Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "The Sun" channel.

  1. Russia's gains are going to be naught once Ukraine gets up speed with its Western tech
    8
  2.  Biljana Cvjetinovic  Ukraine has been hype vs reality and the reality for Russia has shown Russian to be completely lacking The hype During a reported test conducted by the Russian military in 1999 the T-90 was exposed to a variety of RPG, ATGM and APFSDS munitions. When equipped with Kontakt-5 ERA the T-90 could not be penetrated by any of the APFSDS or ATGM used during the trial The reality Javelins, and NLAW have been shredding Russia armor at whole sale prices despite those tanks have Kontak-5 and Relikt ERA The hype The Defense System President-S, also referred to as BKO, is a fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft protection system designed to defeat incoming infrared-guided missiles by laser and radiofrequency/electronic jamming of the missile's seeker. President-S is intended to defeat primarily man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) such as the Russian Igla and the United States Stinger shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles. KRET and Ekran tested this system firing Igla missiles at a President-S equipped Mi-8 helicopter fixed up on a special rig. During the tests, several missiles were fired from a distance of 1,000 meters with no missile reaching its target due to the highly effective jamming The reality Everything from Ka-52s to Su-34 have been shot down by Stingers. Russian aircraft losses are continuing to mount The hype Russia forces control the situation the reality Within 4 weeks of war, Russia has several high ranking officers including 5 generals and one captain Everything from armor to aircraft to personnel is being shredded in Ukraine and that Russia fighting against a poorly armed opponent after 4 weeks
    8
  3. Russian can strike Ukrainian forces all they want at this point The damage to Russia's standing as superpower has already been done Loss of so many senior officials, their flagship as well massive personnel and equipment losses in the span of 2 months
    8
  4. How exactly is it war crime when Hamas continues to hid in the civilian population as well as use human shields
    8
  5. Doesnt matter The US which is Israel's supporter already labeled Hamas as terror group
    8
  6.  @askohelminen8511  its more than that The F-18 can use Mavericks, HARM, JSOW , SLAM-ER and Harpoon Unlike Ukraine, the Finnish air force can respond in various ways against targets in air , ground and sea
    8
  7.  @dean8542  So many ways to make of you here First the weapon that F-18 use for BVR is the AIM-120. Secondly unlike the R-77, the AIM-120 has over 12 confirmed kills since the late 90s Side note about the R-77, India is replacing it with the locally made Astra and Israeli made Derby because of its poor performance in the 2019 Skirmish The Finish air force has the AGM-158s which allows to the strike land targets 230-600 miles away. They can literally attack well out of range of Russian Aerospace Forces ability to intercept but most importantly, Finland uses the F-18 why is this important, Because if conflict did break out, Finland can easy by resupplied with F-18s from the US The USN sent 500 F-18 to the boneyard and the USMC currently fly 273 In Ukraine, Russia forces don't have deal with BVR threats as the Ukrainian air force has no BVR Against , Finland, they would face major BVR threats
    8
  8.  @tobberino  The multiple rounds simultaneous impact (MRSI) is common place to western arty The Archer strength is the fact that the can set fire 3 rounds and move in 75 seconds MRSI, doesnt matter when you have precision rounds which allows you to on fire multiple targets
    8
  9. Well armor is good, its not what is needed. Ukraine needs long range cruise missiles so they can attack Russian forces on the strategic level HIMARS and 155mm can only do so much, they need 150-200 mile system able to carry at 500lbs warhead so they can inflict serious damage to Russian forces accurately
    8
  10. Training to be cannon fodder
    7
  11. Russia desperately trying to show that they are not completely inept
    7
  12. So much for Russia's vaunted EW and air defense capabilities
    7
  13. Sorry Ivan , not potato for you modernized MiG29 can't fully use western weapons while F-16s are fully capable with US, EU, French and Israeli weapons The F-16 can use the AGM-84F Harpoon which strike ships from over 150 miles away while MIG-29 ??? The F-16 can use the AIM-9, ASRAAM, MICA and Python-5 while the MIG-29 ?? The F-16 can use the AIM-120 or Meteor whereas MIG-29 once again Also the F-16 can fully use AGM-65, AGM-88s, JDAM and PAVEWAYs while modernized MiG29 can't The Storm Shadow can easily intergrated to the F-16s The F-16 would be a coffin nail for Russian forces
    7
  14. They are firing on training range there is no secondary explosion , no ammunition , no fuel burning ? they are shooting at static targets on a training range
    7
  15. its underway and not going well for Russian forces
    7
  16. Right and after 6 months where exactly is Russia ?
    7
  17. By all means give Israel an excuse
    7
  18. They should work an arrangement where training is done much closer to Ukraine so they can return faster
    6
  19. Tank turrets flying aircraft dropping At what point does Russia realize this won't end well for them
    6
  20.  @riparianlife97701  That myth was busted for sure
    6
  21. It will give Ukrainian forces the ability to go head to head with Russian armor in any engagement as well possibly break through Russian lines if Ukrainian forces adopt western armor tactics
    6
  22. Sure you can NOT!!!
    6
  23. Russia can't do jack to any of them While Ukraine does not have air force,navy or strategic weapons to fight Russia head on, all those have all of the above and substantially more modern than Russia
    6
  24. Tell you one thing, Scrap metal business in Ukraine is A- boomin
    6
  25.  @SlasherCat-oe4nd  No There are was an S-400 in Crimea till Ukraine destroyed The is also one in Syria
    6
  26. And that is sad reality of the situation Their infrastructure is going to need a helluva alot of work when the dust settles
    6
  27. St patty day's Always a fun time
    5
  28. Cope harder buddy
    5
  29.  @ReySchultz121  Even if they managed to capture the country, they still have years of insurgency to look forward to
    5
  30. Long range precision missiles is what Ukrainian forces need
    5
  31. These purported videos from the Russian MoD are so hilarious They make all these outlandish claims with no proof
    5
  32.  @jaydon707  Sorry sunshine but they have photos from the crash site that clearly show the aircraft was from the Russian air force
    5
  33.  @brianedward6417  Yeah it called fragmentation for a reason
    5
  34. oh wow, Russia destroyed a Ukrainian ship from country that had no real navy to begin with stop the press lol
    5
  35. So another dressed up video from Russian mod shocker Funny how those vehicles are not moving after the first attack Even funnier how there is no secondary explosion , no ammunition , no fuel burning ? Almost like they are shooting at static targets on a training range Ukraine-nope Russian training range yep
    5
  36. leave his ass there
    5
  37. ​ @ramsses5175  US withdrew The whole point of the US invasion was hunting Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden Last time I checked, they accomplished both In 20 years US causalities were barely 3500 while the Taliban was well into 20,000 Secondly How did it end for Russia lets they withdrew , In 9 years over 14,000 causalities Geneva Accords (1988)
    5
  38.  @alifauziyan1157  In 20 years, the worst damage inflicted by the Talbian was in 2012 for lost of 6 planes 6 months Ukraine cost 1 750 mil warship There is literally no comparsion
    5
  39. thank you I am glad someone else noticed that those gloves and her obviously dont mix
    5
  40. Good job but they need up to their game and go after major assets like airfields, arty and air defense equipment
    5
  41. Russian tank turrets spending more time in the air than the Russian air force
    5
  42. Kinda of sorta The KA-52 primary precision weapon is the Vikhr which can engage targets up 7 mils away which is well outside MANPAD range ,however the Vikhr problem is that its like arrow it can' only travel in straight trajectory as it laser beam control system is rear mounted. Pro the system is immune to countermeasure Con, it can't alter its trajectory The Hellfire missile travels in arc allowing it to literally drop on targets but most importantly, the Hellfire can fired without the helicopter breaking cover whereas the KA-52 has to break cover to use its precision missiles. Because of Ukraine's terrain and forest, its hard for KA-52 to get shots in with Vikhr missiles The KA-52 another problem is that it lacks advance sensors and weapons like the AH-64 Now as Ukraine is getting closer and closer to having an functional Integrated air defence system (IADS) with western systems The range is going from SHORAD 3 to 5 miles to medium range 15 miles plus which means Russia aircraft will no longer have free reign
    4
  43.  @just4visit  13 out 15 missiles stopped but only took 1 to completely destroy the ship Same claim as before Russian HQ,attack, Russian claims to intercept a lot missiles yet their HQ still got level Russian naval yard attack, again claims to intercept a lot missiles yet two ships destroyed Doesnt matter how many missile you intercept if the enemy still achieves their goal Thats 3 missiles destroyed
    4
  44. There is no amount of protection that would stopped 95,000 ton ship from tearing into that bridge The problem with the Dali story is that ships are supposed to have redundant and emergency systems that should have kicked in and the crew should been trying either maneuver the vessel or kill its forward momentum
    4
  45. Its will be an great test of the concept in real world situation but at the end of the day .Ukraine still needs aircraft
    4
  46. Russia does realize that even if they capture the country They still have to fight insurgent forces equipped with ATGMs, Recoilless rifles , MANPADs , RPG systems and large caliber anti-material rifles that will make the US experience in Iraq and Afghanistan look like pre-K.
    4
  47.  @xion1305  Its more than that they are highly mobile, unlike 155mm systems, the HIMARS can emplace, fire and displace under two minutes Striking from 40 miles away, Russian counter battery fire can't reach them The Ukrainian forces love that it takes under 10 minutes to reload vs 20 mins for GRAD and 40 for the SMERCH But most important is the rockets, unlike the soviet era junk the HIMARS has a plentiful western supply line
    4
  48. Good , now Germany stop with feet dragging and do the same supply Ukraine with tanks
    4
  49.  @lukekor  Like I said thats just one area The US LGM-30 Minuteman like the Trident has been tested reliably for even longer. Russia on the other hand , as you stated created the Sarmat Again by comparison, the US has 1 ICBM type in service for over 40 years while Russia apparently needs 7 ICBM types Same with SLBM, 1 type for the US while Russia needs 3 apparently The fact that Russia is consistently making more nuclear says a lot about their fate in their missiles
    4
  50.  @lukekor  Lets put that to test The US has test fired the Trident 2 177 times since 1989 whereas Russia has test fires its RSM-56 31 times since 2004 both missiles have 10 failures The US has over 30 years of reliability with its Trident 2 wheres Russia's RSM-56 has a fraction of that and thats just one area
    4