Comments by "Aaron White" (@Aaronwhatnow) on "'Nobody' can make a 'valid assumption' of what Labor's green energy plan will cost" video.

The copy and paste is strong in you...
2
Renewables Nd battery storage would cover base load. Do you even know what base load is?
2
 @Father-Grandfather do you ever want to improve your trolling? Where did the father grandfather thing even start and why is it used as a insult?
2
Source?
1
@RogueElementMkII the same website also have a report saying that a move to renewables would save the world 71 trillion by 2050. Have searched 9 trillion dollars on the website I still haven't find a story that has that number in the report.
1
 @RogueElementMkII that's still not the source of your figures. That is deflecting. Give me the headline so I can read the report.
1
@RogueElementMkII plus why would we only use wind or solar? You have also failed to answer that question. Its almost like you have been forced feed information instead of actually researching it independently.
1
The first story i got was the saving 71 trillion dollars by 2050 and than some irrelevant stories and then a blog about how the 9 trillion is problem. (paraphrasing of course). I would just like the name of the reportso i am sure that I'm reading the same report us all of you. @WallsendChook
1
 @RogueElementMkII then give me the headline of the report.
1
 @RogueElementMkII you have not actually. More deflecting it seems. Of well this has become a runabout.
1
 @WallsendChook just type in the head line of the story. Not a link. The name of the website and the headline. That should work.
1
 @Diponty wow someone with a source. Ok. Will read the report and reply after reading it.
1
I have found it. The 9 trillion is right but having read articles about the report. You seem to fail to mention the fact that the same people doing the report of stated in of reports that doing nothing would cost more. Australia already has to spend trillions upgrading current fossil fuel sources as they are getting to the end of their operation life. So we could spend trillions on outdated and costly sources or move to cheaper options. I'm not sure your ability to self research is as good as you believe it is. Shame. But hay you tried. Hopefully you can improve in the future 👍🏻
1
@RogueElementMkII they didn't make any excuses. The report was just about the cost of getting to net 0. The article on the website you set to me is making the excuses. Once again, you are failing at researching and understanding the sources you are getting your information from. You are just showing me more and more that we don't debate. you Can't debate. Shame but you are now just other troll for me. No need to continue to try ad you just repeat yourself ever time.
1
 @rhyno1740 I've seem to have triggered the climate deniers in this thread. Spreading facts help with that
1
@RogueElementMkII the same website also reported that a double of renewables around the world would raise the Australian economy by 1.7% I can't seem to find the 9 trillion dollars report. What is the head line on the report?
1
Source?
1
 @Father-Grandfather I'm honestly asking where or when this grandfather father thing started. I don't actually watch alot of the stories on this channel.
1
So you have the source? @paulveenings6861
1
Well I do actually. I would say I'm a troll. But I use facts and your inability to understand simple things as way to troll you. Now I'm sure you will deflect from the bit of truth or insult me. You don't seem to have alot of tools in your box.
1
 @Father-Grandfather Base load is the minimum amount of electricity needed?
1
 @dr.hans.asperger triggered
1
 @dr.hans.asperger the copy and paste is strong in you
1
 @Diponty am I wrong?
1
Why did you save all your Punctuation for the end of your comment?
1