Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on ""National Betrayal..." Bulgaria's Tough Call To Arm Ukraine Ends In Defective S-300 Systems For Kyiv" video.

  1.  @Alien_isolationist  "Seems like they're holding it just fine in month 20." You obviously haven't heard that ruSSia has lost over 30% of what it had at maximum. Slowly but surely losing ground to Ukrainian armed forces is hardly "holding it just fine". Silly ruSSian troll.
    5
  2.  @mikele9878  Every day is April 1st to you Mikele. Funny thing is, you believe ruSSia's "jokes". Hook, line, and sinker.
    3
  3.  @DaniilBalkans-jh2rw  Which laws of physics and which laws of death do we not understand? Or are you making it all up, because it sounds like unsubstantiated bollocks to me. Slava Ukraini.
    2
  4.  @anirbandasxisciencesection9226  Yes, I believe that Ukrainians are not Nazi supporters. If they honour a man who fought against the USSR's suppression of Ukraine, then that is an indication of how bad the suppression was, and will be again if Ukraine does not repel the fascist invader. Like Finland, the man only used the Nazis to fight against a common enemy - that doesn't mean they are Nazi supporters by any means.
    2
  5. Where does it say Zelenskyy is complaining. ruSSian proaganda channels maybe?
    2
  6. And it has exposed ruSSia as a fascist Judas.
    2
  7. How is it against international law? The S-300 is a Soviet weapon. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union so can give permission to Bulgaria to export the weapon. So all perfectly legal. So how about ruSSia's invasion of Ukraine? How does that fit with international law?
    2
  8. You are so right. ruSSia citing international law is a joke. Especially after breaking international law so often - with Ukraine being just the most obvious current example. Seeing as the missiles are Soviet, not ruSSian, and Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, Ukraine can give permission for Bulgaria to export the missiles. Or, how about a deal: Bulgaria not break international law when ruSSia stops breaking international law - and until then Bulgaria can do what it likes with old Soviet equipment.
    2
  9.  @techyon7427  Which the majority of US taxpayers see as a very good investment.
    2
  10. You silly person. ruSSia was not the supplier of Bulgaria's S-300 systems. USSR was the supplier of those systems. Ukraine was part of the USSR and as such can give permission. "But you don't give them to your suppliers enemy who is at war with your supplier & will use them against him?" Yet you are suggesting they are given to ruSSia to use against a former republic of the USSR. "That is a stab in the back & outright treachery." If you want to see a REAL "stab in the back & outright treachery" just take a look at ruSSia's unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine.
    1
  11. Yup. Tell Pooptin top take his troops home and then we can END THE WAR NOW.
    1
  12.  @willrobinson9767  Well yeah, they invaded Ukraine against international law. They bombed civilians against international law. They bomb food supplies to Europe, Africa and Asia - against international law. I suppose you think ruSSians were sitting quietly at home when suddenly Mariupol got up and ran into ruSSia - and all the Mariupol homes and shops and apartments threw themselves at a ruSSian ammo depot killing all the civilians inside. All while "ruSSians didn't do anything..." Where have you been hiding? Under a rock? Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  13.  @thebeatcreeper  Whataboutism at it's most pathetic.
    1
  14.  @killa2959  Any deaths are ruSSia's fault. Nobody would need to fire S-300s if ruSSia hadn't attacked Ukraine. ruSSia caused the problem, ruSSia caused the deaths.
    1
  15.  @peterkorek-mv6rs  Yes it is.
    1
  16.  @retnerlimsiaco-rh6tg  Recent discussions with Iran and North Korea show that ruSSia is also a begger. The world's second most powerful military having to beg - what a humiliation. The world's second most powerful military having to beg from North Korea - what an absolute humiliation.
    1
  17.  @angeurbain6129  No, ruSSia disrespect towards Ukraine was occurring before the Maidan revolution. The ruSSians have been mistreating Ukrainians for over 100 years.
    1
  18.  @thebeatcreeper  No it's true. ruSSia has Nazis fighting for them: the Rusich, Utkin (RIP), etc. And most policies coming out of the Kremlin would make Adolf proud. It seems you are the one who needs to look into stuff a bit more.
    1
  19.  @thebeatcreeper  So you can't figure that out for yourself? You must be blind. How about the Hitler Youth, ruSSia is now indoctrinating young children in the same way as the Nazis did. Or the Nazi policy of Lebensraum, currently being applied by ruSSia in Donbas, Crimea, and parts of Georgia. Then there is the Nazi practice of burning books - currently being applied to Ukrainian language books in occupied Donbas. There is the Nazi policy of persecuting political opposition, currently being applied to Navalny among MANY others. There is the Nazi policy of supression of free press - currently being applied to all press in ruSSia. And that's just scratching the surface. As you are an ill-informed ruSSian troll I won't bother spending any longer on this, but you could always get off your fat behind and do your own research (hint: looking at censored rusSSia information will not find you the truth).
    1
  20. You are so right. ruSSia has no respect for international law. Their current war against Ukraine is only the most obvious example.
    1
  21.  @thebeatcreeper  But ruSSia had no right to be "warning for years decades Ukraine joining NATO would provoke an invasion" as Ukraine is a sovereign nation that makes it's own decisions. ruSSia also threatened Finland if it joined NATO, but Finland has joined NATO and there is no threat to ruSSia. This isn't about NATO (have you not yet realised that?), this is about Pooptin wanting to create a 'greater ruSSia" - with him as Czar of course. This is about ruSSian imperialism.
    1
  22.  @rudolfkeizah4682  In one of the F-16s or one of the ruSSian fighter jets?
    1
  23.  @rudolfkeizah4682  Canada? They were honouring a man who fought for his people against an oppressor. When you are being repressed, your enemy's enemy can be your friend. That his oppressors enemy was Nazi Germany is unfortunate, but Stalin's ruSSian dominated USSR was hardly an angel. Both were evil regimes.
    1
  24. Ukraine isn't a third party. Those are Soviet era weapons and Ukraine is a former Soviet republic. The weapons are simply being returned home. What part of "Soviet Union" do you not understand?
    1
  25. "Ukraine is devastated !" No it isn't. It's still a fighting force - currently the superior fighting force (but only just).
    1
  26.  @thebeatcreeper  "Like the promise NATO gave to Russia to not move beyond west Germany?" That is a promise that NATO never made. Stop with the ruSSian BS.
    1
  27.  @thebeatcreeper  Well obviously in their own country - that is where the ruSSian fascists have sent their invading troops. Do you think Ukraine should defend themselves in Saudi Arabia or Norfolk Island? What a stupid statement you make.
    1
  28.  @thebeatcreeper  Says the person who is writing like an idiot. Cope buddy.
    1
  29.  @jan_darysh  Under the terms of the Budapest Memorandum, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in return for security guarantees. As ruSSia has now reneged on the agreement, surely it is only fair that Ukraine gets nuclear weapons back.
    1
  30. I'm sure they are really worried. As of 24th February, 2022, ruSSia had already become the enemy of Bulgaria. ruSSia is so worn down and useless that it can't even support Armenia, nor attack Finland in response to it joining NATO. There's no way ruSSia is any threat to Bulgaria.
    1
  31.  @kam1470  Bulgarians will have a better and safer future when the ruSSian army is defeated. It's a shame it has come to this, but ruSSia has forced our hand.
    1
  32.  @Faiez-rh1gm  "Germans and Poles are in battle now with Russian forces" Yes, that's your fantasy. You should try living in the real world.
    1
  33.  @kam1470  No, I won't interfere in Bulgarian elections - but you can bet the ruSSia will attempt to. Maybe if ruSSia was totally defeated they would keep their noses out of other countries internal affairs.
    1
  34.  @Faiez-rh1gm  You seem to find Nazis everywhere you look - maybe you are looking in a mirror.
    1
  35.  @kam1470  Why? If you can push ruSSian BS and disinformation, then there is no reason why I can't speculate. But if you want facts, here's one - this video is about Bulgarian S-300 systems and that you are trying to distract with your comments about Poland.
    1
  36.  @kam1470  No it's not disinformation, it's distraction, as Bulgarian S-300 systems don't use wheat as a propellent, nor as an explosive. Try to concentrate on the subject in hand.
    1
  37. As far as we know, only two countries have supplied weapons to this conflict, that they allow to be launched across international borders (in breach of international law). Iran and North Korea.
    1
  38.  @David2l  Or more BS.
    1
  39.  @ukchatman4920  I'm not sure what the problem is with willrobinson. He either has no clue what is happening, or he's baiting. Either way, I no longer bother to reply to his nonsense.
    1
  40.  @thebeatcreeper  Why not? You obviously would prefer that the ruSSian Nazis win in Ukraine.
    1
  41. Correct.
    1
  42.  @thebeatcreeper  "It works both ways mate." Except it doesn't work both ways if USA isn't one of the "both". This is a war of aggression by ruSSia against Ukraine - they are the two combatants - they are the "both". So you arguement doesn't work, mate.
    1
  43.  @thebeatcreeper  Great. So where is your list of countries USSR/ruSSia has attacked since WW2? It seems to be missing....
    1
  44.  @thebeatcreeper  Why would I provide that list? I have better things to do than spend my time researching for ignorant ruSSian trolls. You are the one putting out bias lists - so you get to correct that deficiency.
    1
  45.  @thebeatcreeper  "you can be easily manipulated as evidenced in you pathological ignorance" Yup, you sure can.
    1
  46.  @thebeatcreeper  You can call me what you like Mr Strings of War, it makes no difference to the outcome. But you can't prove you are British. Most ruSSian trolls pretend they are from the west, and as you are a disseminator of disinformation I have no reason to accept your claim to British nationality. However, no matter where you live, if you are pushing ruSSian BS and propaganda, you fit the discription of a ruSSian troll - and you fit that description.. The reason I don't want to make a list is because it is you who are the list maker, and frankly I can't be bothered wasting my time on a doughnut like you. But the list would be long because there are very few countries where USSR/ruSSia has not attempted to interfere in the internal affairs. Russia IS incompetent - every bit as incompetent as us "online warriors" (as you put it) claim. How else could the under-equipped Ukrainian army bring the army of the world's second most powerful military to a halt (twelve months ago) and then push it back. And finally, yes Ukraine is a sovereign independent nation. Whatever obligations it may have to the west for the support given, after victory it will be far more independent than it could ever be under the thumb of Nazi ruSSia.
    1
  47.  @Alien_isolationist  I don't even believe there is any connection between you and reality. This video is about old S-300 SAMs being sent to Ukraine - but you are rambling on about tanks. Why don't you try to concentrate your ruSSian propaganda addled brain on the subject. We know it hard for ruSSian trolls, but just try really hard.
    1
  48.  @Alien_isolationist  "Russia been using their oldest equipment 1st" Oh yeah, so that's why they are digging out decrepit T-62s and T-64s to send to the front. It's not because their T-72s and T-90Ms keep getting blown up (or captured). At least the unreliability of the T-14s is enabling ruSSia to keep them until last. Yeah ruSSia is getting stronger - Admiral Viktor Sokolov is feeling much stronger than he was two weeks ago.
    1
  49.  @chicomodello911  Did he!! He is trying to distract with "whataboutism". You too are off subject. The subject of this video is breaking international law by sending S-300s to Ukraine - and neither he, nor you, addressed that subject. You are both trolls trying to divert attention by bringing up stuff totally unrelated to this war that ruSSia started..
    1
  50.  @thebeatcreeper  No, that's not what he means. He means "Is there anything like international law anymore if a stronger country is allowed to attack a weaker nation?". It is a shame your ability to concentrate on the subject is so degraded - but then that explains how you are so easily sucked in by ruSSian BS.
    1
  51.  @thebeatcreeper  Yup, Ukraine is a sovereign nation that makes it's own decisions. ruSSia does not get to make decisions for Ukraine.
    1