Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "UK Warships Don't Have Any Weapons To Hit Houthi Targets On Land: NATO Member's Military Exposed?" video.

You do realize that US barely using a fraction of fraction of its forces
2
@dr69296 When B-52s and B-1s pull they are going to get very quiet
1
@williamkunte5361 Everything is open source and you still cant read 8 Fleets 7 active, 1 reserve The fleet that operates in Middle east is the 5th Fleet so much for your open source
1
@isaacisang2715 Lets see Vietnam is ancient and shows you absolutely desperation to refer to something from over 60 years ago Secondly the US had the Afghan on its knees with months and under control with in month, the US withdrew once Bid Laden was killed as saying was moot there ass
1
@akmalkonoha8055 By all means Cope harder
1
The fact of the matter was the Type-45 was supposed to be this all EU made ship, France convinced the UK to invest with Sylver VLS with Aster instead of the US MK-41 with SMs The Sylver A-50 weighs 8 tons whereas the tactical Mk-41 weighs 13.5 ton and 15 tons for strike MK-41 The shortcomings of the Sylver are painfully clear which is why the Type-26 and Type-83 will use the Mk-41 Secondly the UK chose the NSM to replace the Harpoon The NSM range is only 100 miles while the Harpoon maxes at 192 miles with II ER model The smarter choice would have been the LRASM The LRASM can be use by the F-35 and P-8s as well be intergrated with the Typhoon and Tempest The LRASM has top side launcher that allows it to bolted to the deck like the Harpoon and NSM as well has VLS capability The LRASM range is over 300 miles The other option is ripping out the Sylver and replacing it with the MK-41
1