.... the answer to your question is NO! our government is NOT being fair and balanced.
    1
  29. speech and debate clause. a better analogy would be other civilians who refused to show up for congressional subpoenas, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. both were prosecuted.. why do you guys never mention that?
    1
  30. he was subpoenaed for a deposition. just like trumps kids were. there was no option. trump's kids showed up. why is this such a problem?
    1
  31. speech and debate clause. hunter is a civilian. a better analogy would be other civilians who refused to show for congressional subpoenas like peter navarrow and steve bannon. both were prosecuted... why is this so different?
    1
  32.  @robyoung-pl1gq  "The same one that lets a 91 time felon walk free." who the hell has been convicted of 91 felonies?
    1
  33.  @denelldawson7074  "nobody is above the law in America right." absolutely wrong. clinton is above the law. seems the bidens are above the law. and no, I'm not ok with it..
    1
  34.  @pattidick9310  jordan was a member of congress. different situation. a better analogy would be to look at other civilians who refused to appear, like peter navarrow and steve bannon. both were prosecuted. why is this so different?
    1
  35.  @sally-sp8ee  "Trump should go too Right ?" trumps kids were subpoenaed by congress for depositions, repeatedly. they showed up and were deposed. why is this so different?
    1
  36.  @patricktaylor5802  "For what? He showed up for the hearing" he wasn't subpoenaed for a hearing. he was subpoenaed for a deposition. just like trumps kids were...
    1
  37.  @benoitforget2497  I feel bad for you people... you make me sad.
    1
  38. for a never trumper, he did better than I expected. good job bret
    1
  39.  @slavbrav69  lol
    1
  40. this woman is as partisan as it gets!! brainwashed...
    1
  41. how? because libtards did it.... it's that simple.
    1
  42. actually, we live in neither a republic nor a democracy. we live in an oligarchy.
    1
  43.  @elephantoflight3362  T R U M P !!!!
    1
  44. LETS GO BRANDON!
    1
  45. this administration doesn't believe in rules.. laws... or our constitution... who the hell votes for democrats at this point?
    1
  46. yea... that's why he was a billionaire, then chose to serve his country... <shakes head>
    1
  47.  @legion7193  good one! derp....
    1
  48.  @elephantoflight3362  have you never knowingly told a lie?
    1
  49. it's obvious why twitter banned her... she is devastating to the liberal marxist agenda!
    1
  50.  @mindpoison3277  I don't use twitter either, but based on his track record... MOST everything he says he changes a few weeks later! he should NOT be allowed on twitter.. agreed???
    1