Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Vaccine scientist speaks out on harassment after Joe Rogan challenged him" video.

  1. Rogan has promised money before, then reneged. He's like Trump, a liar.
    3
  2. Did you end up in the hospital? Are you dead? Did you get long Covid. If any of the answers are 'no', the vaccine was effective.
    3
  3. Yes he sounds demented, especially if you listen to the nonsense he spouts.
    2
  4. Debating either of those ignorant morons would accomplish as much as debating a ape flinging crap.
    1
  5.  @YungBeezer  That is a lie. No scientist ever said vaccines would prevent transmission. What was said was, by preventing unrestrained replication, vaccination would reduce transmission. And it did. In fact, although I doubt you've read the paper, recent statistical analysis has proven all the immune evasive variants arose in unvaccinated individuals. So jerks like Rogan helped the pandemic persist longer than it should have.
    1
  6. Would you debate a barking dog or a feces flinging ape? That would have as much value as debating an ignorant moron who thinks yelling lies counters the truth.
    1
  7. No, he was not wrong. You just didn't have the bandwidth to understand him.
    1
  8. And when Rogan spends those three hours lying, then reneges because Hotez was unable to change Rogan's pea brain?
    1
  9.  @raziele92  What do you mean by "do your own research", reading actual scientific papers, which most people are incapable of understanding, or listening to the lies and drivel put out by liars like Kennedy? All the data has been out there for years. The only good thing to come out of this pandemic, was the lowering of the paywall on scientific papers. I've been feasting on knowledge, but know most people don't have a degree in microbiology, like I do, and don't understand anything.
    1
  10. How many people have taken a statistical analysis class, and can understand the data?
    1
  11. I never want to hear another word out of that addled liar. What I want from the pharmaceutical industry is that they continue to manufacture drugs after they have gone generic, and are less profitable.
    1
  12. Do you argue with a toddler or barking dog, when it misbehaves? Rogan and Kennedy don't deserve a debate, after all their lies, but a rolled up newspaper whack on the nose. If you want to be spoon fed real science, I suggest Vincent Racaniello's This Week in Virology channel.
    1
  13. Because Rogan is a liar.
    1
  14. Why not debate a monkey throwing feces? It has as much value.
    1
  15. All the arrogance is in the uneducated morons, who think their ignorance has more value than actual expertise it took decades to acquire.
    1
  16. Deflection.
    1
  17. Nothing was hidden. There were countless papers published about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. The problem is, to many ignorant fools, who couldn't understand the science and math, and think their valueless opinion is more important than actual facts.
    1
  18. This schmuck has been debunked by other physicians, then claimed he won the 'debate' via whataboutisms and lies. Trying to debate him is like trying to win an argument with a two year old, who thinks fart noises are a cutting rebuttal.
    1
  19. False.
    1
  20. The data is already out there, and available for all to see. Showing it to liars and con artists like Rogan and JFK jr will do nothing, but give more air time for those bastards to hurl worthless accusations.
    1
  21. No, he did not.
    1
  22. Rather than listen to anything coming out of uneducated, conceited BS artists, like Rogan or Kennedy, one would do better to listen to real virologists and immunologists discuss the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines. I suggest Vincent Racaniello's channel, which goes over scientific papers and interviews real scientists. They have reviewed several of Dr. Hotez's papers, in an intelligent fashion, something neither of the windbags harassing him are capable of. Nothing either Rogan, Kennedy or any of their mouth breathing followers, have to say has any merit or value. There is no point in debating ignoramuses, who think their lies have the same value as actual scientific fact.
    1