Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "How new Mk 41 Vertical Missile systems increase firepower for Royal Navy" video.

  1. In this case, the ships in question won't be underarmed thanks to MK-41 universal capability As for the numbers Its quality over quantity The QE class has few F-35s but 1v1 against the Admiral Kuznetsov with its Su-33 and MIG-29K, the few F-35s would easily defeat all 3 Same with the China's carriers and the J-15s, no match Its not how much you have , its what you have Lastly As for tanks, You dont need that many any more One USAF F-15E can carrying up 28 GBU-53 storm breaker which 105lbs warhead can shred any armor regardless of APS and ERA The UK Eurofighter and F-35B will have similar capability with the SPEAR-3 You dont need a large amount of armor when your air force can kill several tanks whole sale per plane
    2
  2.  @user-sc9oy1kz8g  Russia capable, now thats hilarious The last year plus has shown Russia anything but capable Here are 3 facts The T-90 claimed to be best protected tank in the world yet Javelin missiles are destroying them whole sale, The KA-52 claimed be superior to Apache yet KA-52 performance nearly 40 aircraft destroyed has been abysmal. FYI KA-52 losses are nearly more than Apache losses in the Gulf War, Iraq war and Afghan combined. The so called Su-34 hell duck/flying tank, 21 losses and counting All of Russia's latest tech including are taking a beating in Ukraine Thats not capable thats called getting ur ass handed to you A capable force would have crushed Kyiv and attacked Western Ukraine cut them off completely from the West Instead, Russia left that door open and year later things have gone from bad to worst The Kinzhal is 0 and 7 against the US made Patriot Now Ukraine has Storm Shadow cruise missiles. They have asked Germany for KEDP-350s and US has stated that ATACMS is still very much on the table
    1