Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "CNN" channel.

  1. it's not rich vs poor, it's left vs right.
    1
  2. the left is obsessed... I have never seen the government of the united states of america so afraid of anything before in my life...
    1
  3.  @aceydishy9338  "Without any consequences January 6 was practice." yea, most all coups throughout history were preceded by 2 or 3 practice runs...
    1
  4.  @rednugget1986  joel, this is exactly why we elected a non-politician in donald trump, and look at how they system - both sides responded......
    1
  5.  @tahart1  where do you people come up with this nonsense??
    1
  6.  @tahart1  I don't have a constitutional right to sell guns anymore than you have a constitutional right to sell tomatoes!
    1
  7.  @tahart1  "Sir, you do not have a constitutional right to sell guns." who told you that I have a constitutional right to sell guns?
    1
  8. so my rights are dependent upon our governments performance?? so much for my rights.....
    1
  9. what do you suggest?
    1
  10.  @rednugget1986  exactly why we elected a non-politician in donald trump, and look at how they system - both sides responded......
    1
  11. biden is not responsible for the border?
    1
  12. "Gun laws can only be changed when there is emotional pain to be happened dearly and closer to pro-gun legislators." what "gun laws" would you like to see changed? (what is a gun law?)
    1
  13. @bubble jim "So what is your solution?" nothing will stop criminals from committing crimes..... well, almost nothing. preemptively put each american in a separate cage, and crime will no longer exist in our country. is that you're proposed solution to prevent crime? if not, you're wasting your time... criminals are gonna criminal, that's what they do!
    1
  14.  @Napalmdog  "I will work on getting laws in place that dictate what either you or I can and cannot possess." so you want to "fundamentally transform" this country into a dictatorship, correct?
    1
  15.  @Napalmdog  "always fall in line of guns over kid's lives crowd, I will work on getting laws in place that dictate what either you or I can and cannot possess." please define guns over kids lives crowd. thank you.
    1
  16.  @Napalmdog  you don't get to dictate to me which I can use... unless, of course...... you're a dictator.
    1
  17. 10 foot tall and bullet proof, are ya??? DAM! I'll bet you can leap tall building in a single bound too! lol
    1
  18.  @thefpvlife7785  "Oh and btw ... remember the seat belt law we were all against when it was passed back in 1982. It saved hundreds of thousands of lives." yes.... but I'm not sure I follow. do you think seat belt laws would have protected these children better? maybe you misread my question... my question was, "what bill do you think would have protected these children better?" these children being the three who were murdered yesterday.
    1
  19. "Until there children are in harms way they may pass bills to protect our kids." what bill do you think would have protected these children better?
    1
  20. there are certainly risks associated with living in a free and open society..
    1
  21.  @adrianmyers6429  "very true" so you want to ban something that you cannot define... is that the bottom line?
    1
  22.  @adam6072  "ultimately you're arguing on semantics." YOU suggested we ban "assault rifles", but my wanting to know the definition of an assault rifle is a problem? if you want me to agree with banning something, shouldn't I know what it is?? I'll [politely try once again... you are suggesting that our government ban "assault rifles"? I might actually agree with you, but I'm not sure I understand what an "assault rifle" is. and so I politely ask once more.. what is an assault rifle? if you continue to refuse to define it, I will be forced to assume you simply mean "firearm". is that your definition of an "assault rifle"? again, if you're going to suggest these things and have these discussion you should be man enough to define the items you want our government to ban!
    1
  23.  @adam6072  so you want to ban assault rifles, but can't define an assault rifle... is this correct? this then makes you look silly, so you become angry and attack me?? YOU used the term assault rifle. what is an assault rifle? please tell me that you can define the words that you use!
    1
  24.  @adam6072  "I have faith in your ability to Google it." typical liberal response.... you have no clue as to what you're talking about, yet you keep talking...
    1
  25.  @adam6072  "Easy. Assault rifles." what's an "assault rifle"?
    1
  26. what's a weapon of war?? you twits can't even tell me what a woman is!!!
    1
  27. "You can still have your 2nd amendment rights without having the assault weapons!!!" what is an assault weapon?
    1
  28. better than the party of tyranny, no...??
    1
  29. yea, wars, inflation, tanking retirement accounts, open border, depleting our emergency oil reserves, pushing russia and china together, spy balloons flying over our country.....
    1
  30.  @roxannaweaver2155  "It's not that they don't give a rats ass about people, its that they don't give a rats ass about our children." because they're trying to protect your children's liberty? <shakes head>
    1
  31. because they won't turn into tyrants?
    1
  32. obviously we have to defend ourselves from sick women pretending to be men...
    1
  33.  @bertvanmourik2345  ’ve heard John fugelsang say, there will be no action until one of them or a family member is killed. Hard to argue" is that how tyrants are created? jaded personal emotion of anger??
    1
  34.  @bethl8866  "Exactly. They need to see the destroyed 9-year old bodies and not look away. They are cowards." blah blah blah beth.. conservatives have been using that line about 9 month fetuses as they are ripped apart for decades now. come up with something new.
    1
  35. demonrats: oh no, six people were killed, let's go full tyrant, shred the constitution, and strip 340 million innocent americans of their god given rights.
    1
  36. none of these weapons fired 7.62mm rounds...
    1
  37.  @matthewsanchez7953  "Ghoul or troll, either way it's sad" wait, ghouls and trolls are penalizing your children?? that's your answer to my question?? <shakes head>
    1
  38. who is penalizing your children? and how?
    1
  39. who is "we"?
    1
  40.  @mile_high_topher  another adolescent liberal... you can't define the terms you use, you can't explain what you want to change in our constitution, just word salads and moving of goal posts when asked direct questions... then hours later, tell the person it was already addressed.... liberalism is a mental disorder.
    1
  41.  @mile_high_topher  "No, no one is moving the goal post. You asked what we do with the constitution. I explained it. Try to keep up." you explained what we should do with our constitution?? and I missed it?? darn..... ok ok, you're simply trolling me at this point. have a nice life skippy.
    1
  42.  @mile_high_topher  you can't define broad gun reform, so now you want to talk about amending the constitution instead?? again, rhetorical... at this point, I believe you are incapable of answering simple questions. typical liberal, all emotion.... no sense whatsoever.
    1
  43.  @mile_high_topher  "When we see a glaring problem with the constitution, we amend it. That's why the process was put in place, genius." wait, now we are moving the goal posts to amending the constitution?? this is the first time you have mentioned this!!! ok, new conversation.. amending the constitution. how would you like to amend the constitution? what are you suggesting?
    1
  44.  @mile_high_topher  "I didn't move the goal posts or run. I highlighted two democracies with excellent gun laws that don't deal with two mass shootings a day." yes, but why? they don't answer my questions, explain your definitions, or define what you would like to see happen. why did you highlight two other countries, instead of define what "broad gun reform" you want to see? ok, you didn't move the goal posts, or run away,.. you dodged the question, correct??? talk about arguing over semantics... good grief. I'll try once again... what is your definition of "broad gun reform" that you are lobbying for?
    1
  45.  @mile_high_topher  neither canada nor sweden are bound by our constitution. what do we do with our constitution? again, there will be no answer.......
    1
  46.  @mile_high_topher  "Canada and Sweden are both excellent examples to base our laws on. You want to know more, look it up." this is your answer to my questions?? just move the goal posts and change the conversation when you have no answers??? you ask for "broad gun reform" but run away when asked to define it..? (all rhetorical, I know you can't answer any of my questions at this point) good grief... and as an american citizen, I am not interested at all in emulating any other nation on the planet. if you are, why not simply move to one of those countries you wish to emulate???
    1
  47.  @mile_high_topher  "It's getting to the point where we're done asking, though." who are you asking, and what are you asking them to do? what happens when you're done asking?
    1
  48.  @mile_high_topher  "It's getting to the point where we're done asking, though." well if you can't explain what it is, how can you expect an answer??? what does "broad gun reform" mean? please clarify. thank you in advance.
    1
  49.  @mile_high_topher  "I already made it clear that we're asking for broad gun reform." I asked you for something specific that would have prevented these murders... not msnbc talking points. is that all you have? msnbc talking points?? I do not know what "broad gun reform" means... you're asking for it, so I'm politely asking you to clarify, what is "broad gun reform"? please?
    1
  50.  @mile_high_topher  "You actually think you're coming off as a rational person?" I asked you specifically, what is it that you want to see happen or changed that would have prevented these murders? and this was your answer?? good grief...
    1