General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

CNN
comments

Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Hear GOP lawmakers speak on gun laws after Nashville shooting" video.

@mile_high_topher "Universal background checks, closing gun show and private sale loopholes, licenses, safe storage, etc." universal background checks, already have them... gun show and private sale loopholes, I don't know what those are... please clarify. licenses, if I need a license, it's no longer a right. do you know the purpose of the bill of rights is? safe storage, you mean laws that require me to handle my property a particular way in my home? is that constitutional, and how do you intend to enforce that?
5
@vocalartistsmgmt "The Diary of Anne Frank. The Rosa Parks Story. Florida, Texas." it is illegal to print and sell these books to adults in texas and florida?? why do I smell crap....?
4
@rednugget1986 exactly why we elected a non-politician in donald trump, and look at how they system - both sides responded...
3
@ivanmcbleedy1397 "A woman's right to make choices about her own reproductive health." lol you people are sick... if you're referring to abortion, which is not a right, who's health is being "cared for" when a fetus is destroyed?
3
what would you like to "try"?
3
well we don't have a bill of needs, so there's that.......
2
obviously encouraging these transvestites isn't working out so well...
2
@robertsmith2956 gotta remember who we are dealing with here robert... most in these discussions dont know what end the bullet comes out of...
2
@robertsmith2956 "Rittenhouse used one FOUR times in self defense." correct, and had he had a shotgun he would most likely be dead...
2
@Napalmdog "which I honestly don't understand. That's a job for a shotgun, not a rifle meant for far-range targets." can you imagine a 70 year old woman trying to defend herself with a 12 gauge?? lol ar platform rifles are small, light and don't kick hard at all, making them easy for people to use, and making them much more safe to use. besides, who are you to tell me what I can and can't defend myself with. of course our "arms" should be, and are restricted, but it's a .22 cal. rifle!?? if a .22 is too much, what am I left with? a pellet gun?
2
most use them for self defense...
2
@adrianmyers6429 "Then define a so-called assault rifle... You are literally calling for banning millions of guns, so you need to explain what the ban encompasses." well now I have to defend adam here... how do you know he is proposing to ban millions of guns? if he refuses to define "assault weapon", how do you know there are millions of them? per his definition, maybe there are only 7 of them? but until he defines what an "assault weapon" is, we don't know...
2
you don't even know what the bill of rights is or why it was written....
2
@kimbrey65 "And too scared to do anything." they didn't seem scared to me...
2
@mile_high_topher "There's a dozen or so gun safety measures that a vast majority of Americans agree upon." name 3 of the dozen or so..? let's see if I agree, and if they are constitutional.
2
@bertvanmourik2345 ’ve heard John fugelsang say, there will be no action until one of them or a family member is killed. Hard to argue" is that how tyrants are created? jaded personal emotion of anger??
1
you have no constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle on public streets...
1
@nicks-fix "ok boomer." ok skippy.
1
@grandenauto3214 "rights are not simply given, there are responsibilities that go with rights…. One responsibility could be licensing and registration… you can have your gun you just need to ensure you are using it in an appropriate manner. We have the right to free speech, that doesn’t mean you can say anything you want…" you people actually frighten me... you think the gubbermint GAVE me the right to keep and bear arms? the ignorance is staggering!! this is why there is so much division on these issues! ignorance! you obviously have no clue as to WHY the bill of rights was written... not when, not by who... but WHY! I'll educate you... when the federal government was formed, many of the original 13 colonists baulked at joining this centralized government. the colonies wanted things like to practice religion as they saw fit, without interference from a centralized government. after the colonists baulked those pushing for a federal government went back and wrote the bill of rights. these were not rights "given" to citizens, as you so ignorantly suggested in your post. the second amendment does not read "the right to keep and bear arms is hereby granted"... it reads that this right shall not be infringed. the bill of rights were promises made to the citizens of the colonies to entice them into joining this newly formed federal government. they did not give citizens rights... they were limitations put on the federal government! they were promises that these god-given rights would not be infringed upon by the federal government! why don't you know this? what has happened to our school system? no wonder you people vote for democrats...
1
@mile_high_topher "Maybe you don't understand what the word universal means? The Texas church shooter legally bought his firearms despiite being a felon. Voting is a right. If I need a license, it's no longer a right. Notice I'm quoting you pretty much verbatim?" voting is not a right... have you ever even seen our constitution, let alone read the darn thing?? do you believe abortion is a right as well?
1
@mile_high_topher by the way, if you're gong to use my very logic to tell me that voter IDs are unconstitutional, do you not also have to agree that requiring an ID to purchase a firearm is unconstitutional??
1
@mile_high_topher "So, you admit voter ID is unconstitutional?" if you admit that asking for ID for the purchase of a firearm based on that same reasoning, sure. but let's move past the tit for tat, and act like adults, shall we? specifically, what is it that you want to see happen or changed that would have prevented these murders? can you even BEGIN to answer that question? do you really even know what you're asking for? are you able to articulate what it is that you want to see happen or changed that would have prevented these murders? if so, please tell me... hell, I might agree! so far you are suggesting not asking for ID to exercise constitutional rights. I don't think that would have helped in this case... what else do you have?
1
@mile_high_topher "of course you believe in god. I don't argue with clowns." ahhh, an atheist... here, let me school you on this as well son.... as an agnostic myself, I see you absolutely no differently than those you criticize. you are no different, you just aren't smart enough to understand. you criticize these people for having religious beliefs.... believing in a god, and an afterlife. and you criticize their dogma in those beliefs! that they believe thay are correct, and know the one real truth concerning religion. while at the same time, YOU have a set of religious beliefs... you believe there is NO god, and YOU believe there is NO afterlife, and you are as, or nor dogmatic as they are regarding your religious beliefs!! you are as convinced that your religious beliefs are correct, and everyone else's religious beliefs are incorrect. again, as an agnostic, is there a god? I do not know... maybe... is there an after life? I do not know, maybe... but I don't attack others for those beliefs, because, unlike you, and them, I'm not convinced that I know the one and only truth regarding religion. YOU have a set of religious beliefs, and are as dogmatic as anyone else on the planet about your one and only truth about religion.. you're just not smart enough to understand that you are no different than they are.. that atheism is a set of dogmatic religious beliefs.
1
@mile_high_topher "You actually think you're coming off as a rational person?" I asked you specifically, what is it that you want to see happen or changed that would have prevented these murders? and this was your answer?? good grief...
1
@mile_high_topher "I already made it clear that we're asking for broad gun reform." I asked you for something specific that would have prevented these murders... not msnbc talking points. is that all you have? msnbc talking points?? I do not know what "broad gun reform" means... you're asking for it, so I'm politely asking you to clarify, what is "broad gun reform"? please?
1
@mile_high_topher "It's getting to the point where we're done asking, though." well if you can't explain what it is, how can you expect an answer??? what does "broad gun reform" mean? please clarify. thank you in advance.
1
@mile_high_topher "It's getting to the point where we're done asking, though." who are you asking, and what are you asking them to do? what happens when you're done asking?
1
@mile_high_topher "Canada and Sweden are both excellent examples to base our laws on. You want to know more, look it up." this is your answer to my questions?? just move the goal posts and change the conversation when you have no answers??? you ask for "broad gun reform" but run away when asked to define it..? (all rhetorical, I know you can't answer any of my questions at this point) good grief... and as an american citizen, I am not interested at all in emulating any other nation on the planet. if you are, why not simply move to one of those countries you wish to emulate???
1
@mile_high_topher neither canada nor sweden are bound by our constitution. what do we do with our constitution? again, there will be no answer.......
1
@mile_high_topher "I didn't move the goal posts or run. I highlighted two democracies with excellent gun laws that don't deal with two mass shootings a day." yes, but why? they don't answer my questions, explain your definitions, or define what you would like to see happen. why did you highlight two other countries, instead of define what "broad gun reform" you want to see? ok, you didn't move the goal posts, or run away,.. you dodged the question, correct??? talk about arguing over semantics... good grief. I'll try once again... what is your definition of "broad gun reform" that you are lobbying for?
1
@mile_high_topher "When we see a glaring problem with the constitution, we amend it. That's why the process was put in place, genius." wait, now we are moving the goal posts to amending the constitution?? this is the first time you have mentioned this!!! ok, new conversation.. amending the constitution. how would you like to amend the constitution? what are you suggesting?
1
@mile_high_topher you can't define broad gun reform, so now you want to talk about amending the constitution instead?? again, rhetorical... at this point, I believe you are incapable of answering simple questions. typical liberal, all emotion.... no sense whatsoever.
1
@mile_high_topher "No, no one is moving the goal post. You asked what we do with the constitution. I explained it. Try to keep up." you explained what we should do with our constitution?? and I missed it?? darn..... ok ok, you're simply trolling me at this point. have a nice life skippy.
1
@mile_high_topher another adolescent liberal... you can't define the terms you use, you can't explain what you want to change in our constitution, just word salads and moving of goal posts when asked direct questions... then hours later, tell the person it was already addressed.... liberalism is a mental disorder.
1
who is "we"?
1
who is penalizing your children? and how?
1
@matthewsanchez7953 "Ghoul or troll, either way it's sad" wait, ghouls and trolls are penalizing your children?? that's your answer to my question?? <shakes head>
1
none of these weapons fired 7.62mm rounds...
1
demonrats: oh no, six people were killed, let's go full tyrant, shred the constitution, and strip 340 million innocent americans of their god given rights.
1
@bethl8866 "Exactly. They need to see the destroyed 9-year old bodies and not look away. They are cowards." blah blah blah beth.. conservatives have been using that line about 9 month fetuses as they are ripped apart for decades now. come up with something new.
1
@mile_high_topher "Yes, I mean laws that require you store your firearms in a way that makes it extremely difficult for children or criminals to access. The ATF and local law enforcement. Periodic safety checks." safety checks" is how this will be enforced? so now the constitution goes away, and our rights to privacy and due process are gone? you tyrants frighten me.... do you suggest we simply BURN the nation's constitution? safety checks??? like nazis??? good grief....
1
@mile_high_topher "No, we do not have universal background checks. People slip through the cracks to buy guns all the time. You'd probably know that if you knew what gun show and private sale loopholes are. I assume you also believe voter ID is unconstitutional?" well we have to have background checks where I live... you are going to have to be more specific or give actual examples. and no, asking for id to purchase alcohol, vote or purchase a firearms is not unconstitutional. I assume you believe voter ID is constitutional as well?
1
@nicks-fix "ok sea lion." now there's an intelligent contribution to the conversation!!! lol kids! this is your brain o liberalism!! JUST SAY NO! 😂🤣
1
obviously we have to defend ourselves from sick women pretending to be men...
1
because they won't turn into tyrants?
1
@roxannaweaver2155 "It's not that they don't give a rats ass about people, its that they don't give a rats ass about our children." because they're trying to protect your children's liberty? <shakes head>
1
yea, wars, inflation, tanking retirement accounts, open border, depleting our emergency oil reserves, pushing russia and china together, spy balloons flying over our country.....
1
better than the party of tyranny, no...??
1
"You can still have your 2nd amendment rights without having the assault weapons!!!" what is an assault weapon?
1
what's a weapon of war?? you twits can't even tell me what a woman is!!!
1
@adam6072 "Easy. Assault rifles." what's an "assault rifle"?
1
@adam6072 "I have faith in your ability to Google it." typical liberal response.... you have no clue as to what you're talking about, yet you keep talking...
1
@adam6072 so you want to ban assault rifles, but can't define an assault rifle... is this correct? this then makes you look silly, so you become angry and attack me?? YOU used the term assault rifle. what is an assault rifle? please tell me that you can define the words that you use!
1
@adam6072 "ultimately you're arguing on semantics." YOU suggested we ban "assault rifles", but my wanting to know the definition of an assault rifle is a problem? if you want me to agree with banning something, shouldn't I know what it is?? I'll [politely try once again... you are suggesting that our government ban "assault rifles"? I might actually agree with you, but I'm not sure I understand what an "assault rifle" is. and so I politely ask once more.. what is an assault rifle? if you continue to refuse to define it, I will be forced to assume you simply mean "firearm". is that your definition of an "assault rifle"? again, if you're going to suggest these things and have these discussion you should be man enough to define the items you want our government to ban!
1
@CarlWithACamera "I think we’ve maybe taken our comments as far as we productively can" we americans do not believe that you have the power or authority to license an inalienable right. Personal rights held by an individual which are not bestowed by law, custom, or belief, and which cannot be taken or given away, or transferred to another person, are referred to as “inalienable rights.” The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life. To explore this concept, consider the following inalienable rights definition. Definition of Inalienable Rights Noun Rights that are not alienable Rights that are not transferable or capable of being taken away or nullified
1
@adrianmyers6429 "very true" so you want to ban something that you cannot define... is that the bottom line?
1
there are certainly risks associated with living in a free and open society..
1
"Until there children are in harms way they may pass bills to protect our kids." what bill do you think would have protected these children better?
1
@thefpvlife7785 "Oh and btw ... remember the seat belt law we were all against when it was passed back in 1982. It saved hundreds of thousands of lives." yes.... but I'm not sure I follow. do you think seat belt laws would have protected these children better? maybe you misread my question... my question was, "what bill do you think would have protected these children better?" these children being the three who were murdered yesterday.
1
10 foot tall and bullet proof, are ya??? DAM! I'll bet you can leap tall building in a single bound too! lol
1
@CarlWithACamera awesome carl, thank you for your service. and grew up in florida, and plan to move back when I can retire in a few years as well. anyway, here is the issue I have with your "common sense" comments... taken from one of your recent posts that I did not respond directly to: 1 - "we could use a healthy dose of common sense versus a strict and literal reading of the 2nd amendment." I do not have the first clue as to what you mean when you say we could use a healthy dose of common sense when reading the 2A. if you would like to try to clarify, perhaps I could understand. but to suggest we use a healthy dose of common sense when reading the 2A alone is nothing more than a meaningless msnbc talking point. please clarify, if you'd like. 2 - "why are these constitutionalists so adamant on a literal interpretation of the 2nd amendment, even as people die in ever greater numbers, tracking pretty closely to the ever greater numbers of guns bought and owned in America?" you are aware that access guns is more restricted, and guns are much harder to get today than they have been in the past, yes? and you are also aware that the number of these "mass/school shootings" continue to rise, yes? so if guns, or access to guns is the problem, how do you explain this correlation? the more we restrict access to guns, the more mass/school shootings we have!! if access to guns is the cause, shouldn't we make access easier, like it was in the past, when we had less of these mass/school shootings??? have a great night, and if I don't get back, I am on my way to florida tomorrow to burry my dead mama... but I will get back to you asap.
1
@CarlWithACamera "How does it make sense to require a background check when buying from a sporting goods store like Bass Pro Shops, where I purchased a Ruger SR9 a number of years ago, but not at a gun show or from a private seller? " I don't think it makes sense, and agree that all sales should require a background check. but that would not have prevented these murders, correct? so what is your point? now, can you respectfully address my questions? by the way, are you in the US? or the philippines?
1
@CarlWithACamera "thanks for the not applicable Gish gallop (shaking my head). You are surely well aware that it's only the draconian and obtuse interpretation of the 2nd amendment that I'm referring to as nonsensical. And yes, a large population of Americans display an unwillingness to see how America stands nearly alone in the developed world in an almost comical, but ultimately sadly tragic, position on firearms registration, firearms ownership, firearms education and even coverage of common sense background checks." ok... a long-winded excuse as to why you're not going to address anything I took the time to type out. I will not be as disrespectful and will address your comments.
1
@CarlWithACamera "I pointed out that your response exhibited a lack of common sense." isn't that what I said when I asked you "didn't you start the attacks by suggesting I had no common sense? you aren't smart enough to understand that?? how ironic..." good grief carl... and your comparing the US to other countries is meaningless to me. if you would prefer to live in another country, you are free to leave. but telling me that americans lack commons sense because our government promised not to infringe on our right peaceably assemble, simply because some countries governments did not offer such a promise is moronic. telling me that americans lack common sense because we are presumed innocent until proven guilty (unless your name is trump), simply because other nations do not offer such assumptions is moronic. telling me that americans lack common sense because our government promised it wouldn't interfere with our right to criticize our government in public, simply because some countries governments made no such promise to their people is moronic. telling me that americans lack common sense because our government promised us they would not infringe on our right to keep and bear arms, simply because other countries governments made no such promise to their people is moronic. telling me that americans lack commons sense because we legally recognize same sex marriage, simply because other countries do not recognize such marriages is moronic.
1
@Napalmdog you don't get to dictate to me which I can use... unless, of course...... you're a dictator.
1
@Napalmdog "always fall in line of guns over kid's lives crowd, I will work on getting laws in place that dictate what either you or I can and cannot possess." please define guns over kids lives crowd. thank you.
1
@Napalmdog "I will work on getting laws in place that dictate what either you or I can and cannot possess." so you want to "fundamentally transform" this country into a dictatorship, correct?
1
@bubble jim "So what is your solution?" nothing will stop criminals from committing crimes..... well, almost nothing. preemptively put each american in a separate cage, and crime will no longer exist in our country. is that you're proposed solution to prevent crime? if not, you're wasting your time... criminals are gonna criminal, that's what they do!
1
@CarlWithACamera um, didn't you start the attacks by suggesting I had no common sense? you aren't smart enough to understand that?? how ironic...
1
"Gun laws can only be changed when there is emotional pain to be happened dearly and closer to pro-gun legislators." what "gun laws" would you like to see changed? (what is a gun law?)
1
@CarlWithACamera "and out goes common sense when the constitutional argument is thrown up as a roadblock." and out goes our liberty when emotional liberals start to cry...
1
biden is not responsible for the border?
1
@rednugget1986 exactly why we elected a non-politician in donald trump, and look at how they system - both sides responded......
1
what do you suggest?
1
so my rights are dependent upon our governments performance?? so much for my rights.....
1
@tahart1 "Sir, you do not have a constitutional right to sell guns." who told you that I have a constitutional right to sell guns?
1
@tahart1 I don't have a constitutional right to sell guns anymore than you have a constitutional right to sell tomatoes!
1
@tahart1 where do you people come up with this nonsense??
1
@rednugget1986 joel, this is exactly why we elected a non-politician in donald trump, and look at how they system - both sides responded......
1
@nova4374 "Univeral background checks only apply to licensed dealers. Unlicensed private dealers don't need to perform background checks." I believe they do in the state that I live in, but ok... I'm fine with that, make it national. but would that have prevented these murders? so long as you're busy chasing your tail I guess you think you're doing something constructive...
1