Comments by "Shakey" (@shakey3306) on "Hitler's Socialism | Destroying the Denialist Counter Arguments" video.

  1. Hitler wasn’t even totalitarian, he was a democratic socialist, he was democratically elected
    2
  2. Agreements don’t matter, truth is not democratic. It’s way too obvious at this point that the nazis were democratic socialists
    2
  3. Make an argument then, because all you’re doing is discrediting someone saying they are wrong and don’t know what they are saying when you don’t cultivate self awareness enough to realise that you might be the wrong, you literally made no point, just nonsense stuff about liver and gravity, premises:socialism are inherently left wing; the nazis are socialists. Therefore the nazis are left wing. Period
    2
  4.  @ianjulius5185  that’s the flaw of socialism, the collective does, but it assumes that people not as individuals but as groups can make the same decisions on controlling a collective body, which they cannot, your assumption that the system should be enforced shows that we have a general comprehension that people can’t really be trusted in a group, they would individually(in capitalism) because it’s loosely based on merit, he who is trustable to get, is trustable to have, power is acquired and therefore deserved, i do not agree with that completely. But socialism is a failure for the same reason as democracy, people are not equal and cannot be trusted as a group because their nature of pursuing pleasure will destabilise the system, in essence anyone would try to just pick their share without merit. Communism would be a kind of socialism that is owned directly by the state who is said to distribute equally, that is, it’s a neutral third agent, that therefore inevitably creates a totalitarian state, but that wouldn’t matter because it’s perceived as a fair and just state.
    2
  5.  @kingorange7739  he’s just coming up with stuff he takes from his ass, no basis at all
    2
  6. You just completely contradicted yourself in the comment 🤦‍♂️ Hitler and the nazis were most certainly socialists basically democratically elected, almost no totalitarian at all, so they very much were in action with their ideology. “Siphoned the blood of his country” wth that even means?… Do you wanna say he killed people? Say it at once, but he didn’t do it personally himself, stop the sensationalism, “his movement” like he’s the only one that wanted it, definitely not, as i said it was a popular movement and most germans wanted it. Btw you can say he has whatever mental illnesses, but not narcissism or psychopathy, that’s factually wrong, and don’t pretend you’re a psychologist nor that you have a defined definition of good and evil to say someone is malignant, you’re probably an imoral sinner yourself
    1
  7. Yeah but the argument would be that it’s a mere disguise, but it’s not, they’re really democratic socialists
    1
  8. “Anti-egalitarian” lost all your credibility, hitler most certainly wanted equality for the germans
    1
  9.  @vascosantos5489  nonsense, equality for people who are equal, if you’re trying to make people who are not equal equal then you’re not being egalitarian, you’re being unjust, a country should definitely not treat a foreigner just like they are equal to native citizens
    1
  10. You’re correct, that description is of communism, the state is the neutral agent, socialism would be a kind of democratic anarchism, where the people as group would take every decision, probably through democratic voting. Whereas in communism the state would own the means of production and redistribute from the one according to their skill to the one according to their need.
    1