Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "Fighter Jets For Ukraine Counteroffensive | NATO Says Morale, Western Weapons Enough Against Russia" video.

  1. Wrong Ukraine has very limited number of old and very much obsolete R-73 and R-27s which has limited their ability to carry out counter air against Russian aircraft The F-16 on the other has access to the larger stockpile of AIM-7, AIM-9, AIM-120, Python 5 and ASRAAM The MiG-29s and Su-27 have old and very outdated radar,. MAWS,RWR and EW suites whereas the F-16 has very modern and up to date tech Effectively making it easier for Ukraine to carry out counter air against Russian aircraft
    3
  2. Wrong F-16 would most definitely change the tide Keys points Ukraine lacks the ability to effectively attack the Black Sea Fleet The F-16 equipped with Harpoons would allow Ukraine to attack the Black Sea Fleet far more effectively than drones Ukraine can only use JDAMs at fraction of their capability while the F-16 can use them at max More the point ,the F-16 are equipped with targeting pods for laser guided munitions which can easily destroy GPS and communication of jammers While the Su-24 required extenisve modding, the F-16 is already compatible with all NATO weapons Storm Shadow as well KEDP-350 can be added to the F-16 in a matter of days Lastly Ukraine has very limited number of old and very much obsolete R-73 and R-27s The F-16 on the other has access to the larger stockpile of AIM-7, AIM-9, AIM-120, Python 5 and ASRAAM Effectively making it easier for Ukraine to carry out counter air against Russian aircraft There are several ways the F-16 will be nightmarish for Russia
    3
  3. Cope harder
    1
  4. Again not likely
    1