Comments by "Aaron White" (@Aaronwhatnow) on "Those ‘opposed’ to AUKUS are ‘yesterday’s heroes’: Greg Sheridan" video.

Yes because 385+ billion on 3 subs is a great. It's nice to know that the homelessness crisis and cost of living crisis are solved. Wouldn't want to spend money on Australians now would we?
5
@Daniel Matthews why does Australia need that capacity? The subs we have at the moment (edit. What i mean is the propulsion used at the moment) do the job just fine. Australia doesn't need power projection ability. We just need to defend the home shore. And the money could buy enough equipment to do that and more.
2
@Daniel Matthews not at all.
1
That's over 30 years. So you sums aren't right. We don't pay it all in one year. So it's not as bad as you are trying to say it is. It's still far to much for what Australia actually needs.
1
@Daniel Matthews 😂 Australia would need more than subs to protect its shipping lanes. A 10 fold increase in ships of all types and the man power to go with it. Australian navy is and has always been a defence force. The only time Australia goes out side it waters if massive help from America. We don't have ports outside of Australia. Subs arnt the silver bullet you think they are. They are but a part of the whole.😂
1
@AnAls AWOL they will not be. Australia has signed the non nuclear proliferation pact. So it a moo point
1